Well, a proxy is not possible right now. A small question regarding the
caching you mentioned. My URL for successful queries could be same, for
example, http://my.site.com/app/gettime, but obviously, the response need
not.
How can I make sure the responses are not cached? (And I don't control the
"DED|Chain is free open source software (BSD License) that will allow
you to build first class, high-quality websites without the cruft.
You get the reliability of Yahoo! UI, and the developer friendliess
of jQuery. "
http://dedchain.dustindiaz.com/
--
Mika Tuupola http
I just wrote a small macro for the Rails based blogging system
Mephisto. Macro utilizes Cody Linley's excellent ThickBox. Those who
are interested check url below:
http://www.appelsiini.net/~tuupola/434/thickbox-macro-for-mephisto
--
Mika Tuupola http://www.appelsiini.net
Mike,
On Mar 26, 2007, at 10:13 AM, Mike Alsup wrote:
>> Safari 2.0.4 has problems when a file is chosen to upload and the
>> return choice is xml. It looks like the form is sent, but the
>> 'Submitting' overlay never goes away, so it appears as if the
>> callback
>> isn't happening. All othe
Thanks much.
On 3/26/07, Jake McGraw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To quote Mastering Regular Expressions 3rd Ed. by J. Friedl:
The real problem is that on the majority of systems, you simply can't
match arbitrarily nested constructs with regular expressions.
He goes on to give the syntax for ma
To quote Mastering Regular Expressions 3rd Ed. by J. Friedl:
The real problem is that on the majority of systems, you simply can't
match arbitrarily nested constructs with regular expressions.
He goes on to give the syntax for matching a SINGLE set of nested
parenthesis, it's quite convoluted.
K
You're right about the CF meaning, Aaron.
Thanks!
I'm running some validation on a per field basis
and I'm using CF for most, but had to use
a Taconite line for change an input attribute
and needed to be able to enclose
the check on the existence of Form.Principal
via js.
Rick
From: [EMAIL
My knowledge of CF is rather limited, but from what I can remember, that
code is trying to determine whether the Form variable "Principal" exists
(correct me if I'm wrong). My best guess, then, would be:
if( jQuery(":[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Principal']").val() != null ) {
// do super cool stuff...
}
I just went cross-eyed looking at your regex, so I'm sorry I can't help you
there (I really need to get a regex book to read), but I know at least in
PHP you can create k:v pairs like this:
preg_match('/(?P.*)/', 'bar', $matches);
echo $matches['foo'];
// outputs: bar
I'm not sure if that helps
Hi, all..
How do I write this CF code:
in js?
Rick
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
I'm working on a regular expression to do syntax highlighting and I just ran
into a problem.
The regular expression below works on just about everything except nested
parentheses:
()
Will match:
but not
I'm not sure what to do about nested parens because nested functions c
dealing with autocomplete fields is a royal pain! Since you never know what
the user has in the autocomplete list, it's even more painful!
I'd hope there are more fields at the end of the form that would trip up
during the submit validation, thus still allowing enter... but the kluges to
capture
The reason being that when I have an autocomplete field the user will start
type something in the field and can arrow down and hit enter when on the
selected item. However, if they have "outtyped" the field and there is no
option select (none returned in the autocomplete) they are hitting enter by
the submit handler is where you should do the validation, if the user filled
in the form properly, they should be permitted to submit using their
preferred method. Click or Enter. Disabling enter makes the user remove
his/her hands from the keyboard for very little benefit.
On 3/26/07, Mike Alsup
You can intercept the enter key (code 34 I think...).
Something like this:
$("#myForm").bind("keypress", function(e) {
if (e.keyCode == 34) return false;
});
Keypress may be the wrong event, can't remember if forms submit on keyup,
keydown or keypress
__
> Except that they'll need to submit the form when the click the submit
> button. I just don't want them submitted the form when they hit enter on
> the keyboard.
But that is the default and *expected* behavior. Is there a good
reason to intentionally alter standard behavior?
Except that they¹ll need to submit the form when the click the submit
button. I just don¹t want them submitted the form when they hit enter on
the keyboard.
