Dave
thanks for the info. I have looked through all the HRD instructions ,cant find
any thing that covers tis problem. Guess will look again.
have a merry christmas
dale wt4t
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 9:
John
I have tried vox a year ago,not to much success,will check it out again. how
did you set yours up..using vox.
thanks
dale wt4t
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] What in
Pah!
Watching 20m PSK at the moment, why do so many users send in uppercase! PSK
uses varicode, lowercase is *so* much faster. PSK63 + Uppercase seems to defeat
the aims of the game.
Really it's down to the programmers - let's make the users aware that lowercase
is sent much faster. I do this
Dale, As you have an IC-746 let HRD do the TX/RX via CAT control.
Essentially you have 3 options for TX/RX:
* VOX,
* Let PSK31 Deluxe toggle a COM port pin,
* Interface with HRD and let HRD do the work.
I suggest you ask in the HRD forums or Yahoo! groups.
FWIW the replacement for PSK31 Deluxe
At least you are watching something... at this latitude, and at 1600Z,
can't hear anything on 20M psk. , and you are absolutely right on the caps
letter comment.
Question for you on HRD:
Just getting my TS480 hooked up, and HRD keeps wanting to give me the
narrowest filter when I try t
Simon,
Because most are "seniors" and have poor eye site, HI.
Jerry - K0HZI
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Pah!
Watching 20m PSK at the moment, why do so many users send in
uppercase! PSK uses varicode, lowercase is *so* much faster. PSK63 +
U
> Simon HB9DRV wrote:
> Watching 20m PSK at the moment, why do so many users send
> in uppercase! PSK uses varicode, lowercase is *so* much faster.
Hi Simon,
Here are my observations:
1. Many operators are familiar with RTTY and enjoy seeing Upper Case
for QSOs.
2. On PSK31, when decoding err
> Watching 20m PSK at the moment, why do so many users send in uppercase!
> PSK uses varicode, lowercase is *so* much faster. PSK63 + Uppercase
> seems to defeat the aims of the game.
> Simon Brown, HB9DRV
Why not have the receiving PC enlarge the text
and/or convert to all upper case *after* th
I RESEMBLE THAT REMARK ..
--- Jerry W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon,
>
> Because most are "seniors" and have poor eye site,
> HI.
>
> Jerry - K0HZI
>
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> Pah!
>
> Watching 20m PSK at the mome
Dale,
I too have a Donner but I have never used it. Do you like it?
Couldn't quite tell from your post...
Thanks,
Bob KB8ZJH Wittmuss
> Also I have a DONNER sound
> card interface,which goes from the Icom's ACC-1 port to the in and out
> of my computers sound card and the computers serial port
It's academic anyway, cause I can't type fast enough
even in capital letters..
Andy, DF4WC
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 08:23:38 -0800 (PST)
Von: bruce mallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: Re: [digitalradio] Re: GRUMBLE
> I RESEMBLE
Bob
have no problems with the donner interface,works perfect on psk-31. Can't see
what anyother interface could do any better. I would like to find a innerface
that can do the necessary sound card interface ,but also the rig control
interface for the icom thru the CV-1 port. all in one box. so
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 15:52 +, expeditionradio wrote:
> > Simon HB9DRV wrote:
> > Watching 20m PSK at the moment, why do so many users send
> > in uppercase! PSK uses varicode, lowercase is *so* much faster.
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> Here are my observations:
> 1. Many operators are familiar with
Certainly ! And I speak for myselfthe easy move is to use shift lock...
the clever move is to increase the font size...
Thanks for the reminder, Simon.
Jose, CO2JA
---
Jerry W wrote:
> Simon,
>
> Because most are "seniors" and have poor eye site, HI.
>
> Jerry - K0HZI
>
> --- In digit
i have often thought that a caps lock mode would be nice. echoes
locally in caps but sends out in lowercase. then add the same feature
on the RX side to uppercase all the text that you receive, if you like
that green-keys feel.
if you "speed enhancer" on the transmit side, people might turn i
Here I feel much safer if I use a transistor to key the PTTdriven by
light.
I use an optocoupler to key the PTT. It has stood thunder, which is real
serious
in June, without damage to the rest of the connected stuff. I don't use
rig control.
The simple transistor interface for CAT blew t
You are assuming that speed is what people want. Perhaps that
assumption is wrong.
