Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and
runs through November . Following that, a vote will take place for one
week. Please post any comments about this library in this thread.
Docs:
http://nascent.freeshell.org/programming/D/doc/phobos/std_csv.html
Code:
dsimcha wrote:
Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and
runs through November . Following that, a vote will take place for one
week. Please post any comments about this library in this thread.
Docs:
http://nascent.freeshell.org/programming/D/doc/phobos/std_csv
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:18:27 +0300, dsimcha wrote:
Docs:
http://nascent.freeshell.org/programming/D/doc/phobos/std_csv.html
Documentation should have examples of basic usage at the top. It should be
possible to figure out how to use a CSV parser within 10 seconds of
looking at the docs.
On 10/28/2011 9:18 AM, dsimcha wrote:
Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and
runs through November . Following that, a vote will take place for one
week. Please post any comments about this library in this thread.
Docs:
http://nascent.freeshell.org/programm
On 2011-10-28 15:25, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and
runs through November . Following that, a vote will take place for one
week. Please post any comments about this library in this thread.
Docs:
On 2011-10-28 15:18, dsimcha wrote:
Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and
runs through November . Following that, a vote will take place for one
week. Please post any comments about this library in this thread.
Docs:
http://nascent.freeshell.org/programming/
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-10-28 15:25, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and
runs through November . Following that, a vote will take place for one
week. Please post any comments about this library in this thread.
Le 28/10/2011 16:09, Piotr Szturmaj a écrit :
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-10-28 15:25, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and
runs through November . Following that, a vote will take place for one
week. Please pos
On 10/28/11 10:18 AM, dsimcha wrote:
Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and
runs through November . Following that, a vote will take place for one
week. Please post any comments about this library in this thread.
Docs:
http://nascent.freeshell.org/programming/
dsimcha Wrote:
> I'll kick this off with my review of the documentation (I'll review the
> implementation later):
>
> "Header may be provided as first line in file" -> "A header may be
> provided as first line in file"?
>
> csvText: Shouldn't heading be a generic range of strings instead of a
Piotr Szturmaj Wrote:
> dsimcha wrote:
> > Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and
> > runs through November . Following that, a vote will take place for one
> > week. Please post any comments about this library in this thre
Ary Manzana Wrote:
> I like the idea of reading a CSV into a struct, or treating all fields
> as ints.
>
> But, in my experience, CSVs are never perfect... because humans fill
> them, and humans aren't perfect or don't know "Oh, of course I must fill
> only numbers in this column, otherwise pr
Vladimir Panteleev Wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:18:27 +0300, dsimcha wrote:
>
> > Docs:
> > http://nascent.freeshell.org/programming/D/doc/phobos/std_csv.html
>
> Documentation should have examples of basic usage at the top. It should be
> possible to figure out how to use a CSV parser wit
Forgot to answer one.
dsimcha Wrote:
> Why should the order of the heading provided to csvText matter? csvText
> should simply rearrange its results.
Because I do not store anymore information then requested. I must keep pumping
out values as I receive them, so order can not be rearranged. Wi
On 10/28/11 1:14 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Ary Manzana Wrote:
I like the idea of reading a CSV into a struct, or treating all fields
as ints.
But, in my experience, CSVs are never perfect... because humans fill
them, and humans aren't perfect or don't know "Oh, of course I must fill
only numbe
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
> If a header is specified, is it possible to iterate over the content as
> an associative array, something like this:
>
> string str = "a,b,c\nHello,65,63.63\nWorld,123,3673.562";
> auto records = csvText(str, ["b"]);
>
> foreach (header, value ; records) {}
>
> Or acces
Ary Manzana Wrote:
> You are right.
>
> I see that you throw ConvException, because when some to!... fails it
> throws that. But you don't catch it. So you'd get something like "Can't
> convert 'hello' to an int", but you loose the information of which row
> and column caused the problem. So m
On 2011-10-28 19:07, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
If a header is specified, is it possible to iterate over the content as
an associative array, something like this:
string str = "a,b,c\nHello,65,63.63\nWorld,123,3673.562";
auto records = csvText(str, ["b"]);
foreach (header, va
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:41:35 +0300, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev Wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:18:27 +0300, dsimcha wrote:
> Docs:
> http://nascent.freeshell.org/programming/D/doc/phobos/std_csv.html
Documentation should have examples of basic usage at the top. It should
be
On 10/28/2011 6:18 AM, dsimcha wrote:
Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and runs
through November . Following that, a vote will take place for one week. Please
post any comments about this library in this thread.
Docs:
http://nascent.freeshell.org/programm
On 10/28/2011 12:18 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module
Walter,
Asking for high precision documentation is fine.
