I use Win-test, try the demo version.
Andy K3UK
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 3:39 PM, mhz14071n...@arrl.net wrote:
I am unsuccessful in getting N1MM to work with my setup.
I am looking for comments, on other contest logging programs
that would work using USB to Navigator with internal Winkey
Isn't this just precious. .
The move is divisive, and obviously geared toward attrition. Navy seems to
be leading the charge
Chief NAVMARMARS managed to honor tradition, and managed to make policy move
back toward the stone age.
Nice tantrum.
What a comfort.
I will sleep better at
Robert,
fldigi on linux does CW and in my tests received as well as cwget. It allows
for AFSK and hardline keying via the key input on your radio. There was a
bug with hardline keying in the older alpha versions so it is best to run
the latest code from w1hkj.com. Of course, full source code is
The most available options are...
Multipsk
MixW
- Original Message -
From: Robert Meuser
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 1:01 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] CW software?
Speaking of keyboards and the like, does anyone have a suggestion
There is a varity of Software that will send and receive CW.
Try Hamscope, MultiPsk, MixW or CWType.
It is not as much fun as a real key or paddle but gets the job done during a
contest when there are a lot of operators doing 30+wpm.
I dubbed around a bit before I discovered my radio had to
There is only one really superior receiving software program but it
costs $60:
http://www.polar-electric.com/Morse/MRP40-EN/
There is a trial version that works for a short time so you an see how
well it can receive CW compared to most any other program. If anyone
knows of a freeware program
Robert,
After reading Rick's glowing assessment of the MRP4-EN I gave it another try.
I am afraid I can not give it the same rating. I ran CWget and Hamscope at the
same time
both with near 100% copy while the MRP40-EN got 50% at best. At times it would
get 100%
(so I must have it setup right)
David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD wrote:
now would be a good time to get the arrl cw practice down in the
area that they themselves recommend for cw.
david/wd4kpd
Effective today there is no more Morse Code
requirement so the ARRL should suspend CW
broadcasts immediately and release that spectrum
Why bother? They just did away with CW
Danny Douglas N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all
DX 2-6 years each
.
QSL LOTW-buro- direct
As courtesty I upload to eQSL but if you
use that - also pls upload to LOTW
or hard card.
moderator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Here in VK interest in CW has been increasing one we no-coders got HF
privileges. The code practice beacons are an invaluable resource for those
learning. On-air code practice sessions take place and have increasing
number of participants, including those who did not require the code to get
on HF
The first thing you need to do is to learn the characters by ear. You just
need lots of repetitions and lots of drilling. Have a look here
http://c2.com/morse/ - it is good stuff. Once you know the characters find a
HF or VHF morse beacon somewhere (3699 East-coast Australia, w1aw in the
USA) and
MixW does a good job, so does Hamcope. Ham radio Deluxe may add CW
capability later this year. I think Winwarbler may do CW these days,
not sure.
Andy K3UK
On 3/7/06, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does everyone recommend to copy and transmit CW?
I use TRX-Manager as well as Ham Radio
: Re: [digitalradio] CW program???
MixW does a good job, so does Hamcope. Ham radio Deluxe may add CW
capability later this year. I think Winwarbler may do CW these days,
not sure.
Andy K3UK
On 3/7/06, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does everyone recommend to copy and transmit CW?
I
Have you tried CW Type? Is recv companion program is CW Get.
73 WB4M
Buddy
- Original Message -
From: Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:48 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] CW program???
What does everyone recommend to copy and
and macro facility are used with
all supported modes.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andrew O'Brien
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 7:29 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio
Personally I havent used one yet that was satisfactory. Yeah, they can copy
other computers fairly well, but even then with static and QRM they come in
a dismal second to my handwritten copy.
- Original Message -
From: Migliari Adriano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 1- forum digitalradio
SURE !
On a side note did it get to you when they
all but did away with the code? DID IT DID IT
At 12:04 PM 2/5/06, you wrote:
Although Morse code is not the digital mode this group usually
focuses on, I wonder if any of the members are interested in CW
operations and the occasional sked ?
To me CW is "the" original digital
mode.
Personally I neglected CW for several years
because of my extensive involvement in the digital modes. Recently I did come
back to CW and mainly on 160 meters as that's the mode that most of the DX uses.
The first thing I discovered was that my
I've started to do the same thing, and have been
lurking around 3700-3715 nites getting my speed up
usually around 0300-0400Z
John
- Original Message -
From:
obrienaj
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 12:04
PM
Subject:
NO
From:
digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of obrienaj
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006
1:04 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] CW ?
Although Morse code is not
the digital mode this group usually
focuses on, I wonder
MultiPSK has the tones at the beginning of the transmission that
identify the upper and lower limits... maybe the software authors
could agree upon and put into the packages something that could
identify the mode? Low-Mid-High for Olivia, High-Mid-Low for RTTYM,
and Mid-Low-High for Contestia?
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] CW ID of Olivia/Contestia tone setting
MultiPSK has the tones at the beginning of the transmission that
identify the upper and lower limits... maybe the software authors
could agree upon and put into the packages something that could
identify the mode? Low-Mid
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 2:19 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] CW decoding comparison (MPSK, Mixw, Hamscope)
Forgive the intrusion from a non-expert (in both CW and other digital
modes), but what seems to me to be an obvious Characteristic of many
digital modes is being ignored
is much more powerful). It can been decoded by
humans and programs. To test it, try MultiPSK.
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Bill Aycock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 2:19 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] CW decoding comparison
.
- Original Message -
From: Dean Gibson AE7Q [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] CW decoding comparison (MPSK, Mixw, Hamscope)
Modern communications technology has decoders that can rapidly adapt
!
- Original Message -
From:
F.R.
Ashley
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 11:35
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] CW decoding
comparison (MPSK, Mixw, Hamscope)
Multipsk
6 YRS A G ON WA A SE LF E MPL OYE D RAD I
Multipsk
6 YRS A G ON WA A SE LF E MPL OYE D RAD I O ES T V RE PAI R
MAN=NW JUSTA BEA C H BUMHEE HEE= OKON WX ES OVE R HR T O O MU CH OF T HE WIT
ET STUFF SO SU RE WISH WE CUD S EE SE N D SUM OUTTOUH EI= B EEN VT E T AE ITEL
YES HAD TO CUT
So, which of the three
Yes,
It is legal. Keying CW with a tone is no different than AFSK for RTTY. Due
to it being potentially less clean, I would not personally use it unless I
had a rig that could not TX CW. But you would not find many like that.
73,
Rick, KV9U
-Original Message-
From:
this way
Andy K3UK
- Original Message -
From:
Rick Williams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 7:39
PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] CW
Yes,It is legal. Keying CW with a tone is no
different than AFSK for RTTY. Dueto it being potenti
I too used it for a couple of years, on and off,
and ocassionally someone said I had "audio" on my tones. HI.
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go
--- mac2251 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question concerning cw using MixW or
Hamscope. Is it legal or
not? I have heard both sides. Anyone have the
facts.Mike K9HCK
As long as it is CW it is legal. If you feed a pure
sine wave into a ssb transceiver the output will be
31 matches
Mail list logo
