On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 17:51:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:34:56 JS wrote:
Is is possible to import all modules using something import
a.b.*;?
I'd like to partition some modules up into smaller pieces to
simplify modification(reduce scrolling) but, of cou
On Thursday, 18 July 2013 at 05:57:48 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 07:23:57AM +0200, JS wrote:
[...]
Thanks, this has made it much clearer.
Something like
foreach(a; StrSplit!(s))
foreach(b; StrSplit !(a))
does work because the second StrSplit uses a "ctfe-time
variable"
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 07:23:57AM +0200, JS wrote:
[...]
> Thanks, this has made it much clearer.
>
> Something like
>
> foreach(a; StrSplit!(s))
>foreach(b; StrSplit !(a))
>
> does work because the second StrSplit uses a "ctfe-time variable"
> instead of a "template-time variable".
>
> My
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 23:56:11 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 01:02:26AM +0200, JS wrote:
[...]
I can't put together a working example right now(other things
to do)
but the gist of the matter is:
template strsplit(string n) { enum strsplit =
std.string.split(n,
",");
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 17:39:19 Timothee Cour wrote:
> std.range shouldn't contain public import std.array.
It's done because otherwise std.range is useless with arrays, and arrays are
probably the most frequently used type of range. We lose nothing by having
that public import. Now, docume
On 07/17/2013 08:13 AM, Chris wrote:
with some nasty surprises as regards obtaining
(valid) paths on Windows as opposed to Linux / Mac.
Do tell.
(Any time and life saving advice about linking to other libraries / DLLs?)
Thanks everyone!
celerid should be up to the task.
Timothee Cour:
1)
html documentation should show public imports (sometimes such
public imports make sense)
2)
std.range shouldn't contain public import std.array.
Sounds good.
Bye,
bearophile
std.range contains public import std.array.
There are a few full module public imports like that in phobos. What's the
rationale?
I understand for hierarchical modules (breaking modules into packages) but
for this?
it's a bit confusing, as searching for 'array' in std.range docs yields
nothing.
My
Jaehunt:
Does any have a idea for it?
Unfortunately this is a design limitation of D operator
overloading. I have shown this problem in the main D newsgroup
lot of time ago. I don't remember the answer, but nothing
changed. You can bring the problem again in the main D
newsgroup...
In th
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 01:02:26AM +0200, JS wrote:
[...]
> I can't put together a working example right now(other things to do)
> but the gist of the matter is:
>
> template strsplit(string n) { enum strsplit = std.string.split(n,
> ","); }
>
> ... inside a ctfe ...
>
> foreach(n; strsplit!(s))
Hi, I tried to compare two sets by opCmp, but I couldn't get
correct outputs.
Does anyone help me?
I have same sets of set S1 = [1,2,3] and S2 = [1,2,3].
Output of S1I can't make a difference between two sets by if statements, so I
can't make different output.
Does any have a idea for it?
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 18:00:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 16:02:00 JS wrote:
foreach(n; std.string.split(s, ","))
{
// n can't be read at compile time
}
using in a ctfe.
How to loop over a string array in a ctfe?
I would point out that if you're just spl
On 07/17/2013 07:01 AM, Baz wrote:
> Hello, is there any particular reason why dmd would tell me that the
> "Previous Definition different" when compiling a program with -inline
> while not when compiling it without the switch ?
I could not find that phrase in the dmd, dlang, or phobos sources.
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 20:58:41 UTC, Baz wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 18:00:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 16:01:23 Baz wrote:
Is the bug described a "well known" issue with a "well known"
workaround ?
(so far, I haven't found anything which is relate
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 18:00:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 16:01:23 Baz wrote:
Is the bug described a "well known" issue with a "well known"
workaround ?
(so far, I haven't found anything which is related, even with
some serious forum/newsgroup investigation.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:18:27PM +0200, Rob T wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 July 2013 at 19:33:13 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> >
> >The right, safe and readable way is to use std.array.empty:
> >
> >if (myString.empty)
> >
> >If you don't want to import functions, then test for the length:
> >
> >if (strin
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 19:18:29 UTC, Rob T wrote:
What was the rational for empty not being built in?
Is there a performance penalty using "empty"?
