On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:26:54 -0400, Jose Armando Garcia
jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:09:17 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
What is wrong with
import std.log;
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:05:33 -0400, Jose Armando Garcia
jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
I thought more about the point made about mixing throwing and logging
levels. I agree that it's awkward to e.g. log to
On Mar 12, 2012, at 7:28 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/11/12 4:49 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
Unfortunately, the discussion has ground to a halt again, so consider
this a friendly reminder that there is still one day left until the end
of the review period.
David
I thought more
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:15:14 -0500, Jose Armando Garcia jsan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:22:21 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu
On Monday, 12 March 2012 at 05:05:43 UTC, Jose Armando Garcia
wrote:
I think there is currently too much disagreement on std.log. I
am
honestly too busy juggling family, friends, school and work. I
am
currently leaning towards removing std.log from the review
queue and
spending some time
On 3/12/12 5:35 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Monday, 12 March 2012 at 05:05:43 UTC, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
I think there is currently too much disagreement on std.log. I am
honestly too busy juggling family, friends, school and work. I am
currently leaning towards removing std.log from the
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 3/12/12 5:35 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Monday, 12 March 2012 at 05:05:43 UTC, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
I think there is currently too much disagreement on std.log. I am
honestly too busy
On 13 March 2012 12:34, Jose Armando Garcia jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
I think that's a wise decision, thanks Jose and David.
One possibility is that Jose transfers the code to someone else who takes it
through the review process and makes
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:44 PM, James Miller ja...@aatch.net wrote:
On 13 March 2012 12:34, Jose Armando Garcia jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
I think that's a wise decision, thanks Jose and David.
One possibility is that Jose transfers the
Unfortunately, the discussion has ground to a halt again, so
consider this a friendly reminder that there is still one day
left until the end of the review period.
David
On Sunday, 11 March 2012 at 22:09:54 UTC, Robert Jacques wrote:
Has Jose updated anything?
Not sure what you mean – the latest state of the code is at
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/432. I was
more referring to the design-level discussions anyway, though.
David
On 3/11/12 4:49 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
Unfortunately, the discussion has ground to a halt again, so consider
this a friendly reminder that there is still one day left until the end
of the review period.
David
I thought more about the point made about mixing throwing and logging
levels. I
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 05:28:44PM -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[...]
I thought more about the point made about mixing throwing and logging
levels. I agree that it's awkward to e.g. log to critical without
throwing etc. I personally think in that case you really want the
error log, but
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:14:37 -0500, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2012 at 22:09:54 UTC, Robert Jacques wrote:
Has Jose updated anything?
Not sure what you mean – the latest state of the code is at
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/432. I
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 3/11/12 4:49 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
Unfortunately, the discussion has ground to a halt again, so consider
this a friendly reminder that there is still one day left until the end
of the review
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:22:21 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 3/6/12 6:05 PM, Geoffrey Biggs wrote:
That approach means that if I actually do have a fatal error, I can't
mark it as such.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:59:09 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 3/6/12 4:31 PM, Geoffrey Biggs wrote:
On 07/03/12 09:25, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:54:39 -0500, James Miller ja...@aatch.net wrote:
Surprisingly, I agree with the idea that fatal and critical shouldn't
throw, or at least shouldn't throw by default, maybe a configuration
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:09:17 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:39:28 -0500, Jose Armando Garcia
jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Jonathan M
On Mar 11, 2012, at 10:26 PM, Jose Armando Garcia jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
alternatively:
log_info(cool);
linfo(cool);
lginfo(cool);
There are so many choices besides just info. We should use something
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:32:37 -0500, Jose Armando Garcia
jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
Except 'info', 'error', 'warning' are all common names, likely to be a
very
attractive name for something that has nothing to do
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:39:28 -0500, Jose Armando Garcia
jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 09:14:16 so wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 March 2012 at 07:46:14 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-06 02:32,
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:59:09 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 3/6/12 4:31 PM, Geoffrey Biggs wrote:
On 07/03/12 09:25, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 13:08:42 Brad Roberts wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Fix now:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:10:58 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 3/6/12 7:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Because the level that you log something at and what you want to do in
terms
of exceptions aren't necessarily related at all. It could easily be
that you
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:54:39 -0500, James Miller ja...@aatch.net wrote:
Surprisingly, I agree with the idea that fatal and critical shouldn't
throw, or at least shouldn't throw by default, maybe a configuration
option would allow for that functionality. Logging probably shouldn't
affect program
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 02:33:05 -0500, Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
Exception is a graceful shutdown, as it calls destructors finally
blocks while unrolling the stack.
