some one on 14075.9 +/- you clock is off by 30 sec, your TXing in the middle
on a time frame.
Russell NC5O
1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving door!
2- A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to
take everything you have.
-
I was listening down around 14.077, just above some slow FSK mode which I think
is JT65A. The JT65A was tuned quite low pitched in my receiver, and I could
clearly see images of it over to the right. Judging by the spacing of the
image tones I was seeing an audio third harmonic of the original
While harmonics from modes like PSK31 are common, I have never seen a JT65A
signal generate what you describe. Interesting.
Andy K3UK
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 11:28 AM, g4ilo jul...@g4ilo.com wrote:
I was listening down around 14.077, just above some slow FSK mode which I
think is JT65A. The
El 06/03/2010 11:28, g4ilo escribió:
I was listening down around 14.077, just above some slow FSK mode which I
think is JT65A. The JT65A was tuned quite low pitched in my receiver, and I
could clearly see images of it over to the right. Judging by the spacing of
the image tones I was seeing
:54 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65A harmonics
El 06/03/2010 11:28, g4ilo escribió:
I was listening down around 14.077, just above some slow FSK mode which I
think is JT65A. The JT65A was tuned quite low pitched in my receiver, and I
could clearly see images
-
From: Jose A. Amadorama...@electrica.cujae.edu.cu
Sent: Mar 6, 2010 8:54 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65A harmonics
El 06/03/2010 11:28, g4ilo escribió:
I was listening down around 14.077, just above some slow FSK mode which I
think is JT65A
Hi all
I am running a 5W JT65A beacon at 5350 Khz + 1270Hz USB this evening.
Software: Multipsk
Transceiver: Modified ICOM IC-718
Antenna: w3dzz (80, 40 an 20m) tuned with a LDG AT-100Pro Autotuner.
Try to catch me ;)
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi all
I am running a 5W JT65A beacon at 5350 Khz + 1270Hz USB this evening.
I'll take a listen for you Steinar,
However, the frequency that you have chosen is not one of the ones
authorised in the UK, so I will not be able to reply of course.
I wonder why you
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi all
I am running a 5W JT65A beacon at 5350 Khz + 1270Hz USB this evening.
I'm a bit confused on the frequency being used Steinar,
Can you confirm 5350kHz plus 1.270kHz please?
The only information on the Norwegian frequencies on 60M that I can find
is as
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi all
I am running a 5W JT65A beacon at 5350 Khz + 1270Hz USB this evening.
I'm seeing your signals and I'll move my dial frequency up a bit more as
well...
So far decoded these transmissions from you.
163600 3 -24 -0.3 525 3 * LA5VNA/B
Hi Dave
In Norway the band 5260 - 5410 kHz is now open for general Amateur
Radio use.
The band is not channelized. The allocation is secondary and power is
limited to 100 watts.
To avoid conflicts with other country's channels the Norwegian Radio
Relay League (NRRL) has decided that we
Great! Thanks for your report.
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Dave Ackrill wrote:
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi all
I am running a 5W JT65A beacon at 5350 Khz + 1270Hz USB this evening.
I'm seeing your signals and I'll move my dial frequency up a bit more as
well...
So far
15:48 5 -20 9 -0010 LA5VNA/B
15:50 4 -20 9 -0010 LA5VNA/B
- Original Message -
From: Dave Ackrill dave.g0...@tiscali.co.uk
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65A Beacon on 60m
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi all
I am
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Great! Thanks for your report.
Thanks for the explanation on the allocation in Norway, Steinar,
I've been decoding your signals again, but the path is starting to
become difficult and I'm not always decoding your callsign. There seem
to be SSB stations on and I
Patrick Lindecker wrote:
Hello Steinar,
I left my transceiver on duty and that is what I got (QTH near Paris).
The message from Patrick reminded me to give my location as well.
QTH = Bolsover, Derbyshire, East Midlands
QRA = IO93if
Distance, using IARU locators, from G0DJA to LA5VNA =
Nearly zeroed in on the right frequency...