--rt
empty() was added to provide a range interface to arrays.
Probably wasn't built in since you have to handle all array
types. The co
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 11:45:09 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
//main.d
import a;
void main()
{
foo(); //OK
bar(); //OK
a.foo(); //OK (!!!)
a.bar(); //OK (!!!)
a.b.foo(); //OK
a.c.bar(); //OK
}
//===
To be frank, I don't know if this is a bug
On Tuesday, 16 July 2013 at 19:33:13 UTC, bearophile wrote:
The right, safe and readable way is to use std.array.empty:
if (myString.empty)
If you don't want to import functions, then test for the length:
if (string.length == 0)
Bye,
bearophile
What was the rational for empty not being bui
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 17:11:20 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 17:09:30 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 16:52:40 UTC, Baz wrote:
Hello, I've defined a simple template used in a double linked
list implementation:
template tDLListItem(T)
{
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 16:01:23 Baz wrote:
> Is the bug described a "well known" issue with a "well known"
> workaround ?
> (so far, I haven't found anything which is related, even with
> some serious forum/newsgroup investigation...)
I don't know if this particular issue with -inline is in b
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 16:02:00 JS wrote:
> foreach(n; std.string.split(s, ","))
> {
> // n can't be read at compile time
> }
>
> using in a ctfe.
>
> How to loop over a string array in a ctfe?
I would point out that if you're just splitting a string to iterate over it,
then you should pro
On 07/17/2013 10:21 AM, Yota wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 09:48:06 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
>> I find it disturbing that the built-in property "keys" would dup an
>> entire array, and then copy all the keys into that array, whereas the
>> function "byKeys()" will simply allow you to it
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:34:56 JS wrote:
> Is is possible to import all modules using something import
> a.b.*;?
>
> I'd like to partition some modules up into smaller pieces to
> simplify modification(reduce scrolling) but, of course, this
> increases the number of imports drastically.
Thi
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 19:21:03 Yota wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 09:48:06 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
> > I find it disturbing that the built-in property "keys" would
> > dup an entire array, and then copy all the keys into that
> > array, whereas the function "byKeys()" will simply a
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 09:48:06 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
I find it disturbing that the built-in property "keys" would
dup an entire array, and then copy all the keys into that
array, whereas the function "byKeys()" will simply allow you to
iterate on the keys.
"keys" is in blatant vio
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 17:09:30 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 16:52:40 UTC, Baz wrote:
Hello, I've defined a simple template used in a double linked
list implementation:
template tDLListItem(T)
{
const cPrevOffs = size_t.sizeof;
const cNextOffs =
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 16:52:40 UTC, Baz wrote:
Hello, I've defined a simple template used in a double linked
list implementation:
template tDLListItem(T)
{
const cPrevOffs = size_t.sizeof;
const cNextOffs = size_t.sizeof + size_t.sizeof;
void* NewItemCaps(T* aDat
Hello, I've defined a simple template used in a double linked
list implementation:
template tDLListItem(T)
{
const cPrevOffs = size_t.sizeof;
const cNextOffs = size_t.sizeof + size_t.sizeof;
void* NewItemCaps(T* aData, void* aPrevious, void* aNext)
{
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 16:19:46 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 15:26:19 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I think I can speak quite safely for the majority of the
community when I say that you are only welcome here if you can
keep your aggressive and disrespectful comments t
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 15:26:19 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I think I can speak quite safely for the majority of the
community when I say that you are only welcome here if you can
keep your aggressive and disrespectful comments to yourself.
I think you cannot, as nobody provided you such ri
On 07/17/13 16:38, JS wrote:
> it is is a lot of work to simplify my code to something that will make sense
Indeed.
> If it will make you feel better to see some code, which does work,
[...snipped incomplete example which doesn't...]
> template tSplitStr(string n, string d = " ") { enum tSpl
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 05:29:26 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 05:27:34AM +0200, JS wrote:
With heavy ctfe code generation usage is it possible to have
the d
compiler output the source code after all mixin templates have
been
"used"? This way it is easier to visually chec
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 15:18:03 UTC, JS wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 14:55:12 UTC, Ary Borenszweig
wrote:
[...]
If you think the language is shitty why are you using it?
