As usual Rick you take comments and twist them to take off on a tangent and
make personal put downs. Worse yet you make associations that were not made
and not intended. I will no longer make replies to you or your posts. If
your continual mis-directions and abuse of congenial communications
co
I am not sure THOR has officially been released yet, it was in Beta testing
last I checked.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:49 PM, matt gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HELLO,
> WHERE CAN I FIND SOFTWARE FOR THOR
>
>
> MATTHEW A. GREGORY
> KC2PUA
>
>
>
>
--
Andy K3UK
www.obriensweb.com
(QS
HELLO,
WHERE CAN I FIND SOFTWARE FOR THOR
MATTHEW A. GREGORY
KC2PUA
Bill Vodall WA7NWP wrote:
>
> > Phil's paper is from many years ago but the reality is that there was no
> > further movement away from the legacy AX.25 equipment toward a new
> > layer, much less toward a completely new protocol.
>
> There is some movement...
>
> Check out:
>
> FX.25 - Forward Err
> Phil's paper is from many years ago but the reality is that there was no
> further movement away from the legacy AX.25 equipment toward a new
> layer, much less toward a completely new protocol.
There is some movement...
Check out:
FX.25 - Forward Error Correction Extension to AX.25 Link Proto
I agree. But as we just found out in the 2008 flooding
it took days for some sites to get on the air even with
radio equipment on hand - on site.
Not everyone knows how to operate the equipment. 99.999%
can send a text message using a cell phone.
Win-link again worked.
FYI water got to within 3
Has anyone considered the implications of using narrow-band digital voice in an
environment that has Doppler Shift, for example, from space?
If you have some thoughts about the challenges, feasiblity & approach to using
digital voice with Doppler Shift please reply to me OFF-LIST so I can discu
I have discussed this many times, but may some have missed it. The SCAMP
development was an amazing ham radio software breakthrough.
It dispelled many of the claims that you could not develop a sound card
modem that would compete with Pactor 3.
It solved the issue of the timing of computers by
OK , It was simply a concept based on current systems , the original
panoramic digipan system capturing all, now expanded to cover rtty
and the Olivia recovery in drm780 , my experience with hf packet
back in the 80's when you could digi all over the place on 10 Mtr's ,
the wspr auto beacon
Based on the comments that WD8ARZ quoted below, it would seem that there
is a basic misunderstanding of the use of e-mail for emergency
communications by some hams. If you have taken any of the ARRL ARECC
courses, or have a good understanding of basic public service
communication, real time co
WD8ARZ wrote:
> Get good at using what we got the way it currently works, or it is all a big
> waste. Many are dedicated to making what we have work, work better, and
> evolve over time.
>
> 73 from Bill - WD8ARZ
> http://hflink.net/qso/
Whatever the protocol and network, I still see the need
Dont like to cross post, but I dont know how this topic can be said any
better than what is listed below. With out an independent internet or
wireless network to span our coverage needs to support our cause, and this
isnt going to happen, these issues are not going to go way.
However, it must b
Phil's paper is from many years ago but the reality is that there was no
further movement away from the legacy AX.25 equipment toward a new
layer, much less toward a completely new protocol.
Packet radio is a ghost of what it once was on VHF. Some areas
apparently have some surviving networks i
Improvements at layer 1 and at layer 2 would both be useful. If done
"right", both could be developed apart from each other. A better layer 1
protocol should work just fine with AX.25 as a data layer, or with some
improved "future" layer 2 implementation. Any improved layer 2 should work
fine wheth
I hate to burst any bubbles here but the HF network ( Packet etc. ) is still
quite active, and has been seeing some resurgence in recent years. ( New
stations joining, advancement of the art. )
VHF/UHF Packet networks here and there around the US have also been seeing some
growth and advancemen
Rud Merriam wrote:
> I suggest anyone interested in this topic start by reading
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/2504/http:zSzzSzpeople.qualcomm.
> com/karnz/papers/newlinkpaper.pdf/karn94toward.pdf by Phil Karn
> KA9Q. If anyone does not recognize his name or call then research him
16 matches
Mail list logo