You're assuming the program uses finally/scope exit blocks to do shutdown
logic. This is not always the
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:27:17 -0500, Jose Armando Garcia
jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 02:22:05 so wrote:
That is not a counter-argument to something related to this
library but everything that
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:09:17 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:39:28 -0500, Jose Armando Garcia
jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 09:14:16 so wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:19:27 -0500, Jose Armando Garcia
jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:50:04 -0500, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at
wrote:
There are several modules in the review queue right
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:22:21 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 3/6/12 6:05 PM, Geoffrey Biggs wrote:
That approach means that if I actually do have a fatal error, I can't
mark it as such.
Use log.fatal for those.
Andrei
But fatal Logs a fatal severity
On 3/6/12 5:39 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I don't like the current state of dlang.org docs either. There is little
or no intro paragraph to explain what on earth the module is used for or
why you should bother reading the rest of the page for the next hour or
so. It also doesn't give any motivating
On 07.03.2012 16:34, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 02:33:05 -0500, Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
Exception is a graceful shutdown, as it calls destructors finally
blocks while unrolling the stack.
You're assuming the program uses finally/scope exit blocks
Richard van Scheijen dl...@mesadu.net wrote:
When logging the severity level should convey a certain insight that the
developer has about the code. This can be done with a 3 bit field. These
are: known-cause, known-effect and breaks-flow.
This creates the following matrix:
KC KE BF
On Monday, 13 February 2012 at 15:50:05 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
Barring any objections, the review period starts now and ends
in three weeks, on March 6th, followed by a week of voting.
Okay, everyone, by the original schedule, the review period would
have ended yesterday. However, I
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:53 PM, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote:
On Monday, 13 February 2012 at 15:50:05 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
Barring any objections, the review period starts now and ends in three
weeks, on March 6th, followed by a week of voting.
Okay, everyone, by the
On Tuesday, 6 March 2012 at 07:46:14 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-06 02:32, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The user can then alias log!info to info if he/she wants to.
Again, you are now forcing 2 common names instead of one as it is
now.
When you instantiate log!info where do you get
On 2012-03-06 08:54, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 08:46:14 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-06 02:32, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 02:22:05 so wrote:
That is not a counter-argument to something related to this
library but everything that lies in
On Tuesday, 6 March 2012 at 03:11:11 UTC, Robert Jacques wrote:
Please don't forget that you are _submitting_ a library into
Phobos and the D ecosystem at large. Yes, new code can be
expected to avoid these names, but all existing code has to be
retrofitted and fixed.
Probably it is the
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 09:14:16 so wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 March 2012 at 07:46:14 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-06 02:32, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The user can then alias log!info to info if he/she wants to.
Again, you are now forcing 2 common names instead of one as it is
now.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Kalle Svensson ka...@ieee.org wrote:
Since I'm D n00b I'll just post a couple of observations:
* I agree that it is a good idea just to use few log levels.
* I think is it is a misstake not to let formatting of the whole
log message be pluggable (i.e. not
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Richard van Scheijen dl...@mesadu.net wrote:
When logging the severity level should convey a certain insight that the
developer has about the code. This can be done with a 3 bit field. These
are: known-cause, known-effect and breaks-flow.
This creates the
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:38 AM, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:09:28AM +0100, Mikael Lindsten wrote:
On Monday, 27 February 2012 at 18:10:15 UTC, Kalle Svensson wrote:
* I agree that it is a good idea just to use few log levels.
[...]
I second what Kalle
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Richard van Scheijen wrote:
When logging the severity level should convey a certain insight that the
developer has about the code. This can be done with a 3 bit field. These
are:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:01:19 -0600, Jose Armando Garcia
jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Richard van Scheijen dl...@mesadu.net
wrote:
When logging the severity level should convey a certain insight that the
developer has about the code. This can be done with a 3 bit
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:13:30 -0600, Richard van Scheijen dl...@mesadu.net
wrote:
When logging the severity level should convey a certain insight
that the developer has about the code. This can be done with a 3
bit field.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:01:19 -0600, Jose Armando Garcia jsan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Richard van Scheijen dl...@mesadu.net
wrote:
When logging the severity level should convey a certain
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:44:13 -0600, Jose Armando Garcia
jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:01:19 -0600, Jose Armando Garcia
jsan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Richard van Scheijen
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:34:21 -0600, Jose Armando Garcia
jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:13:30 -0600, Richard van Scheijen
dl...@mesadu.net
wrote:
When logging the severity level should convey a certain
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2/13/2012 7:50 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
There are several modules in the review queue right now, and to get things
going, I have volunteered to manage the
review of Jose's std.log proposal. Barring any objections,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:50:04 -0500, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at
wrote:
There are several modules in the review queue right now, and to get things
going, I have volunteered to manage the review of Jose's
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:30:03 -0500, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at
wrote:
On Monday, 5 March 2012 at 21:55:08 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The log aliases use names that are too common. I think log.info
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 02:22:05 so wrote:
That is not a counter-argument to something related to this
library but everything that lies in global namespace.
