Hi, sorry for the broad and vague question. I have read in some
reddit post about benchmarks, that some code didn't use the final
keyword on methods in a sense that final would make it faster, I
believe.
I thought, without any D knowledge, it could be that with shorter
code I might create
On Monday, 26 September 2022 at 04:40:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
You may have seen [the long discussion about the deprecation of
binary
literals(https://forum.dlang.org/thread/vphguaninxedxopjk...@forum.dlang.org).
A few hours ago, Walter and I recorded a second conversation
for our YouTube
On Wednesday, 21 September 2022 at 10:39:27 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
For example:
T front() => from;
becomes:
T front => from;
I kind of agree with Max's contention, but nonetheless, I quite
like it.
On Tuesday, 11 June 2019 at 05:15:17 UTC, Markus wrote:
I have cleaned it up, kind of. Just in case you want to compile
it. The Zip contains some DLL from
https://github.com/spatialaudio/portaudio-binaries where you
can find the original if you want.
https://gofile.io/?c=NpUxrJ
I'm in
I have cleaned it up, kind of. Just in case you want to compile
it. The Zip contains some DLL from
https://github.com/spatialaudio/portaudio-binaries where you can
find the original if you want.
https://gofile.io/?c=NpUxrJ
I'm in general thinking of buying a Mac. I know it has not much
to
Hi, when you use core.windows and LoadLibrary to load a DLL, and
that DLL will create a new thread and inside that it will call
back into your D app, is there something to special to be aware
of?
I've done it like with the CreateWindow and WndProc, but this
time I'm loading a compiled
On Monday, 3 June 2019 at 12:09:18 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Don't use just e.msg, that's just the string the constructor
sent, use e.toString and see if it works for you.
toString works, thanks! :)
Hi, I'm using core.sys.windows.windows to make a Windows GUI, and
the WindowProc must be nothrow. My code does not provide me a
stack backtrace when some exception is thrown in there. I would
like to have at least the number of the line that caused a throw,
has anyone an idea how to do this?
On Friday, 28 December 2018 at 11:14:01 UTC, Laurent Tréguier
wrote:
[...]
Wow, just awesome! I really love this language server. It just
works!
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 08:09:52 UTC, Markus wrote:
I wonder what's the reason for that?
I wonder why it's not at least @trusted. Literally, can't I trust
that method/function?
Hi.
I'm a big fan of @safe code. But within my first 20 program lines
I already run into problems:
Error: @safe function D main cannot call @system function
std.getopt.defaultGetoptPrinter
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_getopt.html#.defaultGetoptPrinter
I wonder what's the reason for that?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/8mtfy5/the_evolution_of_c/
Hi
[template.cpp]:
template
void some_templated_function();
template<>
void some_templated_function()
{}
[main.d]:
extern(C++) {
void some_templated_function(Type)();
}
void main() {
some_templated_function!int;
}
compilation:
g++ -c template_with_ns.cpp
dmd main.d template.o
this
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 21:14:36 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/8/18 2:01 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 3/8/18 1:56 PM, Markus wrote:
I tested dmd (2.079.0), gdc and ldc2. All got the same
result. Which makes me think, that it's not a bug, but a
"feature" :)
This is
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 17:04:02 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/8/18 11:35 AM, Markus wrote:
When I do this locally on my mac, I get a similar error. When I
nm the main.o file vs. the lib.o file, I see different mangled
names.
It appears that the D mangled name is not doing back
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 16:19:40 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/8/18 10:27 AM, Markus wrote:
Hi
I got the following c++ code [lib.cpp]:
namespace ns_a
{
class class_a {
};
void some_function(class_a*) {;}
}
and the following d code [main.d]:
extern (C++, namespace_a) {
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 15:27:31 UTC, Markus wrote:
Hi
I got the following c++ code [lib.cpp]:
namespace ns_a
{
class class_a {
};
void some_function(class_a*) {;}
}
and the following d code [main.d]:
extern (C++, namespace_a) {
class class_a {}
void some_function(class_a);
Hi
I got the following c++ code [lib.cpp]:
namespace ns_a
{
class class_a {
};
void some_function(class_a*) {;}
}
and the following d code [main.d]:
extern (C++, namespace_a) {
class class_a {}
void some_function(class_a);
}
void main() {
namespace_a.class_a instance_a;
On Tuesday, 21 November 2017 at 04:39:52 UTC, A Guy With a
Question wrote:
I'm trying to learn D using Visual D in Visual Studio Community
2015. Both dmd and ldc give me this error when building from
Visual Studio. Any ideas? I'm able to build C++ projects...
I had to update "Visual Studio
another indicator (as documented) that GC destructor won't work
// extern(C++) classes don't have a classinfo pointer in their
vtable so the GC can't finalize them
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/blob/3d8d4a45c01832fb657c16a656b6e1566d77fb21/src/rt/lifetime.d#L90
annoying :(
Markus
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 08:43:54 UTC, drug wrote:
22.11.2017 02:12, Markus пишет:
What about dtor - you allocate class using D GC but try to
destroy it manually - namely this I guess gives you an error in
rt_finalize2 because it tries to destroy object that has been
destroyed.
hi, im trying to interface a cpp class. I'd like to interface a
bigger library and I'm trying to figure out the minimum effort.
--- c++ part:
#include
class some_class {
public:
static some_class* __ctor();
some_class();
~some_class();
void some_method();
};
some_class*
On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 07:56:06 UTC, Markus wrote:
On Monday, 29 August 2016 at 14:31:50 UTC, eugene wrote:
On Monday, 29 August 2016 at 12:11:34 UTC, Markus wrote:
[...]
Hello,
the url https://dlang.org/overview.html states that "It's a
practical language for practical
On Monday, 29 August 2016 at 14:31:50 UTC, eugene wrote:
On Monday, 29 August 2016 at 12:11:34 UTC, Markus wrote:
Take a look on this discussion thread and you know WHY D IS
NOT SO POPULAR.
The community discusses technical details and compares D to
C++, but there is no clear mission
Take a look on this discussion thread and you know WHY D IS NOT
SO POPULAR.
The community discusses technical details and compares D to C++,
but there is no clear mission statement, there is no vision
statement and no marketing.
Often you merchandise D as a "system programming language",
From my point of view is the biggest disadvantage in D marketing,
that D is only placed as a "systems programming language". The
fact is, that D is very usable for numeric and large scale data
processing -- so called business software -- but if a manager
takes a look on the D homepage he will
26 matches
Mail list logo