175200 1 -24 -0.4 35 3 * LA5VNA/B 1 0
Just 16Hz to go. ;-)
175400 1 -23 -0.5 16 3 * LA5VNA/B 1 0
One more tweek needed.
175800 11 -18 -0.5 13 4 * LA5VNA/B 1 0
OK, a few more decodes and then I'll head back to WSPR again.
I'll keep the frequency in memory and, after the end of June 2010, the
UK will become RX only on 60M again anyway.
Unless they change the rules again! LOL
180800 7 -20 -0.40 3 * LA5VNA/B 1 0
181000 3
Hello I copy you good. 5 Mhz not allowed here in Finland yet
- Tommi OH7JJT
18:08 7 -11 8 +0147 LA5VNA/B
18:10 5 -18 8 +0147 LA5VNA/B
18:12 4 -11 8 +0147 LA5VNA/B
18:14 3 -20 8 +0147 LA5VNA/B
18:16 4 -16 8 +0147 LA5VNA/B
18:18 4 -19 8 +0147 LA5VNA/B
18:20 4 -13 8 +0147 LA5VNA/B
18:22 7
Hi all
I am running a 5W JT65A beacon at 5310 Khz + 1270Hz USB
this evening, with start at 1830 UTC.
The transceiver is a modified ICOM IC-718 and the
antenna is a w3dzz (80, 40 an 20m) tuned with a LDG AT-100Pro Autotuner.
Try to catch me ;)
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
I am process TQSL/LoTW (v11.1) which report
Error: C:\Documents and Settings...XXX.adi: Invalid MODE (JT65A) on line
18
In https://p1k.arrl.org/lotw/faq emission modes are supported by LoTW
was only JT65 . Also I can't see other few other modes which have QSOs
in my log (Contestia ,
Thanks to Jim KS7S and Dave NZ3M who help me with fix problem , but still when
I am
download QSL from LoTW in my logging program (DXLab) all JT65a QSO
still noconfirm (it confirm in LoTW as JT65). Need change mode in my
log - and I don'n like it.
Again thanks my friends and see you on
Does anyone use JT65A on 17 or 30 meters, and if so, what frequency is used on
both?
Tnx es 73
Dave
KB3MOW
10138.2 is what I use
Andy K3UK
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Dave dco...@zitomedia.net wrote:
Does anyone use JT65A on 17 or 30 meters, and if so, what frequency is used
on both?
Tnx es 73
Dave
KB3MOW
In the past month all the high power stations who ruined Psk-31 have discovered
JT65A and have shown up with their amps a-blazin. It took them about a year and
a half, CBers not being the brightest tools in the shed. My sense is they'll
get bored shooting the same fish in the same barrel every
I must be missing something here.
If they are CB'ers on 11 meters and not on the ham bands
why worry about it? But again not being a PSk operator
maybe I should not be the one asking.
At 10:08 AM 3/13/2009, you wrote:
In the past month all the high power stations who ruined Psk-31 have
Does anyone know what's going on with JT65A? I'm seeing signals now that are
400 hz wide and I am unable to decode them with WSJT6 software.
Kim AB7JK
I suspect that they are NOT JT65A signals , what frequency?
Andy K3UK
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Kim kimme...@yahoo.com wrote:
Does anyone know what's going on with JT65A? I'm seeing signals now that are
400 hz wide and I am unable to decode them with WSJT6 software.
Kim AB7JK
_
The deadline for receiving logs from the 1/1/08 JT65A Crawl has now
passed. I will publish the results within the next few days.
--
Andy K3UK
www.obriensweb.com
(QSL via N2RJ)
GE to the group.
Does anyone know any frequencies for JT65a on UHF, particularly 70
cm ? The band plan for weak signal cw is 432.08 - 432.1
with other weak signals from 432.1 - 432.33 MHz. EME is 432.0 -
432.08 MHz. I've searched the web a couple different ways and can
find HF-VHF
FYI, number of unique calls heard by stations serving as reverse
ebacons on JT65A.
