[digitalradio] Re: RFSM8000 qrg's?

2009-02-22 Thread Wolf, oe7ftj
Hi John! I contacted Dmitri some months ago and he sent me a trial code for hams. In the meantime he released the version 0.535 but I did have no contact with him the last few weeks. So I think he is still working on RFSM8000. In our local tests pactor3 has won the 'competition' :-) Because of

[digitalradio] Re: RFSM8000 qrg's?

2009-02-22 Thread Wolf, oe7ftj
Rick et al! --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick W mrf...@... wrote: Hi Wolf, Be sure to keep us informed as to your results. Yes I will share our experiences here in the group. It is ironic that we can not use MIL-STD-188-110A type modulation here in the U.S. HF ham bands, at

RE: [digitalradio] Re: RFSM8000 qrg's?

2009-02-22 Thread John Bradley
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Wolf, oe7ftj Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 11:55 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] Re: RFSM8000 qrg's? Hi John! I contacted Dmitri some months ago and he sent me a trial code for hams. In the meantime

Re: [digitalradio] Re: RFSM8000 qrg's?

2009-02-22 Thread Rick W
The non-standard protocol is a slightly slower, but less bandwidth to fit in the passband of many ham rigs. The baud rate is still 2400 baud of course so can not be used in the HF RTTY/Data portions of the bands here in the U.S. It may be legal in our MF (160 meter) band and in the phone/image