LibreOffice 5.1.1 on Macs still doesn't recognize Java Runtime Environment (JRE 1.8.0_73 & OS X
ver.10.11.3)
You need to fix this bug. Can't use database without JRE.
--
_
Larry I. Gusaas
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada
Website: http://larry-gusaas.com
"An
Hi therebeen testing 3.5.0 since beta...now RC3...
I have also been testing Java 7 (now update 2). After each
installation, LibreOffice
doesn't like to play nice with Java 7 (which is working fine otherwise,
both LibreOffice
and Java), saying that the installation is defective and it
I've read somewhere that there is discussion on ditching support for
Java in LO. Is this true? Is there a decision taken the matter?
--
Marc-André Laverdière
Software Security Scientist
Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services
Hyderabad, India
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Hi Marc-André, *,
2011/5/19 Marc-André Laverdière marc-an...@atc.tcs.com:
I've read somewhere
If you cannot even remember where you read it, that source is not very
reliable, is it?
that there is discussion on ditching support for
Java in LO. Is this true?
No, this is not true. There are no
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 21:05, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com wrote:
If you cannot even remember where you read it, that source is not very
reliable, is it?
In my case, not remembering where I read something has nothing to do
with how reliable the source is, and
Christian,
Your first comment really was a cheap shot and certainly not becoming the
professionalism that should exist on this mail-list and the Document
Foundation as a whole. I know I might be less apt to ask a question for fear
of being ridiculed.
Martin.
An innocent bystander
On Thu, May
On Nov 3, 2010, at 12:56 PM, Ian wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 11:34 -0500, T. J. Brumfield wrote:
The cheapest iPad is $500, and comparable tablets are priced along the same
lines. There are cheap tablets more in the $99-$150 range, but they are
underpowered compared to the iPad and Galaxy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/05/2010 03:35 PM, Benjamin Horst wrote:
It doesn't even need to be built on the existing LibO code-it could be built
using LibO's ODF libraries, though, for perfect file
compatibility. Users won't care what the underlying code is; as long as
Hi Ian,
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 12:50 +, Ian wrote:
Ok, perhaps a daft suggestion but the principle is that all cell phones
will have a vast amount of RAM and fast CPUs in the next 2 to 3 years. A
gig of RAM is normal now, it would have been unthinkable 10 years ago.
Sure - but our
Hi all,
On Nov 3, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Ian wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 09:09 -0400, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Ian,
I've seen OO.o running quite nicely on small ARM devices as native
code; that would be my approach to mobile.
So why is there no strategy to get OOo on to these mobile devices? Or
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Benjamin Horst bho...@mac.com wrote:
I expect the iPad and upcoming Android tablets to become the dominant
computing platform in developing countries--they are cheaper and make a
simple upgrade path from the mobile phones that are the primary means of
internet
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:34 PM, T. J. Brumfield enderand...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Benjamin Horst bho...@mac.com wrote:
From a broad view of future success, tablets merit a great deal of
attention on our part. As I mentioned elsewhere, a LibreOffice Touch for
I'm an user, and not a developer. So perhaps this is a silly question.
From a user's perspective, it always seemed like the Java portions of OOo
were shoehorned in. Starting a JVM eats up unneccessary memory and takes
time. One of the most common complaints of OOo is that it is a bloated app
that
According to me, Libre Office is developed primary on C++ with GTK, just the
extensions are on Java.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:36 AM, T. J. Brumfield enderand...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm an user, and not a developer. So perhaps this is a silly question.
From a user's perspective, it always seemed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2010 03:36 PM, T. J. Brumfield wrote:
Is there a technical advantage of running the wizards and such in Java that
I'm not aware of?
For those that have accessibility requirements, the Java is mandatory.
OTOH, even with Java, LibO is not
+1 for getting rid of java.
2010/11/2 jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2010 03:36 PM, T. J. Brumfield wrote:
Is there a technical advantage of running the wizards and such in Java that
I'm not aware of?
For those that have
+1 for getting rid of java.
+2 for getting rid of java.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2010 08:25 PM, RGB ES wrote:
Agree. Java affect key components, not only extensions:
base needs java, and as consequence the bibliographic database too.
Is that Base as in the database engine, or Base as in the front end?
If the former,
18 matches
Mail list logo
