--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "ve3fwf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Any suggestions for PCALE? Not much activity so one channel per band
> should be used.
>
> 73, Bernie, VE3FWF, Ottawa, Canada
>
Bernie,
As the Canada Goose flies...we are fairly close. 80, 40, and 30M ALE
frequen
Any suggestions for PCALE? Not much activity so one channel per band
should be used.
73, Bernie, VE3FWF, Ottawa, Canada
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Salomao Fresco"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everybody!
>
> I don't think they (us) call it "calling frequency" for nothing,
bu
Hi Patrick.
Thanks for an answer.
> It works on Olivia because this mode uses a transform (Walsh
Hadamard), an interleaving and a pseudo-random function: so within a
pack of bits defined in time and in frequency there is a very strong
correlation and outside the correlation decreases rapidly. Th
Hear nothing on that freq here in Virginia at 8:27 EST. There is a carrier
on 10.14252, but doesnt seem to have any signal on it.
Danny Douglas N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all
DX 2-6 years each
.
QSL LOTW-buro- direct
As courtesy I upload to eQSL but if you
Tried off an on for about a half hour on 10.142 but no one around, or at
least anyone who can hear me. I then went down to the lower part of the
band to see if any CW stations around and called CQ and immediately got
a response from a VE7. We were both running QRP CW but the band did have
sever
I have made a couple of VK east coast ssb phone contacts on 30m but no
digital contacts yet. I have been trying mfsk16 at the recommended frequency
of 10142 - I even put some spots in the dx cluster when I was calling. The
band is very quiet with very little activity here. It is strange, as one
wo
I haven't done much with the 30m allocation -- Rein, PA0R, had some
info on it in his posting. In THEORY, it might be good for NVIS
during the peak of the sunspot cycle, but this time of the sunspot
cycle, NVIS wouldn't be good there. There may be other propagation
modes that may provide some sho
I have 1882 QSOs logged on 30 meters, and 253 countries and have found it an
excellent DX Band. That is two more countries than I have on 17 meters, and
just 2 less than on 40 meters. It exceeds my country count on 10/12 and of
course 80/160 as well. Looking at the logs I have worked a lot of
I have had a number of digital QSOs on 30 (mostly PSK) and found people all
up and down the band. When I sit on it and call CQ it has been somewhere
right around 10.140. Remember that is the "signal" position on the
waterfall, which in my case sets the VFO on 10.139, but that figure doesnt
mean a
Mel,
A couple of weeks ago I monitored 30M (10150) via the APRS HF system, I did
so for about two days. The band totally closed a couple of hours after
sunset. During the day time it was 200-500 mile range. About 5 years ago,
I did the same for a few weeks. 500 miles was about average during
In the past, I have often called around 10133 dial frequency +1500 =
10134.5, but with the proposal to go up into the U.S. automatic area, I
have been trying 10140.5 +1500 = 10142. In fact, at 2335Z here I have
been called CQ in Olivia 8/500. I could of course go to any of the sound
card modes
Hello everyone,
The posting by Paul K9PS was very interesting. I have a fascinated
interest in 30 metres, primarily because it should be a very useful
band for digital activity, and yet the band is always devoid of user.
s. May I ask Paul if he could advise us when 30 metres is at its best
bec
Hello Vojtech,
It works on Olivia because this mode uses a transform (Walsh Hadamard), an
interleaving and a pseudo-random function: so within a pack of bits defined in
time and in frequency there is a very strong correlation and outside the
correlation decreases rapidly. This permits to define
Hi Patrick.
I wonder whether it would make sense to improve MFSK16 to be more easy
to use. The idea is to decode multiple streams in parallel as it is
done in Olivia and pick the one with the best S/N. It seems to me that
Olivia is only that much popular because it is a lot easier to tune
than M
For a number of years now we have used 80M as a regional net , primary
coverage area was all of our province, which is just
slightly smaller than Texas in land area. The terrain here is very flat so
6M and 2M will work out quite a ways , but still does not cover the area
required. 2M link
We tried using 6 meters for a "local" voice net, but few members had
adequate capability and almost no one had horizontal polarization. We
thought that we would be able to attract the Technican class hams but no
luck with that. Our nets are heavily promoted on the local internet
reflector and b
The correction/clarification wasn't much clearer than the original,
was it?
I was thinking of the 80-meter loop when I originally posted the
60-foot-or-so length per side; and was referring to the 160m loop
when posting that "at 130 feet or so per side, it's pretty big", etc.
- ps
kd4e wrote:
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
