On 09/03/2011 16:12, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/9/11, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
but that requires compiling and using GDC, which
apparently has a host of issues and problems as well;
It doesn't have much building problems anymore. There's a couple of
patches that need to be applied, but everythi
Daniel Gibson Wrote:
> Am 14.03.2011 02:21, schrieb Nebster:
> > On 12/03/2011 17:23, Daniel Gibson wrote:
> >> No reason to "hate" Tango.
> >
> > Ok, I don't really hate Tango, I just prefer Phobos because I got used
> > to it first :)
>
> This is perfectly fine :)
>
> Just don't feed the troll
Am 14.03.2011 02:21, schrieb Nebster:
On 12/03/2011 17:23, Daniel Gibson wrote:
No reason to "hate" Tango.
Ok, I don't really hate Tango, I just prefer Phobos because I got used
to it first :)
This is perfectly fine :)
Just don't feed the trolls and don't let them provoke baseless insults ;
On 12/03/2011 17:23, Daniel Gibson wrote:
No reason to "hate" Tango.
Ok, I don't really hate Tango, I just prefer Phobos because I got used
to it first :)
Am 12.03.2011 18:16, schrieb Nebster:
On 11/03/2011 20:03, Gary Whatmore wrote:
Nebster Wrote:
On 10/03/2011 19:36, Trass3r wrote:
How about adding more stuff to CTFE, esp. pointers and classes?
Or get Algebraic data types to typecheck in the compiler :)
Stop trolling. We should really ba
On 11/03/2011 20:03, Gary Whatmore wrote:
Nebster Wrote:
On 10/03/2011 19:36, Trass3r wrote:
How about adding more stuff to CTFE, esp. pointers and classes?
Or get Algebraic data types to typecheck in the compiler :)
Stop trolling. We should really ban these Tango fanboys here.
Nobody rea
Nebster Wrote:
> On 10/03/2011 19:36, Trass3r wrote:
> > How about adding more stuff to CTFE, esp. pointers and classes?
>
> Or get Algebraic data types to typecheck in the compiler :)
Stop trolling. We should really ban these Tango fanboys here.
Nobody really wants to turn D into an ivory towe
On 10/03/2011 19:36, Trass3r wrote:
How about adding more stuff to CTFE, esp. pointers and classes?
Or get Algebraic data types to typecheck in the compiler :)
How about adding more stuff to CTFE, esp. pointers and classes?
On 2011-03-09 23:16, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-03-09 11:11, Trass3r wrote:
How about a GUI library. Probably helping with an already existing one,
DWT for example.
Good idea, but rather improve GtkD or QtD.
Too bad that's the general
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2011-03-09 11:11, Trass3r wrote:
>>>
>>> How about a GUI library. Probably helping with an already existing one,
>>> DWT for example.
>>
>> Good idea, but rather improve GtkD or QtD.
>
> Too bad that's the general opinion people seem to ha
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
> Mars. Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
>
> http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
I did some research on Protocol Buffers. I found
https://256.makerslocal.org/wiki/
On 2011-03-09 17:00, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/9/11 1:24 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-03-08 20:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wi
On 3/9/11 7:34 AM, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 04:37:43 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu
> wrote:
>
>> I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
>> Mars. Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
>>
>> http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 04:37:43 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Networking
I think high level networking
On 3/9/11, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> but that requires compiling and using GDC, which
> apparently has a host of issues and problems as well;
It doesn't have much building problems anymore. There's a couple of
patches that need to be applied, but everything is described here:
https://gist.github.co
On 3/9/11 1:24 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-03-08 20:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
How ab
On 2011-03-09 13:30, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 08/03/2011 19:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
I've
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 04:37:43 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Bindings to popular IPC/RPC protocols such a
On 2011-03-09 13:09, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 09.03.2011 09:39, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2011-03-09 00:14, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 08.03.2011 20:37, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
Mars.
Please review and contribute to the projec
On 2011-03-09 11:55, spir wrote:
On 03/09/2011 11:46 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-03-09 11:11, Trass3r wrote:
How about a GUI library. Probably helping with an already existing one,
DWT for example.
