Re: Dlang forum: some feature requests

2017-04-11 Thread Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 at 16:23:15 UTC, Marco Leise wrote: (A problem with HTML mail is the great flexibility. Some mails are unreadable on a dark color scheme or the different fonts and sizes drive you mad.) We could do what GitHub does and send Markdown in text/plain and

Re: Dlang forum: some feature requests

2017-04-11 Thread Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d
Am Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:24:15 + schrieb Vladimir Panteleev : > On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 09:35:30 UTC, crimaniak wrote: > > IMHO, it's better to do the same as with HTML letters: > > text/markdown body + text/plain body for clients not supporting > >

Re: Dlang forum: some feature requests

2017-04-11 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 at 12:12:05 UTC, biocyberman wrote: Well, does this mean that dlang.org does not have strong intention to keep this forum as the main gathering point for D community? Because if you guys do, it is good idea to make it a feature-rich forum, not a minimalist to keep

Re: Dlang forum: some feature requests

2017-04-11 Thread biocyberman via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 9 April 2017 at 12:56:48 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: Mailing list is one thing, forum is another thing; so making the current forum act as both will be difficult. This has already been done. If you decide it is done. It is hard to say anything further. Respect your choice

Re: Dlang forum: some feature requests

2017-04-10 Thread XavierAP via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 8 April 2017 at 12:34:56 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: Thanks for the feedback. What I miss most is to split the General board, as everything gets buried too quick because it's too messy with different topic categories together: - Development (of projects not internal to D)

Re: Dlang forum: some feature requests

2017-04-10 Thread Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 09:35:30 UTC, crimaniak wrote: IMHO, it's better to do the same as with HTML letters: text/markdown body + text/plain body for clients not supporting markdown. BTW, this would mean sending exactly the same text twice, just with a different Content-Type.

Re: Dlang forum: some feature requests

2017-04-10 Thread Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 09:35:30 UTC, crimaniak wrote: IMHO, it's better to do the same as with HTML letters: text/markdown body + text/plain body for clients not supporting markdown. Multipart messages have their issues. Are there any clients which will render a text/markdown part as

Re: Dlang forum: some feature requests

2017-04-10 Thread crimaniak via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 9 April 2017 at 12:58:30 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: _Someone_ should write Markdown rendering plugins for popular news readers. What mime type will the Markdown enhanced messages use? text/plain or text/markdown as per https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markdown ? text/plain

Re: Dlang forum: some feature requests

2017-04-09 Thread Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 9 April 2017 at 12:55:57 UTC, Marco Leise wrote: Am Sat, 08 Apr 2017 12:34:56 + schrieb Vladimir Panteleev : This is planned in a future update, as part of Markdown support. That will be a web front-end rendering feature only, I guess.

Re: Dlang forum: some feature requests

2017-04-09 Thread Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 9 April 2017 at 12:45:58 UTC, biocyberman wrote: and here he faces overquoting filter, and have to manually delete quote text Snipping irrelevant quoted parts when replying is part of the normal way to use e-mail and newsgroups, so I don't see a problem here. When the forum

Re: Dlang forum: some feature requests

2017-04-09 Thread Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d
Am Sat, 08 Apr 2017 12:34:56 + schrieb Vladimir Panteleev : > This is planned in a future update, as part of Markdown support. That will be a web front-end rendering feature only, I guess. _Someone_ should write Markdown rendering plugins for popular news

Re: Dlang forum: some feature requests

2017-04-09 Thread biocyberman via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 8 April 2017 at 12:34:56 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: On Saturday, 8 April 2017 at 12:15:45 UTC, biocyberman wrote: This is planned in a future update, as part of Markdown support. So it is coming. This is great. The forum software will already detect overquoting, and

Re: Dlang forum: some feature requests

2017-04-08 Thread Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 8 April 2017 at 12:15:45 UTC, biocyberman wrote: @Admins: Please move to the right place for me if this is not the right one. 1. Code formatting seems to be support in all other parts of dlang.org, but not in the forum. It would be nice to be able to format code for readability.

Dlang forum: some feature requests

2017-04-08 Thread biocyberman via Digitalmars-d
@Admins: Please move to the right place for me if this is not the right one. 1. Code formatting seems to be support in all other parts of dlang.org, but not in the forum. It would be nice to be able to format code for readability. 2. Automatic exclude ones own text to avoid 'overquoting'.

Re: Forum for language feature requests?

2012-07-12 Thread Tommi
On Monday, 2 July 2012 at 11:44:27 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote: Improving pseudo function call syntax: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/uufohvapbyceuaylo...@forum.dlang.org This is not a feature request. It is a feature sketch at best. Sketchy or not, I posted that one as an enhancement request

Re: Forum for language feature requests?

2012-07-02 Thread Tobias Pankrath
On Monday, 2 July 2012 at 10:49:07 UTC, Tommi wrote: I've made a couple of language feature requests: This Super: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/csjqswdlermlnbjbx...@forum.dlang.org Improving pseudo function call syntax: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/uufohvapbyceuaylo...@forum.dlang.org

Re: Forum for language feature requests?

2012-07-02 Thread Timon Gehr
On 07/02/2012 12:49 PM, Tommi wrote: I've made a couple of language feature requests: This Super: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/csjqswdlermlnbjbx...@forum.dlang.org We already have this. typeof(this) and typeof(super). Improving pseudo function call syntax: http://forum.dlang.org/thread

Feature requests

2011-02-19 Thread Bekenn
Hello, I'm new here. I've read through some of the archives, but it's unclear to me if this is the correct place to propose and discuss new language features; would someone point me in the right direction? I've been playing around with the language for a few weeks now, and I have to say I'm

Re: Feature requests

2011-02-19 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
On 2/19/11 6:35 PM, Bekenn wrote: Hello, I'm new here. I've read through some of the archives, but it's unclear to me if this is the correct place to propose and discuss new language features; would someone point me in the right direction? This is definitely the right place. Welcome and thanks

Re: Feature requests

2011-02-19 Thread Nick Sabalausky
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message news:ijpogm$29au$1...@digitalmars.com... On 2/19/11 6:35 PM, Bekenn wrote: Hello, I'm new here. I've read through some of the archives, but it's unclear to me if this is the correct place to propose and discuss new language

Re: Feature requests

2011-02-19 Thread Bekenn
On 2/19/2011 6:57 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: Andrei Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message news:ijpogm$29au$1...@digitalmars.com... On 2/19/11 6:35 PM, Bekenn wrote: Hello, I'm new here. I've read through some of the archives, but it's unclear to me if this is the correct