On Monday, 2 June 2014 at 23:47:27 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 2 June 2014 at 15:03:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I'd propose deadalnix to stand up as mentor with SDC ;)
I already did. I'm discussing the details with Craig so we can
find a good topic for a student to work on. Less posting, more
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 17:34:46 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
2. Rather than wait to the last minute to start gathering
possible project ideas I thought it might be good to start
early.
Since D-Conf is just recently ended I wanted to take advantage
of the generated enthusiasm to find out if
On Monday, 2 June 2014 at 15:03:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I'd propose deadalnix to stand up as mentor with SDC ;)
I already did. I'm discussing the details with Craig so we can
find a good topic for a student to work on. Less posting, more
doing :D
On Monday, 2 June 2014 at 17:14:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 12:11:39 -0400, Craig Dillabaugh
clip
But I didn't see the GSOC thing being a "grunt work" type of
thing. Wouldn't such a student be interested in his/her own
project rather than filling out someone else'
On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 12:11:39 -0400, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Monday, 2 June 2014 at 14:22:02 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2014 14:33:15 -0400, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 10:19:03 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 02:44
On Monday, 2 June 2014 at 14:22:02 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2014 14:33:15 -0400, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 10:19:03 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 02:44:00 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
clip
Steven Schveighoffer - if
On Monday, 2 June 2014 at 15:03:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I'd propose deadalnix to stand up as mentor with SDC ;)
Thanks
He already did (emailed me directly), so I have that on my list.
I'd propose deadalnix to stand up as mentor with SDC ;)
On Sat, 31 May 2014 14:33:15 -0400, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 10:19:03 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 02:44:00 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 19:49:31 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
I know this is very early, but I wor
Some things on my wish list, not in any order
- D => JS converter/compiler. There has been talk about this in a
thread currently.
- DDL for D2
- vibe.d - update pages without having to recompile entire server and
restarting the entire server
- help get std.simd into review queue
- dscanner w
On 05/30/2014 09:49 PM, Tobias Pankrath via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> I know this is very early, but I work slowly :o)
>
> * Something like boost::log
phobos PR #1500 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1500
> * Something like boost::program_options
phobos PR #2072 https://github.co
On 30/05/2014 18:34, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
I had a couple of things I wanted to post about the D Google Summer of
Code submission for 2015.
1.
After Andrei had asked for someone interested in taking over the D GSOC
submission for 2015, I, along with a few others of you volunteered to
pitch in
On 01/06/14 14:25, Joakim wrote:
The only bigger piece I can think of is maybe pushing through the Objective-C
integration for iOS, but I don't know much about that.
If you referring to making D ABI compatible with Objective-C [1] then
that's mostly done. I'm currently updating to latest mast
On 1 June 2014 13:25, Joakim via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 17:34:46 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
>>
>> I had a couple of things I wanted to post about the D Google Summer of
>> Code submission for 2015.
>>
>> 1.
>> After Andrei had
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 17:34:46 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
I had a couple of things I wanted to post about the D Google
Summer of Code submission for 2015.
1.
After Andrei had asked for someone interested in taking over
the D GSOC submission for 2015, I, along with a few others of
you
On 5/31/14, 10:07 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 02:43 +, Craig Dillabaugh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 19:49:31 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
I know this is very early, but I work slowly :o)
* Something like boost::log
* Something lik
On 31/05/2014 3:43 AM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 19:49:31 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
I know this is very early, but I work slowly :o)
* Something like boost::log
* Something like boost::program_options
* An parser generator on par with antlr4
* std.stream replacement /
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 17:34:46 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
I know this is very early, but I work slowly :o)
It will likely prove successful to have such an early start if
only to remind the community of the approaching deadline so they
can keep it in the back of their mind.
Here are s
On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 02:43 +, Craig Dillabaugh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 19:49:31 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
> >> I know this is very early, but I work slowly :o)
> >
> > * Something like boost::log
> > * Something like boost::program_options
> > * An parser generat
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 14:03:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/31/14, 1:30 AM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
As I said with this years one. I'll most likely be available
as a mentor.
I'll be able to definitely help with anything involving web
development.
You're welcome to cc me in / c
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 10:19:03 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 02:44:00 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 19:49:31 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
I know this is very early, but I work slowly :o)
* Something like boost::log
* Something like boost
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 08:30:17 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 31/05/2014 5:34 a.m., Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
I had a couple of things I wanted to post about the D Google
Summer of
Code submission for 2015.
1.
