At 04:04 PM 7/6/2010, you wrote in part:
>UH OH.now I've done it. Bet I won't ever get on their forum, much less
>be able
>to use ROS any time soon I'm down in the dingy cellar now with
>the
>likes of John W0JAB!
>
>Howard W6IDS
>Richmond, IN EM79NV
Come on down. The beer is cold and th
At 09:46 AM 7/7/2010, you wrote:
>--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Siegfried Jackstien"
> wrote:
><..>
>> Ros is programmed for low power qrppp experiments . with a few watt and a
>> groundplane for a 16000 km path .. But there are users thinking more power
>> is better . and using ros the
Just another part of the mystery, I guess Andy...a lot about ROS makes no
sense one way or another.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Andy obrien wrote:
>
>
> There is one thing about Jose that does not make sense... if he is as
> devious and untrustworthy ass some suggest...and he has had to put
There is one thing about Jose that does not make sense... if he is as
devious and untrustworthy ass some suggest...and he has had to put up with
much criticism and anguish, WHY does he persists with ROS? He has not asked
for money (that I am aware of), he has spent HOURS and HOURS adding new
feat
I think Dave sums it up to how most of us feel about Jose and ROS! just
my 2 cents worth...73, Alan
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Siegfried Jackstien <
siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de> wrote:
> His interest is making a software that gets over the ocean under the
> noiselevel with a few watts and a simple antenna !
>
For what purpose? If he's not a ham, then it isn't to support the amateur
co
My response to that would not be deemed polite in any company.
From: Russell Blair
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 9:53 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf 18102
Rudy, worked him agn for the 2nd time, yesterday as well, its a short window,
been on 17m
gitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 6, 2010 8:37:38 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf 18102
Listening... .
From: Russell Blair
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 9:30 PM
To: Digital Radio
Subject: [digitalradio] jt65-hf 18102
VK3XQ on 17m calling CQ jt65-hf
Russ NC5O
1- Whoever said
Listening
From: Russell Blair
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 9:30 PM
To: Digital Radio
Subject: [digitalradio] jt65-hf 18102
VK3XQ on 17m calling CQ jt65-hf
Russ NC5O
1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving door!
2- A government big enough to give you eve
The 14.105 packet group has been there a long time, but all I ever hear there
now is splatter from ROS.
If jose were a ham and had a better understanding of the gentlemen's agreement
on bandplans, a lot of his inconvenience
of having to reassign frequencies could have been avoided. Oops, off th
WHO/WHAT is claiming 14.103 - 14.115? The author? The Hams who seem to be
intrigued with ROS? If there's an apparent acceptance of the claimed freq
spread,
then it's not the author only who's in need of a good trouncing.
UH OH.now I've done it. Bet I won't ever get on their forum, much l
is welcome though to use his trash bin
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
>From: Steinar Aanesland
>Sent: Jul 6, 2010 1:18 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS on 40 meters
>
>
>It is a shame . There is only one thing t
It is a shame . There is only one thing to do -take back these
frequencies by running other modes when they are free
73 de la5vna Steinar
On 06.07.2010 18:08, pd4u_dares wrote:
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Siegfried Jackstien"
> wrote:
>
>> If you download and installed the n
> Does Winmor keep any log of activity?
>
> 73, Skip KH6TY
>
It logs each connect plus other activity
example
2010/07/06 00:00:04 RMS WINMOR ID sent on frequency: 7104.50 KHz
2010/07/06 03:23:38 RMS WINMOR -Western New York Gateway (FN02HK)
2010/07/06 03:23:39 108 Minutes remaining
2010/07/06
o@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Tue, July 6, 2010 3:20:11 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] WINMOR Server Busy Detect- report
>
>
>
> No one answered his CQ. The transmitting Winmor stations were in Europe,
> so perhaps they did not hear the CW station.
