oops this went into the wrong forum! Sorry! I will repost
this as a compiler issue, any moderator feel free to delete this
post.
Forgot to mention: I'm using DMD, and the Windows 10 is 64 bit.
When compiling my project using v2.098.0 or v2.098.1 on Windows
10, this error just appeared:
: fatal error LNK1318: Unerwarteter PDB-Fehler: OK (0) "".
Error: linker exited with status 1318
"Unerwarteter PDB-Fehler" means "Unexpected PDB-error". The next
3 attempts to compile yielded the fol
Microsofts C++ compiler provides the __debugbreak function, which
on x86 emits interrupt 3, which will cause the debugger to halt.
What is the equivalent in D? I tried using raise(SIGINT) from
core.stdc.signal, but that just closes the debugger (I thought
that was the same, seems like I was wro
On Saturday, 23 October 2021 at 20:24:32 UTC, Tim wrote:
import std.traits, std.stdio;
string generateLogCode(alias func)()
{
string code = "writeln(";
code ~= "\"" ~ fullyQualifiedName!func ~ "(\"";
foreach(i, param; ParameterIdentifierTuple!func)
{
if(i)
code
On Saturday, 23 October 2021 at 19:03:41 UTC, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, 23 October 2021 at 18:56:48 UTC, Simon wrote:
And I tried to use your suggestion like this:
enum OUTPUT_REPRO_CASE(alias func = __traits(parent, {})) =
"build the actual code stuff with"~fullyQualifiedName!func~&q
On Saturday, 23 October 2021 at 18:36:27 UTC, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, 23 October 2021 at 18:23:47 UTC, Simon wrote:
So what I am looking for then is the equivalent to
__FUNCTION__ that evaluates to the actual symbol of the
function instead of its name, so it can be used as a parameter
to
For debugging purposes, I have built a mixin that will, when
declared inside a function, output code to the console that will
reproduce the exact function call.
So, as an example, for the following function
int reproducible_function(int a, int b){
mixin(OUTPUT_REPRO_CASE!reproducible_functio
Thanks! The alias solution works and is good enough for me. Also
thanks for providing the code to typecheck the alias, I would
have never been able to come up with that myself.
I have the following struct declaration:
struct Hash_Table(Key, Value, u32 delegate(ref Key)
custom_hash_function = null){
...
}
When I try to instance the Type like this:
Hash_Table!(Component*, Component_Tick_Info, (c) =>
hash32(c.handle.bitfield)) my_hash_table;
I get the followin
On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 20:10:03 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 19:23:43 UTC, Simon van Bernem
wrote:
The only explanation I can think of is that D memcmps the
entire struct including the padding. Is this correct?
If so, what can I do about this? Why doesn&#
I ask this question because I chased a very very nasty bug all
the way down, and I think I found the offender:
I have a extern(C++) struct that contains an 8-byte integer
followed by a 4-byte enum value. I came across two variables of
that type, that are not equal by comparison (no opEquals
d
On Friday, 31 January 2020 at 14:01:04 UTC, Minty Fresh wrote:
On Thursday, 30 January 2020 at 21:36:53 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Thursday, 30 January 2020 at 21:09:41 UTC, Simon wrote:
How do I revert my variable to the init state?
null is the initial state for those.
More generally
On Thursday, 30 January 2020 at 21:18:04 UTC, MoonlightSentinel
wrote:
On Thursday, 30 January 2020 at 21:09:41 UTC, Simon wrote:
Hi dlang community,
I'm trying to implement a "reset" functionality which should
revert all variables to the program start initial state.
Example
nt how it works
// m_string2edge[name] = e;
// resetting it
m_string2edge = null;
m_string2edge = new Edge[string]; // <- won't compile
return 0;
}
How do I revert my variable to the init state?
Thanks in advance,
Simon
Hi Guys!
In my programm, I have a custom String-type that I want to
initialize some variables of at compile time by casting a string
literal to said custom String type. I thought I could achieve
this straight forwardly, but after trying a bit, I could not find
a (simple) working solution. I m
On Saturday, 23 March 2019 at 13:04:10 UTC, kinke wrote:
On Saturday, 23 March 2019 at 11:35:45 UTC, Simon wrote:
Is there any way to end up with the correct mangled function
signature, using only pointer types?
The problem is that the C++ compiler uses head-const for the
array param (`float
Hi,
I experienced some trouble with DMD today, while trying to
declare an external C++ function in D, that gets linked from a
C++ compiled object file.
