On Tuesday, 26 March 2013 at 05:40:00 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
What you have to do is instantiate the template, then call the
constructor:
S!(int, 4).S!(byte, 5)(3)
Note that the way templates work in D, a templated struct is
really a shortcut for:
template S(T)
{
struct S { ...
Am Mon, 25 Mar 2013 19:43:11 +0100
schrieb "J" :
> Where or to whom should I report a bug in the thrift D bindings?
>
> In recent ubuntu, the maintainers inexplicably changed the linker
> (ld) defaults to --as-needed, which breaks the 'make check' for
> Thrifts D binding, presumably because the
On 2013-03-22 10:58, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
So I want to install my own assertHandler. The problem is, that even if
I call "setAssetHandler" in a shared module constructor, and that module
does not import any other modules, it is still not initialized first. Is
there a way to set the assert before
On 2013-03-25 23:58, Jonathan Crapuchettes wrote:
Is there a way to get the names of the fields in a named tuple? It looks
like the names are actually aliases.
Perhaps "fieldSpecs".
--
/Jacob Carlborg
I wonder, if someone has already thought about "immutable ref". I
can not imagine that many use it, so it wouldn't break (much)
code.
On 03/25/2013 11:15 PM, cal wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 March 2013 at 06:03:55 UTC, cal wrote:
>> I.e., why I can't match on some generic second parameter - what if the
>> second parameter was an int:
>>
>> struct S(A, int B) {}
>> static assert(is(S!(int, 5627) _ == S!(U, ??), U, ??));
>>
>> how to m
On Tuesday, 26 March 2013 at 13:45:52 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
There are three kinds of template parameters: type, value, and
alias.
That syntax does not work because you are trying to match 5 to
V, where 5 is a value and V is a type.
Ali
Thanks Ali,
I guess the tuple version is fine, it i
Hi -
I get some errors from this simple code:
class Class_a {
double[2][2] ob;
}
class Class_b : Class_a { int obb;}
Serializer.register!(Class_b);
The error is:
Error: variable
orange.serialization.Serializer.Serializer.serializeArray!(inout(double[2LU][2LU])).serializeArray.__lambda2008._
On Tuesday, 26 March 2013 at 11:41:13 UTC, Namespace wrote:
I wonder, if someone has already thought about "immutable ref".
I can not imagine that many use it, so it wouldn't break (much)
code.
immutable ref works (for me) very well. Are there any pitfalls
that I can not see?
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:13:03 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-03-25 23:58, Jonathan Crapuchettes wrote:
>> Is there a way to get the names of the fields in a named tuple? It
>> looks like the names are actually aliases.
>
> Perhaps "fieldSpecs".
Well, that gets you a FieldSpec template whi
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 17:22:29 Namespace wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 March 2013 at 11:41:13 UTC, Namespace wrote:
> > I wonder, if someone has already thought about "immutable ref".
> > I can not imagine that many use it, so it wouldn't break (much)
> > code.
>
> immutable ref works (for me) very
how about '&' :
void fun(int & x);
which is same as C++ syntax, hence familiar. I thought someone had
proposed that a few weeks ago
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 17:22:29 Namespace wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 26 March 2013 at 11:41:13 UTC, Names
On Tuesday, 26 March 2013 at 16:31:51 UTC, Jonathan Crapuchettes
wrote:
but I wish there was a cleaner way to do it. If the FieldSpec
template
was moved into the public section, it would allow for the name
member to
be accessed.