73,
--Alex KR1ST
http://www.kr1st.com
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Pah!
>
> Watching 20m PSK at the moment, why do so many users send in
uppercase! PSK uses var
I, and a few others, will be testing 110 baud packet on 3590 plus 1000
Hz AF tonight as of 0100 UTC until 0300 UTC.
Andy K3UK
Thanks for the review, guess it is time to get busy installing it,eh?
Take care,
Bob KB8ZJH Wittmuss
Radio is my middle name!
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Wh
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Peter G. Viscarola" <
> On the topic of sound cards for digital modes in general:
>
> While using a sound card with a wide frequency response,
> and using high sampling rates, might intuitively appear to be
> a good idea, I'd suggest this is not likely to be
ANDY YOU HAVE A MERRY CHRISTMAS AND I HOPE I TYPED
THIS S L O W ENOUGH
--- Andreas Rehberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's academic anyway, cause I can't type fast enough
> even in capital letters..
>
> Andy, DF4WC
>
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 08:23:38 -
I had that in the back of my mind too. What is with all this thinking on
speed these days. People want faster digital, faster cw, even faster voice
contacts. Look at the "normal" QSO of today: "N7DC DE XU1 59 tu QRZ?"
Hey I might like to know the guys name, his QTH, What gear is he using,
No change to privileges, only the band segment.
See pages 13 & 18:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-178A1.pdf
... Duane N7QDN
Seeing something on the waterfall, but nothing decoding.
73
Dave
KB3MOW
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
I, and a few others, will be testing 110 baud packet on 3590 plus 1000
Hz AF tonight as of 0100 UTC until 0300 UTC.
Andy K3UK
so what software are u using for 100 baud packet? can't find anything that slow
on MixW
calling u on 300baud packet right now as of 0115Z
john
ve5mu
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 4:35 PM
Subject:
beaconing every 5 minutes 300 baud, 3590 USB
John
VE5MU
Well lets see with me, bad eye sight makes it easier to read. I am a
old RTTY operator when there was no such thing as lower case letters
on a keyboard (love the smell of oiled paper). Sometimes it is just
easier then looking for the shift key.
Kurt
K8YZK
Establishing separate spot frequencies for each mode seems a bit
impractical. The 003 frequency is close to where I operate on any mode
except PSK31. On the later, I usually set my dial frequency on the
watering hole frequency and use the cursor to pick out individual
signals or to set my trans
Yes, I agree. The frequency would be where we were putting our RF energy -
not what the dial on our radio said - and the maths that we do to get the
energy at that particular frequency is our own business. For instance if I
normally sit with the radio at 14070 USB and transmit at +1800Hz then we
c
Multipsk 4.1.2 has 100 baud packet. I hear someone weak currently.
I am beaconing every 3 minutes.
- Original Message -
From: John Bradley
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:30 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] packet test
beaconing every 5 min
Well I haven't solved the problem with Digipan, but the new card
seems to work just fine with MultiPSK, and also with Linux, so I
guess I will just forget about Digipan.
ok beaconing now 0330Z 110baud 100watts
- Original Message -
From: Andrew J. O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] packet test
Multipsk 4.1.2 has 100 baud packet. I hear someone weak currently.
I
"Very basic math of course, but unless
everyone has identical center frequencies, quite necessary."
Not at all! It doesnt matter if you set your rig at whatever freq (take
3581.5 your example) and the audio you have is at 1.500 on the waterfall.
The signal we are talking about is the one on 358
It is possible that I misread Andy's suggestion, but what you wrote
below should be in agreement with what I wrote. My position is that the
frequency should be the actual frequency and not the dial frequency.
73,
Rick, KV9U
Danny Douglas wrote:
>"Very basic math of course, but unless
>everyo
H. I just think it's just a habit carried over from RTTY,
since PSK is keyboard-based like RTTY. I've read some of the
replies on this to you; still looks like keeping it looking like RTTY.
BTW, your DM780 program is causing quite a stir amongst the
EPC membership. Looks like MixW i
Yep Rick, I was agreeing, but apparently didnt know who I was agreeing
with. hehe
Danny Douglas N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all
DX 2-6 years each
.
QSL LOTW-buro- direct
As courtesty I upload to eQSL but if you
use that - also pls upload to LOTW
or hard
36 matches
Mail list logo
