On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:47:37 +, Basile B. wrote:
> no...it's dead, obviously whatever is the amount of #, they'll be
> removed when the token is patched for the first time. This just doesn't
> work with mixins. End of story.
If it's changed to `# identifier` instead of `# keyword`, you can
de
On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 04:11:54 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
While we're talking about this, this proposal breaks any string
mixin that mixes in an identifier detected with reflection.
http://imgur.com/NHe6k2p
On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 10:47:37 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
End of story.
This was worth trying anyway. Especially for the "body" keyword.
Personally I don't need it anymore, but it is substantial issue
for newcomers wanting to use it badly for web/sci dev.
This is probably the most con
On 12/22/2016 05:11 AM, Basile B. wrote:
On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 04:11:54 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
While we're talking about this, this proposal breaks any string mixin
that mixes in an identifier detected with reflection.
RIP DIP 1007. It was too simple to be true.
If that's the ca
On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 10:35:23 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 10:11:19 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 04:11:54 UTC, Chris Wright
wrote:
While we're talking about this, this proposal breaks any
string mixin that mixes in an identifier de
On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 10:11:19 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 04:11:54 UTC, Chris Wright
wrote:
While we're talking about this, this proposal breaks any
string mixin that mixes in an identifier detected with
reflection.
RIP DIP 1007. It was too simple to be
On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 04:11:54 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
While we're talking about this, this proposal breaks any string
mixin that mixes in an identifier detected with reflection.
RIP DIP 1007. It was too simple to be true.
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:58:28 +, default0 wrote:
> On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 08:30:07 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> If you are prepending # you might as well prepend _
>
> That doesn't solve the complications this introduces if you want to
> serialize to/from members with these names, as seen
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 10:28:31 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 09:58:28 UTC, default0 wrote:
That doesn't solve the complications this introduces if you
want to serialize to/from members with these names, as seen in
the Examples section of the DIP.
Yes it does. S
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 10:24:08 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 08:30:07 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
If you are prepending # you might as well prepend _
No, because # is not an identifier char while _ is.
* _delegate is 1 token (_delegate)
* #delegate is 2 tokens ( #
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 09:58:28 UTC, default0 wrote:
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 08:30:07 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 08:14:44 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
I know that there is other hot stuffs since a few days but
this is a really simple DIP, that has no effect o
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 08:30:07 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 08:14:44 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
I know that there is other hot stuffs since a few days but
this is a really simple DIP, that has no effect on the grammar
and no effect on the semantic. It was drafted a
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 08:30:07 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 08:14:44 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
I know that there is other hot stuffs since a few days but
this is a really simple DIP, that has no effect on the grammar
and no effect on the semantic. It was drafted a
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 08:14:44 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
I know that there is other hot stuffs since a few days but this
is a really simple DIP, that has no effect on the grammar and
no effect on the semantic. It was drafted after the announce of
DIP 1003 last week. During a discussion I'v
I know that there is other hot stuffs since a few days but this
is a really simple DIP, that has no effect on the grammar and no
effect on the semantic. It was drafted after the announce of DIP
1003 last week. During a discussion I've proposed to take a
radically different approach. This approa
15 matches
Mail list logo
