On Friday, 2 August 2013 at 05:09:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, August 02, 2013 06:50:01 Douglas Petterson wrote:
Is there a way to convert a string to a struct, similarly to
the
conversion of a struct to a custom string representation ?
The following code works fine when using fo
On Friday, August 02, 2013 06:50:01 Douglas Petterson wrote:
> Is there a way to convert a string to a struct, similarly to the
> conversion of a struct to a custom string representation ?
>
> The following code works fine when using format("%s",C) or
> to!string(C):
>
> struct sCustomConv
>
Is there a way to convert a string to a struct, similarly to the
conversion of a struct to a custom string representation ?
The following code works fine when using format("%s",C) or
to!string(C):
struct sCustomConv
{
string toString()
{
return "My custom r
On 08/01/2013 05:40 PM, tx wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Ali. Everything you wrote makes sense, but I
> think I may have oversimplified the problem in my original email. In
> general I don't care about what T is when working with Box (or
> ConcreteBox as it were), but I do care that Box contains
Thanks for the reply Ali. Everything you wrote makes sense, but I
think I may have oversimplified the problem in my original email. In
general I don't care about what T is when working with Box (or
ConcreteBox as it were), but I do care that Box contains a T. Consider
this rather contrived example
how can I get the UDA's of a type that I only know by name and
only in a CTFE.
I would like to loop over an array of names passed to a me(I
don't know their contents beforehand) and get the attributes.
I've tried to use a mixin but I can't get the mixin to work on
the string name...
e.g.,
On Friday, 2 August 2013 at 00:44:21 UTC, Meta wrote:
One more way, not necessarily a workaround but a little trick
that doesn't require you to know the exact type of box, is to
use typeof(box).
auto box = Box!int();
auto item = cast(Item)box;
auto box2 = cast(typeof(box));
Whoops, make that
One more way, not necessarily a workaround but a little trick
that doesn't require you to know the exact type of box, is to use
typeof(box).
auto box = Box!int();
auto item = cast(Item)box;
auto box2 = cast(typeof(box));
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 23:15:47 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 22:59:14 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
...
To further clarify this, I have used your simplified example:
And in case someone thinks template functions are treated any
differently, "string generator(T)(T a)" acts
On 08/01/2013 04:28 PM, tx wrote:
> Hi All,
> Hoping somebody can provide some help here, I have a set of classes
> that are similar to the following
>
> class Item{}
>
> class Box(T) : Item {
>T value;
>// ...
> }
>
> //Along with some aliases:
>
> alias Box!(long) LongBox;
> alias Box!
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 23:48:33 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/02/2013 01:34 AM, hunt wrote:
Hello, guys. It is weird to ask about my homework here, but I
haven't
gotten a proper answer yet. It's about D feature...maybe..
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/905d6ad7
Question is that "Investigate how D
On 08/02/2013 01:34 AM, hunt wrote:
Hello, guys. It is weird to ask about my homework here, but I haven't
gotten a proper answer yet. It's about D feature...maybe..
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/905d6ad7
Question is that "Investigate how D allows you to defend your definition
of Map so that it may be u
Hi All,
Hoping somebody can provide some help here, I have a set of classes
that are similar to the following
class Item{}
class Box(T) : Item {
T value;
// ...
}
//Along with some aliases:
alias Box!(long) LongBox;
alias Box!(char) CharBox;
//etc.
I'd like to have a function that opera
Hello, guys. It is weird to ask about my homework here, but I
haven't gotten a proper answer yet. It's about D feature...maybe..
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/905d6ad7
Question is that "Investigate how D allows you to defend your
definition of Map so that it may be used only with a type of key
that i
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 22:59:14 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
...
To further clarify this, I have used your simplified example:
-
// test.d
string generator(int x)
{
if (x > 0)
{
asm
{
mov EAX, 0xDEAD;
}
}
return "return 42;";
}
int
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 22:42:11 UTC, JS wrote:
I don't know why it is so damn confusing...
I didn't say templates, I SAID string mixins of templates.
Symbol emitting does not go that way. Object files are old school
entities from C times. They have function symbol and type
symbols. Te
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 22:26:06 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 22:04:57 UTC, JS wrote:
IS A GOING TO BE IN THE BINARY?!?!?! Yes, I'm yelling... just
to get the point across about the question I'm trying to get
answered.
HOW MANY TIMES I NEED TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION F
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 22:13:25 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 22:04:57 UTC, JS wrote:
IS A GOING TO BE IN THE BINARY?!?!?!
Why don't you try it and see? Disassemble the object file or
get your linker of choice to print out some info.
I don't have any of the to
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 22:04:57 UTC, JS wrote:
IS A GOING TO BE IN THE BINARY?!?!?! Yes, I'm yelling... just
to get the point across about the question I'm trying to get
answered.