At its first state both severity levels and the log was in
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 20:22:05 -0500, so s...@so.so wrote:
On Monday, 5 March 2012 at 23:51:29 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:30:03 -0500, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at
wrote:
On
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:22:05 -0600, so s...@so.so wrote:
On Monday, 5 March 2012 at 23:51:29 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:30:03 -0500, David Nadlinger
s...@klickverbot.at wrote:
On Monday, 5
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 09:14:16 so wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 March 2012 at 07:46:14 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-06 02:32, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The user can then alias log!info to info if he/she wants
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:44:13 -0600, Jose Armando Garcia jsan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:01:19 -0600, Jose Armando Garcia
On 3/6/12 11:39 AM, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Seriously everyone. What are we spending some much effort on this?
What is wrong with:
import log = std.log;
log.info(cool);
Indeed I think that should be fine.
Thanks,
Andrei
On 3/6/12 11:36 AM, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
import someSymboleThatDoesntCollide = std.log;
I think this works better:
static import log = std.log;
Andrei
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 11:45:47AM -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/6/12 11:39 AM, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Seriously everyone. What are we spending some much effort on this?
What is wrong with:
import log = std.log;
log.info(cool);
Indeed I think that should be fine.
[...]
+1.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:50 AM, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote:
There are several modules in the review queue right now, and to get things
going, I have volunteered to manage the review of Jose's std.log proposal.
Barring any objections, the review period starts now and ends in
On Tuesday, 6 March 2012 at 19:47:50 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/6/12 11:36 AM, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
import someSymboleThatDoesntCollide = std.log;
I think this works better:
static import log = std.log;
Isn't this just another case of DMD silently accepting
superfluous
On Mar 6, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Future:
1. Allowing filtering of regular log messages (like info, warning,
etc) based on the module. Similar to how vlog works.
2. Add support for custom line formatters
3. Talk about adding config.setSeverity(...) which is a union
On Mar 6, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Seriously everyone. What are we spending some much effort on this?
What is wrong with:
import log = std.log;
log.info(cool);
Why should the default be unqualified names? Is this simply a desire to not
change std.log so we can just
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Future:
1. Allowing filtering of regular log messages (like info, warning,
etc) based on the module. Similar to how vlog works.
Once you add module filtering to the regularly log messages, what's the
point of having the separate vlog? I think
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org wrote:
On Mar 6, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Seriously everyone. What are we spending some much effort on this?
What is wrong with:
import log = std.log;
log.info(cool);
Why should the default be
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Future:
1. Allowing filtering of regular log messages (like info, warning,
etc) based on the module. Similar to how vlog works.
Once you add module filtering to the
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:41:32 -0600, Jose Armando Garcia
jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:44:13 -0600, Jose Armando Garcia
jsan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Robert Jacques
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:32:37 -0600, Jose Armando Garcia
jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 20:22:05 -0500, so s...@so.so wrote:
On Monday, 5 March 2012 at 23:51:29 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Future:
1. Allowing filtering of regular log messages (like info, warning,
etc) based on the module. Similar to how vlog works.
Once you add module filtering to the
I still don't understand how to set the filename of the log file. Has
this been added yet?
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
I still don't understand how to set the filename of the log file. Has
this been added yet?
http://jsancio.github.com/phobos/phobos/std_log.html#fileNamePrefixes
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:41:32 -0600, Jose Armando Garcia jsan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:44:13 -0600, Jose Armando Garcia
On 3/7/12, Jose Armando Garcia jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
http://jsancio.github.com/phobos/phobos/std_log.html#fileNamePrefixes
That was what I was looking for but I didn't find it at first. I think
that info about what the defaults are
([program].[hostname].[user].[severity].log.[datetime].[pid])
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:26 PM, David Nadlinger c...@klickverbot.at wrote:
Just a quick reply, more tomorrow:
On 6 Mar 2012, at 0:03, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
What is your objection here? I don't remember reading your thoughts on
critical.
Darn, my longer review post apparently didn't
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/7/12, Jose Armando Garcia jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
http://jsancio.github.com/phobos/phobos/std_log.html#fileNamePrefixes
That was what I was looking for but I didn't find it at first. I think
that info
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 13:08:42 Brad Roberts wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Future:
1. Allowing filtering of regular log messages (like info, warning,
etc) based on the module. Similar to how vlog works.
