On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 22:02:57 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 21:55:10 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
For the latter - on Windows 10 b64-bit - I am using following
options for example:
-shared -L/LIBPATH:c:\\lib -L//IMPLIB:mylib.lib
I'm not having any luck
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 22:54:26 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 22:49:06 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I'm not trying to created a shared library in D. My goal is to
use a shared library from C in D. Right now, I'm working with
a simple test case to make sure I
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 22:35:29 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
Sorry the option should be -L/IMPLIB:.. - with single slash but
you only need this if you are trying to create a shared library
which presumably you are not?
I believe to create a static library you need to use -lib,
I also added an enhancement request:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15588
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 21:39:08 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
Hi I am also new to D and trying to do similar things - i.e.
call a shared library written in C from D, but also create a
shared library in D.
For the latter - on Windows 10 b64-bit - I am using following
options for
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 22:14:25 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 22:09:47 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
The -L/LIBPATH:c:\lib gives me an error that
OPTLINK : Warning 9: Unknown Option : LIBPATH
and then gives the path I put is not found.
At least when it's
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 00:43:05 UTC, W.J. wrote:
The GNU linker ld, for instance, uses the -l switch
for adding libraries to link against and -L to add a
search path to look for the libraries passed in with
-l.
If you leave it to the compiler to invoke the linker you need
to
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 01:34:00 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
Have you used pragma(lib)?
https://dlang.org/spec/pragma.html#lib
There's also a section on it in Learning D.
Looks like the sections are split apart by a couple hundred
pages. I tried it with the .lib I created earlier without
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 04:03:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for the detailed reply.
On Wednesday, 20 January 2016 at 19:19:04 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 January 2016 at 16:37:31 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I'm not sure if this is how the behavior is supposed to be or
if it is a bug.
I believe, however, that it _is_ a bug that the imported
symbols are visible outside
On Wednesday, 20 January 2016 at 19:48:04 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 January 2016 at 19:19:04 UTC, Marc Schütz
wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 January 2016 at 16:37:31 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I'm not sure if this is how the behavior is supposed to be or
if it is a bug.
I believe, however, that
I was thinking about using mixin templates to put some
module-level default information in a single file so that it
doesn't clutter up other files. It works for imports, but it
doesn't seem to propagate for function attributes.
module_default.d
---
module module_default;
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 18:07:40 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
[snip]
Cool example.
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 04:43:52 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
[snip]
Thanks again! Will review.
On Tuesday, 16 February 2016 at 15:03:36 UTC, Jakob Jenkov wrote:
I cannot speak on behalf of the D community. In my opinion I
don't think that it is D that needs a big data strategy. It is
the users of D that need that strategy.
I am originally a Java developer. Java devs. create all kinds
I'm trying to write a function that will adjust the parameters of
a function pointer.
In the code below, my goal is to call the function qux with a
variety of different function pointers (in the actual
application, I don't have the ability to modify qux). I created a
function foo that I
On Friday, 19 February 2016 at 11:26:56 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
Like
alias fp1 = int function(int x);
alias fp2 = int function(int x, int y);
auto foo(T)(T f)
{
static if (is(T == fp2))
return f;
else static if (is(T == fp1))
{
On Friday, 19 February 2016 at 14:21:26 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
int bar(int x)
{
return x;
}
int baz(int x, int y)
{
return bar(x);
}
void main()
{
import std.stdio : writeln;
int function(int x, int y) foo_bar =
writeln(foo_bar(1, 2));
}
This
On Friday, 19 February 2016 at 15:00:51 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
This works.
But when I re-write foo to take that into account as in below,
I get an error that I can't implicitly convert int function(int
x) to int function(int x, int y).
I don't think I had looked at what you had done carefully
On Friday, 19 February 2016 at 22:07:25 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
If you want to cast function pointers successfully, you have to
know the D calling convention.
[snip]
I figured there was an explanation. Definitely "here be dragons"
territory. I hope I can figure out a better solution, but
On Friday, 19 February 2016 at 22:34:48 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
I tested this a fair bit today, and I haven't been able to do
any of the nefarious things I expected to be able to do. No
overwriting variables in the caller's scope, no smashing stack
pointers, etc.
I was surprised by this
On Sunday, 21 February 2016 at 14:32:15 UTC, dextorious wrote:
Now, seeing as how my experience writing D is literally a few
hours, is there anything I did blatantly wrong? Did I miss any
optimizations? Most importantly, can the elegant operator
chaining style be generally made as fast as
I'm playing around with ldc on Windows 64bit. I'm able to compile
some simple stuff, but I'm having an issue with something I
compile giving an error:
The application was unable to start correctly (0xc7b). Click
OK to close the application.
