On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
This isn't a re
On 10/12/2013 3:20 PM, Tourist wrote:
I'm wondering whether there will be the nifty changelog like it was for 2.063?
It only awaits someone to write it!
I started on it here:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/391
Here are the relevant links:
http://d.puremagic.com/is
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
This isn't a re
On Sunday, 13 October 2013 at 01:26:39 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
The sizes of Phobos binaries increased by a third for every OS
except FreeBSD, which seems to have remained the same (created
17 Feb 2013). Aside from the FreeBSD case which is most likely
a bug, is that an expected increase, or
13-Oct-2013 05:29, Ivan Kazmenko пишет:
On Sunday, 13 October 2013 at 01:26:39 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
The sizes of Phobos binaries increased by a third for every OS except
FreeBSD, which seems to have remained the same (created 17 Feb 2013).
Aside from the FreeBSD case which is most likely a
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
I found 2 issues:
1) Compile time almost doubled. Tested on vibe.d
28 seconds - dmd 2.063 + updated snn.lib
52 seconds - dmd 2.064 beta
2) Regression - After building vibe.d as a l
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
This isn't a re
On Sunday, October 13, 2013 11:27:12 Namespace wrote:
> DIP 37 causes problems:
> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/qlrfzafudnfuialnj...@forum.dlang.org#post-utjv
> lygdigsxtkgpfcny:40forum.dlang.org
Then report the bug and mark it as a regression if it works with the previous
release: http://d.purem
On Sunday, 13 October 2013 at 09:44:23 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, October 13, 2013 11:27:12 Namespace wrote:
DIP 37 causes problems:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/qlrfzafudnfuialnj...@forum.dlang.org#post-utjv
lygdigsxtkgpfcny:40forum.dlang.org
Then report the bug and mark it as a
Found one issue :
A call to std.functional.memoize crashes with the following error:
object.Error: TypeInfo.compare is not implemented
./rossignol(const(pure nothrow @trusted int
function(const(void*), const(void*)))
object.TypeInfo_Struct.compare+0x3a) [0x89b3032]
./rossigno
On 10/13/2013 4:01 AM, Olivier Pisano wrote:
Found one issue :
A call to std.functional.memoize crashes with the following error:
object.Error: TypeInfo.compare is not implemented
./rossignol(const(pure nothrow @trusted int function(const(void*),
const(void*))) object.TypeInfo_
Am 13.10.2013 00:16, schrieb Walter Bright:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
This zip does not contain the latest version of Optlink.
The one at http://ftp.digitalmars.com/optlink.zip seems to be newer.
Kind Regards
Benjamin Thaut
On 10/14/2013 12:50 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Am 13.10.2013 00:16, schrieb Walter Bright:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
This zip does not contain the latest version of Optlink.
The one at http://ftp.digitalmars.com/optlink.zip seems to be newer.
That one is dated 04-10-13, while th
Am 14.10.2013 10:59, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 10/14/2013 12:50 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Am 13.10.2013 00:16, schrieb Walter Bright:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
This zip does not contain the latest version of Optlink.
The one at http://ftp.digitalmars.com/optlink.zip seems to be
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
> My bad. German dates... We write the the day first then the month and then
> the year.
>
Americans seem to read dates as "October 14th, 2013" which is way they
write numeric dates in such an odd way :D.
Since I realized that is the reason
Am 13.10.2013 00:16, schrieb Walter Bright:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
This isn't a release candidate, in pa
Am 14.10.2013 15:14, schrieb Benjamin Thaut:
Am 13.10.2013 00:16, schrieb Walter Bright:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=RE
On 10/14/2013 04:59 AM, Rory McGuire wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Benjamin Thaut mailto:c...@benjamin-thaut.de>> wrote:
My bad. German dates... We write the the day first then the month
and then the year.
Americans seem to read dates as "October 14th, 2013" which is way the
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 10:00:01 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Benjamin Thaut
wrote:
My bad. German dates... We write the the day first then the
month and then
the year.
Americans seem to read dates as "October 14th, 2013" which is
way they
write numeri
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 13:25:23 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
I'm also getting random missing symbol linker errors with both
dmd 2.063.2 and dmd 2.064. But only on 32-bit windows. On
64-bit windows it works fine.
This is really frustrating...