Unique Calls
112 K3UK/RB
308 KI4MTI/RB
595 JE5FLM/RB
343 OE3DXA/RB
558 GW6TYO/RB
292 BX1AD/RB
295 PY8ELO/RB
355 F5RRS/RB
70 DU1GM/RB
136 W8LIW/RB
64 GW6TYO/RB
123
There seems to be a difference btween reporting systems between the US
system and the European system on terrestrial JT65A contacts.
Can anyone explain to me when a contact is 'valid' between two stations
using the two different systems please?
For example, I received the following today
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was it, no report, not even OOOs. I was using what, in the
guide, says is the European standard of sending the received dB signal
strength, but the EA station was using the US version, appart from no OOO.
Sorry, my mistake, I missread the guide. Seems that
/W7
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 9:24 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] JT65A reports
There seems to be a difference btween reporting systems between the US
system
Hey Barry, Happy New Year..
Where are you camped out now?
Not much new here, still sticking in TXs and stuff like that with Paul PQ...
Will be in AZ next month I think..
Len
:* [digitalradio] JT65A reports
There seems to be a difference btween reporting systems between the US
system and the European system on terrestrial JT65A contacts.
Can anyone explain to me when a contact is 'valid' between two stations
using the two different systems please?
For example, I received
] On
Behalf Of David
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 1:10 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65A reports
Barry Garratt wrote:
Hi Dave,
Actually what you describe is EME reports as opposed to Terrestrial reports.
The OOO and RO are used for EME but are also
Mind you, I do have to pay attention to the difference between the
column marked DT and the one marked dB when sending a report - Ooops!
I'm having a problem coverting to the HF reporting system from the MS
one. Well, that is my excuse.
Dave (G0DJA)
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
Dave , there is a well known WSJT phenomenon whereby one receives
FALSE CQs. When I first started using WSJT on HF and left on
overnight , I received a few CQs from Japan on 40M but I was on a
frequency that is not used in Japan.
That's why I *never* have deep search
Dave , there is a well known WSJT phenomenon whereby one receives
FALSE CQs. When I first started using WSJT on HF and left on
overnight , I received a few CQs from Japan on 40M but I was on a
frequency that is not used in Japan. As I mentioned in my Bozo'z
Guide To HF JT65A, this occurs
If only I didn't have to sleep!
Found a load of the following CQ calls on 80M, from leaving WSJT running
overnight...
034600 3 -16 1.6 100 3 * CQ KD5JGA EM161 0
034700 0 -15 3.3 -471 3
034800
Can someone assist me with this request for help regarding JT65A? I
do no speak Spanish but I gather that Luis thanking me for my Bozo
Guide to HF JT65A and has some decoding issues that he wonder if his
soundcard timing may be contributing g to . Anyone ?
Andy K3UK
-- Forwarded
Hi Allread Andy's very good Bozo Guide to HF JT65 and followed his
instructionswas on 14076 and saw a JT65A signal (using
Fldigi)...loaded up WSJT and proceeded to Monitor...saw JA2BGH calling
CQ so decided to take the plunge and replymade it first
shot..surprise...good contact both
Thanks for the kind words David, glad you made your first JT65A
contact from Townsville (dangerously close, in my opinion , to Port
Douglas. Home of the best meat pies, Mocka Pies !) .
I will add a few Linux items to the next revision, especially the
options for clock accuracy.
Andy.
On
I guess you are using ntp via modem.
I am interested in finding a way to sync Linux to CHU, WWV or WWVB using
a soundcard and the radio time codes.
Does anyone on the list has already done that? How?
73,
Jose, CO2JA
---
David Munn wrote:
for clock accuracy im using the ntp server of
I'm not sure what the current status is, but the NTP code has from
time immemorial contained modules for those... actually the CHU module
(basically a bell 103 software decoder) was what got me interested in
software signal processing ;-)
On 9/30/07, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Jose A. Amador wrote:
I guess you are using ntp via modem.