HOW MANY TIMES I NEED TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION FOR YOU TO NOTICE?
Yes.
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 22:04:57 UTC, JS wrote:
IS A GOING TO BE IN THE BINARY?!?!?!
Why don't you try it and see? Disassemble the object file or get
your linker of choice to print out some info.
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 21:17:34 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 10:06:54PM +0200, JS wrote:
[...]
Now are you telling me that
template A()
{
void foo() { writeln("asdf"); }
}
void main()
{
A!().foo();
}
does not create a function foo in the binary? That it is
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 21:38:15 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
This scares me, it seems to me that the unused import should
not be compiled in. And I frequently hear people talk about the
linker removing unused code, but this proves that it doesn't or
at least not all.
It does not. People talk
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 20:06:56 UTC, JS wrote:
the binary file is is 150kB. If I add import std.stdio; It
jumps to 300kB.
This scares me, it seems to me that the unused import should not
be compiled in. And I frequently hear people talk about the
linker removing unused code, but this
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 10:06:54PM +0200, JS wrote:
[...]
> Now are you telling me that
>
> template A()
> {
> void foo() { writeln("asdf"); }
> }
> void main()
> {
> A!().foo();
> }
>
> does not create a function foo in the binary? That it is equivalent
> to just calling writeln("asdf"
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 18:09:54 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:52:28PM +0200, JS wrote:
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 17:47:00 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:12:51PM +0200, John Colvin wrote:
>>On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 17:09:07 UTC, JS wrote:
>>
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 17:46:07 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
There must be a simpler way to pass these files to dmd in the
right order? rdmd does it somehow.
You do know that you can use GDC with rdmd? `rdmd
--compiler=gdmd` afair.
Anyway, rdmd does it my checking dmd verbose output th
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 18:09:54 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
See for yourself: run a disassembler on the result (preferably
filtered
through ddemangle so the symbols are actually readable) and see
what's
included and what's not. On Posix, you can use objdump or nm
(if you use
nm, though, keep
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 17:53:38 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I think the question is whether the instantiations of such
templates are removed. If the instance is used only to
initialize an enum, the function shouldn't stay in the binary.
Even if the function remains, I think the linker takes
Am Thu, 01 Aug 2013 19:46:05 +0200
schrieb "Gary Willoughby" :
> I've just finished a project in D and have been using rdmd to
> compile during testing. While this is nice, i now want to try
> other compilers to see if i get any speed gains.
>
> Because i use rdmd it takes care of passing every
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:52:28PM +0200, JS wrote:
> On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 17:47:00 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:12:51PM +0200, John Colvin wrote:
> >>On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 17:09:07 UTC, JS wrote:
> >>>If I have a bunch of templates that are only used for co
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 17:57:28 UTC, JS wrote:
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 17:53:38 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 08/01/2013 10:45 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:12:51PM +0200, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 17:09:07 UTC, JS wrote:
If I have a bunch o
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 16:36:34 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 08/01/2013 03:29 AM, JS wrote:
> On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 05:22:46 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> On 07/31/2013 06:10 PM, JS wrote:
>>> http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/dbb40dbc
>>>
>>> The code was pared down from a lot of string mixin cod
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 17:53:38 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 08/01/2013 10:45 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:12:51PM +0200, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 17:09:07 UTC, JS wrote:
If I have a bunch of templates that are only used for code
generation, are
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:46:05PM +0200, Gary Willoughby wrote:
> I've just finished a project in D and have been using rdmd to
> compile during testing. While this is nice, i now want to try other
> compilers to see if i get any speed gains.
Based on my experience, you will, with gdc / ldc. The
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 17:47:00 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:12:51PM +0200, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 17:09:07 UTC, JS wrote:
>If I have a bunch of templates that are only used for code
>generation, are they removed in the binary(since they are
On 08/01/2013 10:45 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:12:51PM +0200, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 17:09:07 UTC, JS wrote:
If I have a bunch of templates that are only used for code
generation, are they removed in the binary(since they are not
needed)?
templa
I've just finished a project in D and have been using rdmd to
compile during testing. While this is nice, i now want to try
other compilers to see if i get any speed gains.
Because i use rdmd it takes care of passing everything to dmd.
Now i want to try GDC and i need to pass the files in the
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:12:51PM +0200, John Colvin wrote:
> On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 17:09:07 UTC, JS wrote:
> >If I have a bunch of templates that are only used for code
> >generation, are they removed in the binary(since they are not
> >needed)?
>
> templates don't exist in binaries.
Te
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 17:09:07 UTC, JS wrote:
If I have a bunch of templates that are only used for code
generation, are they removed in the binary(since they are not
needed)?
templates don't exist in binaries.
If I have a bunch of templates that are only used for code
generation, are they removed in the binary(since they are not
needed)?