I've encountered this too. I'll try to reduce,
On 10/14/2013 6:25 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
I'm also getting random missing symbol linker errors with both dmd 2.063.2 and
dmd 2.064. But only on 32-bit windows. On 64-bit windows it works fine.
This is really frustrating...
Is it possible you are linking together code compiled with different
On 10/14/2013 2:35 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
My bad. German dates... We write the the day first then the month and then the
year.
Yah, that is terribly confusing, especially considering the global intarnets.
I tend to write dates as year-month-day, that way they sort properly in a
directory l
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 19:17:25 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
*BOTH* of you write dates in an odd way.
http://xkcd.com/1179/
Amen. ISO 8601 FTW.
The Japanese got it correct natively though. It's year, then
month then day, seperated either by explicit 年月日 (year, month,
day), or by "/" or "-". A
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 21:21:29 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 19:17:25 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
*BOTH* of you write dates in an odd way.
http://xkcd.com/1179/
Amen. ISO 8601 FTW.
The Japanese got it correct natively though. It's year, then
month then day, seperat
On Monday, October 14, 2013 14:18:33 Walter Bright wrote:
> On 10/14/2013 2:35 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
> > My bad. German dates... We write the the day first then the month and then
> > the year.
>
> Yah, that is terribly confusing, especially considering the global
> intarnets.
>
> I tend to w
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 21:18:32 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Yah, that is terribly confusing, especially considering the
global intarnets.
I get bitten by it locally too: if there's a test with an
inaccurate sql query with time formatted as string, the sql
server doesn't always compute it
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 04:41:13 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 21:18:32 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Yah, that is terribly confusing, especially considering the
global intarnets.
I get bitten by it locally too: if there's a test with an
inaccurate sql query with time f
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
This isn't a re
On 2013-10-15 07:16, deadalnix wrote:
This is for that very reason that I prefers to work with timestamps UTC
as much as possible. No timzone hell, no format hell, no nothing. Just
convert from user input directly, and convert back to text just before
output.
Agree. Always work with universal
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:13:25 +0200
"monarch_dodra" wrote:
> On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 13:25:23 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
> > I'm also getting random missing symbol linker errors with both
> > dmd 2.063.2 and dmd 2.064. But only on 32-bit windows. On
> > 64-bit windows it works fine.
> > Th
On 2013-10-13 00:16, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
Another one: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11268
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Am 14.10.2013 23:19, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 10/14/2013 6:25 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
I'm also getting random missing symbol linker errors with both dmd
2.063.2 and
dmd 2.064. But only on 32-bit windows. On 64-bit windows it works fine.
This is really frustrating...
Is it possible you are l
On 10/15/2013 1:50 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Am 14.10.2013 23:19, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 10/14/2013 6:25 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
I'm also getting random missing symbol linker errors with both dmd
2.063.2 and
dmd 2.064. But only on 32-bit windows. On 64-bit windows it works fine.
This is re
Am 15.10.2013 11:25, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 10/15/2013 1:50 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Am 14.10.2013 23:19, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 10/14/2013 6:25 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
I'm also getting random missing symbol linker errors with both dmd
2.063.2 and
dmd 2.064. But only on 32-bit windows
On 10/13/13, Tourist wrote:
> I'm wondering whether there will be the nifty changelog like it
> was for 2.063?
> Andrej? :D
We'll see if someone else volunteers to do it. I'm not doing it out of protest.
On 10/15/13 7:15 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/13/13, Tourist wrote:
I'm wondering whether there will be the nifty changelog like it
was for 2.063?
Andrej? :D
We'll see if someone else volunteers to do it. I'm not doing it out of protest.
What are you protesting against?
Andrei
On 10/16/13, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> What are you protesting against?
Walter.
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
This isn't a re
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 13:34:04 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 10/16/13, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
What are you protesting against?
Walter.
The last change log was awesome.
I vote to get rid of Walter. :)
On 10/16/13 6:33 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/16/13, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
What are you protesting against?
Walter.
That's not a what, that's a who. Would you please elaborate on the what and why? I haven't seen
any obstructionism coming from anyone in terms of repeating the pre
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 20:19:17 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
That's not a what, that's a who. Would you please elaborate on
the what and why? I haven't seen any obstructionism coming
from anyone in terms of repeating the previous style for this
releases notes.