You didn't pay for D, you are receiving it as a free tool. I
don't think many people will help you if you co
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 14:55:12 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 7/17/13 11:38 AM, JS wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 14:18:25 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 14:09:28 UTC, JS wrote:
Ok, spoke too soon again,
my string requires compound splitting:
foreach(ss;
On 2013-07-17 16:13, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Since Descent used a port of the D compiler to Java, I think the same
can be done by tweaking dmd. You have the generated AST after semantic
analysis and you can easily output that. But of course you need to be
able to convert the AST to string with co
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 15:18:03 UTC, JS wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 14:55:12 UTC, Ary Borenszweig
wrote:
On 7/17/13 11:38 AM, JS wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 14:18:25 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 14:09:28 UTC, JS wrote:
Ok, spoke too soon again
On Monday, 15 July 2013 at 15:59:42 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Monday, 15 July 2013 at 15:26:49 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On 07/15/2013 07:18 AM, Chris wrote:
doesn't work with newer versions of dmd
does too. (I'm the maintainer)
https://bitbucket.org/ariovistus/pyd
Thank you very much (I used
On 7/17/13 11:38 AM, JS wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 14:18:25 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 14:09:28 UTC, JS wrote:
Ok, spoke too soon again,
my string requires compound splitting:
foreach(ss; split(s, ","))
{
split(ss, "|"); // ss can't be read at compile t
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 14:18:25 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 14:09:28 UTC, JS wrote:
Ok, spoke too soon again,
my string requires compound splitting:
foreach(ss; split(s, ","))
{
split(ss, "|"); // ss can't be read at compile time
although I can use ss direc
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 14:09:28 UTC, JS wrote:
Ok, spoke too soon again,
my string requires compound splitting:
foreach(ss; split(s, ","))
{
split(ss, "|"); // ss can't be read at compile time
although I can use ss directly
string a = ss; // works fine.
}
Is there any possibi
On 7/17/13 4:33 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-07-17 05:27, JS wrote:
With heavy ctfe code generation usage is it possible to have the d
compiler output the source code after all mixin templates have been
"used"? This way it is easier to visually check for errors in the
generated code.
I ima
Ok, spoke too soon again,
my string requires compound splitting:
foreach(ss; split(s, ","))
{
split(ss, "|"); // ss can't be read at compile time although
I can use ss directly
string a = ss; // works fine.
}
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 14:02:01 UTC, JS wrote:
foreach(n; std.string.split(s, ","))
{
// n can't be read at compile time
}
using in a ctfe.
How to loop over a string array in a ctfe?
Strange...
The code actually works, but when I use my wrapper template it
doesn't...
template
Hello, is there any particular reason why dmd would tell me that
the "Previous Definition different" when compiling a program with
-inline while not when compiling it without the switch ?
more information:
- the message appears two times and it's about two methods used
in a lib.
- the message
foreach(n; std.string.split(s, ","))
{
// n can't be read at compile time
}
using in a ctfe.
How to loop over a string array in a ctfe?
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 13:12:18 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On 07/17/2013 02:42 PM, bearophile wrote:
You need a lambda delegate for that. But I forgot about
multisort algorithm...
It's probably the right tool.
So, in the end I tried out 3 different alternatives:
schwartzSor
On 07/17/2013 02:42 PM, bearophile wrote:
> You need a lambda delegate for that. But I forgot about multisort algorithm...
> It's probably the right tool.
So, in the end I tried out 3 different alternatives:
schwartzSort(a => tuple(arr1[a], arr2[a]), "a < b")
sort((a, b) => arr1[a] < arr1[b]
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
Actually, I don't find it needs any more memory than regular
schwartzSort (which I was using anyway),
A and array of tuples should take more memory. Try with a much
larger input array.
but it does cost _speed_ -- quite a lot. :-(
Right, schwartzSort is quite slo
On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, bearophile wrote:
> Another way is to use something like this, but this needs some memory:
>
> idx.schwartzSort!(i => tuple(arr1[i], arr2[i]));
Actually, I don't find it needs any more memory than regular schwartzSort (which
I was using anyway), but it does cost _speed_ --
On 07/17/2013 02:35 PM, John Colvin wrote:
> Is std.algorithm.multisort what you'd be looking for?