Not sure this qualifies as clean, but it's an option:
import s
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:02:32 Timothee Cour wrote:
> how about '&' :
>
> void fun(int & x);
>
> which is same as C++ syntax, hence familiar. I thought someone had
> proposed that a few weeks ago
That would be a much larger change, and I'd be surprised if Walter or Andrei
went for that. Pi
Am 26.03.2013 10:09, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2013-03-22 10:58, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
So I want to install my own assertHandler. The problem is, that even if
I call "setAssetHandler" in a shared module constructor, and that module
does not import any other modules, it is still not initialized
Am 25.03.2013 23:49, schrieb Sean Kelly:
On Mar 22, 2013, at 2:58 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
So I want to install my own assertHandler. The problem is, that even if I call
"setAssetHandler" in a shared module constructor, and that module does not
import any other modules, it is still not init
On 2013-03-26 16:34, Dan wrote:
Hi -
I get some errors from this simple code:
class Class_a {
double[2][2] ob;
}
class Class_b : Class_a { int obb;}
Serializer.register!(Class_b);
The error is:
Error: variable
orange.serialization.Serializer.Serializer.serializeArray!(inout(double[2LU][2LU
On 2013-03-26 19:35, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Yes, but this workaround does not work for windows 64 bit as the
microsoft linker complains about duplicate symbols. Also I think it will
only work with dmd because all other compiles (I tested with gdc) also
complain about duplicate symbols.
I suspec
I wrote a stacktrace tool that shows a nice stacktrace upon error,
with file names, demangled D symbols and (sometimes) line numbers. It
works on OSX and linux and uses execlp behind the hoods.
Problem:
for some silly reason I can only get stack trace info of the form:
D5main28main_auxFZi (in mai
demangle D15bootstrap_utils4util15replace_macros2FKHAyaAyaAyaZAya
immutable(char)[] bootstrap_utils.util.replace_macros2(ref
immutable(char)[][immutable(char)[]], immutable(char)[])
I want to obtain function name, arguments, etc (eg AST as json output
would show)
is there a reliable library solu
Why is "const ref" not a good choice?
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 22:55:56 Minas Mina wrote:
> Why is "const ref" not a good choice?
I really don't want to get into that again. There have been a number of
discussions on it in the main newsgroup which you can search for, but Andrei
considers it to be a major mistake of C++ that const&
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 18:11:42 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 22:55:56 Minas Mina wrote:
> > Why is "const ref" not a good choice?
>
> I really don't want to get into that again. There have been a number of
> discussions on it in the main newsgroup which you can search f
This task has just a Tango entry:
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Concurrent_computing
So I am writing a Phobos version. This seems to work as requested:
import std.stdio, std.random, std.parallelism, core.thread,
core.time;
void main() {
foreach (m; ["Enjoy", "Rosetta", "Code"])
ta
struct S {
int value() {
return 1;
}
}
class Base {
S s;
alias s this;
}
class Derived : Base {
void func() {
int i = value();
}
}
Fails with "main.d(14): Error: undefined identifier value".
Explicitly casting this to Base works:
void func() {
On 03/26/2013 04:58 PM, Henning Pohl wrote:
> struct S {
> int value() {
> return 1;
> }
> }
>
> class Base {
> S s;
> alias s this;
> }
>
> class Derived : Base {
> void func() {
> int i = value();
> }
> }
>
> Fails with "main.d(14): Error: undefined identifier value".
> Explicitly casting this t
"Thats the reason why all following declarations behave as const:"
should be
"Thats the reason why all following declarations behave as
const&:"
I tried the last few hours to implement something like 'A&' but
it's horrible if you haven't complete knowledge and want to
implement something that comes after the type...
But what's wrong with '@ref'? If I had knowledge how you could
implement new properties I could start a trial.
Afte
Henning Pohl:
class Base {
S s;
alias s this;
}
"alias this" is meant to be used in structs.
Bye,
bearophile
"alias this" is meant to be used in structs.
On the other hand, unless the compiler refuses to compile a class
with an alias this, it should behave meaningfully.
Bye,
bearophile
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 17:24:20 Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 03/26/2013 04:58 PM, Henning Pohl wrote:
> > struct S {
> > int value() {
> > return 1;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > class Base {
> > S s;
> > alias s this;
> > }
> >
> > class Derived : Base {
> > void func() {
> > int i = value();
> > }
> > }
>
31 matches
Mail list logo