Originally Walter thou
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 22:28:41 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 20:19:17 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
> > That's not a what, that's a who. Would you please elaborate on
> > the what and why? I haven't seen any obstructionism coming
> > from anyone in terms of repeating
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 20:28:42 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 20:19:17 UTC, Brad Roberts
wrote:
That's not a what, that's a who. Would you please elaborate
on the what and why? I haven't seen any obstructionism coming
from anyone in terms of repeating
On 10/16/13 2:16 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 22:28:41 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 20:19:17 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
That's not a what, that's a who. Would you please elaborate on
the what and why? I haven't seen any obstructionism coming
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 20:28:42 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 20:19:17 UTC, Brad Roberts
wrote:
That's not a what, that's a who. Would you please elaborate
on the what and why? I haven't seen any obstructionism coming
from anyone in terms of repeating
On 10/16/2013 6:33 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/16/13, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
What are you protesting against?
Walter.
I'll go have myself flogged, then.
Walter Bright:
I'll go have myself flogged, then.
But please be gentle and use something soft, like a fake snow
leopard tail:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v310/musta.surma/Hpim4850.jpg
Bye,
bearophile
On 17 Oct 2013 00:40, "bearophile" wrote:
>
> Walter Bright:
>
>
>> I'll go have myself flogged, then.
>
>
> But please be gentle and use something soft, like a fake snow leopard
tail:
Surely having to deal with c++ whenever Walter works on dmd is punishment
enough :D.
On 2013-10-16 23:16, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Yes, but after Andej did the great changelog for 2.063, Walter publicly
admitted that he had been wrong about the changelog. Andrej showed Walter that
it _is_ worth doing something more than just a list of bugzilla issues. So, I
would assume that what
On 10/16/13, Brad Roberts wrote:
> That's not a what, that's a who.
- We do not have any vision or major plans ahead for the language.
Currently we're stuck in a bug-driven development environment, where
bugs are arbitrarily picked off of bugzilla and fixed. But there's no
major plans ahead, e.g.
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 17:41:37 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Hum I have several regression is SDC's test suite. I have to
investigate more to fix the code or submit bug report. It looks
related to AA. What are the changes that affect AA in this new
release ?
It turns out that is is a closu
On 2013-10-17 22:35, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
- Walter is still not tagging the beta releases by the file name (it's
always dmd2beta.zip). I've complained about this several times and
IIRC someone else did as well at dconf (maybe I'm remembering wrong
though). They should at least be named as "dmd
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 04:14:59 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 17:41:37 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Hum I have several regression is SDC's test suite. I have to
investigate more to fix the code or submit bug report. It
looks related to AA. What are the changes that affe
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 06:36:43 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-10-17 22:35, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
- Walter is still not tagging the beta releases by the file
name (it's
always dmd2beta.zip). I've complained about this several times
and
IIRC someone else did as well at dconf (maybe
On 10/17/2013 11:45 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Also, when NOT using the unittest flag, a lot of my code do not compile, symbol
_D6object15__T7reserveTyaZ7reserveFNaNbNeKAyamZm is missing.
See:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11284
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 07:21:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/17/2013 11:45 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Also, when NOT using the unittest flag, a lot of my code do
not compile, symbol
_D6object15__T7reserveTyaZ7reserveFNaNbNeKAyamZm is missing.
See:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.c
On 10/18/13, eles wrote:
> IIRC, Walter wanted that file to always be named dmd.zip or
> dmd2.zip or whatever, in order to allow a permanent download
> link, while guaranteeing the file to be the latest version of the
> tool.
This is the wrong approach. There should be a "latest_beta" file which
On 10/18/13 7:08 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/18/13, eles wrote:
IIRC, Walter wanted that file to always be named dmd.zip or
dmd2.zip or whatever, in order to allow a permanent download
link, while guaranteeing the file to be the latest version of the
tool.
This is the wrong approach. The
Am 18.10.2013 09:33, schrieb deadalnix:
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 07:21:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/17/2013 11:45 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Also, when NOT using the unittest flag, a lot of my code do not
compile, symbol
_D6object15__T7reserveTyaZ7reserveFNaNbNeKAyamZm is missing.