After Andrei had asked for someone interested in taking over
the D GSOC
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 08:30:17 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 31/05/2014 5:34 a.m., Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
I had a couple of things I wanted to post about the D Google
Summer of
Code submission for 2015.
1.
After Andrei had asked for someone interested in taking over
the D GSOC
On 5/31/14, 1:30 AM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
As I said with this years one. I'll most likely be available as a mentor.
I'll be able to definitely help with anything involving web development.
You're welcome to cc me in / chat via gmail.
Thanks! Craig, you may want to put together a permanent
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 02:44:00 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 19:49:31 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
I know this is very early, but I work slowly :o)
* Something like boost::log
* Something like boost::program_options
* An parser generator on par with antlr4
* std.s
On 31/05/2014 5:34 a.m., Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
I had a couple of things I wanted to post about the D Google Summer of
Code submission for 2015.
1.
After Andrei had asked for someone interested in taking over the D GSOC
submission for 2015, I, along with a few others of you volunteered to
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 19:49:31 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
I know this is very early, but I work slowly :o)
* Something like boost::log
* Something like boost::program_options
* An parser generator on par with antlr4
* std.stream replacement / buffers
* std.xml
* SSL implementation?
Would
I know this is very early, but I work slowly :o)
* Something like boost::log
* Something like boost::program_options
* An parser generator on par with antlr4
* std.stream replacement / buffers
* std.xml
* SSL implementation?
I had a couple of things I wanted to post about the D Google
Summer of Code submission for 2015.
1.
After Andrei had asked for someone interested in taking over the
D GSOC submission for 2015, I, along with a few others of you
volunteered to pitch in. I can't find that thread right now
On Tuesday, 4 February 2014 at 03:01:28 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/3/14, 6:24 PM, Mathias LANG wrote:
Hi all,
Registration for mentoring organization has begun for GSoC
2014 !
As mentionned in the announce [1], it will end the 14th of
February, 2014.
Will Digital Mars be a mentorin
On 2/3/14, 6:24 PM, Mathias LANG wrote:
Hi all,
Registration for mentoring organization has begun for GSoC 2014 !
As mentionned in the announce [1], it will end the 14th of February, 2014.
Will Digital Mars be a mentoring organisation again ?
Yes.
And what are the problems that should be tac
ne knows ?
[1]:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-summer-of-code-announce/TQ26T9Df79w
[2]: http://wiki.dlang.org/GSOC_2013_Ideas
On 27 March 2013 15:19, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On 03/26/2013 06:22 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
>>
>> We certainly can do. Which compiler do you have in mind for using?
>>
>
> Have you send Andrei a mail to add you as mentor?
> I'll add a project idea to the wiki http://wiki.dlang.org/GSOC_**
> 2013_I
On 03/26/2013 06:22 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
We certainly can do. Which compiler do you have in mind for using?
Have you send Andrei a mail to add you as mentor?
I'll add a project idea to the wiki http://wiki.dlang.org/GSOC_2013_Ideas.
On 27 March 2013 11:06, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 27 March 2013 08:14, Johannes Pfau wrote:
>
>> Am Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:50:40 +0100
>> schrieb Martin Nowak :
>>
>> > On 03/26/2013 06:22 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> > > We certainly can do. Which compiler do you have in mind for using?
>> > >
>> > I m
On 27 March 2013 08:14, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Am Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:50:40 +0100
> schrieb Martin Nowak :
>
> > On 03/26/2013 06:22 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > > We certainly can do. Which compiler do you have in mind for using?
> > >
> > I mostly thought of porting GDC and LDC to linux glibc and
Am Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:50:40 +0100
schrieb Martin Nowak :
> On 03/26/2013 06:22 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > We certainly can do. Which compiler do you have in mind for using?
> >
> I mostly thought of porting GDC and LDC to linux glibc and bionic.
> A Windows ARM port would be interesting too, but
On 03/26/2013 06:22 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
We certainly can do. Which compiler do you have in mind for using?
I mostly thought of porting GDC and LDC to linux glibc and bionic.
A Windows ARM port would be interesting too, but could be out of reach.
Support for bare metal targets is interesting
On Sunday, 24 March 2013 at 16:01:45 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Sure, and AFAICT for that to happen we need at least an ideas
page. Shouldn't be hard to put together.
For one idea I'd love to see more D support in embedded/ARM
world e.g. an easy to use STM32 quick-start package would be
nice.