And since you face it ...
What about having such a high precision for D2 language definition ?
std.csv is pretty cool. No doubt
8 AM, dsimcha wrote:
>> Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and
>> runs through November . Following that, a vote will take place for one
>> week. Please post any comments about this library in this thread.
>>
>> Docs:
>>
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:27:22 -0700, bls wrote:
> On 10/28/2011 12:18 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module
>
> Walter,
> Asking for high precision documentation is fine.
> And since you face it ...
> What about having
On 10/29/2011 03:56 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
std.csv is pretty cool. No doubt, But shouldn't std.csv be based on
> std.lexer ?
>
> A+
Well, std.lexer doesn't exist. And if it is reasonable to use one, then
it could be done without changing the API.
I think the database API stuff will have mu
On Saturday, October 29, 2011 22:33:30 Jesse Phillips wrote:
> > On 10/28/2011 6:18 AM, dsimcha wrote:
> > First off, mucho thanks to Jesse for writing this. It's an important
> > module for Phobos.
>
> Thank you. Fun fact, many popular languages don't include a CSV parser,
> C# and Java being not
On 10/29/2011 3:27 PM, bls wrote:
What about having such a high precision for D2 language definition ?
Specific suggestions are welcome. Patches are even more welcome.
std.csv is pretty cool. No doubt, But shouldn't std.csv be based on std.lexer ?
I don't see a similarity.
On 10/29/2011 3:33 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
"This parser will loosely follow the RFC-4180"
How exactly will it differ from RFC-4180?
I do not know how to address this. After making this statement I list the
criteria. I don't see the need to list where it differs:
* Records terminate with LF,
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:19:44 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Saturday, October 29, 2011 22:33:30 Jesse Phillips wrote:
>> > On 10/28/2011 6:18 AM, dsimcha wrote:
>> > First off, mucho thanks to Jesse for writing this. It's an important
>> > module for Phobos.
>>
>> Thank you. Fun fact, many p
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:05:01 -0700, bls wrote:
> Regarding std.database.. Please elaborate/ ATM I just can imagine that
> std.csv will be used for Import/Export.
CSV is tabular data, so it would make sense that you may have a similar
interface as you would a database.
csv.select("name").where!
Thank you for the response, only one more follow-up question.
Records
Record
Don't these look easy to confuse? And funny if we didn't have type
inference.
Records records = csvText(str);
foreach(Record record; records) ...
Anyone want to complain about this suggestion? Record is private and c
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 17:02:26 +, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> Thank you for the response, only one more follow-up question.
>
> Records
> Record
If it's any consolation, I'm suffering from similar questions to myself
in my naming of structs and methods for my database interface experiments.
Sinc
On 10/30/2011 10:02 AM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Thank you for the response, only one more follow-up question.
Records
Record
Don't these look easy to confuse? And funny if we didn't have type
inference.
Records records = csvText(str);
foreach(Record record; records) ...
Anyone want to complain
On 10/29/2011 10:03 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
I want to press Andrei to write up a doc on "What's a Range"
As a D1 user planning to migrate, this would be very appreciated.
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:18:27 +0300, dsimcha wrote:
Docs:
http://nascent.freeshell.org/programming/D/doc/phobos/std_csv.html
Checked the new docs today. If I'm reading them right, the top example
prints:
"Fred works as a Fly and earns $4 per year"
Is this a pop culture reference I'm not c
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:21:02 +0200, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:18:27 +0300, dsimcha wrote:
>
>> Docs:
>> http://nascent.freeshell.org/programming/D/doc/phobos/std_csv.html
>
> Checked the new docs today. If I'm reading them right, the top example
> prints:
>
> "Fred wor
On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 01:28:07 Jesse Phillips wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:21:02 +0200, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:18:27 +0300, dsimcha wrote:
> >> Docs:
> >> http://nascent.freeshell.org/programming/D/doc/phobos/std_csv.html
> >
> > Checked the new docs today
On 2011-11-01 02:28, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:21:02 +0200, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:18:27 +0300, dsimcha wrote:
Docs:
http://nascent.freeshell.org/programming/D/doc/phobos/std_csv.html
Checked the new docs today. If I'm reading them right, the to
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 03:28:07 +0200, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:21:02 +0200, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:18:27 +0300, dsimcha wrote:
Docs:
http://nascent.freeshell.org/programming/D/doc/phobos/std_csv.html
Checked the new docs today. If I'm reading
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:11:24 +0200, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> I guess such things are really subjective, but personally to me it does
> seem a bit silly, and out-of-place from the documentation of a language
> that aims to be the successor of C++.
