Rick et al! --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick W <mrf...@...> wrote: > > Hi Wolf, > > Be sure to keep us informed as to your results. > Yes I will share our experiences here in the group.
> It is ironic that we can not use MIL-STD-188-110A type modulation here > in the U.S. HF ham bands, at least not in the text RTTY/Data areas, with > the requirement to keep the baud rate of any one tone no faster than 300 > baud. > RFSM8000 can be switched to a socalled 'non standard' mode, which will match the legal requirements i.e. bandwidth on our bands. >The RFSM program is about the cleanest and best design I have seen > for a data transfer program, especially for basic use by those not that > familiar with this technology. > Full ack!! > With Winmor coming very soon for the Winlink 2000 system, and being an > open protocol, there is the possibility that some of the most brilliant > ham programmers might be willing to develop a peer to peer version. > Perhaps even a cross platform version. It should work much deeper into > the noise and QRN than the current RFSM software which required good > signals due to not having the slow robust mode. > > Imagine having a program that could use the Winlink 2000 system, but > also be able to meet the larger needs as well. > I hope the winmor developer will make a kind of 'software-modem' which can be selected out from Airmail also and not in PacLink only! 73 de Wolf, oe7ftj