The C++ function that I want to link against is declared as
follows:
bool ColorEdit4(const char* label, float col[4], int flags = 0);
Yield
On Saturday, 9 March 2019 at 09:12:13 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Friday, 8 March 2019 at 11:42:11 UTC, Simon wrote:
Thanks, this works flawlessly. Out of interest: what is the
"enum" doing there? I had the exact same behaviour in a
function before, that I only called at compile-time, so w
On Thursday, 7 March 2019 at 21:50:17 UTC, Johannes Loher wrote:
```
enum profile_scope(string name) = "import core.stdc.stdio :
printf;
printf(\""
~ name ~ "\n\"); scope(exit) printf(\"" ~ name ~ "\n\");";
extern (C) void main()
{
mixin(profile_scope!"func1");
}
```
This uses string
On Thursday, 7 March 2019 at 20:34:48 UTC, Johannes Loher wrote:
auto profile_scope(string name)
{
import std.format : format;
return q{import std.stdio : writeln; writeln("%1$s");
scope(exit)
writeln("%1$s");}.format(name);
}
void main()
{
mixin(profile_scope("func1"));
}
Is th
Hello,
I am currently porting the frontend of my instrumenting profiler
to D. It features a C++-makro that profiles the time between
entering and leaving a scope (achieved with con-/destructors in
C++). Since D has scopeguards, I hoped to achieve this by
creating a mixin that generates the fo
On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 at 13:54:16 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
struct Double
{
double v = 0;
alias v this;
}
struct Foo(size_t n)
{
Double[n] bar;
}
Interesting approach. But this might introduce problems later.
For example `Double` is implicitly convertible to `double`, but
`D
On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 at 13:48:16 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 at 13:36:56 UTC, Simon Bürger wrote:
Is there a good way to set them all to zero? The only way I
can think of is using string-mixins to generate a string such
as "[0,0,0,0]" with exactl
I have a static array inside a struct which I would like to be
initialized to all-zero like so
struct Foo(size_t n)
{
double[n] bar = ... all zeroes ...
}
(note that the default-initializer of double is nan, and not zero)
I tried
double[n] bar = 0; // does not compile
double[n]
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 12:50:22 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 5 August 2017 at 19:58:08 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
(k){ dgs[k] = {writefln("%s", k); }; }(i);
Yeah, that's how I'd do it - make a function taking arguments
by value that return the delegate you actually wa
On Saturday, 5 August 2017 at 18:54:22 UTC, ikod wrote:
Maybe std.functional.partial can help you.
Nope.
int i = 1;
alias dg = partial!(writeln, i);
i = 2;
dg();
still prints '2' as it should because 'partial' takes 'i' as a
symbol, which is - for this purpose
On Saturday, 5 August 2017 at 18:54:22 UTC, ikod wrote:
On Saturday, 5 August 2017 at 18:45:34 UTC, Simon Bürger wrote:
On Saturday, 5 August 2017 at 18:22:38 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
[...]
No, sometimes I want i to be the value it has at the time the
delegate was defined. My actual usecase
On Saturday, 5 August 2017 at 18:22:38 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Saturday, 5 August 2017 at 18:19:05 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Saturday, 5 August 2017 at 18:17:49 UTC, Simon Bürger wrote:
If a lambda function uses a local variable, that variable is
captured using a hidden this-pointer. But
If a lambda function uses a local variable, that variable is
captured using a hidden this-pointer. But this capturing is
always by reference. Example:
int i = 1;
auto dg = (){ writefln("%s", i); };
i = 2;
dg(); // prints '2'
Is there a way to make the delegate "capture by value
On Thursday, 29 June 2017 at 00:07:35 UTC, kinke wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 22:16:48 UTC, Simon Bürger wrote:
I am currently using LDC on 64-bit-Linux if that is relevant.
It is, as LDC on Windows/MSVC would use 64-bit compile-time
reals. ;)
Changing it to double on other
Thanks a lot for your comments.
On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 23:56:42 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
[...]
Nice work can you re or dual license under the boost license ?
I'd like to incorporate the qd type into newCTFE.
The original work is not mine but traces back to
http://crd-legacy.lbl.gov/~dh
According to the standard (http://dlang.org/spec/float.html), the
compiler is allowed to compute any floating-point statement in a
higher precision than specified. Is there a way to deactivate
this behaviour?