I'll make it a pop culture reference... kidding
Le 30/10/2011 03:09, Jesse Phillips a écrit :
> That is all I meant by it. A CSV parser does exist for every language,
> but none come packaged with the language. C# even chose not to include an
> ini so people would use XML. It really is sad that instead of something
> solid they go the way of
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:18:27 -0400, dsimcha wrote:
> Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and
> runs through November . Following that, a vote will take place for one
> week. Please post any comments about this library in this thread.
&
lips wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:18:27 -0400, dsimcha wrote:
>
>> Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and
>> runs through November . Following that, a vote will take place for one
>> week. Please post any comments about this libra
On 10/28/2011 9:18 AM, dsimcha wrote:
Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and
runs through November . Following that, a vote will take place for one
week. Please post any comments about this library in this thread.
Docs:
http://nascent.freeshell.org/programm
On Sunday, November 06, 2011 20:49:29 dsimcha wrote:
> On 10/28/2011 9:18 AM, dsimcha wrote:
> > Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and
> > runs through November . Following that, a vote will take place for one
> > week. Please post any comm
On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:00:42 -0500, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
And only one pending request, csvFormatter. I am still considering how I
want to approach this. I don't want to rush it in so I don't plan on
having it complete before voting starts.
My primary use of csv files is as a method of saving
On Friday, October 28, 2011 09:18:27 dsimcha wrote:
> Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and
> runs through November . Following that, a vote will take place for one
> week. Please post any comments about this library in this thread.
>
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:28:20 -0500, Robert Jacques wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:00:42 -0500, Jesse Phillips
> wrote:
>> And only one pending request, csvFormatter. I am still considering how
>> I want to approach this. I don't want to rush it in so I don't plan on
>> having it complete before
Thank you, lots of stuff to ponder and comment.
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 02:10:28 -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Friday, October 28, 2011 09:18:27 dsimcha wrote:
>> Formal review of Jesse Phillips's CSV parser module begins today and
>> runs through November . Following th
On Friday, November 11, 2011 03:17:10 Jesse Phillips wrote:
> > I also have some API design concerns. Primarily, most of the type names
> > are overly broad and unclear. For example: Record, Records, Malformed
> > could just as easily be part of a database API. And because of this, not
> > only doe
On 02.11.2011 09:02, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-11-01 02:28, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:21:02 +0200, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:18:27 +0300, dsimcha wrote:
Docs:
http://nascent.freeshell.org/programming/D/doc/phobos/std_csv.html
Checked the new do
On 2011-11-11 12:50, Don wrote:
Far more horrible than that -- in an old Excel from around 2000 the user
interface used US settings for reading short dates, if the day of the
month was 12 or less. Otherwise it uses the locale. But it always uses
the locale for displaying them.
So 11/1, 12/1, 13/
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:50:52 +0200, Don wrote:
Far more horrible than that -- in an old Excel from around 2000 the user
interface used US settings for reading short dates, if the day of the
month was 12 or less. Otherwise it uses the locale. But it always uses
the locale for displaying the
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 02:17:40 -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Actually, I'd argue that Row would be better than Record, since it _is_
> a row in a table. Personally, I'd find it to be more immediately clear
> that way. With Record, I have to figure out what the heck it is a record
> of, whereas Ro
On Friday, November 11, 2011 15:25:29 Jesse Phillips wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 02:17:40 -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Actually, I'd argue that Row would be better than Record, since it _is_
> > a row in a table. Personally, I'd find it to be more immediately clear
> > that way. With Record,
On 11 November 2011 19:07, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Friday, November 11, 2011 15:25:29 Jesse Phillips wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 02:17:40 -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > > Actually, I'd argue that Row would be better than Record, since it _is_
> > > a row in a table. Personally, I'd fi
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:17:10 -0500, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:28:20 -0500, Robert Jacques wrote:
On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:00:42 -0500, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
[snip]
I also have some API design concerns. Primarily, most of the type names
are overly broad and unclear. For exam
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 00:21:55 -0500, Robert Jacques wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:17:10 -0500, Jesse Phillips
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:28:20 -0500, Robert Jacques wrote:
>>> On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:00:42 -0500, Jesse Phillips
>>> wrote:
> [snip]
>>> I also have some API design concerns
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:30:51 -0500, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 00:21:55 -0500, Robert Jacques wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:17:10 -0500, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:28:20 -0500, Robert Jacques wrote:
On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:00:42 -0500, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:12:57 -0500, Robert Jacques wrote:
> Thank you for explaining. I wasn't seeing the implementation efficiency
> that comes from the custom struct approach.
No, thank you. It is good to have someone fighting a different opinion.
It is because of you we can have this bike-she
59 matches
Mail list logo
