On Friday, 13 February 2015 at 07:42:41 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Thursday, 12 February 2015 at 23:18:29 UTC, Brian Schott
wrote:
I've been looking for a graphical front-end for GDB that's not
terrible, and I've found that Nemiver works pretty well. It's
worth trying out if you're on Linux.
ht
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 15:36:04 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/1/15 2:00 AM, uri wrote:
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 09:46:45 UTC, eles wrote:
Whatever, anyway.
Translation of that being:
"Boring pedestrian issues like simple string logging are
bikeshedded
for YEARS, yet PhD
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 09:46:45 UTC, eles wrote:
Whatever, anyway.
Translation of that being:
"Boring pedestrian issues like simple string logging are
bikeshedded for YEARS, yet PhD-level esoteric stuff makes it
into phobos with relative ease."
https://github.com/klamonte/cycle/bl
On Tuesday, 27 January 2015 at 04:10:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/26/15 7:25 PM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 January 2015 at 02:40:16 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 1/26/2015 6:15 PM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
What's keeping you from committing to 'dfix' as the way to
solve
is
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 22:53:15 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 22:12:24 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
" If Java consumes 15% more power doing it, does
it matter on a PC? Most people don't dare. Does it matter
for small-scale server environments? Maybe not. Does it
mat
On Tuesday, 27 January 2015 at 01:32:23 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 19:51:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/26/2015 3:39 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Personally, I'd much prefer that we not make this change.
It's good to have this discussion.
Previously, i
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 02:16:47 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 06/01/15 23:32, uri via Digitalmars-d wrote:
The dmd backend is not under an OSS license, why haven't they
left? I suspect
there are not very many of the type of people you're talking
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 13:34:59 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Before you make such claims, you should probably think about
them a little bit first. Please tell me one company that does
not buy outside commercial software which they then use to
build their own products. Some companies will want t
Hi,
Your business model is flawed for a number of reasons. Firstly,
companies make money from their own products, not paying staff to
figure out which bug fixes/features to cherry pick for the tool
chain.
Secondly, no one makes money by locking out others when they
themselves can be locked
On Sunday, 28 December 2014 at 15:57:39 UTC, Ary Borenszweig
wrote:
After programming in Ruby for a long time (and I think in
Python it's the same) I came to the conclusion that all the
sections (Return, Params, Example) just make writing the
documentation a harder task. For example:
~~~
/*
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 03:11:20 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 22:46:57 UTC, aldanor wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 22:36:16 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
FYI, Kenji's merge has since been merged. So now the stage is
set for
somebody to step
On Friday, 19 December 2014 at 12:53:32 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
On Friday, 19 December 2014 at 12:44:26 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
On Friday, 19 December 2014 at 09:13:07 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/18/2014 2:24 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Docs need to have examples which are plain and
On Friday, 19 December 2014 at 11:54:42 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:47:27 +
Sergei Nosov via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
In the "debugger" case, Manu's point is that it's unusable.
And Walter's implied point is "debuggers aren't that useful
anyway, so why it was
On Friday, 19 December 2014 at 09:52:09 UTC, uri wrote:
On Friday, 19 December 2014 at 07:37:45 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 19 December 2014 at 07:25:20 UTC, ole wrote:
me too. it's really disgusting how you guys treat (verbally
mistreat) others, who take a chance with D.
Good luck to you al
On Friday, 19 December 2014 at 07:37:45 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 19 December 2014 at 07:25:20 UTC, ole wrote:
me too. it's really disgusting how you guys treat (verbally
mistreat) others, who take a chance with D.
Good luck to you all on your pet project.
