Consider:
struct MyRefCounted
void opInc();
void opDec();
int x;
}
MyRefCounted a;
a.x = 42;
MyRefCounted b = a;
b.x = 43;
What is a.x after this?
Andrei
a.x == 42
a.ref_count == 1 (1 for init, +1 for copy, -1 for destruction)
b.x == 43
b.ref_count == 1 (only init)
On Saturday, 27 September 2014 at 19:11:08 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/27/14, 1:11 AM, Foo wrote:
Consider:
struct MyRefCounted
void opInc();
void opDec();
int x;
}
MyRefCounted a;
a.x = 42;
MyRefCounted b = a;
b.x = 43;
What is a.x after this?
Andrei
a.x == 42
a.ref_cou
On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 at 13:38:43 UTC, Foo wrote:
I hate the fact that this will produce template bloat for each
function/method.
I'm also in favor of "let the user pick", but I would use a
global variable:
enum MemoryManagementPolicy { gc, rc, mrc }
immutable
gc = ResourceMan
I hate the fact that this will produce template bloat for each
function/method.
I'm also in favor of "let the user pick", but I would use a
global variable:
enum MemoryManagementPolicy { gc, rc, mrc }
immutable
gc = ResourceManagementPolicy.gc,
rc = ResourceManagementPolicy.rc,
On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 at 13:59:23 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/30/14, 6:38 AM, Foo wrote:
I hate the fact that this will produce template bloat for each
function/method.
I'm also in favor of "let the user pick", but I would use a
global
variable:
enum MemoryManagementPoli
Remembers me a bit of http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP36
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 16:10:53 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
I agree with Jonathan's points, this solution doesn't seem like
an improvement. If I understand the problem, we don't want to
make every attribute use the '@' symbol because it looks bad
and would cause a lot of code changes f
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 21:25:57 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 21:12:50 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/26/2015 12:45 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Just because they are function attributes does not mean
they were tokenized as "keywords".
The lexer has no idea wh
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 21:41:31 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 21:28:14 UTC, Foo wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 21:25:57 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 21:12:50 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 1/26/2015 12:45 PM, Jonathan Marler w
On Friday, 30 January 2015 at 01:08:31 UTC, bearophile wrote:
The D type inference for array literals is now more flexible:
void main() {
auto[$][$] m1 = [[1, 2], [3, 4], [5, 6]];
pragma(msg, typeof(m1)); // int[2][3]
const auto[string] aa1 = ["red": 1, "blue": 2];
pragma(msg, t
On Friday, 30 January 2015 at 17:37:44 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 30/01/2015 16:53, Nick Treleaven wrote:
This version of staticArray allows the user to (optionally)
specify the
element type.
Actually, I'm having trouble implementing staticArray like
that, perhaps there are compiler issue
On Friday, 30 January 2015 at 19:07:53 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/30/15 10:40 AM, Foo wrote:
On Friday, 30 January 2015 at 17:37:44 UTC, Nick Treleaven
wrote:
On 30/01/2015 16:53, Nick Treleaven wrote:
This version of staticArray allows the user to (optionally)
specify the
element t
Is there interest in such a thing?
I'm currently working on something for my own use and I'm curious
if anyone else would be interested in something like that.
I'm aware of Unique, RefCounted, Scoped, emplace and so on, but
I'm not a big fan of some implementations (in my opinion not much
of it
On Saturday, 31 January 2015 at 01:07:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/30/15 3:49 PM, Foo wrote:
Is there interest in such a thing?
I'm currently working on something for my own use and I'm
curious if
anyone else would be interested in something like that.
I'm aware of Unique, RefCounte
On Saturday, 31 January 2015 at 01:07:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/30/15 3:49 PM, Foo wrote:
Is there interest in such a thing?
I'm currently working on something for my own use and I'm
curious if
anyone else would be interested in something like that.
I'm aware of Unique, RefCounte
For what it's worth, today I finished the current work. Now we
will start working with it. If someone has critique, improvement
suggestions or want to take some ideas, he is free to do so.
To repeat myself: we rewrote some functionality which already
existed in D, but were improvable. For exampl
On Wednesday, 4 February 2015 at 20:15:37 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/4/15 9:13 AM, Foo wrote:
For what it's worth, today I finished the current work. Now we
will
start working with it. If someone has critique, improvement
suggestions
or want to take some ideas, he is free to do so.
T
On Wednesday, 4 February 2015 at 20:55:59 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/4/2015 12:42 PM, Foo wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 February 2015 at 20:15:37 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
@trusted
@nogc
char[] read(const string filename) nothrow {
Yes that is correct, currently there is no error checking,
On Wednesday, 4 February 2015 at 20:55:59 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/4/2015 12:42 PM, Foo wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 February 2015 at 20:15:37 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
@trusted
@nogc
char[] read(const string filename) nothrow {
Yes that is correct, currently there is no error checking,
On Wednesday, 4 February 2015 at 23:01:48 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
I just stepped into a disaster zone in std.file and submitted
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14125.
This reveals the merits of reviewing pull requests carefully,
and the issues that can crop in when that doesn'
On Wednesday, 4 February 2015 at 20:15:37 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/4/15 9:13 AM, Foo wrote:
For what it's worth, today I finished the current work. Now we
will
start working with it. If someone has critique, improvement
suggestions
or want to take some ideas, he is free to do so.
T
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 07:53:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/4/15 11:48 PM, Foo wrote:
I would be glad if you or Walter could review the other parts
as well.
I'm very sure that your review will be very helpful and I'm
convinced
that the modules Array or Smart Pointer could be u
On Saturday, 7 February 2015 at 11:29:51 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2015-02-04 21:55, Walter Bright wrote:
No need to reinvent this:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/master/std/file.d
line 194
Just for the record, you can get a link to the exact line by
clickin
Maybe someone should remove this from the Changelog?
http://dlang.org/changelog.html#partial-type
24 matches
Mail list logo
