[digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Leigh L Klotz, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Vojtect OK1AK's PocketDigi may be the answer here, in the x86 version. > Especially if the cntrol gets done over TCP. > Leigh/WA5ZNU There is a file interface built in the desktop build of PocketDigi similar

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

Patrick - Original Message - From: KV9U To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 4:34 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk I used to struggle with converting from cps to wpm until one day my brain actually kicked in and I made the

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

: Thursday, February 01, 2007 2:11 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk Hi Rick, I think FNpsk uses QPSK125 and PSK31...but otherwise you are correct as there is no speed difference that I am aware of between BPSK125 and QPSK125QPSK125 is alot more frequency sensitive then BPSK12

PSK 1200 baud anyone? (was Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk)

Something I never have quite understood is that in the late 90's in Indonesia, hams have used 1200 baud satellite PSK modems on 40 meters with seemingly good results. It has been a bit hard for me to follow that. Does anyone have a sensible explanation for this to be useful. I do not own such a

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

The bps with packet is the same as the baud rate. With other modes that have different levels, the signalling rate (the baud rate) can have more than one bit sent per baud. The fastest baud rate that Pactor uses is 200 baud, but the bps rate is many times faster with P2 and P3. The speed of co

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

How many bps is 1200 baud FSK? How many bps = cps? Walt/K5YFW KV9U wrote: > I used to struggle with converting from cps to wpm until one day my > brain actually kicked in and I made the association this way: > > cps x 60 seconds / 6 characters per word = wpm > > Therefore, if 120 cps x 60 =

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

So is 1200 baud = 1200 bps and 1200 bps (1200 / 8) = 120 cps? If so then 120 cps (120 / 6) = 20 wps X 60 sec. or 1200 WPM. That's over 1.5 pages per minute. (Page = 72-76 characters X 60 - 66 lines per page.) Walt/K5YFW Chris Jewell wrote: > Walt DuBose writes: > > How can 1200 baud = 1320

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

Ok...got it. I think I see my mistake. Thsnk & 73, Walt/K5YFW KV9U wrote: > I used to struggle with converting from cps to wpm until one day my > brain actually kicked in and I made the association this way: > > cps x 60 seconds / 6 characters per word = wpm > > Therefore, if 120 cps x 60 =

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

Walt DuBose writes: > How can 1200 baud = 1320 WPM? In the case of AX.25 baud=bps since a > mark-space=one bit. > > An 8 bit ASCII character with start and stop bits would be 10 bps so 1200 > bps=120 CPS. > > If a word is 6 characters, then 120 CPS = 20 WPM which we know is too slow. (

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

I used to struggle with converting from cps to wpm until one day my brain actually kicked in and I made the association this way: cps x 60 seconds / 6 characters per word = wpm Therefore, if 120 cps x 60 = 7200 / 6 = 1200 wpm Thus, to convert from cps to wpm, just add a zero. To convert from

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

How can 1200 baud = 1320 WPM? In the case of AX.25 baud=bps since a mark-space=one bit. An 8 bit ASCII character with start and stop bits would be 10 bps so 1200 bps=120 CPS. If a word is 6 characters, then 120 CPS = 20 WPM which we know is too slow. As far as a mode using a VariCode, the WPM

[digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

Hi Rick, I think FNpsk uses QPSK125 and PSK31...but otherwise you are correct as there is no speed difference that I am aware of between BPSK125 and QPSK125QPSK125 is alot more frequency sensitive then BPSK125 and I think that about -5 db S/N is probably more realistic than -8 db S/N. 73

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

According to the information in the help files from Multipsk: 1200 baud Packet = 1320 wpm BPSK125 = 148 wpm capital and 204 wpm small letter average speed at about -8 db S/N Of course this assumes that both have good signal strengths and there are no hits. If the PSK125 mode takes a hit it kee

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 4:58 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk Say what? My XP and My W2000pro machines all still show the correct date? Danny Douglas N7DC ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all DX 2-6 years each

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

James Wilson wrote: > > > Whats wrong with service packs and AV and security hot fixes? Us > networking guys have to stay in business. > > Seriously though I would recommend using Linux over MS. This recent > daylight savings time issue shows how Microsoft can be heavy handed. > Basically you

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

Here is an interesting question... What is the user throughput in WPM or CPS (what you see on your monitor) in 1200 baud AX.25 and the 190-200 WPM user throughput of PSK125? I have send many, many pure SMTP messages using sendmail over AX.25 KISS mode with a NOS stack. I have also worked wi

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

. moderator [EMAIL PROTECTED] moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk - Original Message - From: "James Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 5:31 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk > Whats wrong with service packs and AV and