I am interested in finding a way to sync Linux to CHU, WWV or WWVB using
a soundcard and the radio time codes.
Does anyone on the list has already done that? How?
73,
Jose, CO2JA
---
David Munn wrote:
for clock accuracy
David,
I do not have full Internet at home, just e-mail.
I have been using CHU with the CLOCK program from F6CTE, for Windows.
I am running XP now, but this is a dual boot PC. That's the reason I
am interested in using the radio to sync my PC, which is necessary to
use WSJT or track
well Bonnie...i would guess that a human being could be considered
automatic
a guaranteed response no matter what it receives.
david/wd4kpd
The same is true for
unattended JT65 stations that transmit on schedule
i have been on hf/jt65a since its birthday. while not knowing it all, i have
never heard of a jt65a beacon or unattended operations. the mode COULD be used
for a beacon just like the cw beacons run by the california
Claudio Ruben skrev:
Ok, i try to contact you, please beam Argentina.
Claudio-LU2VCD
2007/9/9, Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On wednesday the 12th I'll be making a presentation and demo of WSJT,
with the emphasis on JT65A as used on HF,
Ok, i try to contact you, please beam Argentina.
Claudio-LU2VCD
2007/9/9, Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On wednesday the 12th I'll be making a presentation and demo of WSJT,
with the emphasis on JT65A as used on HF, at my local ARC: EDR
Frederikssund Afd. (call sign OZ2AR).
Claudio Ruben skrev:
Ok, i try to contact you, please beam Argentina.
Claudio-LU2VCD
2007/9/9, Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On wednesday the 12th I'll be making a presentation and demo of WSJT,
with the emphasis on JT65A as used on HF,
On wednesday the 12th I'll be making a presentation and demo of WSJT,
with the emphasis on JT65A as used on HF, at my local ARC: EDR
Frederikssund Afd. (call sign OZ2AR).
As part of the demonstration I'll be calling CQ on 14.075 from about
18:00 GMT using between 10 20W beaming in a westerly
Thanks to Joe's efforts try this site for a very useful JT65A HF site.
Thanks for your efforts, Joe.
Bill, N9DSJ
Thanks to Joe's efforts the below site is highly recommended for anyone
working JT65A on HF:
http://jt65.w6cqz.org/
73,
Bill N9DSJ
how can you get the hf standard messages to be set when first switching
to jt65a? it always comes up in eme style.
david/wd4kpd
I've been playing around with this on 20M.
The new version which does the decoding starting at 48 seconds is a
big help.
Of the the 25 contacts I've made all were clearly audible. All could
have been worked on CW with no difficulty. They could have been
worked on PSK or other such modes
I too have been perplexed why these modes that were developed for weak
signals on VHF and above and only have the most meager rudimentary
exchange, would have any value on HF, relative to already existing weak
signal modes. Perhaps because it seemed new, some focused on trying it
out?
What I
: Thursday, May 31, 2007 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65A HF query/observations
I too have been perplexed why these modes that were developed for weak
signals on VHF and above and only have the most meager rudimentary
exchange, would have any value on HF, relative to already existing
%40frontiernet.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65A HF query/observations
I too have been perplexed why these modes that were developed for weak
signals on VHF and above and only have the most
: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 7:12 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65A Propagation
tool?
There is a station in the UK that beacons via
JT65A, can't recall what
frequency though. It would perhaps require
someone to program transmit
options different from the every minute
situation that is within
- Original Message -
From: Dave Sparks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 11:32 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] JT65a on 6m?
Is anyone using JT65a on 6 meters (or higher)
for terrestrial (non-EME) Work? If so, what is
the best frequency to try
There is a station in the UK that beacons via JT65A, can't recall what
frequency though. It would perhaps require someone to program transmit
options different from the every minute situation that is within WSJT. Five
different minute options would be useful where each continent could choose a
Is anyone using JT65a on 6 meters (or higher) for terrestrial (non-EME) Work?