On 26 March 2013 16:13, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On 03/24/2013 10:28 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
>> Sure, and AFAICT for that to happen we need at least an ideas page.
>> Shouldn't be hard to put together.
>> For one idea I'd love to see more D support in embedded/ARM world
>> e.g. an e
On 03/24/2013 10:28 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Sure, and AFAICT for that to happen we need at least an ideas page.
Shouldn't be hard to put together.
For one idea I'd love to see more D support in embedded/ARM world
e.g. an easy to use STM32 quick-start package would be nice.
This c
On 2013-03-25 10:08, Iain Buclaw wrote:
It has been a long and colder March than usual. :o)
It can snow in the beginning of May here :(
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 25 March 2013 09:00, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-03-24 22:28, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> This could be taking up with someone willing to dedicate time in GDC /
>> LDC. I would be willing to mentor anyone who wants to join in on
>> getting GDC on ARM ready for production, but I must admit th
On 2013-03-24 22:28, Iain Buclaw wrote:
This could be taking up with someone willing to dedicate time in GDC /
LDC. I would be willing to mentor anyone who wants to join in on
getting GDC on ARM ready for production, but I must admit this is rather
short notice for me. ;-)
"short notice"? It
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:49:06 -0700, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/24/2013 09:42 PM, alex wrote:
On Sunday, 24 March 2013 at 20:22:56 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
I just want to throw some caution into the wind here. Many people have
tried emitting CIL from D source, and have had varying levels of
succes
On 24 March 2013 16:01, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> 24-Mar-2013 19:25, David Nadlinger пишет:
>
> On Sunday, 24 March 2013 at 14:48:30 UTC, alex wrote:
>>
>>> I've just read that there are only 5 days remaining for organization
>>> applications
>>> http://www.google-melange.com/**gsoc/homepage/goo
On Sunday, 24 March 2013 at 20:49:06 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/24/2013 09:42 PM, alex wrote:
On Sunday, 24 March 2013 at 20:22:56 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
I just want to throw some caution into the wind here. Many
people have
tried emitting CIL from D source, and have had varying levels
of
s
On 03/24/2013 09:42 PM, alex wrote:
On Sunday, 24 March 2013 at 20:22:56 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
I just want to throw some caution into the wind here. Many people have
tried emitting CIL from D source, and have had varying levels of
success. Ranges in particular seems to a pain point as the CIL
On Sunday, 24 March 2013 at 20:22:56 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
I just want to throw some caution into the wind here. Many
people have tried emitting CIL from D source, and have had
varying levels of success. Ranges in particular seems to a pain
point as the CIL has no way to express that concept
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 08:07:24 -0700, alex wrote:
I forgot to specify the topic I'd like to work on:
To implement CTFE of D code under .Net - whereas the D code should
become compiled into CIL (Common language runtime Intermediate Language,
an assembler-like language), so one could execute t
On 2013-03-24 17:01, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Sure, and AFAICT for that to happen we need at least an ideas page.
Shouldn't be hard to put together.
For one idea I'd love to see more D support in embedded/ARM world e.g.
an easy to use STM32 quick-start package would be nice.
There's always the
24-Mar-2013 19:25, David Nadlinger пишет:
On Sunday, 24 March 2013 at 14:48:30 UTC, alex wrote:
I've just read that there are only 5 days remaining for organization
applications
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013
Will Digitalmars do it a further year? Or are there too m
On Sunday, 24 March 2013 at 15:39:37 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/24/13 10:48 AM, alex wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've just read that there are only 5 days remaining for
organization
applications
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013
Will Digitalmars do it a further ye
On 3/24/13 10:48 AM, alex wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've just read that there are only 5 days remaining for organization
applications
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013
Will Digitalmars do it a further year? Or are there too many resources
spent on managing DConf?
Personally
On Sunday, 24 March 2013 at 14:48:30 UTC, alex wrote:
I've just read that there are only 5 days remaining for
organization applications
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013
Will Digitalmars do it a further year? Or are there too many
resources spent on managing DConf?
I forgot to specify the topic I'd like to work on:
To implement CTFE of D code under .Net - whereas the D code
should become compiled into CIL (Common language runtime
Intermediate Language, an assembler-like language), so one could
execute the 'final' program directly in a .Net environment.
I
Hi everyone,
I've just read that there are only 5 days remaining for
organization applications
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013
Will Digitalmars do it a further year? Or are there too many
resources spent on managing DConf?
