This looks like a nice tool for those wanting to learn more about
WebAssembly:
https://mbebenita.github.io/WasmExplorer/
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 08:06:00AM +, Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[...]
> The general public has become more ignorant. I guess to a large extent
> because of information overflow and the downfall of real journalism
> (e.g. the old payment model is failing which means media is
On Thursday, 2 March 2017 at 19:52:58 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
At some point there will be a resistance movement, forking one
of the
main browsers and building in collaborative blacklisting etc.
I hope, but I'm skeptical. Big business is definitely headed
very 1984, but that's h
On 03/02/2017 04:18 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 18:28:00 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa)
wrote:
Well, it's Google's main domain, and they've kinda already settled
into a pattern of making decisions more on self-serving grounds than
for the good of the product/use
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 18:28:00 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
Well, it's Google's main domain, and they've kinda already
settled into a pattern of making decisions more on self-serving
grounds than for the good of the product/users. "Don't be evil"
doesn't exactly set a very hig
On 03/01/2017 05:15 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
So, maybe the conclusion is: don't let corporations create technology
standards in their main domain, because then they try to create
monopolies and start misbehaving. Browsers is a side-line tech, so...
this might have a chance..?
Well, it'
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 09:00:42 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
If we could invent a technical way to screw over, underminine,
and completely replace corporate interests, it would be the
single greatest achievement in computing (not to mention
economic theory), EVER.
I bet Intel
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 08:56:37 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 03/01/2017 03:47 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 08:01:41 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
I'm not so up-to-date about the mechanics of WebAssembly, but
it would
be pretty exciting to run D cod
On 03/01/2017 03:46 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 21:50:11 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
What a long, roundabout path we've taken to end up back where we
started: shipping binaries in a sandboxed environment.
Portable object-files is something that that people have
On 03/01/2017 03:47 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 08:01:41 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
I'm not so up-to-date about the mechanics of WebAssembly, but it would
be pretty exciting to run D code in the browser.
Is this now possible or have I completely misunderstood what
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 08:01:41 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
I'm not so up-to-date about the mechanics of WebAssembly, but
it would be pretty exciting to run D code in the browser.
Is this now possible or have I completely misunderstood what
WebAssembly allows for?
It should be possible, a
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 21:50:11 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
What a long, roundabout path we've taken to end up back where
we started: shipping binaries in a sandboxed environment.
Portable object-files is something that that people have tried to
achieve since the 1980s, but vendors have
I'm not so up-to-date about the mechanics of WebAssembly, but it
would be pretty exciting to run D code in the browser.
Is this now possible or have I completely misunderstood what
WebAssembly allows for?
On 02/28/2017 11:26 PM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
On 02/28/2017 10:28 PM, Joakim wrote:
What is the alternative you prefer: javascript and its myriad
vulnerabilities?
Probably shipping binaries in a sandboxed environment...but, you know,
*without* the browser community badly reinventin
On 02/28/2017 10:28 PM, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 21:50:11 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 18:04:39 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
[...]
What a long, roundabout path we've taken to end up back where we
started: shipping binaries in a sandboxed en
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 21:50:11 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 18:04:39 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
[...]
What a long, roundabout path we've taken to end up back where
we started: shipping binaries in a sandboxed environment.
What is the alternative y
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 18:04:39 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
«WebAssembly CG members representing four browsers, Chrome,
Edge, Firefox,
and WebKit, have reached consensus that the design of the
initial (MVP [1])
WebAssembly API and binary format is complete to the extent
that no fur
17 matches
Mail list logo