Once you add module filtering to the regularly log
On 07/03/12 09:25, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 13:08:42 Brad Roberts wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Fix now:
1. Add thread name attribute to the default logger
2. Check that the example compile
3. Come up with a better name for Rich and rich
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 03:52:56PM -0800, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/7/12, Jose Armando Garcia jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
http://jsancio.github.com/phobos/phobos/std_log.html#fileNamePrefixes
That was
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 07:25:23PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 13:08:42 Brad Roberts wrote:
[...]
I still believe pretty strongly that the logger must not affect
application flow, ie, not throw or exit the app. From the feed back,
I am not alone in thinking
On 3/6/12 4:31 PM, Geoffrey Biggs wrote:
On 07/03/12 09:25, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 13:08:42 Brad Roberts wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Fix now:
1. Add thread name attribute to the default logger
2. Check that the example compile
3. Come up
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 16:59:09 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I don't see why the agitation around this particular matter. It's a
matter of convenience, much like writeln (as opposed to just write).
Let's admit that it often happens that you want to log some troublesome
stuff just before
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Geoffrey Biggs
geoffrey.bi...@aist.go.jp wrote:
On 07/03/12 09:59, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I don't see why the agitation around this particular matter. It's a
matter of convenience, much like writeln (as opposed to just write).
Let's admit that it often
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 16:59:09 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I don't see why the agitation around this particular matter. It's a
matter of convenience, much like writeln (as opposed to just write).
Let's admit that
On 07/03/12 11:12, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Geoffrey Biggs
geoffrey.bi...@aist.go.jp wrote:
That approach means that if I actually do have a fatal error, I can't mark
it as such. It gets conflated with the non-fatal errors, both in the source
and in the
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:20:29 -0600, Jose Armando Garcia jsan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:41:32 -0600, Jose Armando Garcia jsan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Robert Jacques
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 18:19:23 Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Fatal and Critical are exactly these continence functions... To
reiterate. fatal will always assert and critical will always throw. It
is impossible for the user to disable these things.
No, because they affect the log level. The
Sorry. For some reason I thought info was callable directly without the leading
log portion.
On Mar 6, 2012, at 1:37 PM, Jose Armando Garcia jsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org wrote:
On Mar 6, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Jose Armando Garcia
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 19:10:14 Sean Kelly wrote:
Sorry. For some reason I thought info was callable directly without the
leading log portion.
It _is_ callable that way. Just look at the example at the top:
http://jsancio.github.com/phobos/phobos/std_log.html
- Jonathan M Davis
On 3/6/12 5:07 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
As it stands, std.log is conflating two separate concepts - logging and and
error handling.
Throwing an exception is not error handling. If it were, so many
entities would do so, the whole concept would become devoid of meaning.
Andrei
On 3/6/12 6:05 PM, Geoffrey Biggs wrote:
That approach means that if I actually do have a fatal error, I can't
mark it as such.
Use log.fatal for those.
Andrei
On 3/6/12 7:04 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 18:19:23 Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Fatal and Critical are exactly these continence functions... To
reiterate. fatal will always assert and critical will always throw. It
is impossible for the user to disable these things.
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 19:27:35 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/6/12 7:04 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 18:19:23 Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Fatal and Critical are exactly these continence functions... To
reiterate. fatal will always assert and critical will
On 7 March 2012 16:43, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 19:27:35 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/6/12 7:04 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 18:19:23 Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Fatal and Critical are exactly these continence
On 3/6/12 7:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Because the level that you log something at and what you want to do in terms
of exceptions aren't necessarily related at all. It could easily be that you
want to log something and then do some series of operations before throwing -
even if the log level
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 20:10:58 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/6/12 7:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Because the level that you log something at and what you want to do in
terms of exceptions aren't necessarily related at all. It could easily be
that you want to log something and then
On 07.03.2012 7:54, James Miller wrote:
On 7 March 2012 16:43, Jonathan M Davisjmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 19:27:35 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/6/12 7:04 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 18:19:23 Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
Fatal and
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:50:04 -0500, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at
wrote:
There are several modules in the review queue right now, and to get
things going, I have volunteered to manage the review of Jose's std.log
proposal. Barring any objections, the review period starts now and ends
On Monday, 5 March 2012 at 21:55:08 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
The log aliases use names that are too common. I think
log.info is a better symbol for logging than just 'info', which
could be a symbol in a myriad of places. Given that D's symbol
lookup rules allow shadowing of global
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:30:03 -0500, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at
wrote:
On Monday, 5 March 2012 at 21:55:08 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The log aliases use names that are too common. I think log.info is a
better symbol for logging than just 'info', which could be a symbol in
On Monday, 5 March 2012 at 23:51:29 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:30:03 -0500, David Nadlinger
s...@klickverbot.at wrote:
On Monday, 5 March 2012 at 21:55:08 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
The log aliases use names that are too common. I think
log.info is a
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