This is effectively the ldc2 command I had run
On Sunday, 21 February 2016 at 17:54:30 UTC, Rainer Schuetze
wrote:
This error code is often caused by a DLL being compiled for the
wrong architecture, so I guess that you have some 32-bit DLL in
your original folder that is found instead of the 64-bit DLL.
That pointed me in the direction
On Wednesday, 30 March 2016 at 18:56:29 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Does this do what you want?
I think it does. That's an approach I would not have thought of.
I do not really know much about AliasSeq.
On Wednesday, 30 March 2016 at 18:56:29 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Does this do what you want?
Okay, I've looked at this a bit more thoroughly and it works
perfectly (perhaps with a better name put in phobos?).
If I'm understanding this correctly, the ImplType creates the
correct type
I wrote a version of cartesianProduct that will return the
cartesian product when the some of the types are not ranges. The
original code is below.
My issue is that I can't figure out how to turn it into a
variadic template. The latest thing I tried is:
auto mixedCartesianProduct(T...)(T x)
I like how dmd has the -profile switch, but I'm not sure how to
go about profiling ldc2. I don't see any compiler flags in the
-help.
I'm also using Windows, if that matters, but if the best options
are on Linux, I can dual-boot.
I've been playing around with __traits and I find myself confused
on one aspect. In the code below, I was testing whether some
templates would compile given types. For the most part it works
as I would expect.
I think I get why the third one works with foo!(int). My guess is
that it assumed
It looks like the bug has already been reported. There are a few
associated with __traits(compiles), but this one seems most
relevant:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3448
It also suggests that this is relevant:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=965
On Friday, 8 April 2016 at 20:58:46 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
And yes, functions can return tuples: :)
I was getting that same error recently, but I forgot what was
causing it. He mentions AliasSeq above, could the error be
referring to compile time argument lists?
On Friday, 8 April 2016 at 18:27:59 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
suppose I have a forward or random access range. what's the
best way to compare each element with the element 4 elements
prior to that element? I could map each element to a tuple of
the element and the element 4 bars previously
On Wednesday, 2 March 2016 at 02:36:50 UTC, Charles wrote:
is this something that could be accomplished in D with CTFE?
I think I've heard him say that tools should be part of the
language. However, I haven't watched that video and anyway am not
sure how important CTFE would be to this
On Thursday, 31 March 2016 at 10:27:41 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
auto mixedCartesianProduct(T...)(T x)
{
import std.range, std.algorithm : cartesianProduct;
return
mixin(`cartesianProduct(`~iota(T.length).map!`"conditionalOnly(x["~text(a)~"])"`().join(",")~`)`);
}
On Friday, 15 April 2016 at 17:51:41 UTC, Napster wrote:
I would like to start learning the De Facto standard. which
book or document would you use?
http://erdani.com/index.php/books/tdpl/
or
https://dlang.org/spec/intro.html
which one would you call de facto standard?
If I were learning
On Friday, 15 April 2016 at 18:41:23 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Having said that, there are some omissions of how some features
interact.
I think it is a fantastic resource and have made much use out of
it. I hope you keep updating it.
It just happens that there are always some random
On Thursday, 14 April 2016 at 11:43:42 UTC, pineapple wrote:
I'm haven't got access to my Windows PC at the moment, but that
sounds like it will solve my problem. Thank you!
Also, you can use rdmd on Windows if dmd is installed.
On Friday, 15 July 2016 at 19:24:12 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
Have you considered recursive solutions?
Will try that next. Thanks.
I think this worked for me.
A few tricks were that I had to have the fillAliasSeq template as
global and also I couldn't disable the default constructor for
what I
In the code below, is it possible to combine both bar functions
into one function (I just put some random foo function to get it
to work)?