>
> Andy K3UK
>
Dave,
It was nice to see a lot of PSK31 activity during Field Day as well, but one
thing I noticed was it seemed that many of the ops were running AFC and they
were moving off of the QSO because so many sigs we so close togeather on the
WF. Did you see the same Thing? BTW, we W3YMW, my club wo
but I have
never tried it on the Yeasu. Thoughts anyone?
73, de Mike N7NMS
From: Andy obrien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 6, 2010 3:20:11 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] WINMOR Server Busy Detect- report
No one answered his CQ. The
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:16 AM, KH6TY wrote:
> Andy, any idea why the Winmor station transmited on an already busy
> frequency? Because it did not copy N0OE? Busy detector disabled? Your side
> worked - why did the other side not work? Did >anyone answer N0OE's CQ?
> 73, Skip KH6TY
So Skip,.
No one answered his CQ. The transmitting Winmor stations were in Europe, so
perhaps they did not hear the CW station.
Andy K3UK
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:16 AM, KH6TY wrote:
>
>
> Andy, any idea why the Winmor station transmited on an already busy
> frequency? Because it did not copy N0OE? Bus
And I would recommend that anyone wanting to use ROS should be required to read
this thread on QRZ which highlights some of the "shadier" aspects of this
program.
http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php...&highlight=ros
And of course, you can search the archives of this mailing list for (literal
Andy
Are you talking about RMS HF for the server or is there something else out
there on the server side?
Mike
N7NMS
Sent from my U.S. Cellular BlackBerry® smartphone
-Original Message-
From: Andy obrien
Sender: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 21:11:52
To: digitalrad
I'm bored, so I'll bite.
It is my understanding that in the US, ROS is only allowed above 222Mhz.
On 40M, you would be held to SWL status.
You should find it around 7.053 to 7.056.
phil
n4zsa
- Original Message -
From: "John Becker, WØJAB"
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent
If I download a new version I will "NOT" be able to use
the program. For a unknown reason I was one of the people
that Jose has seen unfit to use it.
That was the reason I had to "beg" for a earlier venison of it.
But thanks for your reply.
At 03:50 PM 7/5/2010, you wrote:
>If you downloa
Yes, looks like the 10 meter opening is a tad short. You are having fun?
From: Russell Blair
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 1:26 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf on 28.076
OK well I was looking at VE7CC cluster and it showed a lot of 10m, Oh well if
, July 05, 2010 1:26 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf on 28.076
OK well I was looking at VE7CC cluster and it showed a lot of 10m, Oh well if
no takers I will move back to 17m a 18.102, in about 30mins.
Russ NC5O
1- Whoever said nothing is impossible
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf on 28.076
I though I was wrong once, but I was mistaken. I am there now, 28.076
From: Russell Blair
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 1:14 PM
To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf on 28.076
Yes ur wright SRI, I will look c
I though I was wrong once, but I was mistaken. I am there now, 28.076
From: Russell Blair
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 1:14 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf on 28.076
Yes ur wright SRI, I will look closer next time...I'm on 28.076 now even
" IN GOD WE TRUST "
Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693
From: Rudy Benner
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, July 5, 2010 12:05:13 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf on 18.076
Look
Listening.
From: Russell Blair
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 1:10 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf on 18.076 and 10m
Ok I will it also looks like 10m might be open as well so I might slide up
there.. TNX 73 Russell
1- Whoever said nothing is
" IN GOD WE TRUST "
Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693
From: Rudy Benner
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, July 5, 2010 12:05:13 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf on 18.076
Look again, Macro #7 is 14.076. The next 2 are for 17 meters.
Thanks Russ. You are in the log and eQSL.
From: Russell Blair
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 1:02 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf on 18.076
I only used because in the setup under maco it
everything you have.
- Gerald Ford
" IN GOD WE TRUST "
Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693
From: Rudy Benner
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, July 5, 2010 11:46:57 AM
Subject: Re: [di
He is down -23 db but I hear him.
