Re: [digitalradio] Crest factor in Pactor and other considerations

2008-08-14 Thread Rick W.
Considering the success that Pactor 2 has had, with what is one of the more bandwidth conserving modes available with very good throughput and yet only a 500 Hz bandwidth, this may be a target to meet by developing a similar sound card protocol for emergency use. It does not need to be the

Re: [digitalradio] Crest factor in Pactor and other considerations

2008-08-14 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Crest factor in Pactor and other considerations Considering the success that Pactor 2 has had, with what is one of the more bandwidth conserving modes available with very good throughput and yet only a 500 Hz bandwidth, this may be a target to meet by developing

Re: [digitalradio] Crest factor in Pactor and other considerations

2008-08-14 Thread Rick W.
Hi Patrick, While you might get a lot of different opinions on what is needed for public service/emergency communications, absolute accuracy is what many of us consider to be mandatory. And because you are often going to be operating under less than ideal conditions and locations, having a

Re: [digitalradio] Crest factor in Pactor and other considerations

2008-08-14 Thread Patrick Lindecker
14, 2008 10:04 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Crest factor in Pactor and other considerations Hi Patrick, While you might get a lot of different opinions on what is needed for public service/emergency communications, absolute accuracy is what many of us consider to be mandatory. And because

[digitalradio] Crest factor in Pactor

2008-08-13 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello all, I was reading the general specifications of Pactor and I note a curious feature. The first mode of Pactor 3, with 2 carriers (in BPSK) specifies a crest factor of 1.9 dB (ratio of 1.55). Pactor 2 specifies a crest factor of 1.45 (in ratio)...1.6 dB Meanwhile, Pactor 2 applies a root