Thanks!
I will!
/heywood
PS. I like D.
On Jun 29, 2010, at 19:37 , Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:05:50 -0400, Heywood Floyd wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Ok, thanks!
>>
>> How does the chain of command/responsibility work here?
>> Should I file this to bugzilla?
>>
>> (I
bearophile wrote:
Stewart Gordon:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=259
I have added my vote there a lot of time ago. I think Andrei says
that fixing this is unworkable, but I don't know why. If you make
this an error and at the same time turn array indexes/lengths into
signed v
Michal Minich:
>Why on the earth should array indexes and lengths be signed !!!
I have explained why lengthy elsewhere. Short answer: signed fixnum integers
are a bad approximation of natural numbers, because they are limited in range,
they don't even tell you when you try to step out of their
Byron Heads:
> > this(string name, string id) {
> > this._name = _name;
> > this._id = id;
> > }
> >
>
> this._name = name; // you had _name
I have just filed a bug report on this (it's a lot of time I want to write it)
Michal Minich wrote:
I was surprised by the behavior of division. The resulting type of
division in example below is uint and the value is incorrect. I would
expect that when one of operands is signed, then the result is signed
type.
Going by the spec
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/type.ht
Just a few things that may cause you some bugs/errors
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:33:13 +0200, BLS wrote:
> On 29/06/2010 22:12, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> // Confirm these are the same instance
> if (b1 == b2 && b2 == b3 ) {
> writeln("Same instance\n");
> }
I think you m
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:30:19 +0100, Stewart Gordon wrote:
> Michal Minich wrote:
>> I was surprised by the behavior of division. The resulting type of
>> division in example below is uint and the value is incorrect. I would
>> expect that when one of operands is signed, then the result is signed
>
There is very long discussion on digitamars.D ng "Is there ANY chance we
can fix the bitwise operator precedence rules?" which I should probably
read first...but was there some conclusion ?
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:42:45 -0400, bearophile wrote:
> Stewart Gordon:
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=259
>
> I have added my vote there a lot of time ago. I think Andrei says that
> fixing this is unworkable, but I don't know why. If you make this an
> error and at the same ti
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:42:45 -0400, bearophile wrote:
> Stewart Gordon:
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=259
>
> I have added my vote there a lot of time ago. I think Andrei says that
> fixing this is unworkable, but I don't know why. If you make this an
> error and at the same ti
Stewart Gordon:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=259
I have added my vote there a lot of time ago. I think Andrei says that fixing
this is unworkable, but I don't know why. If you make this an error and at the
same time turn array indexes/lengths into signed values, you don't have
I was surprised by the behavior of division. The resulting type of
division in example below is uint and the value is incorrect. I would
expect that when one of operands is signed, then the result is signed
type.
int a = -6;
uint b = 2;
auto c = a / b; // c is type of uint, and has v
== Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s article
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:59:37 -0400, strtr wrote:
> > What is the pretty way to do something like this?
> >
> > Class C
> > {
> > void makeNew()
> > {
> > new typeof(this);
> > }
> > }
> As edited...
> -Steve
Whahaha!
T
What is the pretty way to do something like this?
Class C
{
private const char[] _name = "C";// demangling this.mangleof didn't work
void makeNew()
{
mixin(`new `~_name~`();`); // the not so pretty part
}
}
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:59:37 -0400, strtr wrote:
What is the pretty way to do something like this?
Class C
{
void makeNew()
{
new typeof(this);
}
}
As edited...
-Steve
On 29/06/2010 23:49, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
One thing to note, ArrayList *does* accept an array as a constructor,
and it will actually use that array as its storage. This is so you can
"wrap" an array as a ArrayList and get the full dcollections
functionality from it.
Hi Steve
This is why
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:33:13 -0400, BLS wrote:
On 29/06/2010 22:12, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
For now, can you do something like this?
sl = new ServerList;
sl.add([
new Server("ServerI", "120.14.220.18"),
new Server(...)
...
]);
Hi Steve, I think this should work, however I go
On 29/06/2010 22:12, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
For now, can you do something like this?
sl = new ServerList;
sl.add([
new Server("ServerI", "120.14.220.18"),
new Server(...)
...
]);
Hi Steve, I think this should work, however I got very strange err. msg.
in file ArrayList.d Hav
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:22:30 -0400, BLS wrote:
Hi,
in C# this is common.
private List _servers;
_servers = new List
{
new Server{ Name = "ServerI", IP = "120.14.220.18" },
new Server{ Name = "ServerII", IP = "120.14.220.19" },
new Server{ Name = "Serve
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:27:41 -0400, bearophile wrote:
> In D use dynamic arrays unless you really need to remove or add a lot of
> items from the start or middle of the sequence. On modern CPUs linked
> lists are usually the wrong data structure to use.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
D's dynamic arrays
BLS:
> D2 so far..
