I'm encouraged to see that every person in this thread so far seems to feel
the same way as me regarding the syntax.
On 14 March 2012 05:25, Derek Parnell ddparn...@bigpond.com wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:33:18 +1100, Kevin Cox kevincox...@gmail.com
wrote:
(int i,,float f) =
On Wednesday, 14 March 2012 at 02:33:29 UTC, Kevin Cox wrote:
Kind of unrelated but I think that it is important to have a
way to ignore
values also. Leaving them bank would sufice.
(int i,,float f) = intBoringFloat();
or
(int i, null, float f) = intBoringFloat();
or
(int i, void, float
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:52:55 -0500, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm encouraged to see that every person in this thread so far seems to feel
the same way as me regarding the syntax.
On 14 March 2012 05:25, Derek Parnell ddparn...@bigpond.com wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:33:18 +1100,
On 14 March 2012 15:17, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
But there's a reason we use /// instead of ⫻; we shouldn't require custom
keyboard mappings in order to program efficiently in D.
Hold that thought, I think you're missing a major franchising opportunity
right there...
D branded
On Wednesday, 14 March 2012 at 13:17:47 UTC, Robert Jacques wrote:
snip
But there's a reason we use /// instead of ⫻; we shouldn't
require custom keyboard mappings in order to program
efficiently in D.
Aren't we supposed to be moving towards more natural interfaces
in computing? I'm sure
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Let me put it another way: I don't see one syntax over another a deal
maker or deal breaker. At all.
I am usually able to follow threads, but this time I am a bit lost (this
discussion has mixed very different topics like ABIs, implementation efficiency
of tuples and
Maybe
[x, y] = func();
?
On Tuesday, 13 March 2012 at 22:26:14 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Let me put it another way: I don't see one syntax over another
a deal maker or deal breaker. At all.
I am usually able to follow threads, but this time I am a bit
lost (this discussion has mixed very different
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:33:18 +1100, Kevin Cox kevincox...@gmail.com
wrote:
Kind of unrelated but I think that it is important to have a way to
ignore
values also. Leaving them bank would sufice.
(int i,,float f) = intBoringFloat();
For what its worth, the Euphoria Programming Language