Context (reason why I need this): I am building a "double double"
type, which essent
On Tuesday, 14 June 2016 at 14:47:11 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
* only do one mutable version of opSlice
* add implicit cast (using "alias this") for const(Slice!T) ->
Slice!(const(T)).
Interesting, but unfortunately, the compiler isn't eager about
this conversion. auto x = s[5 .. 7] isn
On Tuesday, 14 June 2016 at 01:50:17 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 23:51:40 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
inout(Slice) opSlice(size_t a, size_t b) inout
{
return cast(inout(Slice)) Slice(ptr+a, b-a);
}
Seems the pointer has to be force-cast back to a
I'm writing a custom (originally multi-dimensional) Slice-type,
analogous to the builtin T[], and stumbled upon the problem that
the following code won't compile. The workaround is simple: just
write the function three times for mutable/const/immutable. But
as "inout" was invented to make that
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 10:40:17 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 21:46:17 UTC, Simon Bürger
wrote:
Sadly, this is incorrect as well. Because if such an object is
collected by the gc, but the gc decides not to run the
destructor, the buffer will never be free'd
What exactly is the difference between C and D headers?
D itself does not use headers at all. But you will need "D
headers", if you want to call a C library from D. The translation
is mostly syntatic and straight forward like:
* replace #define-constants with enums
* replace macros with (templa
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 22:15:41 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:46:15 -0500, Simon Bürger [...]
More and more, I think a thread-local flag of "I'm in the GC
collection cycle" would be hugely advantageous -- if it doesn't
already exist..
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 22:04:50 UTC, Namespace wrote:
A struct is a value type. So it is passed by value and is
placed on the stack.
{
S s;
}
S DTor is called at the end of the scope. So you can rely on
RAII as long as you use structs.
On the stack yes. But not on the heap:
On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 at 13:38:55 UTC, Cooler wrote:
Is there any official/unofficial documentation about -deps
command line option output?
This does not answer your question directly, but if you want to
create dependency files for use with make, you can use "rdmd
--makedepend".
w the suggested way in D is to not deallocate the buffer at
all, but rely on the gc to collect it eventually. But it still
puzzles me that it seems to be impossible to do. Anybody have an
idea how I could make it work?
thanks, simon
On 18/12/2013 22:11, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/18/2013 01:17 PM, Hugo Florentino wrote:
> Changing the codepage worked indeed. Thanks.
> Now, how could I do that programmatically, so that if my application
> runs on a system with a different codepage, the output looks correct?
It is not solva
On Sunday, 10 February 2013 at 06:57:42 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 02/09/2013 10:52 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> auto things = iota(10).map!(i => new Thing(i))().array;
Actually, without the extra parentheses:
auto things = iota(10).map!(i => new Thing(i)).array;
Ali
It's a shame there is
Hi, I'm new to the D programming language. Overall I'm liking
things very much, but I'm still getting the hang of a few things.
Here's a basic programming pattern: I have a class called Thing,
and while I'm coding I decide I need N Thing instances.
In C++ that's a matter of
std::vector things(
On 18/01/2013 08:09, Rob T wrote:
On Friday, 18 January 2013 at 07:34:35 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
You cannot both have CTFE/inlining/templates and hide the source code.
It's the same as in C++.
Yes I am aware of that limitation, nothing can be done except lose the
flexibility of templates a
On 18/09/2012 18:47, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 9/18/12, Simon wrote:
That's just complete and utter bullshit. A try/catch can be set in
WinMain, and any thrown exceptions in WndProc will propagate there.
Code:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/84293982
Screenshot:
http://i.imgur.com/r5wJh.png
On 17/09/2012 23:13, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 9/17/12, Simon wrote:
You MUST NOT allow a D exception to
propagate out of the wndproc (or indeed any other Win32 callback
function) as the Win32 calling code has no idea how to process it and
you'll just get a crash.
That's just co
On 16/09/2012 23:32, cal wrote:
On Sunday, 16 September 2012 at 22:08:53 UTC, deed wrote:
Exactly. I couldn't remember seeing this error before.
I've only used the dsource Win32 bindings, because there is often stuff
missing from the phobos ones:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/bindings/wiki/
On 24/07/2012 20:08, David wrote:
Am 24.07.2012 20:57, schrieb bearophile:
David:
Everything is still a float, so it's easier. Nothing wrong with that
or? Well this change decreases my performance by 1000%.
