On Sunday, 2 May 2010 at 18:16:59 UTC, Bane wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
Bane wrote:
> I meant on topic removal from DM newsgroup. I guess Walther
> did it, as he is
> the one administering it, right? I support his decision for
> a reason I wrote
> above.
Yes, I did it, it was my idea to do
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
> Gurney Halleck wrote:
> > Srsly?!? Its better to censor Walters informative post because the Tango
> > Komintern
> > has no good retort?
> >
> > The dimwits tried to rewrite history once. They edited the title of Dons bug
> > rep
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:hrkp7r$30f...@digitalmars.com...
> Jeff Nowakowski wrote:
>> It looks like you finally broke down and violated your own stated
>> principles by deleting the posts of others (aside from spam) without
>> asking. As a reader of this newsgroup, I'm not so much
"Justin Spahr-Summers" wrote in message
news:mpg.26479be5b58cc3f9989...@news.digitalmars.com...
> On Sun, 02 May 2010 18:25:07 -0400, Jeff Nowakowski
> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/02/2010 05:01 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> >
>> > Yes, this is the one and only time I did that. Maybe it was a really
>> > b
Walter Bright wrote:
[...]
Clearly it is not possible to unring a bell, and bad manners to try. I
apologize.
Lars Ivar Douchegesund wrote:
What if my name really is Douchegesund? Does that make it illegal for me to
post?
No. Use whatever name you please.
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Lars Ivar Douchegesund wrote:
> > My post was deleted.
>
> I will restore it if you request, and this goes for anyone else in this
> thread.
> I apologize if I offended you by deleting this thread.
>
> Your post http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.d.phobos/359 remain
== Quote from Justin Spahr-Summers (justin.spahrsumm...@gmail.com)'s article
> On Sun, 02 May 2010 18:25:07 -0400, Jeff Nowakowski
> wrote:
> >
> > On 05/02/2010 05:01 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, this is the one and only time I did that. Maybe it was a really bad
> > > idea, and some
On Sun, 02 May 2010 18:25:07 -0400, Jeff Nowakowski
wrote:
>
> On 05/02/2010 05:01 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> >
> > Yes, this is the one and only time I did that. Maybe it was a really bad
> > idea, and something we can point to in the future as why it shouldn't be
> > done again.
> >
> > What d
On 05/02/2010 05:01 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Yes, this is the one and only time I did that. Maybe it was a really bad
idea, and something we can point to in the future as why it shouldn't be
done again.
What do you think?
I suppose you're asking "you" to the community, but anyways: Yes, it wa
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
> Lars Ivar Douchegesund wrote:
> > My post was deleted.
> I will restore it if you request, and this goes for anyone else in
this thread.
> I apologize if I offended you by deleting this thread.
> Your post http://thread.gmane.org/
Jeff Nowakowski wrote:
It looks like you finally broke down and violated your own stated
principles by deleting the posts of others (aside from spam) without
asking. As a reader of this newsgroup, I'm not so much offended as
surprised and disappointed. How many years has this newsgroup survived
On 05/02/2010 03:04 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Lars Ivar Douchegesund wrote:
My post was deleted.
I will restore it if you request, and this goes for anyone else in this
thread. I apologize if I offended you by deleting this thread.
It looks like you finally broke down and violated your own st
Gurney Halleck wrote:
== Quote from Bane (branimir.milosavlje...@gmail.com)'s article
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:hrgbo5$fv...@digitalmars.com...
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:hrgag4$cp...@digitalmars.com...
Jason House wrote:
It is my understandi
Lars Ivar Douchegesund wrote:
My post was deleted.
I will restore it if you request, and this goes for anyone else in this thread.
I apologize if I offended you by deleting this thread.
Your post http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.d.phobos/359 remains.
== Quote from Nick Sabalausky (a...@a.a)'s article
> "Bane" wrote in message
> news:hrk1oi$1o7...@digitalmars.com...
> > Gurney Halleck Wrote:
> >
> >> == Quote from Bane (branimir.milosavlje...@gmail.com)'s article
> >> > Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> >> > > "Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
> >> >
> I've read all the discussion, I think it's very clear (especially from
> Lars's mesage here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.d.phobos/359 )
> thst there's been absolutely no ego involved, by anyone, at all. The whole
> thing was all about Walter being told that it may be possible that
Bane wrote:
As I said, this Stalin thing is joke on efficiency and speed of action was
taken. Comparing Walther to Staling was not my intention.
No prob, I knew it was a joke .
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Bane wrote:
> > I meant on topic removal from DM newsgroup. I guess Walther did it, as he is
> > the one administering it, right? I support his decision for a reason I wrote
> > above.
>
> Yes, I did it, it was my idea to do so. I did it for the reason you suggest
> (not
Bane wrote:
I meant on topic removal from DM newsgroup. I guess Walther did it, as he is
the one administering it, right? I support his decision for a reason I wrote
above.
Yes, I did it, it was my idea to do so. I did it for the reason you suggest (not
the Stalin one!) but the one about letti
Gurney Halleck wrote:
Srsly?!? Its better to censor Walters informative post because the Tango
Komintern
has no good retort?
The dimwits tried to rewrite history once. They edited the title of Dons bug
report. They failed to explain that too. This time the truth is out there. Tango
leadership d
Bane wrote:
Joke aside, hot tempered discussion can't bring any good, so its better that
way.