On 3/26/07 4:51 PM, "Chris Domigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you can just return false in the form's submit handler.
>
>
> _
I think you can just return false in the form's submit handler.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Is it possible to prevent a form from being submitted when the user clicks
enter?
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On 3/26/07, Daemach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
Thanks, Daemach. I didn't read it closely enough.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
And I didn't catch the orphaned paren, so we're even ;)
On 3/26/07, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/26/07, Daemach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
Thanks, Daemach. I didn't read it closely enough.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery
>
>
> Error Message
>
>
>
>
> That should work shouldn't it?
If you fix the typo with the parens that is a valid taconite doc.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On 3/26/07, Christopher Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike,
I'm working on this problem with Rick, and I've never used taconite
before.
The idea is that we've got three hidden form fields on the calling page
which are associated with each text field being verified. All fields are
being v
The one gotcha I've run into is with the disabled attribute - setting
disabled="false" doesn't do anything. You have to remove the attribute
entirely using (wait for it...) removeAttr() to re-enable a disabled form
field.
On 3/26/07, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rick,
Anything you ca
Ehh, guess i shouldnt have sounded so confident with that. I acctually dont
know if thats true, it just seems like thats what a browser should do.
On 3/20/07, Aaron Heimlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/20/07, Matt Stith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The browser will cache scripts and css
On 3/26/07, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortuanetely, Javadoc is a bit limited for documenting jQuery plugins.
For example, most plugins offer "options", that is, they accept a object
whose properties are used to override any set defaults. How do you
document all these options vi
> I want to make a remote request to a different server than
> the current page is hosted on, in order to get JSON data
> (padded with a callback).
>
> This is typically handled by inserting
I get that message too, but it appears that I am getting all messages
sent to my Gmail account anyway so I'm not bothered by it.
What is odd though is that that there are some jQuery messages listed
in Gmail that aren't visible in Google Groups?
-- Brad
On Mar 26, 11:44 am, "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL
Brian Cherne schrieb:
> The Java engineers at my company told me about Javadoc... I didn't
> even think to look for JSDoc... but it's essentially the same. I
> haven't needed to extract the Javadoc code into a MSWord document, but
> I think such tools already exist. I'll ask around. The other da
I have a fuction where I pass in a value and then look for a match
inside of a select box...
display = $('#premise-data').find('option').filter('[EMAIL PROTECTED]' + value +
']').text();
Works great in Firefox, but fails in IE6. Why I say the problem seems to
lie in text() or html() is that whe
I laugh at security, and the Same-site rules! With a simple perl program on
my server, I can load anything via ajax!
#!/usr/bin/perl
use LWP::UserAgent;
use CGI;
$ua = LWP::UserAgent->new;
$ua->agent("NuBrowser/10.7 ");
$res = $ua->request(HTTP::Request->new(GET => $ENV{QUERY_STRING}));
$q = CGI
Hi.
I want to make a remote request to a different server than the current page
is hosted on, in order to get JSON data (padded with a callback).
This is typically handled by inserting
i meant "Sortable" to the drag and drop sortable lists
like that:
http://interface.eyecon.ro/demos/sort.html
so what do u say?
Matt Kruse-2 wrote:
>
>> What is the jQuery interface going to look like?
>
> It will simply expose methods like
> .autosort()
> .autofilter()
> .autopage()
(sorry Howard for hijacking your thread)
Yes, the comments would be stripped from your compressed (packed/minified)
code. However, there's nothing keeping you from copying/pasting a simplified
comment block into the compressed code. So, for example, my minified plug-in
would have the comment:
/*
mmm... very WinLike... like :)
http://www.winlike.net/
And potentially nicer! (especially w/jQuery hooks)
_
SEAN O
http://www.sean-o.com
Roman Borisoglebskyi wrote:
>
> http://flymio.ru/object/
>
> This is my first experiment with jQuery framework. It is based on many
> plugins now
Cool! Thanks for clarifying that for me. :o)
Chris
Kenneth wrote:
> Oh no, you're actually correct then. I thought you were asking if you
> could compress the code with the documentation included, not the other
> way around...
