Hi! Thanks for the feedback, I'll have a go at fixing the
problems. As for IE issues, I only tested it with IE9. As for the
older IE versions, well, developers are the target users of the
documentation. And they are usually tech savvy people so I would
expect that they use reasonably up to date
On Wednesday, 11 April 2012 at 16:23:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Generic-Programming-Galore-Using-D
Andrei
Also on HN: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3829871
CandyDOC has not been updated for about 6 years, and despite its
usefulness its current state was rather sad. Overall look was
awful; colours, font sizes, everything just was not right. D
allows some very beautiful code, but the look and feel of
documentation is not on par. Anyway, I gave it a
This was in reply to http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.d.announce/5763 .
I
should probably start use a proper client instead of web-interface for replying
to
these news groups.
Come on, this thread gives us a great excuse!
In Soviet Russia stuff gets you!
Отличные
новости!
Тем не менее,
многие
согласятся
со мной что
при должном
владении
английским
языком,
технические
книги лучше
читать в
оригинале. Но
русский
перевод
будет
отличным
выходом для
многих
программистов,
которые еще
не так хорошо
знают
технический
английский.
dsimcha Wrote:
> Interesting, though from looking at your SimplePlot code and browsing the Qwt
> website, it looks like Qwt was designed much more as a set of low-level
> mechanisms
> with the "everything must be possible" philosophy.
>
> dflplot was designed more with the goal of being as easy
When I saw David's announcement this morning, I remembered that he brought up
this topic
sometime ago(about half-year I think) and I promised to have a look at wrapping
Qwt (http://
qwt.sourceforge.net/) as a part of QtD after we make next release. We never
released the next
version of QtD (as u
Daniel Keep Wrote:
> ... skipped
How is that an overreaction? I entirely understand Steve. He did some work and
now because of the licensing crap another person isn't allowed even to be
inspired by Steve's code, although he doesn't mind it at all. That's why he is
frustrated and reluctant to
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
> I've managed to build Tango as a dynamic library with DMD on Mac OS X. I
> had some problems first but I managed to solve them and everything seems
> to work now.
>
> What I had to do to build it as a dynamic library was:
>
> Resolve the undefined symbol _Dmain.
>
> Re
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > Jerry Quinn Wrote:
> >
> >> [also posted to D.gnu]
> >>
> >> Hi, folks,
> >>
> >> I'm interested in creating a D front end for GCC that would be part of the
> >>
Jerry Quinn Wrote:
> [also posted to D.gnu]
>
> Hi, folks,
>
> I'm interested in creating a D front end for GCC that would be part of the
> GCC codebase. My feeling is that a GDC that is part of GCC distributions
> will likely have more life than one that must be updated whenever a new GCC
>
Matthias Pleh Wrote:
> Stephan schrieb:
> > I dunno if anyone knew this before but i wanted to give my kudos to a
> > guy that did a lot for the D community by developing the still best
> > debugger for the D Programming Language Ddbg
> > (http://ddbg.mainia.de/releases.html)
> >
> > The quest
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> "Eldar Insafutdinov" wrote in message
> news:hj2njd$o1...@digitalmars.com...
> >
> > Having a solid GDC implementation you can be sure that it will be included
> > in distributions (Debian had GDC for quite a long time).
>
> &
bearophile Wrote:
> Jerry Quinn:
> > I'm interested in creating a D front end for GCC that would be part of the
> > GCC codebase.
>
> What about helping LDC devs create a good D2 implementation instead? It's
> probably 1/5 or 1/10 of the work you think about, because lot of work is
> already d
Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
> Walter Bright Wrote:
>
> > Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > > This patch is no longer relevant. Here is the patch
> > > http://pastebin.com/m1bed188d that fixes compiling QtD with the
> > > current dmd (I also have to apply a pa
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > This patch is no longer relevant. Here is the patch
> > http://pastebin.com/m1bed188d that fixes compiling QtD with the
> > current dmd (I also have to apply a patch from #3600). However I
> > cannot really file a bug
Walter Bright Wrote:
> digited wrote:
> > Walter Bright Wrote:
> >
> >> Fixes the Tango build breaks.
> >
> > With RC's, you'll never need this.
>
> I put out a beta to the people who have asked to be on the beta
> announcement list, and nobody (other than Don) gave any feedback on it.
> If y
Leandro Lucarella Wrote:
> Moritz Warning, el 3 de enero a las 15:25 me escribiste:
> > On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 10:22:02 -0500, Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> >
> > > Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
> > >
> > >> Walter Bright Wrote:
Moritz Warning Wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 10:22:02 -0500, Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
>
> > Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
> >
> >> Walter Bright Wrote:
> >>
> >> > Fixes the Tango build breaks.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> &g
Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
> Walter Bright Wrote:
>
> > Fixes the Tango build breaks.
> >
> >
> > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> > http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.055.zip
> >
> >
> > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/c
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Fixes the Tango build breaks.
>
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.055.zip
>
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.039.zip
And thank's a lot for this release. I was fina
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Fixes the Tango build breaks.
