This looks like a nice tool for those wanting to learn more about
WebAssembly:
https://mbebenita.github.io/WasmExplorer/
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 08:06:00AM +, Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[...]
> The general public has become more ignorant. I guess to a large extent
> because of information overflow and the downfall of real journalism
> (e.g. the old payment model is failing which means media is
On Thursday, 2 March 2017 at 19:52:58 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
At some point there will be a resistance movement, forking one
of the
main browsers and building in collaborative blacklisting etc.
I hope, but I'm skeptical. Big business is definitely headed
very 1984, but that's h
On 03/02/2017 04:18 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 18:28:00 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa)
wrote:
Well, it's Google's main domain, and they've kinda already settled
into a pattern of making decisions more on self-serving grounds than
for the good of the product/use
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 18:28:00 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
Well, it's Google's main domain, and they've kinda already
settled into a pattern of making decisions more on self-serving
grounds than for the good of the product/users. "Don't be evil"
doesn't exactly set a very hig
On 03/01/2017 05:15 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
So, maybe the conclusion is: don't let corporations create technology
standards in their main domain, because then they try to create
monopolies and start misbehaving. Browsers is a side-line tech, so...
this might have a chance..?
Well, it'
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 09:00:42 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
If we could invent a technical way to screw over, underminine,
and completely replace corporate interests, it would be the
single greatest achievement in computing (not to mention
economic theory), EVER.
I bet Intel
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 08:56:37 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 03/01/2017 03:47 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 08:01:41 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
I'm not so up-to-date about the mechanics of WebAssembly, but
it would
be pretty exciting to run D cod
On 03/01/2017 03:46 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 21:50:11 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
What a long, roundabout path we've taken to end up back where we
started: shipping binaries in a sandboxed environment.
Portable object-files is something that that people have
On 03/01/2017 03:47 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 08:01:41 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
I'm not so up-to-date about the mechanics of WebAssembly, but it would
be pretty exciting to run D code in the browser.
Is this now possible or have I completely misunderstood what
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 08:01:41 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
I'm not so up-to-date about the mechanics of WebAssembly, but
it would be pretty exciting to run D code in the browser.
Is this now possible or have I completely misunderstood what
WebAssembly allows for?
It should be possible, a
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 21:50:11 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
What a long, roundabout path we've taken to end up back where
we started: shipping binaries in a sandboxed environment.
Portable object-files is something that that people have tried to
achieve since the 1980s, but vendors have
I'm not so up-to-date about the mechanics of WebAssembly, but it
would be pretty exciting to run D code in the browser.
Is this now possible or have I completely misunderstood what
WebAssembly allows for?
On 02/28/2017 11:26 PM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
On 02/28/2017 10:28 PM, Joakim wrote:
What is the alternative you prefer: javascript and its myriad
vulnerabilities?
Probably shipping binaries in a sandboxed environment...but, you know,
*without* the browser community badly reinventin
On 02/28/2017 10:28 PM, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 21:50:11 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 18:04:39 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
[...]
What a long, roundabout path we've taken to end up back where we
started: shipping binaries in a sandboxed en
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 21:50:11 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 18:04:39 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
[...]
What a long, roundabout path we've taken to end up back where
we started: shipping binaries in a sandboxed environment.
What is the alternative y
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 18:04:39 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
«WebAssembly CG members representing four browsers, Chrome,
Edge, Firefox,
and WebKit, have reached consensus that the design of the
initial (MVP [1])
WebAssembly API and binary format is complete to the extent
that no fur
«WebAssembly CG members representing four browsers, Chrome, Edge,
Firefox,
and WebKit, have reached consensus that the design of the initial
(MVP [1])
WebAssembly API and binary format is complete to the extent that
no further
design work is possible without implementation experience and
signif
18 matches
Mail list logo