When I try to do it, I get errors that
no property 'expand' for type '(Tuple!(int, int))'
I think it has something to do with T... being considered a
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 07:23:52 UTC, John wrote:
auto bar(T...)(T x)
{
static if (T.length == 1 && isTuple!(T[0]))
return foo(x.expand);
else
return foo(x);
}
Hmm, this actually doesn't seem to be resolving my issue. I'm
still getting the error about not being able to
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 07:23:52 UTC, John wrote:
auto bar(T...)(T x)
{
static if (T.length == 1 && isTuple!(T[0]))
return foo(x.expand);
else
return foo(x);
}
void main()
{
auto x = tuple(1, 2);
auto y = bar(x);
auto z = bar(x.expand);
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 15:40:20 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote:
You can find this out from the error, which says that you can't
expand an object of type `(Tuple!(int, int))`. Note the
surrounding parenthesis: they tell you that what you have is
not a Tuple, but an AliasSeq whose only
On Saturday, 9 July 2016 at 05:40:10 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 07/09/2016 12:33 AM, jmh530 wrote:
I'm trying to create a tuple of variadic length containing
structs with
mixed types. So for instance, given
struct Foo(T, U)
{
T x;
U y;
}
I want to create something like
On Friday, 15 July 2016 at 17:41:21 UTC, Michael Coulombe wrote:
Your issue is this line:
alias boxAR(A) = Box!(A, R);
This means that A must be a type, but you are trying to
instantiate it with lambdas. If you switch to:
alias boxAR(alias A) = Box!(A, R);
But now you are back to the
I'm trying to create a tuple of variadic length containing
structs with mixed types. So for instance, given
struct Foo(T, U)
{
T x;
U y;
}
I want to create something like
Tuple!(Foo!(type1, type2), Foo!(type1, type3), ..., Foo!(type1,
typeN)) x;
The bar function (below) is
On Saturday, 9 July 2016 at 05:40:10 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
template bar(T, U...)
if (U.length > 1)
{
import std.meta : staticMap;
import std.typecons : Tuple;
alias baz(A) = Tuple!(T, A);
alias V = staticMap!(baz, U);
alias TupleToFoo(T : Tuple!(Types), Types ...) =
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 19:59:05 UTC, Mathias Lang wrote:
Delegate don't GC allocate when:
- You take a pointer to a member function
- The function accept a `scope` delegate and you pass a literal
- You use `scope myDG = (Params) { body... }`
I have a somewhat related question.
Why use a
I was playing around with some Eponymous Templates. I had been
under the impression that Implicit Function-Template
Instantiation (IFTI) meant that you don't have to explicitly
instantiate all functions. However, it seems like there are cases
with eponymous templates with functions in them
On Wednesday, 29 June 2016 at 21:38:23 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
You're explicitly instantiating the outer bar there, not the
inner one.
Yes, you're correct. I mixed up the inner/outer. I just thought
it was something weird I had noticed.
I haven't used std.process before and am trying to play around
with it.
In the code below, the first file writes some text to an output
file. My goal is to be able to read what is written to that file
without creating the file itself. I'm not sure it's possible, but
the second file is my
On Thursday, 9 February 2017 at 21:36:46 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 02/09/2017 12:44 PM, jmh530 wrote:
> I think the issue is that create_file doesn't write to
stdout, it writes
> to file.
Correct. Pipe works by piping the standard input/output streams.
> Other than reading the file and then
On Thursday, 8 September 2016 at 10:18:36 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
I am certainly hoping that Chapel will be the language to
displace NumPy for serious computation in the Python-sphere.
Given it's foundation in the PGAS model, it has all the
parallelism needs, both cluster and local, built
On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 11:37:44 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
I really don't see what's not working in this.
Trying to get new D users from Python users is the main problem.
I came to D from Python/R/Matlab. The biggest issue for me wasn't
error messages so much as the lack of
On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 19:19:23 UTC, data pulverizer
wrote:
For some time I have been considering a problem to do with
creating tables with unbounded types, one of the failed
attempts is here:
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/gdjaoxypicsxlfvzw...@forum.dlang.org?page=1
I then
On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 20:49:42 UTC, data pulverizer
wrote:
You're quite right that D doesn't need to change at all to
implement something like pandas or dataframes in R, but I am
thinking of how to got further. Very often in data science
applications types will turn up that are
On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 18:55:41 UTC, pineapple wrote:
So the first difference you're likely to notice is that it's
not as well documented. (Sorry. I'm a busy woman. I'll get
around to it.) I try to make up for it with copious unit tests,
which should provide a good example for how
On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 21:33:25 UTC, pineapple wrote:
Fuck it, I took an hour to document the most significant
modules.
https://github.com/pineapplemachine/mach.d/tree/master/mach/range
Looks like a step in the right direction!
On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 21:41:20 UTC, data pulverizer
wrote:
Yes, but from a usability point of view this would be very poor
- forcing the user to create a new variable each time they
modified a table. I am aware that databases do this but it is
hidden away.
To be fair, you can
On Friday, 9 September 2016 at 13:24:18 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
For computational work I'd say Chapel was just as productive as
any other language, probably better. This is though likely an
issue on which there is only opinion and no facts.
GPGPU support is not in Chapel as yet I believe,
On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 18:10:45 UTC, pineapple wrote:
You might want to check out the ranges package of the library
I'm working on.
https://github.com/pineapplemachine/mach.d/tree/master/mach/range
There's a lot of stuff there. Do you mind giving a TL;DR version
of what your
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 19:41:35 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
-y1 is -1. But -y2 is uint.max, i.e. a pretty large positive
number.