>
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.055.zip
>
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.039.zip
Could something be done about this one
http:/
dsimcha Wrote:
> == Quote from Eldar Insafutdinov (e.insafutdi...@gmail.com)'s article
> > dsimcha Wrote:
> > > Plotting. I've considered doing this a few times, but I've decided it
> > > needs to be
> > > put off until D2 is stable and the GUI
dsimcha Wrote:
> Plotting. I've considered doing this a few times, but I've decided it needs
> to be
> put off until D2 is stable and the GUI toolkits for it are reasonably stable.
> One
> layer of instability (D2 itself) is workable, but two layers (D2 and the GUI
> libs)
> is not.
>
It wo
Jeremie Pelletier Wrote:
> Lutger wrote:
> > Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
> >
> >> watching wrote:
> >>> what a pityful sate d is in. this probably shows, that you can't use d
> >>> for anything serious and by the time you guys are through discussing
> >>> things, people will be using something diffe
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > Why not changing object format instead and using format acceptable by
> > the linker from MinGW suit? That could free you from rewriting the
> > linker in C, then in D and then maintaining it. Are there any
> > diff
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Optlink is written entirely in rather impenetrable assembler code, and
> is resistant to understanding and modification. Hence, over the last few
> months I've been very slowly converting it to C, function by function.
>
> One might ask, why not convert it to D? The answe
digited Wrote:
> Walter Bright Wrote:
>
> > The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
> > blocking QtD and Tango.
> >
> > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> > http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
> >
> >
> > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/ch
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Rainer Schuetze wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the problem is related to a change that was probably done to improve
> >
> > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1170
> >
> > see my comments there for more details.
>
> I checked into svn a compiler change folding in your
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > Despite the application of #3301 patch that fixed compilation of QtD,
> > the new release introduces a new regression, that causes the compiler
> > to hang while compiling it. This release therefore remains broken.
>
&g
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Folding in patches to compiler faults from bugzilla.
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.049.zip
>
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.034.zip
>
> Many thanks to the num
Robert Jacques Wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 04:40:51 -0400, Robert Jacques
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:45:44 -0400, Robert Jacques
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for yet another great release, but.. has anyone else gotten DFL
> >> to compile? (The latest svn of DFL worked fine in 2.
Tomas Lindquist Olsen Wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> wrote:
> > Eldar Insadutdinov Wrote:
> >
> >> Another release of QtD is out. This time, it's Linux-only because OPTLINK
> >> refuses to link the project with
Eldar Insadutdinov Wrote:
> Another release of QtD is out. This time, it's Linux-only because OPTLINK
> refuses to link the project with debug info on Windows (see bug
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2436). If anybody wants QtD on
> Windows, please keep pushing Walter until he d
Georg Wrede Wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first
> > implementation of signals and slots(thanks to great people from #d)
> > which means that you can actually start doing something useful. 0.1
> > i
Lars Ivar Igesund Wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
>
> > We faced a bug that module static constructors don't work with cyclic
> > imports. Currently it's fixed with a dirty hack which is not really
> > acceptable. Is there any chance for this to be fixed?
>
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > Now we have to make a manual init function called from class
> > constructors. I understand that allowing static consructors with
> > cyclic imports will make order of their execution undefined, but this
> >
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> > wrote:
> >> We faced a bug that module static constructors don't work with
> >> cyclic imports. Currently it's fixed with a dirty hack which
We faced a bug that module static constructors don't work with cyclic imports.
Currently it's fixed with a dirty hack which is not really acceptable. Is there
any chance for this to be fixed?
We found out that while compiling qtd with dmd 1.038 and newer compiler hangs.
ldc is also affected by this issue. which means that this is frontend bug.
testcase is big of course. What are the possible options to solve this issue?
Bill Baxter Wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> wrote:
> > qtd now works for windows. Here's the binary package
> > http://qtd.googlecode.com/files/qtd-dmd-tango-win32.zip . It is compiled
> > with dmd 1.036 and tango from trunk dated
qtd now works for windows. Here's the binary package
http://qtd.googlecode.com/files/qtd-dmd-tango-win32.zip . It is compiled with
dmd 1.036 and tango from trunk dated November 2008.
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows. But at the very last
> > step when compiling example, optlink crashed with a messagebox
> > containing X86 registers content. This seems to be a blocker for qtd
> > wor
Don Wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > Bill Baxter Wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> >> wrote:
> >>> Bill Baxter Wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Eldar Insafutdino
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> wrote:
> >> The reason why is this file is big is in this bug
> >> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282 And I don't thing that
> >> placing enums outside the cl
Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
> Max Samukha Wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:55:58 +0900, Bill Baxter
> > wrote:
> >
> > >On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Max Samukha
> > > wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:06:46 -0500, Eldar Insafutdi
Max Samukha Wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:55:58 +0900, Bill Baxter
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Max Samukha
> > wrote:
> >> On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:06:46 -0500, Eldar Insafutdinov
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Finally we m
Bill Baxter Wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> wrote:
> > Bill Baxter Wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> >> wrote:
> >> > Bill Baxter Wrote:
> >> >
> >>
Bill Baxter Wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> wrote:
> > Bill Baxter Wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> >> wrote:
> >> > Bill Baxter Wrote:
> >> >
> >>
Bill Baxter Wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> wrote:
> > Bill Baxter Wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> >> wrote:
> >> > Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows. But at t
Bill Baxter Wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> wrote:
> > Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows. But at the very last step
> > when compiling example, optlink crashed with a messagebox containing X86
> > registers content. This seems
Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows. But at the very last step when
compiling example, optlink crashed with a messagebox containing X86 registers
content. This seems to be a blocker for qtd working on windows..
Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
> This way won't really work because there are dozens of such a functions -
> that's for virtual dispatch. I have just solved it by declaring functions
> "export extern (C)" and adding "_" prefix to function name when calling
>
Mike Parker Wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > naryl Wrote:
> >
> >> Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
> >>> I'm thinking on putting only C++ part of binding to a dll, while
> >>> statically link D part. With Qt 4.5 out under lgpl we can make Q
Max Samukha Wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:48:07 -0500, Eldar Insafutdinov
> wrote:
>
> >Bill Baxter Wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> >> wrote:
> >> > Bill Baxter Wrote:
> >> >
> >&g
Bill Baxter Wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> wrote:
> > Bill Baxter Wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> >> wrote:
> >> > Can somebody help me with exporting functions from a
Bill Baxter Wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> wrote:
> > Can somebody help me with exporting functions from a DLL? I am defining
> > functions in C++ like
> > extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) void* __qtd_QObject_QObject_QObject(ar
Bill Baxter Wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> wrote:
> > Can somebody help me with exporting functions from a DLL? I am defining
> > functions in C++ like
> > extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) void* __qtd_QObject_QObject_QObject(ar
Can somebody help me with exporting functions from a DLL? I am defining
functions in C++ like
extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) void* __qtd_QObject_QObject_QObject(args)
After compiling a DLL with MINGW and producing a lib file for it with implib I
am trying to use them from D.
In D I declare them
naryl Wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
> > I'm thinking on putting only C++ part of binding to a dll, while statically
> > link D part. With Qt 4.5 out under lgpl we can make QtD under BSD, so this
> > will work.
>
> You mean the Revised BSD License I presum
Don Wrote:
> John Reimer wrote:
> > Hello Eldar,
> >
> >> Bill Baxter Wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Denis Koroskin Wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> wrote:
> > Denis Koroskin Wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:59:28 +0300, Eldar Insafutdinov
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > ideage Wrote:
> >&
Denis Koroskin Wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:59:28 +0300, Eldar Insafutdinov
> wrote:
>
> > ideage Wrote:
> >
> >> Great stuff!
> >>
> >> Expect window's version!
> >>
> >>
> > So after some time trying to build qt
Bill Baxter Wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> wrote:
> > ideage Wrote:
> >
> >> Great stuff!
> >>
> >> Expect window's version!
> >>
> >>
> > So after some time trying to build qtd windows
ideage Wrote:
> Great stuff!
>
> Expect window's version!
>
>
So after some time trying to build qtd windows packages I realized that there
are huge issues. I tried first dmd and since I have to link D part of wrapper
with C++ object files produced by mingw - it didnt work and I was told tha
grauzone Wrote:
> Do I see correctly, that you didn't need to introduce a MOC compiler for
> D? And that the Signal and Slots implementation is written in pure D?
Yes. But it is limited. No information, no dynamic invokation, different type
of connections not implemented(but this theoretically
Chris Nicholson-Sauls Wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first implementation
> > of signals and slots(thanks to great people from #d) which means that you
> > can actually start doing something useful. 0.1
ideage Wrote:
> Great stuff!
>
> Expect window's version!
>
>
I will probably do it in couple of weeks. Don't have time now :(
David Ferenczi Wrote:
> I'm glad to see this release and the progress of qtd!
>
> Coudl you please provide a link to the tutrial? Many thanks!
>
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
>
> > It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first
> > imple
Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
> It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first implementation
> of signals and slots(thanks to great people from #d) which means that you can
> actually start doing something useful. 0.1 is probably most suitable tag for
> this rel
It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first implementation of
signals and slots(thanks to great people from #d) which means that you can
actually start doing something useful. 0.1 is probably most suitable tag for
this release. Again - see tutorials for how to use signals.
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > The main issue is that signals and slots and therefore event-handling
> > in toolkit is not implemented. So it means that it is not really
> > useful right now. But still we decide that it will be better than
> >
Added some screenshots.
http://code.google.com/p/qtd/wiki/Screenshots
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > 2 month passed since the work on Qt binding started and we got first
> > results now.
>
> I think that's awesome news! Quick question - are you using D1, D2, or
> both for compiling?
>
> Andrei
D1
ed to support Qt perfectly without
> MOC.
>
> --bb
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> wrote:
> > 2 month passed since the work on Qt binding started and we got first
> > results now. There are about 130 classes that work now or I better say
&g
h the binding itself.
Thank you, best regards.
Eldar Insafutdinov
78 matches
Mail list logo
