nt: Monday, November 28, 2005 5:10
AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Bandwidth and
Olivia
Mark:
Very perceptive of you... in the long run, the
FCC has a lot of better things to do thanspend their
limitedresources continuing the excessive regulation of the Ham Bands...
From:
Dr. Howard S.
White
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 5:10
AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Bandwidth
and Olivia
Mark:
Very perceptive of you... in the long run, the
FCC has a lot of better things to do th
- Original Message -
From: Danny Douglas
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Bandwidth and Olivia
May I ask just how removing the telegraphy licensing barrier will go a
long way to reducing the burden
Kevin,
The current part 97 rules are very generous as to what modes are authorized
on HF. I don't think that you will find any reasonable and appropriate
mode for HF that would not be allowed. Olivia and Chip 64 are the newest
mode examples that I can think of that are being used today and
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Bandwidth and Olivia
Kevin,
The current part 97 rules are very generous as to what modes are authorized
on HF. I don't think that you will find any reasonable and appropriate
mode for HF that would not be allowed. Olivia and Chip 64
At 03:03 PM 11/27/2005, you wrote:
Even if the ARRL adopts the more restrictive ARRL model ... I predict that
in the longer run we will ultimately get to the Canadian Model
If I was forced to make a wager, that is where my money would go. We will
have to see how the telegraphy testing
On Sunday 27 November 2005 00:05, Dr. Howard S. White wrote:
Kevin:
For Example:
To develop a new Digital Communications Mechanism... one has to go through
all sorts of regulatory hoops.. such as publishing protocols before you
actually use it on the air... the rest of the world can just
On Sunday 27 November 2005 15:03, Dr. Howard S. White wrote:
Mark:
Thanks for your very lucid summary...
My vote is for the Canadian Model where we set the maximum bandwidth
for each band.
I might note that much of the rest of the world is going to this style
model...
Even if the
Says Dave:
In your previous
post, you cited the development of Olivia and PSK
by non-US amateurs as
evidence that current US regulations are
stifling innovation. I asked
you to explain this; instead of a
direct response, you invoked
previous conversations and attempted
to
Original Message -
From:
Kevin der Kinderen
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 8:44
PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Bandwidth and
Olivia
How have the rules
prevented US hams from developing any of the advanced or more rece
10 matches
Mail list logo