Good idea, but rather improve GtkD or QtD.
Too bad that's the general opinion people se
On 2011-03-09 12:12, %u wrote:
I think the advantage of gtk or Qt is people can reinvest previous
knowledge of the framework. (I mean, they are cross-language in
addition to be cross-platform ;-) I would personly prefere a clearly
designed D-specific GUI system than gtk's huge mess. (Dunno about
On 08/03/2011 19:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
I've added two ideas in the IDE category, for Ec
Am 09.03.2011 11:55, schrieb spir:
On 03/09/2011 11:46 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-03-09 11:11, Trass3r wrote:
How about a GUI library. Probably helping with an already existing one,
DWT for example.
Good idea, but rather improve GtkD or QtD.
Too bad that's the general opinion people
Am 09.03.2011 09:39, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2011-03-09 00:14, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 08.03.2011 20:37, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wi
> I think the advantage of gtk or Qt is people can reinvest previous
knowledge of the framework. (I mean, they are cross-language in
addition to be cross-platform ;-) I would personly prefere a clearly
designed D-specific GUI system than gtk's huge mess. (Dunno about
Qt, people seem to find it far
On 03/09/2011 11:46 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-03-09 11:11, Trass3r wrote:
How about a GUI library. Probably helping with an already existing one,
DWT for example.
Good idea, but rather improve GtkD or QtD.
Too bad that's the general opinion people seem to have about GUI libraries. I
On 2011-03-09 11:11, Trass3r wrote:
How about a GUI library. Probably helping with an already existing one,
DWT for example.
Good idea, but rather improve GtkD or QtD.
Too bad that's the general opinion people seem to have about GUI
libraries. I don't understand what they don't like about DW
> How about a GUI library. Probably helping with an already existing one,
> DWT for example.
Good idea, but rather improve GtkD or QtD.
On 03/09/2011 10:57 AM, spir wrote:
On 03/09/2011 01:52 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/8/11 4:11 PM, %u wrote:
Uh... how helping fix compiler bugs? Could we help with that? I
feel that's *much* more important than benchmarking, for instance,
since it doesn't make sense to benchmark someth
spir wrote:
> On 03/09/2011 01:21 AM, Jens Mueller wrote:
> >%u wrote:
> >>>I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
> >>Mars. Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
> >>>http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>Andrei
> >>
> >>
On 03/09/2011 01:52 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/8/11 4:11 PM, %u wrote:
Uh... how helping fix compiler bugs? Could we help with that? I
feel that's *much* more important than benchmarking, for instance,
since it doesn't make sense to benchmark something if it has bugs.
:\
The funny thi
On 03/09/2011 01:21 AM, Jens Mueller wrote:
%u wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
Mars. Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
Uh... how helping fix compiler bugs? Could
On 2011-03-08 20:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
How about a GUI library. Probably helping with a
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 3/8/11 3:11 PM, Jens Mueller wrote:
> >Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >>I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
> >>Mars. Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
> >>
> >>http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
> >
On 2011-03-09 00:14, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 08.03.2011 20:37, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
Two
> Out of curiosity, what's stopping you from helping fix bugs right
now? I agree that being paid for it adds motivation, but if it's
something you want to do, do it.
Great question! :)
Right now? The fact that I'm in school and have other things to do. :(
During the summer? The fact that I migh
>> Also, I (obviously) used the word "accuracy" to mean
"predictability", not "approximation".
> Then you were being inaccurate :o).
> Andrei
I thought the meaning was predictable. :P
On 3/8/11 8:30 PM, %u wrote:
In machine learning it's very common to trade off accuracy for
speed.
Andrei
Er... do you _honestly_ think people will start writing machine
learning programs in D, when we're even having trouble getting them
to use D for more typical applications (because of bugs
On 3/8/2011 8:34 PM, %u wrote:
>>> I have the same feeling. I'd like to see such projects. But I
> believe students are more likely to pick feature-oriented projects.