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

] Re: FNpsk If at all possible (or convenient) I would accept the operators to use Windows. It is THEIR problem with virus and other vulnerabilities. For the server, life would be much simpler using Linux. No antivirus or Service Packs needed... Jose, CO2JA

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

If at all possible (or convenient) I would accept the operators to use Windows. It is THEIR problem with virus and other vulnerabilities. For the server, life would be much simpler using Linux. No antivirus or Service Packs needed... Jose, CO2JA --- Leigh L Klotz, Jr. wrote: > If you use a de

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

If you use a dedicated computer for your gateway, which is somewhat likely if you use a dedicated radio, then you can just stick the CD in and go... 73, Leigh/WA5ZNU On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:04 pm, Chuck Mayfield wrote: > At 01:25 PM 1/30/2007, Rein Couperus wrote: >> M$ gives you windows, Linux gi

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

At 01:25 PM 1/30/2007, Rein Couperus wrote: >M$ gives you windows, Linux gives you as many desktops as you like :)) > >Rein Rein, I am certainly not a fan of M$ or Windows, but M$ Windows is used by a VERY large percentage of ham radio operators who use computers. FNPsk runs directly under window

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > Gesendet: 30.01.07 19:31:08 > An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > Betreff: Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk > > At 03:27 AM 1/30/2007, Rein Couperus wrote: > >Everybody with an HF trx and a lapto

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

Vojtect OK1AK's PocketDigi may be the answer here, in the x86 version. Especially if the cntrol gets done over TCP. Leigh/WA5ZNU On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:17 am, Chuck Mayfield wrote: > At 03:27 AM 1/30/2007, Rein Couperus wrote: >> Everybody with an HF trx and a laptop that has a CD drive and a >>

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

Hey, I proposed this last month for contests and PSK ragchews using QRZ.com as the database... Leigh/WA5ZNU On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 7:32 am, kd4e wrote: >> If we did not have to send all the formatting of a message type, and >> only sent a special identifier of the format, the text data would be a >

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

At 03:27 AM 1/30/2007, Rein Couperus wrote: >Everybody with an HF trx and a laptop that has a CD drive and a >soundcard can set up a server and connect it to the internet, >provided the trx has reasonable fequency stability >. >We are planning to include HF forwarding capability in both client an

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

unning and using the same sound card at the same time on the same mode, then I would thing that having too separate would be Ok but of course integrating them is better. 73, Walt/K5YFW Original Message Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:27:17 +0100

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

> If we did not have to send all the formatting of a message type, and > only sent a special identifier of the format, the text data would be a > fraction of the total we would normally have to send compared to a .doc > file or even a much more efficient Open Office native .odt file. > 73, Rick,

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

PSK mail appears to be similar in user interface to the Winlink 2000 Paclink program that also interfaces with an e-mail program. FNpsk had its own built in, but very basic, mail program. I think you could write templates for it so it was possible to send various kinds of messages. If we did no

[digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

FNpsk was developed by a member of the SGARES (Southern Grafton ARES) group in New Hampshiire. I was an AEC with that group before moving out of state. As such, I was very involved in the testing of FNpsk and I recall that it worked quite well as long as propagation cooperated. That was always some

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

Rick, Anyone using a PC with 256mb ram can use the live CD for pskmail. I have a server (VE7SUN) running 24/7 on 3595.25Khz using psk125 from the live CD and also a client at home also running the CD. All the servers are listed on the pskmail site. My station (VE7CUS) beacons every 15 min

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

Everybody with an HF trx and a laptop that has a CD drive and a soundcard can set up a server and connect it to the internet, provided the trx has reasonable fequency stability . We are planning to include HF forwarding capability in both client and server. The user interface of the client is Evo

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

Andrew O'Brien wrote: > > > --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com > , Walt DuBose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Can someone tell me about FNPSK? > > > > Thanks & 73, > > > > Walt/K5YFW > > Walt, > > I used it and tested it a year or so ago

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

Back in June 2005, Andy and I did some tests with FNpsk. I can't exactly remember how the ARQ works, other than sending a sizeable block and then requesting a retry if it doesn't get the right checksum? There did not seem to be any interest from other group members at the time. From some things

[digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Walt DuBose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can someone tell me about FNPSK? > > Thanks & 73, > > Walt/K5YFW Walt, I used it and tested it a year or so ago, it works as advertised. It essentially formats NTS-Type messages and allows you to use PSK31 or PSk

[digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

Frank, Just downloaded the file and set it up. Looks interesting. Will test with anyone who wants to test. Best would be 20 meters somewhere around 14.069.500 plus 1000Hz (audio). Jerry - K0HZI --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Krasnicki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anybody