From: Rudy Benner
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 12:46 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf on 18.076
Common Frequency on 17 meters are 18.102 & 18.106 Mhz.
Listening on 18.076 dial for you.
From: Russell Blair
Common Frequency on 17 meters are 18.102 & 18.106 Mhz.
Listening on 18.076 dial for you.
From: Russell Blair
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 12:22 PM
To: Digital Radio
Subject: [digitalradio] jt65-hf on 18.076
Think I'l try 17m 18.076 and see it I find someone there.
Russ NC5O
1- Whoever sa
Hi,
As far as I know, Joe is evaluating the results of the tests and feedback
he received.
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
>From: jon_g4fut
>Sent: Jul 5, 2010 2:45 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [digitalradio] JT8
>
>Has Joe dropped JT8?
>
>
>
>-
xcuse me while I blow my nose.
>
>
> From: Russell Blair
> Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 11:42 AM
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf first QSO on 15m
>
>
>
>
> Just had a QSO with KC2QII on 15m my first on 15m
>
>
DANG and DRAT !!
From: Russell Blair
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 12:06 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: jt65-hf first QSO on 15m
No, I'm still on 15m just worked a XE1 and he was running 5w so I have cut my
power back 10w. still calling CQ on the
all on the spotting network, nice to know its working. Not
> hearing anybody on 15 or 20 meters. Excuse me while I blow my nose.
>
>
> From: Russell Blair
> Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 11:42 AM
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf first Q
Yes, I see your call on the spotting network, nice to know its working. Not
hearing anybody on 15 or 20 meters. Excuse me while I blow my nose.
From: Russell Blair
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 11:42 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf first QSO on 15m
Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693
From: Rudy Benner
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, July 4, 2010 10:31:04 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf moved to 15m
Not hearing anything, going dow
Not hearing anything, going down to 14075
From: Russell Blair
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 11:20 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf moved to 15m
Rudy only running 12 w to a vert.
Russell NC5O
1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried
That much !! Easy now, this is supposed to be WEAK SIGNAL.
From: Russell Blair
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 11:20 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf moved to 15m
Rudy only running 12 w to a vert.
Russell NC5O
1- Whoever said nothing is impossible
lair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693
From: Rudy Benner
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, July 4, 2010 10:14:42 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf moved to 15m
Listening from EN98il
From: Russell Blair
Se
Listening from EN98il
From: Russell Blair
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 11:11 AM
To: Digital Radio
Subject: [digitalradio] jt65-hf moved to 15m
I have moved to 21076 and TXing on the even mins, yesterday the band was open
during the contest as well as 10m.
Russell NC5O
1- Whoever said not
TKS Andy.
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Andy obrien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk Final Call for
Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference
Great
I do not know about the SignaLink really, but if you have it connected
correctly to the rear accessory port, there is nothing you need to do
with the radio. When the PTT line is grounded, it enters TX mode.
Thus, I would look into either your software setup (look for a PTT com
port and/or DTR/
;
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Andy obrien
> *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Friday, July 02, 2010 3:48 AM
> *Subject:* [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk Final Call for
> Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference
>
> Hm
OK, well I guess I didn't then. I can't get it to display the band and save
the info on top of the page. I did save all the info in the set up
portion. Thanks Bill N8VWI
In a message dated 7/2/2010 5:28:05 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
jon_g4...@fastmail.co.uk writes:
I don't think
I think I found the problem. I forgot to change mode from usb to fsk.
Atleast the red light comes on now..Bill N8VWI
Hello Andy,
Yes I could concatenate several papers about RS ID and Call ID and present the
result.
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Andy obrien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 3:48 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk
Good point. The early Winmor beta testing advice was to was to keep all
DSP off but yesterday I used it to rid myself of some CW QRM and had no
issues. I am finding Winmor does quite well with QRM unless the QRM is of
a long duration. So, for example, ALE soundings don't always cause major
da
Thanks Jon. I didn't see the port audio window at first. It wa under another
window.