If so, what is the best frequency to try?
--
Dave
AF6AS
50.250
--- Dave Sparks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone using JT65a on 6 meters (or higher) for
terrestrial (non-EME) Work? If so, what is the best
frequency to try?
--
Dave
AF6AS
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has
All:
Was just thinking about the possibility of using
JT65 as a propagation tool. Something like a
robot mode where a WSJT beacon station would
remain dormant until called upon to transmit.
A global network, similar to the NCDXF beacons
would have it's advantages. The JT65 mode would
allow
All:
After several weeks of testing, I think it's fair
to say that JT65 seems to have the ability to
decode weaker signals than what we're used to with
other modes. It would be interesting to see how
much of an advantage it has.
The decode threshold seems to be about 13db better
than others
I finally got the receive part working like it is suppose to, or at
least it looks like it. Now it looks like a good mode for quick
contest qso's, but other then that can it be used for keyboard-to-
keyboard?
I myself am looking for something other then hello/goodbye contacts
except maybe on
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 6:01 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65A pile-up on 40M.
I'm not sure about that either Jeff. I am assuming that two stations fell
within his tolerance range and thus two were
Would it be beneficial for stations calling CQ to transmit on even minutes
(TX first) , while stations answering CQ's use odd minutes (TX second) ???
Jus wonderin ..
Elaine / WA6UBE
- Original Message -
Subject: [digitalradio] JT65A pile-up on 40M.
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:22:36 -0400
From: Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's one of my favourite entries from the N0UK JT65A Terrestrial
page tonight...
04/19 02:14 YIIPS HOW DO YA WRK 4 AT A TIME
It is interesting to see so many operators on JT65A on 14076 USB.
JT65A has caught on fast!
Perhaps that is the only fast thing about JT65A :)
It certainly shows good potential for very slow MFSK systems to
operate in weak signal conditions.
Perhaps a fixed frequency MFSK system could be
The codebase appears to be GPL so this should be achievable in a short
timeframe.
Leigh/WA5ZNU
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 4:06 pm, expeditionradio wrote:
Perhaps a fixed frequency MFSK system could be developed with slightly
faster throughput and a little more bandwidth... decoding at -18dB SNR
to
After reading though the Bozo guide and the JT65 protocol, I am
assuming that everyone is using WSJT as it would be set up for moon
bounce or meteor scatter. Has anyone used it sending plain text?
The reason I ask, I would like to use this as a demonstration mode for
field day and could I
Hello All
I'm just getting into decoding some JT65A on 14076 and I seem to have
a problem that's probably computer related... but I would appreciate
some advice.
My clock is sync'ed OK but at the end of a minute (and when I have
even seen strong traces) it is 25 seconds into the next minute
The computer is very busy in this time frame. Creating a WAV
file and other things. If your CPU is slow it will take a while.
My dell 500 mhz some times goes to 10 seconds after the
minute but never had it run that long.
At 04:36 PM 4/16/2007, you wrote:
Hello All
I'm just getting into
Hi Marc
With my Compaq Deskpro 731Mhz usually decodes at 6 seconds after the
minute with nothing else open.If I have other apps open it could be a
long as 10-11 secs.
I just double click the callsign and hit auto very quickly and I
still make the contacts.
Darrel
On 16-Apr-07, at 2:36
Well guys,
I was a bozo on sound card selection, plus I had a few senior moments
on Friday the 13th. I finally figured out that after correctly setting
the audio in and out card numbers that you had to restart the program
!!! for the changes to take effect. Thanks to all that replied with
I have two sound cards, the windows 0 card is my std Windows default
with speakers connected, the second card 1 is my second 2nd sound card
and connected to a Microham Keyer for all of my ham radio sound card
applications.