See:
On Friday, October 18, 2013 08:57:00 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > Speaking of which, insisting on using .zip files is another beef I
> > have with Walter. The whole "everyone on Windows is stuck in the 90s"
> > mentality is plain wrong, especially for programmers. 7zip (or Peazip
> > or whatever)
On 10/18/13, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I don't think that makes a large difference. Probably the better thing
> to do is trimming the contents of the archive.
Right, but this is more general. He also dislikes non-zip archives in
bugzilla attachments.
On 18 Oct 2013 19:45, "Jonathan M Davis" wrote:
>
> On Friday, October 18, 2013 08:57:00 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > > Speaking of which, insisting on using .zip files is another beef I
> > > have with Walter. The whole "everyone on Windows is stuck in the 90s"
> > > mentality is plain wrong, e
This is a good list of things that we could and should improve. Getting
all minded to perfection would be difficult, but definitely worth living
into.
I appreciate your enthusiasm for and involvement in D. At the top level
a few simple realities need to be understood.
First, there is no OSS
On 10/18/2013 12:33 AM, deadalnix wrote:
I highly doubt that this fit into cases 1 to 4 as you mention. I'll however
double check with that in mind.
I want to know about any other cases, so please investigate.
That also doesn't explain why I get a closure bug (frame pointer or frame
content
On 10/18/2013 11:17 AM, Rory McGuire wrote:
Does it even support executable permissions?
Yes, it does.
On 18 Oct 2013 21:00, "Walter Bright" wrote:
>
> On 10/18/2013 11:17 AM, Rory McGuire wrote:
>>
>> Does it even support executable permissions?
>
>
> Yes, it does.
>
Nice. It's there any particular reason you prefer zip?
I guess it's irrelevant what the current format is if we start using Nick's
b
I get bitten by it locally too: if there's a test with an
inaccurate sql query with time formatted as string, the sql
server doesn't always compute it, because the default
"human-readable" time format is taken from the current locale,
and to parse it one first has to guess the format itself,
On 10/18/2013 12:14 PM, Rory McGuire wrote:
Nice. It's there any particular reason you prefer zip?
It's easy and works on all platforms.
I also point out that, for all platforms supported, when we do a release we also
build a custom download package for each platform in that platform's prefer
On 10/18/13, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> nobody has the time and inclination to actually _be_ the
> build czar (which is entirely understandable).
Building something should be a command on the command-line. The whole
issue is about currently having a person in place of a tool.
> You yourself di
On 10/18/2013 1:29 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
But I hope you understand this isn't really about you or Walter not
doing these things yourself, but rather the fact that you didn't seem
to recognize this as being a problem. I've mentioned the build/release
issue many times, and now we finally have
On Friday, October 18, 2013 15:31:05 Walter Bright wrote:
> We do need a Build Czar, because the install builds break every time, due to
> things like failure to update the manifests, new build targets, new
> features, etc. Somebody has to be responsible for getting all the scripts
> tested and wor
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 20:29:29 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/18/13, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
As a simple start, did you consider announcing the beta
yourself?
I didn't, because I disliked the current model and tied my
hands when
I saw the new beta was out due to the sum of frus
Am Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:45:27 -0700
schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu :
> > - We do not have any defined release timeline. When is it time to
> > start prepping for a release? It's up to Walter's arbitrary decision
> > for when this happens, he doesn't even talk to the community or
> > contributors on w
Am 18.10.2013 20:45, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
Walter and I frequently think of ways to gently steer people toward
working on specific items. Votes, categorization, discussions are of
limited impact. On occasion we've emailed major contributors directly
and asked politely but point blank if th
On Oct 18, 2013 3:09 PM, "Andrej Mitrovic"
wrote:
>
> On 10/18/13, eles wrote:
> > IIRC, Walter wanted that file to always be named dmd.zip or
> > dmd2.zip or whatever, in order to allow a permanent download
> > link, while guaranteeing the file to be the latest version of the
> > tool.