The 'u' in "uint" stands for "unsigned". That is, it doesn't
know negative numbers. Dont' use uint when you need negative
numbers.
Ahh, doh.
I'm a little confused on why pow behaves so differently when
switching from an int to a uint for the exponent.
import std.math : pow;
import std.stdio : writeln;
void main()
{
float x = 2;
int y1 = 1;
uint y2 = 1;
writeln(pow(x, -y1)); //prints 0.5
I am trying to create a vectorize function that mixes in a new
version of function with the same name that applies the function
(to an ndslice).
The code below compiles without error and has the behavior I
would expect.
However, when I change the function import to a selective import
(e.g.
On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 19:05:47 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 19:03:55 UTC, Meta wrote:
`mixin vectorize!sin vsin; alias sin = vsin;` and see if it
Should be `alias sin = vsin.sin;`
Thanks, this pointed me in the right direction. I got the line
below working.
On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 00:22:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 00:16:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 19:07:49 UTC,
You have to specify the appropriate linker option, e.g.
-L-option. For gcc, that happens to -L, so you get -L-L. For
optlink
I am behind a corporate firewall at work so I have to manually
install dub packages. This requires setting the version manually,
otherwise master is inferred. This was working great until I had
ended a dub run command early. Now dub seems to have forgotten
that the versions are in there. It's
On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 19:54:01 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
[snip]
Does not seem to be a problem for another project using dub with
dmd and similar dependencies...
On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 21:25:18 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 20:18:20 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 19:54:01 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
[snip]
Does not seem to be a problem for another project using dub
with dmd and similar dependencies...
After
On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 20:18:20 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 19:54:01 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
[snip]
Does not seem to be a problem for another project using dub
with dmd and similar dependencies...
After spending some time looking through the dub issues, I found
that
Is it possible to set relative -L paths on dub for Windows?
Absolute paths work fine, just can't get relative paths working.
I was looking at the thread here
https://forum.dlang.org/post/dkwqrwzwqbrnaamlv...@forum.dlang.org
and came up with something like
{
...
"lflags":
On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 01:30:58 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
Yes, although I'll have to add an attribute shim layer for the
dcompute druntime symbols to be accessible for DMD. When you
compile LDC will produce .ptx and .spv files in the object file
directory which will be able to be used
On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 12:49:48 UTC, data pulverizer wrote:
Hmm ... it looks as the specialization `:` operator is working
like the constraint `:` operator and doing convertible at least
for the floating point case. Is that right?
They're both doing the same thing as far as I know.
I'm not sure if this is a bug or not.
I was playing around with printing out some member types with
unittests and I was noticing some strange results when they were
in @safe unittests rather than normal unittests. The first one
prints out what I would expect, but the @safe unittest puts @safe
On Monday, 21 August 2017 at 15:39:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
What I mean is that %s goes to %d for isIntegral!(typeof(x)),
and %s goes to %g for isFloatingPoint!(typeof(x)), and stays as
%s for everything else.
Given this, you could probably write the function you were
looking
I'm playing around with std.format and I'm trying to figure out
if there is any way to identify what "%s" should expand to.
So for instance:
int x = 1;
auto result = x.format!"%s";
I would know that result="1". I could run "1" through
unformatValue and get back 1. I'm looking to see if there
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 at 16:27:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Well, templates aren't the only case where we have attribute
inference anymore (e.g. auto return functions have it), and I'm
pretty sure that there have been several requests for fixing
issues regards to local declarations
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 at 18:25:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
@safe void main()
{
struct Foo {
int foo(int i, string s) @safe { return 0; }
double foo2(string s) @safe { return 0; }
}
printMemberTypes!(Foo);
}
The surprising part to me is that
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 14:50:45 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
[snip]
I appreciate the reply.
I should preface this by saying I don't really have a good sense
of how either BetterC or the D runtime work.
The recent BetterC thread made me wonder about TypeInfo in the D
runtime. My (surface level) understanding is that this is what
makes typeid work at run time.
I was looking through
On Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 16:36:45 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
[snip]
I haven't played around with it fully, but it seems like the
following resolves my issue in a sort of manual way:
template Process1(A, B)
{
static if (!isIndex!B)
alias Process1 = A;
else
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 02:06:27 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:
I wonder if it is possible to somehow turn D in to a scripting
language that can be run inside D?
The point? To have the same uniform syntax for quickly
developing scripts that can then be easily transferred, if
desired, in to a
On Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 21:02:07 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 19:22:18 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
You could also use string mixins.