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 16:36:34 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 08/01/2013 03:29 AM, JS wrote:
> On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 05:22:46 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> On 07/31/2013 06:10 PM, JS wrote:
>>> http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/dbb40dbc
>>>
>>> The code was pared down from a lot of string mixin cod
On 08/01/2013 03:29 AM, JS wrote:
> On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 05:22:46 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> On 07/31/2013 06:10 PM, JS wrote:
>>> http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/dbb40dbc
>>>
>>> The code was pared down from a lot of string mixin code generation. I
>>> nest the structs because I want a nested enu
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 15:06:50 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 08/01/13 14:50, John Colvin wrote:
template a(T ...)
{
void a(R r)
{
//want to get a tuple of
//the members of T, each
//instantiated with R.
//do some RT stuff
}
}
Is this possible?
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 14:57:07 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 12:50:42 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
template a(T ...)
{
void a(R r)
{
//want to get a tuple of
//the members of T, each
//instantiated with R.
//do some RT stuff
}
}
On 08/01/13 14:50, John Colvin wrote:
> template a(T ...)
> {
> void a(R r)
> {
> //want to get a tuple of
> //the members of T, each
> //instantiated with R.
>
> //do some RT stuff
> }
> }
>
> Is this possible?
>
> Whatever I try, I keep running in to
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 12:50:42 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
template a(T ...)
{
void a(R r)
{
//want to get a tuple of
//the members of T, each
//instantiated with R.
//do some RT stuff
}
}
Is this possible?
Whatever I try, I keep running in to "c
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 12:27:51 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
Hi!
The key points of this lengthy letter are:
(0) I find RedBlackTree hard to use, and below is one story of
trying to get it to work.
(1) Perhaps I did something wrong a few times. Please show me
a better way to go.
(2) P
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 12:50:42 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
...
Does this help http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/fe533f7a ?
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 12:50:42 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
template a(T ...)
{
void a(R r)
{
//want to get a tuple of
//the members of T, each
//instantiated with R.
//do some RT stuff
}
}
Is this possible?
Whatever I try, I keep running in to "c
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 12:55:30 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 12:27:51 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
On a relevant note, I find the unittests of RedBlackTree a bit
excessive even when they compile successfully. They seem to
test the integrity of the whole tree every
On 08/01/2013 01:56 PM, bearophile wrote:
> I have not critiqued linear flow programming its, I love it and perhaps I was
> the one that has introduced it in D. In the main D newsgroup I have just said
> that in D it still causes some performance loss, even using ldc2.
That's what I meant -- your
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 12:27:51 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
On a relevant note, I find the unittests of RedBlackTree a bit
excessive even when they compile successfully. They seem to
test the integrity of the whole tree every time a tree
operation takes place, and that makes the unittests
template a(T ...)
{
void a(R r)
{
//want to get a tuple of
//the members of T, each
//instantiated with R.
//do some RT stuff
}
}
Is this possible?
Whatever I try, I keep running in to "cannot use local as
parameter to non-global template" errors, wh
Say I have a template
template A(T ...)
{
void A
}
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 12:43:21 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Say I have a template
template A(T ...)
{
void A
}
woops sorry, partial post. Will finish and post again.
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 11:02:00 UTC, JS wrote:
Anyways, Just an idea I had when trying to make attributes more
useful.
struct Name
{
string data;
}
@Name("hello")
void foo();
I favor this approach much more because of strong typing.
Hi!
The key points of this lengthy letter are:
(0) I find RedBlackTree hard to use, and below is one story of
trying to get it to work.
(1) Perhaps I did something wrong a few times. Please show me a
better way to go.
(2) Perhaps the library code could be improved as well to make
the pro
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
So, your critiques of component programming certainly
have merit on the performance side.
I have not critiqued linear flow programming its, I love it and
perhaps I was the one that has introduced it in D. In the main D
newsgroup I have just said that in D it still ca
I guess D doesn't support named UDA's directly?
e.g.,
@(Name = "My Name", Other = .34)
It would be nice to have the ability to have an "attribute"
hierarchy where looking up attributes on objects could easily be
done.
e.g.,
@(Name = "s", Other = 2) struct s
{
@(Name = "q", Default_Valu
On 07/31/2013 02:31 PM, bearophile wrote:
> If this resulting array is used only for a short period of time:
>
> return sequence.map!(x => x.func).array;
Just to compare, I tried rewriting the cacheing version of the neighbours()
function to use this kind of sequence. Here's the original code:
h
On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 05:22:46 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/31/2013 06:10 PM, JS wrote:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/dbb40dbc
The code was pared down from a lot of string mixin code
generation. I
nest the structs because I want a nested enums. I don't want
have to
have eState and eStateTyp
On Wednesday, 31 July 2013 at 12:09:02 UTC, David wrote:
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/mysql-native
Waw ! Many thanks,
Completely missed it :)
See you
62 matches
Mail list logo