>
> This
On Oct 18, 2013 7:45 PM, "Andrei Alexandrescu" <
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
>
> Walter scrambled to implement UDAs in a rush and breaking protocol in
order to win a corporate D user, Remedy Games. It was a major, exceptional
event. Would you have preferred the protocol to have been follo
On Oct 19, 2013 10:11 AM, "Johannes Pfau" wrote:
>
> Am Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:45:27 -0700
> schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu :
>
> > > - We do not have any defined release timeline. When is it time to
> > > start prepping for a release? It's up to Walter's arbitrary decision
> > > for when this happens,
On 19 October 2013 21:29, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> On Oct 18, 2013 7:45 PM, "Andrei Alexandrescu" <
> seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
> >
> > Walter scrambled to implement UDAs in a rush and breaking protocol in
> order to win a corporate D user, Remedy Games. It was a major, exceptional
> ev
On 20 October 2013 07:06, Manu wrote:
> On 19 October 2013 21:29, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Oct 18, 2013 7:45 PM, "Andrei Alexandrescu"
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Walter scrambled to implement UDAs in a rush and breaking protocol in
>> > order to win a corporate D user, Remedy Games. It was a majo
On Saturday, 19 October 2013 at 11:39:08 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> It has been about 3 months since the last release of the D
> front-end implementation. Three years experience and
> carrying
> out over 100 merges into GDC tells me that each time the
> development cycle starts edging towards i
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 18 de October a las 11:45 me escribiste:
> >- We do not have any defined release timeline. When is it time to
> >start prepping for a release? It's up to Walter's arbitrary decision
> >for when this happens, he doesn't even talk to the community or
> >contributors on whether
Why not just copy what Linus does with the Linux kernel. Different people
in charge of different parts of the compiler. Pull requests should go to
the correct person, who then makes a pull request that goes to the main
line.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> Andrei Al
On 22 October 2013 08:35, Rory McGuire wrote:
> Why not just copy what Linus does with the Linux kernel. Different people in
> charge of different parts of the compiler. Pull requests should go to the
> correct person, who then makes a pull request that goes to the main line.
>
>
The thing is, t
Beta 3:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.beta.3.zip
On 24 October 2013 02:29, Walter Bright wrote:
> Beta 3:
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.beta.3.zip
I suppose I better start opening a branch in gdc for the new release
--
Iain Buclaw
*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
On 24 October 2013 07:44, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 24 October 2013 02:29, Walter Bright wrote:
>> Beta 3:
>>
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.beta.3.zip
>
>
> I suppose I better start opening a branch in gdc for the new release
>
>
Noticed this in meld, the readme.txt file is different
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
It is a specific reason why this is kept?:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ohduisigpwdiqhpde...@forum.dlang.org#post-btwbpwgluzyxmhphwebp:40forum.dlang.org
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
And the famou
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 13:24:12 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW
On 10/25/2013 6:15 AM, eles wrote:
It is a specific reason why this is kept?:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ohduisigpwdiqhpde...@forum.dlang.org#post-btwbpwgluzyxmhphwebp:40forum.dlang.org
Breaking peoples' build scripts and makefiles is not nice :-)
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 20:24:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/25/2013 6:15 AM, eles wrote:
Breaking peoples' build scripts and makefiles is not nice :-)
On the same grounds, you could recommend them dmc.
Provide, at least, a flag that passes the file without name
change, for example:
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 15:57:27 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 13:24:12 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright
When was decided to add this? I would love it, but I cannot
remember that this was decided.
Well, like many other id
On 10/26/2013 12:42 AM, eles wrote:
Provide, at least, a flag that passes the file without name change, for example:
dmd -ntest
will really pass "test" file and not test.d.
I'm curious why naming the file test.d is an issue?
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/26/2013 12:42 AM, eles wrote:
I'm curious why naming the file test.d is an issue?
Case:
This forces scrpts to bear the .d extension. For example, if you
write a script on Linux named "git-test" and you put at the top:
On 10/26/2013 2:02 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'm curious why naming the file test.d is an issue?
Case:
Thanks for the clear explanation. It makes a lot of sense. Let me think about it
for a bit.
On 10/26/2013 2:02 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/26/2013 12:42 AM, eles wrote:
I'm curious why naming the file test.d is an issue?
Case:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11365
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 21:11:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/26/2013 2:02 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/26/2013 12:42 AM, eles wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11365
Thank you for considering it.
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 22:35:14 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 21:11:02 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/26/2013 2:02 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/26/2013 12:42 AM, eles wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 22:35:14 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 21:11:02 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/26/2013 2:02 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/26/2013 12:42 AM, eles wrote:
Thank you for considering it.
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:16:22 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 22:35:14 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 21:11:02 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/26/2013 2:02 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/26
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