Aligning floats to 1 byte doesn't seem a good idea. Try to remove the
aling(1).
Bye,
On 13/07/2012 21:47, Kevin Cox wrote:
On Jul 13, 2012 4:40 PM, "OlaOst" mailto:ola...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I'm working on a program (using dmd 2.059 under windows) that
automatically reloads the contents of a file if it has changed, by
checking the last modified timestamp on the file every 0
On 06/07/2012 16:39, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 06-07-2012 16:07, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
06.07.2012 17:43, akaz пишет:
Hi,
Reading about the C++11, I stumbled upon this:
http://www2.research.att.com/~bs/C++0xFAQ.html#gc-abi
Specifically (quote):
int* p = new int;
p+=10;
// ... collect
On 16/05/2012 09:24, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-05-16 09:00, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Probably true. But also, if you're talking about a const pointer to a
mutable
value, the constness of the pointer is actually irrelevant to the
caller. The
pointer will be copied when the function is called,
On 15/04/2012 21:07, Trass3r wrote:
Am 15.04.2012, 21:20 Uhr, schrieb sclytrack :
this( const size_t step) const
{
this.step = step;
}
Error: cannot modify const/immutable/inout expression this.step
Is this the expected behavior? Thanks.
Yep.
No it's not:
import std.stdio;
struct foo
On 19/12/2011 18:01, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Check if GetProcAddress returns null? It seems to me you're looking
for _magicFunction but defining magicNumber, two different names.
that's be it. can't remember the rules for whether it will have a
leading underscore, but you can always use depende
On 12/12/2011 09:31, ParticlePeter wrote:
Hi,
I read several posts about reading in files, but I can't find the "best" way
for my purpose. I am using std.file in the examples bellow.
1.) I'm trying to read an OpenGL Vertex and Fragment Shader. The wired thing on
my approach is that it works .
On 11/11/2011 23:23, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Ali Çehreli Wrote:
On 11/11/2011 01:42 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:10:12 -0500, Simon wrote:
On 11/11/2011 19:04, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:01:42 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote
On 11/11/2011 19:04, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:01:42 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
There should be no bounds error in any case, an empty slice is valid.
By "in any case" I meant in either debug or release mode.
-Steve
even when you index beyond the bounds of
On 11/11/2011 16:56, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
news:mailman.866.1321013026.24802.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
On Friday, November 11, 2011 11:46:02 RenatoL wrote:
int[7] arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7];
writeln(arr[$..$]);
this simply prints a newline... I expec
On 10/11/2011 18:46, Simen Kjærås wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:56:37 +0100, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:24:30 -0500, Simen Kjærås
wrote:
I'm creating a Checked!T struct for integral values. The version
attached
works
for the most part, but some parts confuse me, name
On 31/08/2011 15:42, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Trass3r wrote:
Am 31.08.2011, 12:05 Uhr, schrieb maarten van damme
:
Am I sure those functions aren't shift around during optimization?
No. It's just an ugly hack and likely to go up in flames.
Also what you try could only work with PIC but even then
On 30/08/2011 16:50, maarten van damme wrote:
I'm playing around with writing memory to other processes and now I want
to write a whole function to the other processes memory. The problem is
that function.sizeof always returns 4. Is there a way to get the actual
size?
The short answer is no.
Y
On 06/08/2011 19:07, bearophile wrote:
Simon:
Unless you need pointer to members/pointer to member functions, just
about every bit of c++ is easier and more straight forward in D.
I have had some problems when the original C++ code uses struct inheritance ("alias
this" helps
On 06/08/2011 17:59, Mirko Pilger wrote:
hello everybody,
i'm new to this language and plan to start learning it by porting parts
of an existing c++ library to dpl.
i would very much appreciate it if you have some tips & tricks, hints of
pitfalls or any other experiences to share.
mirko
Well
On 29/07/2011 19:27, simendsjo wrote:
On 29.07.2011 19:13, Simon wrote:
On 29/07/2011 11:14, simendsjo wrote:
Not sure how I can search for symbols in the library, but it seems the
library is missing functions.
I've tried using coffimplib on kernel32.lib from the Windows SDK, but it
ne
On 29/07/2011 11:14, simendsjo wrote:
Not sure how I can search for symbols in the library, but it seems the
library is missing functions.
I've tried using coffimplib on kernel32.lib from the Windows SDK, but it
neither produces a new library or give me an error.
