On 12/9/2014 4:31 PM, Nicholas Londey wrote:
Does @property ever make sense for a free floating function? I would
have thought no but was recently asked to add it if using the function
with uniform call syntax.
I use it from time-to-time. I assume you think of properties as
belonging to
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 07:31:21 UTC, Nicholas Londey
wrote:
as this can break some invalid code (the code where people
using
properties as functions)
Does @property ever make sense for a free floating function? I
would have thought no but was recently asked to add it if using
the
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 21:01:40 UTC, Paul wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 17:48:55 UTC, Jack wrote:
I'm running ArchLinux 64-bit on Vbox and tested out the code.
There haven't been any problems. Have you tried updating
whatever tools you're using?(dmd, dub, etc) Might've been
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 01:17:47 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Looks like a compiler bug.
Filed: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13843
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 10:19:38 UTC, Paul wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 21:01:40 UTC, Paul wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 17:48:55 UTC, Jack wrote:
I'm running ArchLinux 64-bit on Vbox and tested out the code.
There haven't been any problems. Have you tried updating
Hi,
I experience very strange problem: GC somehow collects live
objects.
I found it because i got segfaults. After debugging and tracing i
found this is because of accessing not allocated memory.
I did the following checks:
- added to some class invariant check for access to suspicious
On 12/9/14 8:54 AM, Ruslan Mullakhmetov wrote:
Hi,
I experience very strange problem: GC somehow collects live objects.
I found it because i got segfaults. After debugging and tracing i found
this is because of accessing not allocated memory.
I did the following checks:
- added to some
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 14:23:06 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 12/9/14 8:54 AM, Ruslan Mullakhmetov wrote:
Hi,
I experience very strange problem: GC somehow collects live
objects.
I found it because i got segfaults. After debugging and
tracing i found
this is because of
std.container.BinrayHeap
(http://dlang.org/library/std/container/BinaryHeap.html)
implements a binary heap on top of a) a given random access range
or b) another container that supports random access.
Regardless of it's underlying data structure type, it wraps its
store in RefCounted, but I
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 13:34:56 UTC, Jack wrote:
Can't really think of anything that can solve your problem.
Only time I had a seg fault is calling a method from an
uninitialized class.
You can try to get a debugger and/or a gui that comes with
it(personally I use gdb with ddd) to find
On 12/10/2014 12:19 AM, Paul wrote:
I don't fancy introduing another layer of complexity in a debugger at
present! I wonder if it's the .bmp that's causing the problem. I can't
quite figure how to get Derelict SDL_Image into my project at present
(dub doesn't fetch it if I add import
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 15:40:00 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On 12/10/2014 12:19 AM, Paul wrote:
dub doesn't know anything about DerelictSDL2Image (and even if
it did, just importing it isn't going to tell dub about it --
you would need to add it to your dub.json as a dependency).
That's
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 15:48:32 UTC, Paul wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 15:40:00 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On 12/10/2014 12:19 AM, Paul wrote:
dub doesn't know anything about DerelictSDL2Image (and even if
it did, just importing it isn't going to tell dub about it --
you would
On 12/9/14 9:52 AM, Ruslan Mullakhmetov wrote:
No, there is no accessing GC resources in dtors.
the only usage of dtor in one class is
~this()
{
_file.close();
}
where _file is of type std.file.File
That should work I think.
i'll try to extract problem to any
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 15:53:11 UTC, Paul wrote:
Whoa, I read that wrong - I'm sure I tried just adding
DerelictSDL2Image.load() to my program an it didnt work. Trying
again.
The top of my app.d looks like this:
import derelict.sdl2.sdl;
import std.stdio;
import std.conv;
void
It may happen if only reference to an object is stored in memory
block marked as data-only (using ubyte[] for a buffer is probably
most common reason I have encountered)
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:52:53 +
Ruslan Mullakhmetov via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 14:23:06 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 12/9/14 8:54 AM, Ruslan Mullakhmetov wrote:
Hi,
I experience very strange problem: GC
On 12/9/14 11:17 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:52:53 +
Ruslan Mullakhmetov via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 14:23:06 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 12/9/14 8:54 AM, Ruslan Mullakhmetov
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 16:53:02 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 12/9/14 11:17 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:52:53 +
Ruslan Mullakhmetov via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 14:23:06
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 16:13:25 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
It may happen if only reference to an object is stored in
memory block marked as data-only (using ubyte[] for a buffer is
probably most common reason I have encountered)
Thanks for interesting hypothesis, but that's not the issue.
I'm trying to work with some c functions that make use of varargs
and I'm trying to push my d varargs to c varargs.
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/ad08a6197963
Code:
___
import core.vararg;
import std.string : toStringz;
import std.c.stdio;
char[256]
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 19:44:42 UTC, Dustin wrote:
snprintf(dest, 256UL, toStringz(fmt), _argptr);
To forward varargs in C, you need to use a different function:
vsnprintf instead of snprintf. (The new v at the beginning means
varargs).
I don't think that's completely
On 12/9/14 12:40 PM, Ruslan Mullakhmetov wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 16:13:25 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
It may happen if only reference to an object is stored in memory block
marked as data-only (using ubyte[] for a buffer is probably most
common reason I have encountered)
Thanks for
Also, the reason why the special function is needed is that the
argptr is just a pointer to the arguments. If you pass that to
printf, how does it know that there's varargs on the other end
instead of just being another pointer whose numeric value it is
supposed to print out?
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 19:56:30 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 12/9/14 12:40 PM, Ruslan Mullakhmetov wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 16:13:25 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
i checked attributes for GC block holding this array:
FINALIZE NO_SCAN NO_MOVE APPENDABLE NO_INTERIOR
That does
On 12/9/14 3:18 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/09/2014 11:56 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
i checked attributes for GC block holding this array:
```
FINALIZE NO_SCAN NO_MOVE APPENDABLE NO_INTERIOR
```
That does not sound right at all. No block should ever have both
FINALIZE
On 12/9/14 3:24 PM, Ruslan Mullakhmetov wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 19:56:30 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 12/9/14 12:40 PM, Ruslan Mullakhmetov wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 16:13:25 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
i checked attributes for GC block holding this array:
FINALIZE
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 20:24:18 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Also, the reason why the special function is needed is that the
argptr is just a pointer to the arguments. If you pass that to
printf, how does it know that there's varargs on the other end
instead of just being another pointer
I'm trying to build components that I can dynamically link and keep
running into an issue with sharing modules between the host and the
pluggable components. Assuming a layout like this:
host.d -- loads components at runtime
a.d -- a module that builds to `a.so`
b.d -- a module
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 17:18:44 +
Ruslan Mullakhmetov via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
thanks, I got it: either C++ or D dtors are minefield =)
and in D this is filed *made* of mines. ;-)
but i still have no clue how to overcome GC =(
why do you want to fight
Cheap Kitchens London. Thirty Ex Display Kitchens To Clear.
www.exdisplaykitchens1.co.uk £ 595 Each with appliances.Tel
01616-694785
On Thursday, 20 January 2011 at 13:49:30 UTC, Justin Johansson
wrote:
Not long ago the Java Language people introduced the idea of
annotations together with an annotation processing tool (apt).
Now perhaps the idea of source code annotations is not actually
a Java invention per se, however
32 matches
Mail list logo