> The stuff that sounds cool.
>> And I wouldn't be surprised if Google as well is also more likely
> to accepted feature-oriented pr
On Tuesday 08 March 2011 20:34:00 %u wrote:
> >> I have the same feeling. I'd like to see such projects. But I
>
> believe students are more likely to pick feature-oriented projects.
> The stuff that sounds cool.
>
> > And I wouldn't be surprised if Google as well is also more likely
>
> to acce
>> I have the same feeling. I'd like to see such projects. But I
believe students are more likely to pick feature-oriented projects.
The stuff that sounds cool.
> And I wouldn't be surprised if Google as well is also more likely
to accepted feature-oriented projects than bug-fix ones.
Wait, I thin
> In machine learning it's very common to trade off accuracy for
speed.
> Andrei
Er... do you _honestly_ think people will start writing machine
learning programs in D, when we're even having trouble getting them
to use D for more typical applications (because of bugs)?
Also, I (obviously) used t
On 09/03/2011 00:21, Jens Mueller wrote:
I have the same feeling. I'd like to see such projects. But I believe
students are more likely to pick feature-oriented projects. The stuff
that sounds cool.
And I wouldn't be surprised if Google as well is also more likely to
accepted feature-oriented
On 3/8/11 4:11 PM, %u wrote:
Uh... how helping fix compiler bugs? Could we help with that? I
feel that's *much* more important than benchmarking, for instance,
since it doesn't make sense to benchmark something if it has bugs.
:\
The funny thing is that sometimes it makes perfect sense, as
ben
>> Uh... how helping fix compiler bugs? Could we help with that? I feel that's
>> *much* more
important than benchmarking, for instance, since it doesn't make sense to
benchmark something if
it has bugs. :\
> I have the same feeling. I'd like to see such projects. But I believe
> students are m
Am 09.03.2011 00:50, schrieb %u:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
Mars. Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
Uh... how helping fix compiler bugs? Could we help with that? I f
%u wrote:
> > I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
> Mars. Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
> > http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
> > Thanks,
> > Andrei
>
> Uh... how helping fix compiler bugs? Could we help with that? I feel
>
On 3/8/11 3:11 PM, Jens Mueller wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
Mars. Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Great. I find all of the provided projects usef
On 03/08/2011 08:37 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars. Please
review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Added topic "D tools in D".
Denis
--
_
vita es
On 08/03/2011 23:07, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/8/11 2:35 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 08/03/2011 19:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wi
>> Uh... how helping fix compiler bugs? Could we help with that? I
feel that's *much* more important than benchmarking, for instance,
since it doesn't make sense to benchmark something if it has bugs.
:\
> The funny thing is that sometimes it makes perfect sense, as
benchmarks _do_ push the limits
On 09.03.2011 2:50, %u wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
Mars. Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
Uh... how helping fix compiler bugs? Could we help with that? I feel
> I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
Mars. Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
> http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
> Thanks,
> Andrei
Uh... how helping fix compiler bugs? Could we help with that? I feel
that's *much* more importa
Am 08.03.2011 20:37, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
Two (ok, maybe three) IDE related ideas:
1. i
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital
> Mars. Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
>
> http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Great. I find all of the provided projects useful. Maybe one should add
ZeroMQ to
On 3/8/11 2:35 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 08/03/2011 19:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
Hum, i
On 08/03/2011 19:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
Hum, is it important to flesh these out before t
On 3/8/11 1:23 PM, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Please throw in database interfacing.
Doe
On 3/8/2011 1:23 PM, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Please throw in database interfacing.
Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
> I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
> Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
>
> http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Please throw in database interfacing.
Does putting up XML mean I should stop
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
Great!
Maybe a proper tool to convert C/C++ to D?
Most importantly header files with a correct translation of constness,
conditional compilation etc.,
but partial
I just submitted an application for GSoC 2011 on behalf of Digital Mars.
Please review and contribute to the project ideas page:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GSOC_2011_Ideas
Thanks,
Andrei
63 matches
Mail list logo