> import dcollections.LinkList;
In D use dynamic arrays unless you really need to remove or add a lot of items
from the start or middle of the sequence. On modern CPUs linked lists are
usually the wrong data structure to use.
Bye,
bearophile
Hi,
in C# this is common.
private List _servers;
_servers = new List
{
new Server{ Name = "ServerI", IP = "120.14.220.18" },
new Server{ Name = "ServerII", IP = "120.14.220.19" },
new Server{ Name = "ServerIII", IP = "120.14.220.20" },
new Server{ Nam
On 29/06/2010 20:19, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Are you linking against dcollections? It looks like you are not...
No.
BTW, you can use dcollections' ticket tracking system for things like
this instead of sending to the newsgroup :)
Will do. Thanks Steve
bjoern
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:13:57 -0400, BLS wrote:
Hi
- probably Steve :)
I have problem in compiling a little programm using dcollection.LinkList.
(similar problem appears when I use dcollections.ArrayList)
D2.047
Linker error..
Error 1 Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D12dcollections8LinkL
Hi
- probably Steve :)
I have problem in compiling a little programm using dcollection.LinkList.
(similar problem appears when I use dcollections.ArrayList)
D2.047
Linker error..
Error 1 Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D12dcollections8LinkList7__arrayZ
Error 2 Error 42: Symbol
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:05:50 -0400, Heywood Floyd
wrote:
Ok, thanks!
How does the chain of command/responsibility work here?
Should I file this to bugzilla?
(I'm not able to fix it myself as I haven't built dmd locally. I'm just
not quite there yet... : )
/heywood
Simen actually alre
Ok, thanks!
How does the chain of command/responsibility work here?
Should I file this to bugzilla?
(I'm not able to fix it myself as I haven't built dmd locally. I'm just not
quite there yet... : )
/heywood
On Jun 29, 2010, at 16:31 , Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:5
On 29/06/2010 17:03, Rory McGuire wrote:
@disable propagates throughout the objects hierarchy (all children).
you can use it to disable builtins as well such as opEquals
Cool, thanks Rory!
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:42:33 +0200, BLS wrote:
Hi bearophile,
sorry for my ignorance, but what is the difference between @disable and
simply deleting the line ?
where can I read more about @disable ?
thanks, bjoern
@disable propagates throughout the objects hierarchy (all children).
you c
Hello!
I'm trying to use receiveTimeout:
//
import std.stdio,
std.concurrency;
int main(string[] args){
receiveTimeout( 1000L, (int i){writefln("Received: %d",i);}
) ;
return 0;
}
//
(
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:53:25 -0400, Simen kjaeraas
wrote:
Heywood Floyd wrote:
ops = ops[1 .. $]; // <=== line 335
Well, this looks like a bug to me. Should be
Ops = ops[1 .. $];
Ops is a type, isn't it? Don't you need a variable there?
I agree it's a bug in the original, but I do
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:55:50 -0400, BLS wrote:
On 29/06/2010 15:35, BLS wrote:
On 29/06/2010 15:27, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
string opIndex(string columnName);
yeah this is what I did, too..
However defined as ;
interface I1 {
string opIndex(string columnName);
}
is a no go. So can we
Hello Simen,
BCS wrote:
You can resolve this by having a a.di file with the extern foo(); in
it (DMD has a flag to generate such a file for you). OTOH without
knowing what you are doing, I can't tell if this is the correct
solution.
I'm trying to create a framework in which the user may
Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Heywood Floyd wrote:
ops = ops[1 .. $]; // <=== line 335
Well, this looks like a bug to me. Should be
Ops = ops[1 .. $];
Oh, and you could probably make this change yourself.
--
Simen
On 29/06/2010 15:35, BLS wrote:
On 29/06/2010 15:27, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
string opIndex(string columnName);
yeah this is what I did, too..
However defined as ;
interface I1 {
string opIndex(string columnName);
}
is a no go. So can we say operator overloading within interfaces is not
Heywood Floyd wrote:
ops = ops[1 .. $]; // <=== line 335
Well, this looks like a bug to me. Should be
Ops = ops[1 .. $];
--
Simen
interface I1 {
string opIndex(string columnName);
}
is a no go. So can we say operator overloading within interfaces is not
allowed in D2 ?