>
> Yeah, since the compressed code is only meant to be used and no
You cannot check this; it would be a huge security breach if you could. You
can write some server-side script (ASP, ASPX, PHP, Ruby, etc) so verify this
and have them send whatever response you'd like to the browser.
passenger wrote:
>
> i wonder if someone could help a little. is there a way
Oh no, you're actually correct then. I thought you were asking if you could
compress the code with the documentation included, not the other way
around...
Yeah, since the compressed code is only meant to be used and not modified or
read, the documentation would be stripped, and therefore running
Thanks, Mike...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Alsup
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:54 PM
To: jQuery Discussion
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Taconite question...
> Do those http://malsup.com/jquery/taconite/#commands
Mike
_
Oh... that's exactly the reason I thought it *wouldn't* work. I don't
really understand javadocs... this is the first I've heard of them...
but it sounded like it took your comments and turned them into these
docs. I thought that since compressed js usually has the comments
stripped out, that i
Mike,
I'm working on this problem with Rick, and I've never used taconite before.
The idea is that we've got three hidden form fields on the calling page
which are associated with each text field being verified. All fields are
being verified onblur by the processing page called via ajax.
Since
> Do those http://malsup.com/jquery/taconite/#commands
Mike
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
I am fairly new to structured documentation like javadoc, and for those of
us without professional IDE's, is there an easy way to generate these doc
blocks other than copy/paste from a template? I looked for something online
but couldn't find anythingit seems like surely there'd be an online
v
Mike...
Do those mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Alsup
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:10 PM
To: jQuery Discussion
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Taconite question...
Rick,
Anything you can do in jQuery you can do with Taconite. Just think to
yourself, "How would I do that in jQuery?" For exa
Rick,
Anything you can do in jQuery you can do with Taconite. Just think to
yourself, "How would I do that in jQuery?" For example, to check a
checkbox you would write:
$('#myCheckbox').attr('checked', 'checked');
So in Taconite that becomes:
Mike
On 3/26/07, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTEC
It should as long as the compressor removes comments.
On 3/26/07, Christopher Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That wouldn't work for compressed JS would it?
Chris
Brian Cherne wrote:
> The Java engineers at my company told me about Javadoc... I didn't even
> think to look for JSDoc... but i
Perhaps you can find a solution reading
http://php.group.stumbleupon.com/forum/37465/
Good luck!
2007/3/26, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jake on duty!
> Amirca, let's get debugging! I need to see how the data is served and how
> the page is written and served!
>
>
> On 3/26/07, Karl Swedberg <[EMA
Thanks, Mike!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Alsup
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:10 PM
To: jQuery Discussion
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Taconite question...
Rick,
Anything you can do in jQuery you can do with Taconite. Just think
That wouldn't work for compressed JS would it?
Chris
Brian Cherne wrote:
> The Java engineers at my company told me about Javadoc... I didn't even
> think to look for JSDoc... but it's essentially the same. I haven't
> needed to extract the Javadoc code into a MSWord document, but I think
> su
Andrea Ercolino wrote:
> Scott Sauyet wrote:
>> Does anyone know how I can trigger Chili to run on a particular element
>> after the page has been loaded?
> Your request is very interesting: I'm going to add that feature to the next
> release of Chili.
Nice to hear.
> Meanwhile, if you feel con
I've adopted for my errors. I add all sorts of css to
make them "just right"!
On 3/26/07, Dan G. Switzer, II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jörn,
>amircx schrieb:
>> umm... there is no other tag for replacement? im using it for somthing
>> *
>>
>Good point, thanks. I guess I have to find a combin
The Java engineers at my company told me about Javadoc... I didn't even
think to look for JSDoc... but it's essentially the same. I haven't needed
to extract the Javadoc code into a MSWord document, but I think such tools
already exist. I'll ask around. The other day when I gave Aptana a trial-run
Jake on duty!
Amirca, let's get debugging! I need to see how the data is served and how
the page is written and served!
On 3/26/07, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Calling Jake! Calling Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ! Come in, ʝǡǩȩ.