Good thought. Thanks to pointing me here I also noticed the following example
in the schwartzSort docs which might be relevant:
sort!((a, b) => hashFun(a) < hashFun(b))(array);
I'm going to tr
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
idx.sort!("arr1[a] < arr1[b] || (arr1[a] == arr1[b] &&
arr2[a] < arr2[b])");
I (unsurprisingly) get a load of errors about std.functional
not having access to arr1 or arr2.
You need a lambda delegate for that. But I forgot about multisort
algorithm... It's prob
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 11:43:37 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
.sort!("arr1[a] < arr1[b] || (arr1[a] == arr1[b] && arr2[a]
< arr2[b]"));
... but I'm not sure that would be an optimal strategy.
Is std.algorithm.multisort what you'd be looking for?
On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, bearophile wrote:
> Another way is to use something like this, but this needs some memory:
>
> idx.schwartzSort!(i => tuple(arr1[i], arr2[i]));
Oh, nice thought! :-)
> But often the most efficient way is to use sort() with a comparison function
> that takes in account all
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
Is there a standard, accepted approach for this kind of sort
with primary/secondary criterion?
There are various ways to do it. One way is to use a stable sort
and sort the data two or more times.
Another way is to use something like this, but this needs some
memor
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 10:04:53 UTC, JS wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 09:57:04 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 09:34:58 UTC, JS wrote:
Is is possible to import all modules using something import
a.b.*;?
I'd like to partition some modules up into smaller p
Hi all :-)
Suppose that I have two different arrays of the same length, arr1 and arr2, and
an array of index values idx = [0 .. arr1.length].
Now, suppose that I want to sort the index values according to the corresponding
values of arr1. This is easy with schwartzSort:
idx.schwartzSort!(a
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 09:57:04 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 09:34:58 UTC, JS wrote:
Is is possible to import all modules using something import
a.b.*;?
I'd like to partition some modules up into smaller pieces to
simplify modification(reduce scrolling) but,
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 09:34:58 UTC, JS wrote:
Is is possible to import all modules using something import
a.b.*;?
I'd like to partition some modules up into smaller pieces to
simplify modification(reduce scrolling) but, of course, this
increases the number of imports drastically.
I
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 09:54:28 UTC, JS wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 09:34:58 UTC, JS wrote:
Is is possible to import all modules using something import
a.b.*;?
I'd like to partition some modules up into smaller pieces to
simplify modification(reduce scrolling) but, of course,
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 09:34:58 UTC, JS wrote:
Is is possible to import all modules using something import
a.b.*;?
I'd like to partition some modules up into smaller pieces to
simplify modification(reduce scrolling) but, of course, this
increases the number of imports drastically.
T
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 08:31:00 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 July 2013 at 19:37:14 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
If however you remove the .byKey() call and use .keys instead,
it works!
With byKey, you are iterating over a range of original key
values, meaning that attempt
Is is possible to import all modules using something import
a.b.*;?
I'd like to partition some modules up into smaller pieces to
simplify modification(reduce scrolling) but, of course, this
increases the number of imports drastically.
On Tuesday, 16 July 2013 at 16:33:54 UTC, JohnnyK wrote:
I could not find any posts on this and have not found a link on
the site about this either. It would be nice if there was a
RSS feed for the forum at least for the announce forum. It is
very difficult to monitor changes and updates with
On Tuesday, 16 July 2013 at 19:37:14 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
If however you remove the .byKey() call and use .keys instead,
it works!
With byKey, you are iterating over a range of original key
values, meaning that attempting to remove any of them will result
in bad bahavior. With .ke
On 2013-07-17 05:27, JS wrote:
With heavy ctfe code generation usage is it possible to have the d
compiler output the source code after all mixin templates have been
"used"? This way it is easier to visually check for errors in the
generated code.
I imagine one could use pragma in a "special way
Am 17.07.2013 09:33, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2013-07-17 05:27, JS wrote:
With heavy ctfe code generation usage is it possible to have the d
compiler output the source code after all mixin templates have been
"used"? This way it is easier to visually check for errors in the
generated code.
I
67 matches
Mail list logo