Personally, I'd like to participate in t
On 09/03/2011 16:12, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/9/11, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
but that requires compiling and using GDC, which
apparently has a host of issues and problems as well;
It doesn't have much building problems anymore. There's a couple of
patches that need to be applied, but everythi
Daniel Gibson Wrote:
> Am 14.03.2011 02:21, schrieb Nebster:
> > On 12/03/2011 17:23, Daniel Gibson wrote:
> >> No reason to "hate" Tango.
> >
> > Ok, I don't really hate Tango, I just prefer Phobos because I got used
> > to it first :)
>
> This is perfectly fine :)
>
> Just don't feed the troll
Am 14.03.2011 02:21, schrieb Nebster:
On 12/03/2011 17:23, Daniel Gibson wrote:
No reason to "hate" Tango.
Ok, I don't really hate Tango, I just prefer Phobos because I got used
to it first :)
This is perfectly fine :)
Just don't feed the trolls and don't let them provoke baseless insults ;
On 12/03/2011 17:23, Daniel Gibson wrote:
No reason to "hate" Tango.
Ok, I don't really hate Tango, I just prefer Phobos because I got used
to it first :)
Am 12.03.2011 18:16, schrieb Nebster:
On 11/03/2011 20:03, Gary Whatmore wrote:
Nebster Wrote:
On 10/03/2011 19:36, Trass3r wrote:
How about adding more stuff to CTFE, esp. pointers and classes?
Or get Algebraic data types to typecheck in the compiler :)
Stop trolling. We should really ba
On 11/03/2011 20:03, Gary Whatmore wrote:
Nebster Wrote:
On 10/03/2011 19:36, Trass3r wrote:
How about adding more stuff to CTFE, esp. pointers and classes?
Or get Algebraic data types to typecheck in the compiler :)
Stop trolling. We should really ban these Tango fanboys here.
Nobody rea
Nebster Wrote:
> On 10/03/2011 19:36, Trass3r wrote:
> > How about adding more stuff to CTFE, esp. pointers and classes?
>
> Or get Algebraic data types to typecheck in the compiler :)
Stop trolling. We should really ban these Tango fanboys here.
Nobody really wants to turn D into an ivory towe
On 10/03/2011 19:36, Trass3r wrote:
How about adding more stuff to CTFE, esp. pointers and classes?
Or get Algebraic data types to typecheck in the compiler :)
How about adding more stuff to CTFE, esp. pointers and classes?
On 2011-03-09 23:16, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-03-09 11:11, Trass3r wrote:
How about a GUI library. Probably helping with an already existing one,
DWT for example.
Good idea, but rather improve GtkD or QtD.
Too bad that's the general
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2011-03-09 11:11, Trass3r wrote:
>>>
>>> How about a GUI library. Probably helping with an already existing one,
>>> DWT for example.
>>
>> Good idea, but rather improve GtkD or QtD.
>
> Too bad that's the general opinion people seem to ha
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
> Mars. Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
>
> http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
I did some research on Protocol Buffers. I found
https://256.makerslocal.org/wiki/
On 2011-03-09 17:00, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/9/11 1:24 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-03-08 20:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wi
On 3/9/11 7:34 AM, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 04:37:43 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu
> wrote:
>
>> I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
>> Mars. Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
>>
>> http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 04:37:43 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Networking
I think high level networking
On 3/9/11, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> but that requires compiling and using GDC, which
> apparently has a host of issues and problems as well;
It doesn't have much building problems anymore. There's a couple of
patches that need to be applied, but everything is described here:
https://gist.github.co
On 3/9/11 1:24 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-03-08 20:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
How ab
On 2011-03-09 13:30, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 08/03/2011 19:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
I've
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 04:37:43 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Bindings to popular IPC/RPC protocols such a
On 2011-03-09 13:09, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 09.03.2011 09:39, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2011-03-09 00:14, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 08.03.2011 20:37, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
Mars.
Please review and contribute to the projec
On 2011-03-09 11:55, spir wrote:
On 03/09/2011 11:46 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-03-09 11:11, Trass3r wrote:
How about a GUI library. Probably helping with an already existing one,
DWT for example.
Good idea, but rather improve GtkD or QtD.
Too bad that's the general opinion people se
On 2011-03-09 12:12, %u wrote:
I think the advantage of gtk or Qt is people can reinvest previous
knowledge of the framework. (I mean, they are cross-language in
addition to be cross-platform ;-) I would personly prefere a clearly
designed D-specific GUI system than gtk's huge mess. (Dunno about
On 08/03/2011 19:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
I've added two ideas in the IDE category, for Ec
Am 09.03.2011 11:55, schrieb spir:
On 03/09/2011 11:46 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-03-09 11:11, Trass3r wrote:
How about a GUI library. Probably helping with an already existing one,
DWT for example.
