On 05/13/2013 09:22 PM, Josh wrote:
> Your answer requires the user to
> press enter to send the line. Would it be possible to have getch-like
> behaviour without using C, or would that be the only way?
I don't know how to set stdin to non-blocking mode in D.
However, if you are sure that stdin
> __ctor is a 'this' call, it needs a this (BTW, I get different errors than
> you):
Seems like not (see my corrected bug in previous post)
> Not sure how you would do that in one line
ditto
>> Why not use 'this' instead of '__ctor', and make it documented (and
>> reliable, ie work in the above
BTW, given recent discussion on memory barriers, I think my
previous statement that the mutex does not need to be locked to
call notify is probably incorrect.
Haven't had any issues calling notify outside a synchronized
statement, even from multiple threads. At least this works under
Win32 wi
> I declared fun(T) as fun(T)() with the added parenthesis, and it
> worked (tested on dmd 2.062 / ubuntu 64bits).
sorry I reduced wrongly.
Here's the inconsistency:
struct A {
this(T)(T x) { }
}
auto fun1(){
auto a=A.__ctor!(int)(1); //OK
return a;
}
auto fun2()
On Tuesday, 14 May 2013 at 04:14:27 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 05/13/2013 08:50 PM, Josh wrote:
Is there a way in D to only accept input for a certain time,
instead of
std.stdio.readln's behaviour? Something like "Press a key in 3
seconds
to abort".
Thanks
Josh
An unlikely solution is std.
On 05/13/2013 08:50 PM, Josh wrote:
Is there a way in D to only accept input for a certain time, instead of
std.stdio.readln's behaviour? Something like "Press a key in 3 seconds
to abort".
Thanks
Josh
An unlikely solution is std.concurrency because it already has a timeout
facility:
impor
On Tuesday, 14 May 2013 at 03:34:52 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
A)
The behavior of __ctor (whether or not documented) seems broken
/ unreliable:
struct A{this(T)(T x){}}
void fun(T){
auto a=A.__ctor!(int)(1);
}
void main(){
auto a=A.__ctor!(int)(1); //ok
fun!int(); //Error: type A is not
On Mon, 13 May 2013 23:34:39 -0400, Timothee Cour
wrote:
A)
The behavior of __ctor (whether or not documented) seems broken /
unreliable:
struct A{this(T)(T x){}}
void fun(T){
auto a=A.__ctor!(int)(1);
}
void main(){
auto a=A.__ctor!(int)(1); //ok
fun!int(); //Error: type A is not
Is there a way in D to only accept input for a certain time,
instead of std.stdio.readln's behaviour? Something like "Press a
key in 3 seconds to abort".
Thanks
Josh
A)
The behavior of __ctor (whether or not documented) seems broken / unreliable:
struct A{this(T)(T x){}}
void fun(T){
auto a=A.__ctor!(int)(1);
}
void main(){
auto a=A.__ctor!(int)(1); //ok
fun!int(); //Error: type A is not an expression
}
Is that a bug?
B)
Why not use 'this' instead of
On Monday, 13 May 2013 at 21:28:34 UTC, maarten van damme wrote:
Adam checks this thread so he'll probably read the errors about
simpledisplay. if not I'll copy paste and put in a bug report
on github.
I won't be on my linux box with free time until at least tomorrow
afternoon but i'll check
On 05/13/2013 10:27 PM, Timothee Cour wrote:
While writing DIP40, I came upon the following question:
how to instantiate explicitly template parameters for both the
class/struct AND the constructor?
for example: struct A(T1){this(T2)(){...}} ? (T2 could be used
somehow inside the ctor body for e
On 05/14/2013 01:25 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 05/13/2013 10:27 PM, Timothee Cour wrote:
While writing DIP40, I came upon the following question:
how to instantiate explicitly template parameters for both the
class/struct AND the constructor?
for example: struct A(T1){this(T2)(){...}} ? (T2 could
On Mon, 13 May 2013 19:04:39 -0400, Timothee Cour
wrote:
Thanks!
should that be considered as a limitation, and therefore be fixed?
(for example by documenting the __ctor syntax)?
The static make trick is boilerplate and shouldn't be considered the
best way.
Well, it's not really boilerpl
Thanks!
should that be considered as a limitation, and therefore be fixed?
(for example by documenting the __ctor syntax)?
The static make trick is boilerplate and shouldn't be considered the best way.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2013 16:27:44 -04
On Monday, 13 May 2013 at 21:55:45 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Mon, 13 May 2013 17:04:22 -0400, Juan Manuel Cabo
wrote:
I seem to recall (though I might be wrong) that win32 events
can be signalled before the thread calls WaitForSingleObject
(or WaitForMultipleObjects), and if it was
On Mon, 13 May 2013 16:27:44 -0400, Timothee Cour
wrote:
While writing DIP40, I came upon the following question:
how to instantiate explicitly template parameters for both the
class/struct AND the constructor?