Which will be more efficient then recursion.
I try to avoid string mixins unless I can't help it.
Nevertheless, I made an effort to try to
On Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 19:25:22 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 05/31/2017 08:50 PM, jmh530 wrote:
Note: I left out the function foo, but think of foo is to Foo
as tuple is to Tuple.
You should have included foo, in my opinion. I'm having trouble
figuring out what your code does. `process`
On Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 19:22:18 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
You could also use string mixins.
Which will be more efficient then recursion.
I try to avoid string mixins unless I can't help it.
Nevertheless, I made an effort to try to get it to work and below
seems to be working. I still
I have a struct that I am using like a Tuple, but I want to be
able to opIndex in a different way than Tuple's opIndex. I want
to be able to opIndex whatever is underlying the Tuple.
The code below works, but is kind of annoying because to extend
you have to keep adding static ifs. I want to
On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 19:03:39 UTC, David Sanders wrote:
You can use nested templates to process multiple AliasSeqs like
so:
[snip]
Interesting approach also.
The code below doesn't compile because "static variable z cannot
be read at compile time". However, z is a static variable, so I
don't see why it wouldn't be available at compile-time.
Bug or am I missing something?
struct Bar
{
int x = 2;
int y;
}
static Bar z = {y:1};
void main()
On Tuesday, 13 June 2017 at 22:16:37 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
No bug. `static` has no effect on module-level variables. `z`
is a normal mutable variable, not at all guaranteed to be
constant. Make it an `enum` or `immutable`.
Note that immutable doesn't guarantee compile-time constancy,
I'm trying to process one AliasSeq based on the types in another.
I've tried to sketch it out below. However, it doesn't work
because when you combine together two AliasSeq's in the template,
then it creates one AliasSeq.
The only other thing I considered was a staticMap with isIndex,
but I
On Monday, 11 September 2017 at 20:40:30 UTC, nkm1 wrote:
I don't know, maybe don't use alias this :) IMO, it's a really
dubious feature...
I don't think it's an issue of alias this, per se. I think it's
just something to be aware of and use your approach of aliasing
as necessary. It's
On Friday, 15 September 2017 at 18:20:06 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
It is my understanding that for both C and C++, an enum is
always an int (unless you're talking about enum classes in
C++). The size of an int can change based on your architecture,
but AFAIK, all of the architectures
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 00:33:25 UTC, Matt Jones wrote:
I've been reading the DerelictSDL2 source code. I think I have
a handle on it. I'll have to look more at the wiki too.
Thanks.
Might be interesting to write up your experience with doing it as
either blog post or part of
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 02:36:50 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Please try to be civil. It's fine if you're unhappy about some
aspect of how D works and want to discuss it, but we do not
condone personal attacks here.
- Jonathan M Davis
He seemed to be threatening the guy's life
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 19:16:05 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
()?: is not ambiguous!
The D community preaches all this safety shit but when it comes
down to it they don't seem to really care(look at the other
responses like like "Hey, C does it" or "Hey, look up the
operator
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 20:00:40 UTC, Brad Anderson
wrote:
If you want to help, I suggest trying to come up with a DIP
that addresses it while being conscious of how to avoid
breaking an enormous amount of code. I suspect it's a hard and
maybe impossible problem but if you are up
I'm more of a Windows user than a Linux user. I have the latest
DMD on my Linux install (linux mint 17.3), but I wanted to test
LDC.
I get a message that ldc2 is not found when I type ldc2 --version
or sudo ldc2 --version (I'm not on root and the existing user
does not have root privileges,
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 12:37:12 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
Yes you need to add ldc2 to your PATH. So if your ldc2 binary
is in
/user/something/something/folder_where_is_ldc2/ldc2
you havto add /user/something/something/folder_where_is_ldc2 to
your PATH.
You can test this by pasting
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 16:26:46 UTC, Neia Neutuladh
wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 15:04:08 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
testing_utf16.d(5): Error: Truncated UTF-8 sequence
testing_utf16.d(6):while evaluating: static
assert((_error_) == (wstring
))
Failed: ["dmd",
I don't seem to be having any issues making strings or dstrings
from hex, but I run into some issues with wstrings. Of course, my
knowledge of UTF-16 is limited, but I don't see any issues with
the code below and I get some errors on the hex string literal.
unittest
{
wchar data = 0x03C0;
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 19:25:58 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 19.09.2017 23:17, nkm1 wrote:
...
OTOH, booleans converting to numbers is a very questionable
feature. > I certainly have never seen any good use for it. ...
Actually, it is useful enough to have a Wikipedia page:
101 - 200 of 446 matches
Mail list logo