ᎫᎪᏦᎬ, someone needs your help.
:-)
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
ww
SO:
I sent a message few weeks ago about some advice on genericizing my
code for the motion test example posted here:
http://motiontest.inforetail.com/OLDindex.php
I got some feedback, as well as some finalized specs for the design
and motion themselves, and have tried putting them to the te
Hey, Mike... or some else...
Can taconite be used to change a form field value, say from
false to true, or will it only change element content?
Rick
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
I'd like to see a central jQuery Plugins bug database. I think this would
help greatly in the development process. I've gotten lots of great feedback
via email (and prefer this greatly) but a tool to track development would
also be greatly appreciated.
-js
On 3/25/07, howard chen <[EMAIL PROTEC
>- javadoc commenting of plug-in external interface
Using what tool? jsDoc?
I've found that jsDoc works great for class-based structures, but not so well
for stand-along functions or library interfaces like jquery plugins. There
should be some standard javadoc-style syntax, but not necessarily e
Looks pretty horrid for me in IE 6:
http://img370.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ughbx8.gif
I think I'd rather go without for IE.
On 3/26/07, Glen Lipka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.ruzee.com/blog/shadedborder
Reported on Ajaxian. It says it's jQuery friendly although it doesn't
look
{js}sTyler schrieb:
> I've got a problem.
> I already implemented thickbox on a live site.
> The image has small text in it... if the images resizes to fit the window
> the text becomes unreadable.
> How do I make the thickbox scroll with the image shown at 100% of it's
> actual dimentions, and not
I don't know how I'd feel about being forced to create a getting started,
code samples, faq and download area. At some point we'll be asking too much
of plug-in authors... but while we're making a list... :)
- $-friendly wrapper (as stated before)
- jslint error-free (one step up form missing sem
I had to plug-in my mouse to test this one too. :)
The solution was to use a self-calling timeout instead of an interval. That
guarantees that the polling intervals (now polling timeouts, I guess) are
spaced apart even if one fires later than expected.
Argh. How frustrating. If only...
Brian.
On 3/26/07, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah - it looks like the final switch was made, and everyone is
> getting their updates. We're moving to Google Groups!
>
> --John
>
I just tried to switch to get individual emails and it said
There is a problem with your choice of subscrip
Jörn,
>amircx schrieb:
>> umm... there is no other tag for replacement? im using it for somthing
>> *
>>
>Good point, thanks. I guess I have to find a combination of elements
>that is easy to style, does not interfere with Google Toolbar and makes
>some semantic sense. That can hardly be achieved
discuss@jquery.com will be routed to post to the new Google Group
([EMAIL PROTECTED]). (Hopefully it'll work, haven't tested
it yet)
I haven't moved over the dev list yet - but that'll probably be the next to go.
--John
On 3/26/07, Jonathan Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So discuss@jquery.co
I seen the gap on ie6 when I refreshed the page...looks good though and I like
the idea and effect, especially redoing using jquery!.
Bruce Prochnau
bkdesign solutions
- Original Message -
From: Geoffrey Knutzen
To: 'jQuery Discussion'
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 1:13 PM
Sub
amircx schrieb:
> umm... there is no other tag for replacement? im using it for somthing
> *
>
Good point, thanks. I guess I have to find a combination of elements
that is easy to style, does not interfere with Google Toolbar and makes
some semantic sense. That can hardly be achieved without a
So discuss@jquery.com and [EMAIL PROTECTED] will still be the route to post?
I'm assuming these then map to the google group?
-js
On 3/26/07, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah - it looks like the final switch was made, and everyone is
getting their updates. We're moving to Google Gro
Mike,
Thanks. Shorter is better!
-- Brad
On 3/26/07, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This will also work:
>
> var formName = elem.form.name;
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
This will also work:
var formName = elem.form.name;
On 3/26/07, Brad Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Solved. I had been trying parent() and not parents().
>
> parentformname = $(elem).parents("form").attr("name")
>
> -- Brad
>
> On 3/26/07, Brad Perkins wrote:
> > I have a form template that
Solved. I had been trying parent() and not parents().
parentformname = $(elem).parents("form").attr("name")
-- Brad
On 3/26/07, Brad Perkins wrote:
> I have a form template that is shared among numerous forms. I need to
> modify the ajax response content depending on the form used.
