is, however, that may not be a severe issue.
-- Chris NS
);
}
##
-- Chris NS
, then I'm
honestly not sure what the main obstacle to this is.
-- Chris NS
Not sure yet what your exactly issue is, but have you tried to
reproduce it using register/lookup?
:
foreach ( decl ; __traits( allMembers, data ) ) {
if ( is( typeof( mixin( decl ) ) == class )
!__traits( isAbstractclass, mixin( decl ) ) ) {
// ...some code in here...
}
}
-- Chris NS
... but I'm not so sure
it is such a good idea anymore -- assuming this-params will work
on the class declaration.
-- Chris NS
/discussion of @property and -property
to be... well, moot. But hey, I'm just one crazy among an army
of crazies.
-- Chris NS
On Monday, 16 July 2012 at 23:13:54 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/16/2012 10:55 AM, Chris NS wrote:
Having been around long enough to remember when the ability to
call
foo() as foo first appeared, I feel it necessary to point
out that
this was *not* in fact a deliberate design, but rather
On Thursday, 12 July 2012 at 00:37:22 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 02:14:30AM +0200, Minas Mina wrote:
[...]
** wall o' text **
You forgot about their quantum uncertainty loving transvestite
cousin: inout.