And how? Explaining mistakes and
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 05:48:27 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 16/12/2014 5:11 p.m., MattCoder wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 03:50:59 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
I started writing a small booklet on this, if you got an
email if
you're interested or some way to send you. Ple
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 09:31:28 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:07:53 +
uri via Digitalmars-d wrote:
You were looking forward to that, in fact I'd say trolling for
it...
that's not the first time i asking why bugzilla is still able
to host
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 08:54:24 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:19:01 +1100
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
"ketmar via Digitalmars-d" wrote in message
news:mailman.3160.1418550079.9932.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
> but talking seriously, i do
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 16:44:09 UTC, ddj wrote:
On Saturday, 13 December 2014 at 23:02:52 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
On 12/13/2014 10:55 PM, ddj wrote:
But so many issues and bug fixes scares me from using it.
That's just the wrong way to look at it. Take a look at the
bug list for gc
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 15:36:47 UTC, yawniek wrote:
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 14:09:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
As always, different tools for different uses. Hopefully, D
can one day be polished and mainstream enough for the
enterprise use case and it will be efficient enough to be
On Saturday, 13 December 2014 at 22:49:10 UTC, Joel wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 August 2013 at 06:23:09 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Monday, 5 August 2013 at 18:18:30 UTC, Jonathan A Dunlap
wrote:
I am one of the few who have taken a keen interest in D for
game development. The concise language and modern
con
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 10:49:13 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 20:21:51 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 12/8/14, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
It seems that D3 is already available:
https://github.com/mbostock/d3
Guess we'll just have to sk
On Friday, 5 December 2014 at 10:48:15 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Dicebot" wrote in message
news:kgogertqxpmczhoqr...@forum.dlang.org...
That or just clean up the existing makefiles (getting rid of
DMC make and using GNU make on all platforms would be ideal).
Or just doing nothing - while ex
On Wednesday, 19 November 2014 at 01:35:19 UTC, Alo Miehsof
Datsørg wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 November 2014 at 23:48:27 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 11/18/2014 1:23 PM, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad"
" wrote:
I am arguing against the position that it was a design
mistake to keep the
semantic model simple an
On Wednesday, 19 November 2014 at 18:09:11 UTC, Ary Borenszweig
wrote:
On 11/19/14, 7:03 AM, Don wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 November 2014 at 18:23:52 UTC, Marco Leise
wrote:
>
Weird consequence: using subtraction with an unsigned type is
nearly
always a bug.
I wish D hadn't called unsigned intege
These are of similar nature I believe for c++
http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~damian/papers/PDF/ModestProposal.pdf
http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~damian/papers/PDF/SPECS.pdf
This paper was by my c++ lecturer at the time it was published. A
fantastic coder as well as academic who unfortunately wa
On Thursday, 28 August 2014 at 01:08:43 UTC, Scott Wilson wrote:
SWIG has D support. But it seems old and out of fashion.
Community here does not buzz about it much either. Whats the
word on the street about the quality of SWIG-D stuff?
Scott
PS thankyou Walter for replying
The swig binding
On Wednesday, 30 July 2014 at 00:15:26 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 04:55:04PM -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7/29/14, 4:16 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:09:27PM +, Robert burner
>Schadek via D
On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 17:22:38 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
[snip]
I wonder what are other opinions.
Here's what I'd like to see as a D user with std.experimental...
dub:
==> free-for-all libraries of varying quality
==> Promoted on official D website.
==> Included in the D download
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 09:16:44 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
You said you don't like it and you were heard the first time
I'm speaking the truth which often hurts.
Yes and I don't see w0rp running off and sulking about it either.
Your problem is you are not able to take any criticism
w
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 06:13:38 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 14 July 2014 14:47, uri via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 03:55:02 UTC, Vic wrote:
- I was *very* disappointed that using base library locks you
into GC vs
ref. counting.
Separate, I like how
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 03:55:02 UTC, Vic wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a CTO at a start up and interested in porting our Java
project to D. Some points, I have been lurking on D for years,
went to my first D conf recently. Also I was one of top 20
people to join Java Struts, and that grew to 3million
I assume it will but thought I'd ask all the same...
I only use the latest official release and would still like to
bash on std.experimental modules so I hope it will be in
2.066.zip.
Thanks,
uri
33 matches
Mail list logo