Good idea, but rather improve GtkD or QtD.
Too bad that's the general opinion people
Am 09.03.2011 09:39, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2011-03-09 00:14, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 08.03.2011 20:37, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wi
> I think the advantage of gtk or Qt is people can reinvest previous
knowledge of the framework. (I mean, they are cross-language in
addition to be cross-platform ;-) I would personly prefere a clearly
designed D-specific GUI system than gtk's huge mess. (Dunno about
Qt, people seem to find it far
On 03/09/2011 11:46 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-03-09 11:11, Trass3r wrote:
How about a GUI library. Probably helping with an already existing one,
DWT for example.
Good idea, but rather improve GtkD or QtD.
Too bad that's the general opinion people seem to have about GUI libraries. I
On 2011-03-09 11:11, Trass3r wrote:
How about a GUI library. Probably helping with an already existing one,
DWT for example.
Good idea, but rather improve GtkD or QtD.
Too bad that's the general opinion people seem to have about GUI
libraries. I don't understand what they don't like about DW
> How about a GUI library. Probably helping with an already existing one,
> DWT for example.
Good idea, but rather improve GtkD or QtD.
On 03/09/2011 10:57 AM, spir wrote:
On 03/09/2011 01:52 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/8/11 4:11 PM, %u wrote:
Uh... how helping fix compiler bugs? Could we help with that? I
feel that's *much* more important than benchmarking, for instance,
since it doesn't make sense to benchmark someth
spir wrote:
> On 03/09/2011 01:21 AM, Jens Mueller wrote:
> >%u wrote:
> >>>I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
> >>Mars. Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
> >>>http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>Andrei
> >>
> >>
On 03/09/2011 01:52 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/8/11 4:11 PM, %u wrote:
Uh... how helping fix compiler bugs? Could we help with that? I
feel that's *much* more important than benchmarking, for instance,
since it doesn't make sense to benchmark something if it has bugs.
:\
The funny thi
On 03/09/2011 01:21 AM, Jens Mueller wrote:
%u wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
Mars. Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
Uh... how helping fix compiler bugs? Could
On 2011-03-08 20:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
How about a GUI library. Probably helping with a
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 3/8/11 3:11 PM, Jens Mueller wrote:
> >Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >>I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
> >>Mars. Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
> >>
> >>http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
> >
On 2011-03-09 00:14, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 08.03.2011 20:37, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
Two
> Out of curiosity, what's stopping you from helping fix bugs right
now? I agree that being paid for it adds motivation, but if it's
something you want to do, do it.
Great question! :)
Right now? The fact that I'm in school and have other things to do. :(
During the summer? The fact that I migh
>> Also, I (obviously) used the word "accuracy" to mean
"predictability", not "approximation".
> Then you were being inaccurate :o).
> Andrei
I thought the meaning was predictable. :P
On 3/8/11 8:30 PM, %u wrote:
In machine learning it's very common to trade off accuracy for
speed.
Andrei
Er... do you _honestly_ think people will start writing machine
learning programs in D, when we're even having trouble getting them
to use D for more typical applications (because of bugs
On 3/8/2011 8:34 PM, %u wrote:
>>> I have the same feeling. I'd like to see such projects. But I
> believe students are more likely to pick feature-oriented projects.
> The stuff that sounds cool.
>> And I wouldn't be surprised if Google as well is also more likely
> to accepted feature-oriented pr
On Tuesday 08 March 2011 20:34:00 %u wrote:
> >> I have the same feeling. I'd like to see such projects. But I
>
> believe students are more likely to pick feature-oriented projects.
> The stuff that sounds cool.
>
> > And I wouldn't be surprised if Google as well is also more likely
>
> to acce
>> I have the same feeling. I'd like to see such projects. But I
believe students are more likely to pick feature-oriented projects.
The stuff that sounds cool.
> And I wouldn't be surprised if Google as well is also more likely
to accepted feature-oriented projects than bug-fix ones.
Wait, I thin
> In machine learning it's very common to trade off accuracy for
speed.
> Andrei
Er... do you _honestly_ think people will start writing machine
learning programs in D, when we're even having trouble getting them
to use D for more typical applications (because of bugs)?
Also, I (obviously) used t
101 - 200 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