Sent from my U.S. Cellular BlackBerry® smartphone
-Original Message-
From: "jon_g4fut"
Sender: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:32:04
To:
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.co
Andy,
It would be most helpful to know how much QRM gets through if you use a
500 Hz-wide IF filter and use a center frequency 250 Hz from the top of
a Pactor-III channel. Perhaps the problem is trying to use too wide an
IF filter.
73, Skip KH6TY
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, July 1, 2010 8:56:35 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf program
It is a Google group, not a yahoo group
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Russell Blair
wrote:
>Is there a user group for this program (jt65-hf 1.0.5.1) I can't seem
I think most everyone is recovering from FD,
Jerry Walker aka N1HATor WELLSWORMS
grid square FN33KJ 08
WELLS ,VERMONT
ZONE 2/3
What happened?
2 days without a single message! Is something broke?
Jeff -- KE7ACY
On 7/1/2010 1:44 AM, jim wrote:
I am BROKE send me a $
"A" $ ? Not shooting very high, eh?
Anyway, things seem to be working over here, just nothing to say?
Jeremy
KB8LFA
http://kb8lfa.com
Never Mind Andy, I'm and idiot. i wound the port audio window buried behund
another thingy.
73 de Mike
N7NMS
From: Andy obrien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, July 1, 2010 8:56:35 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf program
It is a G
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693
From: JGMAGS
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, July 1, 2010 7:29:46 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf program
Try:http://groups. google.com/ group/jt65- hf
73, KJ1J
"Many a good argument is ruin
Hmm, I wonder if Patrick has thought about publishing his work with RS-ID?
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Ford, Steve, WB8IMY wrote:
>
>
> Technical papers are solicited for presentation at the 29th Annual ARRL
> and TAPR Digital Communications Conference to be held September 24-26,
> 2010 ne
It is a Google group, not a yahoo group
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Russell Blair wrote:
>
>
> Is there a user group for this program (jt65-hf 1.0.5.1) I can't seem to
> find it need some help.
>
> Rusell NC5O
> 1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving
> door
Try:http://groups.google.com/group/jt65-hf
73, KJ1J
"Many a good argument is ruined by some fool that knows what he is talking
about"
... Marshall McLuhan...
From: Russell Blair
To: Digital Radio
Sent: Thu, July 1, 2010 8:04:21 PM
Subject: [digitalradio]
I am BROKE send me a $
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeff Moore
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 12:37 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Hello?
What happened?
2 days without a single message!
: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: K3UK gone over to the dark side...
Mike, I have not set up RMS relay yet, probably will in a few days. .
Andy K3UK
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Mike Liller wrote:
>
>
> Andy,
> That's what i'm using. I meant th
t;
> --
> *From:* Andy obrien
> *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Mon, June 28, 2010 8:30:20 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] Re: K3UK gone over to the dark side...
>
>
>
> The CLIENT software is RMS Express which allows a
e RMS Relay but use Winmor on the
HF side and have the store and forward from VHF Packet to HF.
73
Mike
From: Andy obrien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, June 28, 2010 8:30:20 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: K3UK gone over to the dark side...
The CLIENT software is RMS Express which allows a user to select WINMOR
access via HF to the Winlink 2000 servers OR use a Telnet Internet access to
the servers. It also provides a "peer to peer" option, using Winmor.
Andy K3UK
use Winmor with RMS HF? According to Steve K4CJX you have to
> have the $1000 modem. I'm new to this and he did't explain why.
>
> 73de
> Mike
> N7NMS
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Andy obrien
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.
9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: K3UK gone over to the dark side...
You are most welcome Mike I see you in my log
N7NMS, 2010/06/28 01:04:59,
I am employed by a hospital system and serve on their Disaster Preparedness
Committee, so I will be interested in your efforts too.