What Windows version is the libr
On 24/04/2011 03:25, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
And by calling IASIO.controlPanel(), I mean calling it on the instance.
E.g.:
class Foo
{
IASIO bar; // can call bar.controlPanel();
}
Not sure how D handles interfaces. If bar is implicitly a pointer
then the bit where you do:
void *this_ = &
On 24/04/2011 02:23, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
I'm in the same situation as the person who posted about this 5 years ago:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/learn/thiscall_calling_convention_4943.html
This isn't so much relevant to COM as it is to this ASIO implementation. The
is
On 12/04/2011 01:59, Steven Wawryk wrote:
On 12/04/11 07:36, Simon wrote:
On 11/04/2011 22:15, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 11/04/2011 02:37, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
This is true for static "globals" and static members, but the C++
standard requires static locals (local to functi
On 11/04/2011 22:15, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 11/04/2011 02:37, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I don't know the background of how static variables really work, so is
there a good reason why the first function can't work like the one below
it?
They have to be calculated at compile time so that orderi
On 08/04/2011 05:37, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Is the makefile supposed to work "out-of-the-box", or is it expected that it
be edited first? Because when I do "make -f win32.mak" form the src dir I
just get "Error: '\dm\bin\dmc' not found". Same (exact same) result if I do
"make -f win32.mak D=path
On 03/04/2011 12:39, simendsjo wrote:
On 03.04.2011 13:32, Simon wrote:
From the D spec:
"A program may not rely on array bounds checking happening"
Where in the spec are you finding this? Or are you talking in general,
not just on array operations?
D does bounds checking, so I d
On 03/04/2011 12:46, bearophile wrote:
Simon:
"A program may not rely on array bounds checking happening"
Yet DMD has to perform them to help programmers.
No it doesn't. D is supposed to be systems programming language.
Unnecessary bounds checking would make array access
On 03/04/2011 12:10, simendsjo wrote:
int[] a = [1,2,3];
int[4] b;
assert(b == [0,0,0,0]);
b = a[] * 3; // oops... a[] * 3 takes element outside a's bounds
assert(b[$-1] == 0); // fails.. last element is *(a.ptr+3) * 3
From the D spec:
"A program may no
On 13/03/2011 15:29, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:43:09 +0100, Simon wrote:
Convention is to use ^ as cross product and * as dot product.
Really? I've never heard of it. Rather, everyone I've talked to about it
has said exactly what I did.
Openscenegraph
On 13/03/2011 14:11, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Spacen Jasset wrote:
On 13/03/2011 00:06, Bekenn wrote:
On 3/12/2011 2:20 PM, Simon wrote:
I've done lots of 3d over the years and used quite a lot of different
libraries and I've come to prefer code that makes a distinction between
On 12/03/2011 20:51, Caligo wrote:
Given everything that D offers, what would be the best way to implement
a Point and a Vector type? The same (x, y, z) can be used to represent
vectors, but a point represents a position, whereas a vector represents
a direction. So, would you define two differe
On 07/03/2011 19:45, Emil Madsen wrote:
On 7 March 2011 20:37, Simen kjaeraas mailto:simen.kja...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Martin Kinkelin mailto:no...@spam.com>> wrote:
Thanks,
movups XMM0, [EAX];
works. The SSE version takes more than 160% of the run-time
compa
On 07/03/2011 15:14, Martin Kinkelin wrote:
Hi, sorry for the dumb question, but how do i get the address of an object
inside a member function in inline assembly?
I have no experience with assembler yet. It seems like names of variables on
the stack are treated as pointers in inline assembly, b
On 02/03/2011 11:28, Simon wrote:
On 02/03/2011 08:56, Trass3r wrote:
Am 01.03.2011, 23:33 Uhr, schrieb bearophile :
Do you know why DMD doesn't give a compilation error here?
import core.stdc.stdio: sscanf;
immutable int value = 5;
void main() {
sscanf("10".ptr, &
On 02/03/2011 08:56, Trass3r wrote:
Am 01.03.2011, 23:33 Uhr, schrieb bearophile :
Do you know why DMD doesn't give a compilation error here?
import core.stdc.stdio: sscanf;
immutable int value = 5;
void main() {
sscanf("10".ptr, "%d".ptr, &value);
}
What's the D signature of sscanf?