It was removed at my suggestion. There was nothing underhanded about it, at
least not by anyone other than myself. It was my words, not anyone else's, so I
feel I had the right.
The point was, thi
"Bane" wrote in message
news:hrk1oi$1o7...@digitalmars.com...
> Gurney Halleck Wrote:
>
>> == Quote from Bane (branimir.milosavlje...@gmail.com)'s article
>> > Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
>> > > "Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
>> > > news:hrgbo5$fv...@digitalmars.com...
>> > > > "Walter Bright" w
Gurney Halleck Wrote:
> == Quote from Bane (branimir.milosavlje...@gmail.com)'s article
> > Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> > > "Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
> > > news:hrgbo5$fv...@digitalmars.com...
> > > > "Walter Bright" wrote in message
> > > > news:hrgag4$cp...@digitalmars.com...
> > > >> Ja
== Quote from Bane (branimir.milosavlje...@gmail.com)'s article
> Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> > "Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
> > news:hrgbo5$fv...@digitalmars.com...
> > > "Walter Bright" wrote in message
> > > news:hrgag4$cp...@digitalmars.com...
> > >> Jason House wrote:
> > >>> It is my und
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> "Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
> news:hrgbo5$fv...@digitalmars.com...
> > "Walter Bright" wrote in message
> > news:hrgag4$cp...@digitalmars.com...
> >> Jason House wrote:
> >>> It is my understanding that several Tango developers no longer follow
> >>> digitalmars
On 02/05/10 13:55, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:hrgbo5$fv...@digitalmars.com...
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:hrgag4$cp...@digitalmars.com...
Jason House wrote:
It is my understanding that several Tango developers no longer follow
digitalmars.D. I re
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:hrgbo5$fv...@digitalmars.com...
> "Walter Bright" wrote in message
> news:hrgag4$cp...@digitalmars.com...
>> Jason House wrote:
>>> It is my understanding that several Tango developers no longer follow
>>> digitalmars.D. I recommend posting to the Tango f
"Lars Ivar Douchegesund" wrote in message
news:hri1n3$187...@digitalmars.com...
> == Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
>> First off, I'm not a copyright lawyer, so my legal opinions are lay.
>> Secondly, every time D gets mentioned publicly, such as on reddit,
>> so
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
> First off, I'm not a copyright lawyer, so my legal opinions are lay.
> Secondly, every time D gets mentioned publicly, such as on reddit, someone
> posts
> that they won't use D because there are "two standard libraries" and "whe
For those Tango programmers not willing to change their license:
They are fucking programmer prima donnas. Tango should prune their work and
continue on without them. Too much good work is at hold because of legal bombs
they planted. Their contribution is clearly useless, even more, harmful.
A
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
> I received a call from the Tango representative yesterday saying that some
> developers expressed concern that SHOO's time library proposed submission to
> Phobos may have an "infraction" of the Tango BSD license. The word
> "infr
On 30/04/10 23:57, Walter Bright wrote:
2. Tango having 2 licenses for different parts will confuse people.
Actually, it would be 3 licenses, as tango is currently dual-licensed.
4. There were some other unspecified reservations.
I believe one of these was that gradually transitioning to bo
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:hrgag4$cp...@digitalmars.com...
> Jason House wrote:
>> It is my understanding that several Tango developers no longer follow
>> digitalmars.D. I recommend posting to the Tango forums.
>
> If anyone would like to repost my message initiating this thread in th
Jason House wrote:
It is my understanding that several Tango developers no longer follow
digitalmars.D. I recommend posting to the Tango forums.
If anyone would like to repost my message initiating this thread in the Tango
forums, feel free.
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Although I'm not really a Tango dev, I have submitted small patches of code
in tickets to Tango that did get included, and I've made a few changes to
the Wiki. I seriously doubt any of that has been significant enough to
qualify me as a developer that would need to give a
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:hrfn8q$262...@digitalmars.com...
>
> 2. Tango having 2 licenses for different parts will confuse people.
>
> This is a reasonable concern. My answer is that we can handle such
> confusion, as both BSD and Boost licenses are simple and well known. It's
> a l
It is my understanding that several Tango developers no longer follow
digitalmars.D. I recommend posting to the Tango forums.
I have been assuming the path of least resistance for D2 Tango was for Tango to
replace a few components with their druntime equivalent. That would allow Tango
and Phobo
First off, I'm not a copyright lawyer, so my legal opinions are lay.
Secondly, every time D gets mentioned publicly, such as on reddit, someone posts
that they won't use D because there are "two standard libraries" and "when will
D get its act together." This situation is deplorable.
Thirdly,
bearophile wrote:
I have tried to find Don's email address, but so far I have failed (and I have
not seen him on IRC d.tango), so I talk here, even if this isn't the best place.
You should post this kind of thing as a ticket in Tango.
I think this is the data representation of a Tango BigInt
I have tried to find Don's email address, but so far I have failed (and I have
not seen him on IRC d.tango), so I talk here, even if this isn't the best place.
I think this is the data representation of a Tango BigInt:
alias uint BigDigit;
const BigDigit[] ZERO = [0];
struct BigUint {
BigDigi
41 matches
Mail list logo
