If you had .deb for the Debian based and .rpm for the Red Hat based,
wouldn't that take care of most of them? Ideally, there should be a
radio amateur area in the universe for the Debian's at least. I am not
sure how it is maintained as it seems almost magical compared to hunting
around for MS
Maybe this is a dumb question, but once someone compiles a program for
Linux and includes the dependencies, wouldn't this be easily shared
between users?
Can't they then put this in their depository for that particular Linux
distribution?
Even if you don't have it in your particular universe
This is just what package managers do.
There are two main package managers: Debainls deb format and Red Hat's
RPM.
Debian historically did a better job on resolving dependencies at
installation time (as opppsed to just reporting them), but part of that
ability was due to Debian have a good
Maybe this is a dumb question, but once someone compiles a program for
Linux and includes the dependencies, wouldn't this be easily shared
between users?
Can't they then put this in their depository for that particular Linux
distribution?
Even if you don't have it in your particular
Very interesting and informative information, Leigh. I did not realize
how proprietary things were in the earlier times. The merging of the
ODSL (Open Source Development Labs) and the FSG (Free Standards Group)
into the Linux Foundation and the attempt to try and bring increased
I guess that has kinda been my thught also.
Walt/K5YFW
KV9U wrote:
Maybe this is a dumb question, but once someone compiles a program for
Linux and includes the dependencies, wouldn't this be easily shared
between users?
Can't they then put this in their depository for that particular
But that still doesn't preclude amateur radio operators from have a place to
store compiled applications for their distro.
There would of course have to be as many major directories as Linux distros and
sub directoried for the various releases of the distro. if the amateur radio
application
That would be a good reason to install Puppy but as I understand it, Puppy is
limited in that most don't consider it a full distribution.
Walt/K5YFW
kd4e wrote:
Maybe this is a dumb question, but once someone compiles a program for
Linux and includes the dependencies, wouldn't this be easily
If you get the things into the distribution, all these problems go
away. Hamish Moffat has laudably done this and is a package maintainer
for several programs. He does the work, and we all benefit. At least
all Debian users.
Personally I don't think all that AX25 stuff is all that useful,
-[Flexradio] Linux SDR TeamSpeak questions
Roger Rehr
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:21:03 -0800
Hi, All, I sent this to the linux-dttsp list and then realized that
not
everyone who was present for the EXCELLENT TeamSpeak last night is
necessarily subscribed to the linux-dttsp list.
I apologize for the
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Walt DuBose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not going to spend $1500 for an SDR transceiver I can't run from
Linux.
Roger's website is the best source for information on getting started.
There will be new information forthcoming by the end of the weekend.
As
Thanks for the encouragement Frank.
For over 2 years now Gerald had been telling me that Oh yes the SDR-1000 was
going to be supported by Linux.
As I told Dave, W1HJK, in a private E-Mail and I was going to address Andy's
and
Roger Rehr's comment. For those of us who eun Linux either just
I pushed forward to a new repository (sdr_linux) today. Frank and I did
the dsp/sdr code and Eric Wachsman and Flex did just about 100% of the
hardware code in support of the SDR-1000. It runs on linux, cygwin on
MS and native on MS (using the MSVS 2005 express) and probably OSX. It
drives
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a multiway exchange, Gerald said
explicitly that Linux would be first out of the gate on any new radio
with an embedded micro for dsp/sdr in it...
...but that the embedded micro version would be a small-volume,
14 matches
Mail list logo