for example: struct A(T1){this(T2)(){...}} ? (T2 could be used
somehow inside the
On Mon, 13 May 2013 17:04:22 -0400, Juan Manuel Cabo
wrote:
I seem to recall (though I might be wrong) that win32 events can be
signalled before the thread calls WaitForSingleObject (or
WaitForMultipleObjects), and if it was signalled, the call returns
immediately. I think this was very
On Mon, 13 May 2013 16:44:36 -0400, Heinz wrote:
3) Need a working example in D? (by Steven Schveighoffer):
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/j7sdte$25qm$1...@digitalmars.com
Well, whaddya know. Glad my former self could help :)
BTW, given recent discussion on memory barriers, I think my previ
I'll check every uint occurance, thank you. I'm on windows so I won't get
the "maximum number of clients" error you talk about. The loop I used
inside main was :
"while(true){
curtrans=generateTransformationMatrix();
for(int y=0;y
> On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 23:18:31 UTC, maarten van damme wrote:
On Monday, 13 May 2013 at 20:44:37 UTC, Heinz wrote:
Ok, here's a summary in case someone else is in the same need:
1) Want to know what "mutex/condition" are, how do they work
and when to use them? Here's a good resource:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/4742236
2) If you come to the question "Wh
On 05/13/2013 01:10 PM, ric wrote:
Is there a way to know if any D documentation was updated or a new D
article is added in the D site? I wanted to keep my references in sync
with updates in the documentation. Maybe, RSS or something?
The web site development is on github as well. Go to the pro
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 23:18:31 UTC, maarten van damme wrote:
I'm trying to generate images and after displaying them I want
to save them
to a png file. I use parallelism to generate them
asynchronously with the
gui-thread to avoid blocking (don't know if this is really
relevant).
If I add
Ok, here's a summary in case someone else is in the same need:
1) Want to know what "mutex/condition" are, how do they work and
when to use them? Here's a good resource:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/4742236
2) If you come to the question "Why a condition needs a mutex?":
http://stackoverflow.c
On Monday, May 13, 2013 13:27:44 Timothee Cour wrote:
> While writing DIP40, I came upon the following question:
> how to instantiate explicitly template parameters for both the
> class/struct AND the constructor?
> for example: struct A(T1){this(T2)(){...}} ? (T2 could be used
> somehow inside the
While writing DIP40, I came upon the following question:
how to instantiate explicitly template parameters for both the
class/struct AND the constructor?
for example: struct A(T1){this(T2)(){...}} ? (T2 could be used
somehow inside the ctor body for example)
// auto a=A!double!int(); // CT error
T
Is there a way to know if any D documentation was updated or a new D
article is added in the D site? I wanted to keep my references in sync
with updates in the documentation. Maybe, RSS or something?
On Monday, 13 May 2013 at 19:41:48 UTC, Heinz wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for an object in "core.sync" whose internal counter
can be 0 or 1 (signaled/not signaled), just like Event Objects
in Win32
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms682396%28v=vs.85%29.aspx).
The object mu
On Monday, 13 May 2013 at 19:49:51 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Mon, 13 May 2013 15:41:47 -0400, Heinz
wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for an object in "core.sync" whose internal
counter can be 0 or 1 (signaled/not signaled), just like Event
Objects in Win32
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us
On Mon, 13 May 2013 15:41:47 -0400, Heinz wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for an object in "core.sync" whose internal counter can be 0
or 1 (signaled/not signaled), just like Event Objects in Win32
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms682396%28v=vs.85%29.aspx).
The object mu
Hi,
I'm looking for an object in "core.sync" whose internal counter
can be 0 or 1 (signaled/not signaled), just like Event Objects in
Win32
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms682396%28v=vs.85%29.aspx).
The object must be waitable and able to notify waiters. A
semaphor
On 5/12/2013 12:31 PM, SundayMorningRunner wrote:
Hello, let's say I have the choice between using an abstract class or an
interface to declare a "plan", a "template" for the descendants.
From the dmd compiler point of view, should I use the abstract class
version (so I guess that for each meth
If you define intelligence as the ability to learn computer languages, I'd
have to disagree with you. No reason to be disgusted, just curious. Why on
earth would you spend your time doing that?
2013/5/13 D-Ratiseur
> On Monday, 13 May 2013 at 00:21:06 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
>
>> On Monday, 13
On Monday, 13 May 2013 at 15:26:12 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2013 17:09:56 -0400, Paolo Bolzoni
wrote:
What is wrong? How I am supposed to pass less address to do
the comparison?
I think it is this issue:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9513
I am going
On Sun, 12 May 2013 17:09:56 -0400, Paolo Bolzoni
wrote:
What is wrong? How I am supposed to pass less address to do the
comparison?
I think it is this issue:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9513
I am going to fix this, soon.
-Steve
actually the output array doesn't need to be there at all, I
could compress on the fly, adding the filter byte to a much
smaller buffer, then writing straight out to the file. Then the
only big array would be the one in the image class itself, which
is easy to manage.
In fact, I did another f
On Monday, 13 May 2013 at 07:13:03 UTC, maarten van damme wrote:
But seeing as the memory only starts growing when I put the png
line in
This is pretty strange because looking at the source there, the
only time data is even referenced is here:
output ~= data[pos..pos+bytesPer
I believe template mixin are the way to go for structs. Small
annotated example:
// http://dpaste.1azy.net/56dd2513
mixin template Operators()
{
// Verify "a" field exists for better compile-time error.
Hard-coded here.
// As an alternative, name of field to use can be provided as a
templat
But seeing as the memory only starts growing when I put the png line in,
and that I keep deleting the old class and replacing it for a new instance,
shouldn't the gc clean up everything as nothing can still be referencing to
that data?
I am working on windows, on linux my original code segfaulted,
39 matches
Mail list logo