It should work.
Only opBinary etc doesn't work yet cause there are problems with template
functions in interfaces.
Hello and Good morning!
I'm trying to use receiveTimeout:
//
import std.stdio,
std.concurrency;
int main(string[] args){
receiveTimeout( 1000L, (int i){writefln("Received: %d",i);}
) ;
return 0;
}
// ���
BLS wrote:
On 29/06/2010 15:27, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
string opIndex(string columnName);
yeah this is what I did, too..
However defined as ;
interface I1 {
string opIndex(string columnName);
}
is a no go.
Hm. That should have worked.
So can we say operator overloading within in
On 29/06/2010 15:27, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
string opIndex(string columnName);
yeah this is what I did, too..
However defined as ;
interface I1 {
string opIndex(string columnName);
}
is a no go. So can we say operator overloading within interfaces is not
allowed in D2 ?
thanks again
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:21:34 -0400, BLS wrote:
Hi, in C# you can do some thing like this.
public interface IDataErrorInfo
{
// INDEXER
string this[string columnName] { get; }
}
}
how to translate this into D2 ?
thanks in advance, bjoern
string opIndex(string columnName);
Hi, in C# you can do some thing like this.
public interface IDataErrorInfo
{
// INDEXER
string this[string columnName] { get; }
}
}
how to translate this into D2 ?
thanks in advance, bjoern
Hi bearophile,
sorry for my ignorance, but what is the difference between @disable and
simply deleting the line ?
where can I read more about @disable ?
thanks, bjoern
On 29/06/2010 14:08, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Besides, try to do this in C#:
@property int value() {return _x;}
@property int value(int x) { return _x = x;}
@property int value(string s) { return _x = to!int(s);}
:) D's properties are so much better...
-Steve
Ok, convinced ;)
BLS:
> But this one NOT.
>
> interface IBindingList {
>
> @property bool AllowEdit();
> @property bool AllowEdit(bool enable);
> }
> class A : IBindingList {
> private bool _allowEdit;
>
> @property {
> bool AllowEdit() { return _allowEdit; }
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:58:54 -0400, BLS wrote:
On 29/06/2010 12:32, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
So, there certainly won't be any restriction on
having a getter or setter in a class if an interface it implements
declared only
one. It's just that you'll only be able to use the one that's part of
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:01:42 -0400, Mike Parker wrote:
I thought I understood ranges until I actually started trying to use
them. Now I'm having difficulties with the new range-based containers.
So I've got two issues right now, grokking ranges and understanding the
container interfaces.
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:24:42 -0400, Simen kjaeraas
wrote:
BCS wrote:
The issue is that the function called from module a is
_D1a3fooFZv where the function defined in module b is
_D1b3fooFZv ('a' <-> 'b') so they aren't the same function. extern(C)
works because C doesn't mangle names so
On 29/06/2010 12:32, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
So, there certainly won't be any restriction on
having a getter or setter in a class if an interface it implements declared only
one. It's just that you'll only be able to use the one that's part of the
interface if you're using a reference of the inte
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 03:11:34 BLS wrote:
> Just wonder how to translate this C# snippet into D..
> //C#
> public interface IBindingList {
>
> bool AllowEdit {
>get;
> }
> }
>
> //D2
> interface IBindingList {
>
> @property bool allowEdit();
> }
>
> Is this correct
sorry for making so much noise.. figured it out by myse4lf.
interface IBindingList {
@property bool AllowEdit();
//@property bool AllowEdit(bool enable);
//remove // to enable setter
}
class A : IBindingList {
private bool _allowEdit;
@pro
BCS wrote:
The issue is that the function called from module a is
_D1a3fooFZv where the function defined in module b is
_D1b3fooFZv ('a' <-> 'b') so they aren't the same function. extern(C)
works because C doesn't mangle names so the function is foo in both
cases.
I know. I just react to
Just wonder how to translate this C# snippet into D..
//C#
public interface IBindingList {
bool AllowEdit {
get;
}
}
//D2
interface IBindingList {
@property bool allowEdit();
}
Is this correct ? I think in C# AllowEdit() takes tare that you don't
implement a s
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 07:16:13 +0200, BCS wrote:
Hello Mike,
I want to do the following:
foreach(obj; list)
{
if(obj.pleaseKillMe)
somehow_remove_the_object_from_the_list();
}
That isn't legal for normal arrays or AAs. IIRC the docs even say that
you can't change what a foreach is iterating
54 matches
Mail list logo
