regular expression search FunctionName.*\{ or FunctionName.*$\s*\{
depending on brace style
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Joakim via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 00:13:37 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 22:49:41 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 1/20/2015 12:30 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Which editor do you use?
https://github.com/DigitalMars/me
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:30:00 +
Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 03:28:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> > On 1/19/2015 7:20 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> >> Yes. "Search Again" is a single button press. It really has
> >> never occurred to me
> >> that this
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 03:28:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 7:20 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Yes. "Search Again" is a single button press. It really has
never occurred to me
that this might be a problem needing a solution.
I admit that I've never gotten in to using an IDE. I s
> So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
Regular Expression Search for
FunctionName.*\n\s*\{
or
FunctionName.*\{
depending on brace style being used.
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 00:13:37 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 22:49:41 UTC, Ary Borenszweig
wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without
an IDE?
Running `dscanner --help` prints this:
--declaration | -d symbolName [sourceFiles sourceDi
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:49:47 +
MattCoder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 13:47:11 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > void function foo () { ... }
> > foo();
> >
> > do you see the subtle difference? yes, that tiny whitespace in
> > declaration. i borrowe
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 13:47:11 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
void function foo () { ... }
foo();
do you see the subtle difference? yes, that tiny whitespace in
declaration. i borrowed that habit from some Oberon code
decades ago, and it serves me well since then.
Hmm, nice
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:35:16 -0300
Ary Borenszweig via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 1/19/15 9:17 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> > On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
> >> So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
> >
> > I do a text search for the name of the functi
On 1/19/15 8:35 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 1/19/15 9:17 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
I do a text search for the name of the function.
I've been programming in C, C++, and D for
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 20:51:03 UTC, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins
with keyword. "def" of "func". e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) -> typeOfResult;
easier to read and PARSE. Next D version may allow
On Monday, January 19, 2015 16:18:25 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 1/19/2015 2:51 PM, ponce wrote:
> > Current syntax is akin to C and C++, it means many people already read it
> > visually and it is easier to port C code to D.
>
> Bingo. It's designed to be an easy transition for peo
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 03:12:52 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
"Tel maître, tel valet." -- Andrei
Will ruby now park cars ?
On 1/19/2015 7:20 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Yes. "Search Again" is a single button press. It really has never occurred to me
that this might be a problem needing a solution.
I admit that I've never gotten in to using an IDE. I still have complaints about
the programmer's editor I use, but they
On 1/19/2015 5:35 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 1/19/15 9:17 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
I do a text search for the name of the function.
I've been programming in C, C++, and D fo
On 1/19/15 3:43 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 1/19/15 7:54 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 1/19/15 6:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 12:51 PM, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins with
keywor
On 20/01/2015 1:17 p.m., Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
I do a text search for the name of the function.
I've been programming in C, C++, and D for 30 years without an IDE. It
never occur
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 01:35:17 UTC, Ary Borenszweig
wrote:
On 1/19/15 9:17 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D
without an IDE?
I do a text search for the name of the function.
I've been programm
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 01:35:17 UTC, Ary Borenszweig
wrote:
On 1/19/15 9:17 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D
without an IDE?
I do a text search for the name of the function.
I've been programm
On 1/19/15 9:17 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
I do a text search for the name of the function.
I've been programming in C, C++, and D for 30 years without an IDE. It
never occurred t
On 1/20/2015 7:49 AM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
It works, but if you stop following that convention you are lost.
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
Case-insensitive search on "funcname(" usually works for me.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 04:17:08PM -0800, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
> >So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an
> >IDE?
>
> I do a text search for the name of the function.
>
> I've been programming in C, C++, an
On 1/19/2015 2:51 PM, ponce wrote:
Current syntax is akin to C and C++, it means many people already read it
visually and it is easier to port C code to D.
Bingo. It's designed to be an easy transition for people used to programming in
C, C++ and Java.
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 00:13:37 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 22:49:41 UTC, Ary Borenszweig
wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without
an IDE?
Running `dscanner --help` prints this:
--declaration | -d symbolName [sourceFiles sourceDi
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
I do a text search for the name of the function.
I've been programming in C, C++, and D for 30 years without an IDE. It never
occurred to me that this was not doable :-)
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 21:25:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/19/15 12:51 PM, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion
begins with
keyword. "def" of "func". e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) -> typeOfResult;
e
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 22:49:41 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without
an IDE?
Running `dscanner --help` prints this:
--declaration | -d symbolName [sourceFiles sourceDirectories]
Find the location where symbolName is declared. Thi
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 22:49:41 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 1/19/15 6:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 12:51 PM, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion
begins with
keyword. "def" of "func". e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
o
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 21:06:40 UTC, Alexey T. wrote:
Better that next D version (next MAJOR version) can support such
syntax. (Old syntax may be compatible too but "deprecated").
What developers think..
That why not is a not a good enough reason to do it.
On 1/19/15 7:54 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 1/19/15 6:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 12:51 PM, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins with
keyword. "def" of "func". e.g.
func myName(params
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 22:54:04 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I abandon D and switch to Ruby. -- Andrei
You should make a front page announcement.
On 1/19/15 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 1/19/15 6:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 12:51 PM, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins with
keyword. "def" of "func". e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...)
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 22:18:34 UTC, Alexey T. wrote:
Ok I see your arguments, indeed, breaking masss of code isn't
good (even with deprecated flag).
So leave it as is (it is TOO LATE to change this)
Current syntax is akin to C and C++, it means many people already
read it visually and
On 1/19/15 6:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 12:51 PM, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins with
keyword. "def" of "func". e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) -> typeOfResult;
easier to read and PARSE.
On 1/19/2015 1:23 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
I'm not familiar enough
with the syntax grammar to say for sure whether or not this would make it easier
to parse the language.
This idea is not going to make the parsing any better.
Ok I see your arguments, indeed, breaking masss of code isn't
good (even with deprecated flag).
So leave it as is (it is TOO LATE to change this)
On Monday, January 19, 2015 20:51:02 Alexey T. via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins
> with keyword. "def" of "func". e.g.
>
> func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
> or
> func myName(params...) -> typeOfResult;
>
> easier to read and PARSE. Ne
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 20:51:03 UTC, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins
with keyword. "def" of "func". e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) -> typeOfResult;
easier to read and PARSE. Next D version may allow
On 1/19/15 12:51 PM, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins with
keyword. "def" of "func". e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) -> typeOfResult;
easier to read and PARSE. Next D version may allow--with compatability
of
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 21:06:40 UTC, Alexey T. wrote:
Better that next D version (next MAJOR version) can support such
syntax. (Old syntax may be compatible too but "deprecated").
What developers think..
I have a feeling you might get some strong opposition to this
idea *Brace Yourself
Better that next D version (next MAJOR version) can support such
syntax. (Old syntax may be compatible too but "deprecated").
What developers think..
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:51:02 +
"Alexey T. via Digitalmars-d" wrote:
> Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins
> with keyword. "def" of "func". e.g.
>
> func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
> or
> func myName(params...) -> typeOfResult;
>
> easier to read and PARS
42 matches
Mail list logo