>
> When a bu
And now it looks fine.
Before, it had a large gap in the div containing the rounded corners.
Strange
_
From: Geoffrey Knutzen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:32 AM
To: 'jQuery Discussion'
Subject: RE: [jQuery] Rounded Corners with Drop Shadow
FWIW, I
It worked for me in IE6 (no shadows) but it is *slow* to render.
-Dan
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Glen Lipka
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 12:14 PM
To: jQuery Discussion
Subject: [jQuery] Rounded Corners with Drop Shadow
http://www.ruzee.com/
Yeah - it looks like the final switch was made, and everyone is
getting their updates. We're moving to Google Groups!
--John
On 3/26/07, bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hey...
>
> quick question... is the list now officially on google groups now?
>
> thanks
>
>
> __
hey...
quick question... is the list now officially on google groups now?
thanks
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
it was there last night
It is not there now
Erik Beeson wrote:
> I don't see that. What URL?
>
> --Erik
>
>
> On 3/23/07, Kush Murod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys,
>> I know I haven't been smoking crack and I saw this message on the
>> website
>> jQuery JavaScript Library has a probl
I have a form template that is shared among numerous forms. I need to
modify the ajax response content depending on the form used.
When a button is clicked, what is the best way (w/ jQuery) to get the
name of the button's parent form?
Thanks,
Brad Perkins
___
FWIW, It breaks in ie 6.
Too bad, it looks good in FF
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Glen Lipka
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:14 AM
To: jQuery Discussion
Subject: [jQuery] Rounded Corners with Drop Shadow
http://www.ruzee.com/blog/shadedborder
R
Mike,
On Mar 26, 2007, at 10:13 AM, Mike Alsup wrote:
>> Safari 2.0.4 has problems when a file is chosen to upload and the
>> return choice is xml. It looks like the form is sent, but the
>> 'Submitting overlay never goes away, so it appears as if the callback
>> isn't happening. All other retu
So is this a bug or feature limitation?
Kush Murod wrote:
Hi Mike,
1. Binding event after content loads works that perfectly.
2. However using bubbling works only in FF not in IE, that's too bad,
'cause I find bubbling more elegant and clean.
I'll just use method 1 for now.
Thanks h
http://www.ruzee.com/blog/shadedborder
Reported on Ajaxian. It says it's jQuery friendly although it doesn't look
like a plugin.
Question: Does it make sense to jQuerify a script like this if it's jQuery
friendly already?
What benefit could be gained? Smaller? Faster? Better integration wit
Oh! I've seen those. Okay, my select box project is different. Sorry.
Chris
Andy Matthews wrote:
> I'm referring to form select dropdowns where you select an option from one,
> and get filtered results in the next, and so on.
>
> This is an example (and done with jQuery):
> http://remysharp.com/
I've got a problem.
I already implemented thickbox on a live site.
The image has small text in it... if the images resizes to fit the window
the text becomes unreadable.
How do I make the thickbox scroll with the image shown at 100% of it's
actual dimentions, and not resize it to fit the window?
I
/me ponders how http://jqueryplugins.com/ is doing.. :)
jQueryplugins.com was announced on this list a month ago today, eerie timing
for this message!
http://www.nabble.com/jqueryplugins.com-t3297295.html
I have no other knowledge than what is in that post, but it sounds very
exciting, and if i
It's just one possible approach to figuring out how I can
run validation using ColdFusion on one field at a time.
Then process all fields when all are validated.
What's happening is I'm breaking up the processing page
with different sections according to the data coming from
the calling page.
IF
im liking that :-)
On Mar 26, 1:22 pm, Ariel Jakobovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you know what else would be nice in this "standard interface"? An include of
> a search from the jQuery archives of any discussions related to that plugin.
>
> - Original Message
> From: Matt2012 <[EMAIL
Thanks Eric.
