Good question...
Of course one of the other factors is that Pactor
is still effective when conditions are poor. SCAMP is nowhere
near as robust right now...
Give them some more time to perfect SCAMP so
that it is capable of working in the rough conditions (low S/N) that Pactor 3
doe
Dave:
You are getting rhetorical...
as a practical matter SCAMP is still at best an
experimental transport mechanism. PACTOR is not...
Give it time and see how things work
out.
SCAMP has a siginificant cost advantage over
PACTOR...
Will cost win out over speed?
Will SCAMP spe
- Original Message -
From: "n3hkn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 7:08 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Advice to the Winlink
team
> > > Automatic stations that
occupy unpredictable frequencies are not in > the spirit of Ham Rad
Dave:
In my dreams the answer is
yes.
Rick who is writing the SCAMP code says that Pactor
3 is very good...and would be hard to beat...
I, personally, would love it if SCAMP
could replace PACTOR
... but unfortunately, the real world creeps into
my dreams..
we just have
Steve,
None of those people are on the five member Task Force other than Jim,
KB9MMC of course, who is the chair. The others are many of the top
ARES/RACES State Leadership, SEC, STM, etc.
Rick, KV9U
-Original Message-
From: Steve Waterman, k4cjx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
I have a million questions and the source code is required but I can do
the busy detection
algorithms in short order. I have been too swamped to do anything
about modem work but
if I can help make this better I will consider doing it. I am buried in
software defined radio
work and AMSAT work
I just created http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rfnetworks.
--
Rud K5RUD
ARES AEC
South Montgomery County, TX
Quoting Rick Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Steve,
>
> In the past, I have suggested a separate discussion group. I was going to
> start one, but am hesitant to do this due to some p
Steve,
In the past, I have suggested a separate discussion group. I was going to
start one, but am hesitant to do this due to some practical time limitations
with participation in a number of groups, one of which is fairly large that
I co-moderate. But it is probably a good idea to separate this
While there are many people on the Winlink group, like most groups, only a
few people actually participate. So it is not more than a few dozens of
people talking over a span of time (not hundreds).
If anyone takes a look at the more detailed messages on the WL2Kemcomm
yahoogroup, they will see th
ca"Website: www.ky6la.com
- Original Message -
From:
Mike/k1eg
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 7:17
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Advice to
the Winlink team
Dr. White I am glad to see that were getting away
from a proprietar
adio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 9:28
AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Advice
to the Winlink team
Steve I will pick a bone with you on this
statement. Because you are usinga proprietary modem that costs
over $1000.00 you are slowing the sp
Just so folks understand that the Winlink 2000 group very much minds ... ANY
... comments that suggest anything could possibly be wrong with their
system. Here is only a sample of some of the comments made towards me and
others in recent months. Remember, I am a beta tester for SCAMP, and have
cle
I had opted not to participate in this thread so far,
but it seems once again that the hidden station case
is not seen, and it is very common on HF, even DXers
know about it to their frustration
Anyone that does not hear any other station may
trigger a Winlink PMBO response. This may respond
Howard, I have been paying attention to the
different messages on Winlink, some I agree with some I don't, but I did see you
mention SCAMP, is this downloadable software?
73
Kurt
WA8VBX
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
Yahoo! Groups Links
fully Extremely Six Sado Masochist""Krazy Yankee
Six Loves America"Website: www.ky6la.com
- Original Message -
From:
Mike/k1eg
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 9:28
AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Advice to
the Winl
Steve I will pick a bone with you on this statement. Because you are using
a proprietary modem that costs over $1000.00 you are slowing the spread of
emergency communications in ARES. Contrary to popular belief not all hams
are millionaires who can just go out and plop down a couple of thousand
16 matches
Mail list logo