Andy K3UK
complaint with FCC.Also ask "t...@arrl.net"
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:23 PM, "John Becker, WØJAB"
wrote:
>
> I am all for busy detect.
>
> That being said what do you do with someone that has so much
> hate for Pactor (like KC7GNM ) that they turn to QRM'ing jamming
> or what ever you would like
I am all for busy detect.
That being said what do you do with someone that has so much
hate for Pactor (like KC7GNM ) that they turn to QRM'ing jamming
or what ever you would like to call it any time they hear it?
Right now the "only" tools that I have for busy detect for others
modes is my ea
Thanks Skip. primary mission is for regional access. So far that has turned
out to be the case, stations within a few hundred miles. I'm also paying
around with 10M ground wave to see what results are. 6M may also be tested.
Andy K3UK
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:00 AM, KH6TY wrote:
>
>
> Andy,
You are most welcome Mike I see you in my log
N7NMS, 2010/06/28 01:04:59,
I am employed by a hospital system and serve on their Disaster Preparedness
Committee, so I will be interested in your efforts too.
Andy K3UK
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Mike wrote:
>
>
> Andy,
>
> Iam new to Win
PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
>
>
>
> +++ More AA6YQ comments below
>
> -Original Message-
> From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
> Behalf Of KH6TY
> Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 7:02 PM
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Subjec
+++ More AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 7:02 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor
>>&
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 2:07 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor
Dave,
I re
Well Andy,
I have that $1K modem.
but in order to run WINMOR I would have to putout for a
new faster computer.
So what better? hen in hand or the one in the bush?
At 12:56 PM 6/27/2010, you wrote:
>Just a reminder..when Winmor first stated, the idea was to establish a
>mode that did not need a
At 12:52 PM 6/27/2010, you wrote:
>This has generated enormous frustration over the years, to the point where
>some operators now intentionally QRM such servers. This intentional QRM is as
>disgusting as running a server without a busy frequency detector, and provides
>a convenient excuse for se
I can't disagree with your points Dave. However, until I have more
experience with the busy detect from the server end, I think I'll feel more
"comfortable" in the auto-sub band...at least for now.. Then , if I do
transmit on a busy frequency despite the busy-detect, I'll feel less guilty.
Despite
ated here a few months ago that he would
investigate
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 9:25 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalrad
Andy,
97.221 is what you're looking for, The ARRL website has part 97 listed there.
73, Chuck AC5PW
From: obrienaj
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, June 27, 2010 8:40:48 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Busy detect screenshot for Winmor
Anyone h
I agree Skip and have been studying the "unattended" sub-bands for suitable
frequencies.
Andy
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:24 AM, KH6TY wrote:
>
>
> Thanks, Andy.
>
> Unless it is not impossible to disable busy detect, to answer your previous
> question about where to operate with Winmor, I perso
In the software there is a check-box that is user selectable, when selected
by the Server owner... it will not transmit if the frequency is busy. I do
not have a lot of experience with it yet. On the client side, same thing,
and it works well. There has been some occasional discussion about remo
gt;
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24.06.2010 14:31, Warren Moxley wrote:
>>>> was anyone successful in getting him to move to 14.100 and up?
>>>> de Warren / K5WGM
>>>>
>>>> --- On Thu, 6/24/10, Sean Gilbert, International Editor - WRTH
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Sean Gilbert, International Editor - WRTH
>>>> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] QRM maker on 14.078 CF
>>>> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>>>> Date: Thursday, June 24, 2010, 2:59 AM
Andy,
Just two-cents worth here. ALE400 forces the user into one software package
and operating system at the expense of others. Of course, there is
virtualization technologies to help with that, but unless ALE400 gets more
widely adopted it likely isn't the answer as a specified signal of inter
> >
> > > --- On Thu, 6/24/10, Sean Gilbert, International Editor - WRTH
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Sean Gilbert, Internati
t; From: Sean Gilbert, International Editor - WRTH
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] QRM maker on 14.078 CF
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, June 24, 2010, 2:59 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
was anyone successful in getting him to move to 14.100 and up?
