+1
Em 16-03-2011 16:57, Florian Effenberger escreveu:
Hello,
this is a formal vote for all steering committee members (not their
deputies, unless their seat holder is unavilable).
To start work on the membership committee soon, all of its committee
members are needed. It is possible, however,
Hi André,
On 21/03/2011 10:26, André Schnabel wrote:
Hi,
Am 20.03.2011 12:13, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:
So, we still miss André's and Caolan's vote before we formally close
this
vote.
+1
(sorry, spent the last two day answering the question What is
different (to OOo) and
Why did you do
Le 20/03/2011 23:25, aqualung a écrit :
Thank you, that is very clear.
I am still not understanding Charles' comment.
Charles meant that embedded fonts is not really a problem for the
software but must be first adressed by the OpenDocument format which is
not under the control of LibreOffice.
Hi, I am subscribed to this list but since the 11 of March I have not
received any emails. I'm based in Chiba, Japan (south-east of Tokyo) but
I doubt if that has anything to do with not receiving email. Regards,
Howard.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Hi,
there are still a few votes missing. I guess we already reached the
needed 2/3 majority, but I'd ask the other SC members to cast their vote
as well, so we can soon close the call and start the membeship process.
Thanks,
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Thanks Jean-Baptiste, yes, that's what I meant :-)
Charles.
2011/3/21 Jean-Baptiste Faure jbf.fa...@orange.fr
Le 20/03/2011 23:25, aqualung a écrit :
Thank you, that is very clear.
I am still not understanding Charles' comment.
Charles meant that embedded fonts is not really a problem
Hi everyone,
I believe this would be better solved with LibreOffice integration with
online font repositories, like openfontlibrary.org,
theleagueofmoveabletype.com or Google Web
Fontshttp://www.google.com/webfonts.
If I received a document with a font I don't have installed, LibO should
look it
On 2011-03-20 3:42 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
On 21/03/11 8:23 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Obviously, it is impossible (as far as I can see) to add tabs without
losing *some* screen real estate...
Unless you had popup tabs on roll over.
True... especially if the tab bar popped up on *top* of
On 2011-03-20 3:49 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Charles in last email you mentioned vertical, why not give the user the
option to have it vertical or horizontal.
They can drag it and it snaps in vertically or horizontally?
Ummm... that's exactly what I suggested? I said *I* preferred it
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 10:56 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
The vote is now formally closed.
Sorry its a bit late; and of course I have no vote :-) but I wanted to
say publicly that I support the direction, but of course with Thorsten's
caveats: that the design -must- be complementary
On 3/18/11 10:17 PM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
I CC'd the discuss@TDF list because this might help to involve friends
of people reading that list to join our community, if they are told
about the SoC possibilities...
Fridrich Strba schrieb:
The title says it all. Let the students start to fall
Hi Italo,
On 21/03/2011 17:46, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 3/18/11 10:17 PM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
I CC'd the discuss@TDF list because this might help to involve friends
of people reading that list to join our community, if they are told
about the SoC possibilities...
Fridrich Strba schrieb:
On 3/21/11 3:51 PM, sophie wrote:
I think you'll find what you need here :
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/GSoc
Thanks, Sophie. I will never learn to use wikis... They simply do not
belong to my mental structure.
--
Italo Vignoli
italo.vign...@gmail.com
Mobile
O.K., so is everyone now in agreement that there is no legal problem
embedding a font that explicitly licenses itself to be embedded?
I am new here and am a bit mystified at the way discussion seems to move,
with inapposite answers to comments and then the point gets lost along the
way.
This
One other problem with embedding the font in the file (which I didn't see
anyone bring up, and if they did, I apologize) is it would increase the file
size for the document. That isn't much of a concern with a single document,
but if you have a couple thousand documents, each with the same font(s)
On 20/03/11 16:18, Charles Marcus wrote:
snip
Adding the ability to have multiple documents as tabs in one window would be
great - as long as
there is a choice.
+1
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive:
On 22/03/11 06:44, aqualung wrote:
O.K., so is everyone now in agreement that there is no legal problem
embedding a font that explicitly licenses itself to be embedded?
I am new here and am a bit mystified at the way discussion seems to move,
with inapposite answers to comments and then the
On 03/21/2011 11:44 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
As pointed out, it may not be possible to package fonts in the document
file because of the Open Document standard, although I would have though
it would have been flexible enough to enable packaging of future items,
otherwise it would be limiting to
On 2011-03-22 12:35, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 03/21/2011 11:44 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
As pointed out, it may not be possible to package fonts in the document
file because of the Open Document standard, although I would have though
it would have been flexible enough to enable packaging of
19 matches
Mail list logo