In the WSJT setup Options screen there is an Audio in and Audio out
if you are using the FT920 and JT65A, would like to hear
from you on the side.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
david/wd4kpd
I am in the area (CM87wk) and interested. Maybe we can get a demo going
next AmTech day at SLAC?
Leigh/WA5ZNU
: [digitalradio] JT65A anyone in the bay area?
I am in the area (CM87wk) and interested. Maybe we can get a demo going
next AmTech day at SLAC?
Leigh/WA5ZNU
other modes also. I am in CM87xj/mountain
view.
- Original Message -
From: Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65A anyone in the bay area?
I am in the area (CM87wk) and interested. Maybe we can get
Hello,
I am in the bay area and am trying to get JT65A to work.
I have received some signals on 14.076 but have not yet
made a contact.
Everett, KG6RYB
Los Altos, CA
At 10:27 PM 4/11/2007, James Wilson wrote:
Is there anyone in the bay area California who wouldn't mind
assisting me on JT65A?
Is there anyone in the bay area California who wouldn't mind assisting me on
JT65A? I think I am pretty clear on how it works but I would like to see
someone else use it.
My station is mobile so we could meet anywhere.
K6WRJ James.
James,
We can try now (0540z) if you'd like, I'll be in
the shack for a while. Can you do 40 meters?
Tony KT2Q
- Original Message -
From: James Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 1:27 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] JT65A anyone in the bay
area
: KT2Q
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65A anyone in the bay area?
James,
We can try now (0540z) if you'd like, I'll be in
the shack for a while. Can you do 40 meters?
Tony KT2Q
- Original Message -
From
Switched to 40M for the evening.
Hi all ,
Because of the heavy qrm from RTTY contesters , who doesn't care about
the fact that the frequency is in use , I will QSY to 18.102 USB for to
day. I have not an optimized antenna for this band, so it will be
interesting to see how it works out.
See you on 17 meter
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Steinar, Good Morning...I am there also. Hope to work Norway on this band.
Andy K3UK
On 4/8/07, Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all ,
Because of the heavy qrm from RTTY contesters , who doesn't care about
the fact that the frequency is in use , I will QSY to 18.102 USB for
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2007 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65A on 18.102 MHz
Steinar, Good Morning...I am there also. Hope to work Norway on this band.
Andy K3UK
Hi Andy and the gang,
I have some static because of snowing, and the condition is not the
best, but I am still transmitting on 18.102 USB in hope of getting in
contact with one of you.
LA5VNA Steinar
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
Steinar, Good Morning...I am there also. Hope to work Norway on
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2007 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65A on 18.102 MHz
Steinar, Good Morning...I am there also. Hope to work Norway on this band.
Andy K3UK
On 4/8/07, Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all ,
Because of the heavy qrm from RTTY
Yes! My first Norwegian in JT65A mode :)
162900 6 -21 0.1 19 3 * LA5VNA LA6TPA JP541 0
163100 8 -20 -0.5 19 3 * LA5VNA LA6TPA JP541 0
163300 10 -2118 3 RO ?
163500 10 -2317 1 73 ?
73 de LA5VNA
When monitoring JT65A I decoded
CQ N4WO EL88 1 and 0
What is the 1 and zero?
Also what is the meaning of the # and * I see in the decoded lines?
Dan
Hi all,
How do you feel about being spotted on the cluster?
I thought it could be a smart way to tell the HAM community about JT65A
on HF, but I don't
want to provoke anybody in the group.
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
I think it is a good idea, just to get people more aware of what DX they can
work on low power.
On 4/7/07, Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
How do you feel about being spotted on the cluster?
I thought it could be a smart way to tell the HAM community about JT65A
on HF,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
- Original Message -
From: Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 10:28 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] JT65A HF on cluster
Hi all,
How do you feel about being
Hi,
I am calling on 7076 USB 23:30 UTC.
Copy me any one ?
LA5VNA Steinar
, IN
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 11:24 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65A Protocol
Dave,
JT65A is the submode for HF use. The same protocol is used since the
software is the same. One station calls on the first minute
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