de Warren / K5WGM
--- On Thu, 6/24/10, Sean Gilbert, International Editor - WRTH
wrote:
From: Sean Gilbert, International Editor - WRTH
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] QRM maker on 14.078 CF
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date
I also noticed this signal yesterday, very strong here in the UK. I have to
admit this is the first time I have heard it but that may simply be because
I have not been on 14076 at the times it has been active. Surely a station
such as this should be further up the band, around 14100 where the rest
Thanks Andy
I have send the operator of this PSKMAIL server a complain
for destroying my qso with his unattended system.
la5vna Steinar
On 23.06.2010 03:10, Andy obrien wrote:
> I suspect this is a PSKMAIL server you are seeing . PSKmail has a
> weather bulletin option. Probably DK4XI-20.
I suspect this is a PSKMAIL server you are seeing . PSKmail has a
weather bulletin option. Probably DK4XI-20. that station is listed as
a server on the frequency you mentioned and is listed as using PSK250
Andy K3UK
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Mike Blazek wrote:
> I've been hear
I've been hearing it off and on for the last couple of weeks as well
(hearing it right now in fact), but not getting full decodes with
MultiPSK. However, I'm seeing enough to confirm that it's marine WX
reports - seems to be mostly for the East Coast of the US.
Mike N5UKZ
On 6/22/2010 4:45 PM,
For what it's worth :
I have been very close to that freq waiting for any pactor
connect. I have not noticed anything.
Must be just outside of what I can hear.
John, W0JAB
Steinar,
> What kind of unidentified station sending WX reports on 14.078 cf in
> BPSK250 mode? This station has no busy detector. It does not care if the
> frequency is in use or not :( la5vna Steinar
>
I've noticed the same thing here.
Tony -K2MO
Bob, which version I currently have WSJT7 installed on this Vista laptop. I
just checked and it starts fine.
de Curt KC8STE/AAR5VR
73
--- On Sun, 6/20/10, dist203 wrote:
From: dist203
Subject: [digitalradio] Software crashing in Vista
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, June 20, 20
søn, 20 06 2010 kl. 09:40 -0700, skrev Warren Moxley:
>
>
> I Contacted W1XT a few minutes ago and it chops of the the last two
> characters of his exchange. Has anyone see this on JT8?
>
> Warren / K5WGM
>
>
>
Most likely he wrote a message longer than the limit (14 chars)
Vy 73 de OZ1PIF
I Contacted W1XT a few minutes ago and it chops of the the last two characters
of his exchange. Has anyone see this on JT8?
Warren / K5WGM
--- On Sun, 6/20/10, Rudy Benner wrote:
From: Rudy Benner
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: QRV new JT8 "mode"
To: digitalradio@yahoogroup
I see more action on JT8 this morning.
From: obrienaj
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 6:44 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: QRV new JT8 "mode"
I will be on 14076.25 with JT8 most of today
TOL = 400
Andy K3UK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien w
Over the course of my work as a 2way radio tech I have looked
at a lot of circuits for one project or another your's being one of them
Very interesting how you made that puppy. Also just about an hour
ago my radio went off.
John, W0JAB
At 10:13 AM 6/19/2010, you wrote:
>John,
>
>I have written
I wouldn't mind that at all IF they made the radio a nice SIMPLE almost non-
menu driven radio that I could afford in a couple of years (say five years?)
I understand that the manufacturers are thinking smaller is better, but I do
hate having to dig through a menu on a radio to change a setting t
EXCELLENT, thnaks for posting that story.
ve3bdr
From: KH6TY
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 11:13 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New release (4.18) of MULTIPSK
John,
I have written up a short story of how the weather alert radio industry began.
You can
501 - 600 of 14887 matches
Mail list logo