Erik Beeson said the following on 3/26/2007 9:47 AM:
> Even easier than that:
>
> jQuery.fn.sort = function() {
> return this.pushStack( jQuery.makeArray( [].sort.apply( this,
> arguments )) );
> };
>
> See here: http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/255
>
> Looks like I'm still about t
Thanks, Harald.
On 3/26/07, Harald Dietrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, but my feedback for IE was missing. I did not have any
> problems until now. So I think for FF and IE everything seems to be fine.
___
jQuery mailing list
dis
I'm referring to form select dropdowns where you select an option from one,
and get filtered results in the next, and so on.
This is an example (and done with jQuery):
http://remysharp.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/select.html
Does anyone else have one that might be more efficient (not saying th
> Safari 2.0.4 has problems when a file is chosen to upload and the
> return choice is xml. It looks like the form is sent, but the
> 'Submitting overlay never goes away, so it appears as if the callback
> isn't happening. All other return types worked fine for me, and the
> xml worked fine when
Brian,
>And thank you Dan -- you were actually much closer to the actual issue than
>my earlier hypotheses. Animate is not killing hoverIntent, but it is
>(occasionally) delaying one of the polling intervals, so that two are
>firing in very close succession.
The only reason I suspect this as the
Rob,
>Ok I think that may answer the next question.
>Are you saying that an assertion:
> $(this)[0] == this
>will always be true?
No, what he's saying is the "this" in $(this) is actually a reference to the
DOM element.
So, in the code:
$("#myDiv").click(
function (){
its also thinks that if i write hebrew letter its more than one letter so if
i force a maxlen=10 and write 1 char
in hebrew its writes me that ive passed the max lengh
ideas?
Karl Swedberg-2 wrote:
>
> Calling Jake! Calling Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ! Come in, ʝǡǩȩ.
>
> ᎫᎪᏦᎬ, someone needs your help.
>
> :-)
>
Ok I think that may answer the next question.
Are you saying that an assertion:
$(this)[0] == this
will always be true?
In other words, if I am using ID selectors and want to access a DOM
property/method should I read the first element or can I just use the
jQuery:
$("#myDiv").selectedIndex;
Even easier than that:
jQuery.fn.sort = function() {
return this.pushStack( jQuery.makeArray( [].sort.apply( this,
arguments )) );
};
See here: http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/255
Looks like I'm still about the only person that actually uses this.
--Erik
On 3/26/07, Luke Lutman <[EMAIL PROTE
What do you mean by n-related select boxes?
I've got a select plug-in in the works, but I don't know if it's what
you're thinking. Also, my plug-in is in pre-alpha stages. Not yet ready
for any general consumption.
Chris
Andy Matthews wrote:
> Does anyone have some jQuery code for n-related sel
Hi Mike,
1. Binding event after content loads works that perfectly.
2. However using bubbling works only in FF not in IE, that's too bad,
'cause I find bubbling more elegant and clean.
I'll just use method 1 for now.
Thanks heaps
--Kush
Mike Alsup wrote:
Kush,
You just need to bin
Hi Jack,
Your timing is impeccable! :)
Posted just this morning:
http://jquery.com/blog/2007/03/26/jquery-book-coming-soon/
http://www.learningjquery.com/2007/03/learning-jquery-the-book
I promise I will provide more details about what's inside as soon as
the publisher gives m
I'd guess it's because arguments isn't really an array (it has a length
property, but none of
Array's methods).
Something like this might do the trick:
jQuery.fn.sort = function() {
for(var i = 0, args = []; i < arguments.length; i++)
args.push(i);
return this.pushStack( [].s
Kush,
You just need to bind the change event to the select element after
it's been inserted into the DOM.
Mike
On 3/26/07, Kush Murod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> Still didn't work, my guess is
> The reason I guess, because that 'select' is loaded through AJAX,
> and once load
Calling Jake! Calling Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ! Come in, ʝǡǩȩ.
ᎫᎪᏦᎬ, someone needs your help.
:-)
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Mar 26, 2007, at 8:34 AM, amircx wrote:
my db and the page saved as utf-8...
its returns me in textfield values of : ×××
a
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