voi
On 23/02/2011 19:56, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
You can overload the cast operator in D:
T opCast(T)() {...}
but it's for explicit cast only. There is not currently any way to do implicit
casts with an overloaded operator. You have to use alias this for that, which
may or may not do what be
On 23/02/2011 18:42, Simon wrote:
On 23/02/2011 14:37, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 23.02.2011 17:08, %u wrote:
Hi everyone,
Was hoping someone could help me make sense of this bit of C++ code:
class canvas
{
operator HDC() { return _hdc; }
protected:
canvas(HDC hdc): _hdc(hdc) {}
HDC _hdc
On 23/02/2011 14:37, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 23.02.2011 17:08, %u wrote:
Hi everyone,
Was hoping someone could help me make sense of this bit of C++ code:
class canvas
{
operator HDC() { return _hdc; }
protected:
canvas(HDC hdc): _hdc(hdc) {}
HDC _hdc;
}
From what I understand, HDC is an a
On 21/02/2011 00:24, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 16:23:14 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Simon" wrote in message
news:ijrdif$1nn6$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 20/02/2011 14:59, d coder wrote:
Greetings
I tried to initialize a struct member with a function po
On 20/02/2011 14:59, d coder wrote:
Greetings
I tried to initialize a struct member with a function pointer, and
found that DMD2 did not like it. Are not function pointers compile
time constants? And why they should not be?
Regards
- Cherry
No a function doesn't have an address until the .exe
On 15/02/2011 18:22, Simon wrote:
On 14/02/2011 22:47, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Anyone know what DMD/OPTLINK's default stack size on windows is? Or
how to
find out?
Dunno.
Actually if you have visual studio installed you can use the dumpbin
utility. the /headers switch prints out the in
On 14/02/2011 22:47, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Anyone know what DMD/OPTLINK's default stack size on windows is? Or how to
find out?
Dunno.
Also, I don't suppose there's a way to give a linker flag to DMD that it'll
simply ignore on non-Windows platforms, is there?
Last time I played with it
On 12.02.2011 11:47, bearophile wrote:
d coder:
Is there a way fro the users like myself to vote up an issue on DMD Bugzilla.
In this case I think voting is not so useful. I think that actually
implementing weak references is better (and later they may be added to Phobos).
It requires some
On 25.01.2011 00:22, Robert Clipsham wrote:
If you append something mutable to something immutable, the resulting
type must be mutable, as some of the contents is mutable and could be
changed - if that can happen the result can't be immutable. To get
around this there's .idup I believe.
This i
On 20/01/2011 02:20, Mariusz Gliwiński wrote:
2011-01-19 19:23, Simon wrote:
Traditionally:
struct dummy;
alias dummy* HANDLE;
void doSomething(HANDLE h) {
}
Just don't provide a body for dummy to keep it abstract.
So, if I understood correctly I can't transparently swap po
On 19/01/2011 12:27, Mariusz Gliwiński wrote:
How to make a HANDLE in D without casting and stuff:
interface iface{
void doSomething(HANDLE h);
}
class A : iface {
override void doSomething(HANDLE h) {
assert(validPointer(h));
h.foo = bar;
}
}
class B : iface {
someVar table[];
override void doS
On 26/12/2010 12:18, spir wrote:
Hello,
I need to test in sequence
Denis
-- -- -- -- -- -- --
vit esse estrany ☣
spir.wikidot.com
http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_intrinsic.html
--
My enormous talent is exceeded only by my outrageous laziness.
http://www.ssTk.co.uk
On 22/12/2010 18:17, bearophile wrote:
A little D2 program:
void main() {
pure nothrow int foo1(immutable int x) { return x; }
static pure nothrow int foo2(immutable int x) { return x; }
}
This is the asm of the two inner functions:
_D6test4mainFZv4foo1MFNaNbyiZicomdat
On 27/11/2010 16:16, spir wrote:
Hello,
I get the above error when compiling. No idea what it means.
It happens when I add the following func:
enum XHTML_CODES = ["&":"&", "<":"<", ">":">", "\"":""",
"'":"'"];
string xhtmlEscape (in string text) {
string newText = text;
Is there a simple way to do this without getting the "version defined after
use" error?
version(Ansi) {
} else version(Unicode) {
} else {
Version = Unicode;
}
I've resorted to this, but it seems hackish:
version(Ansi) {
version = Ansi_ForReal;
} else version(Unicode) {
version = Un
96 matches
Mail list logo
