On 14/03/2007, at 4:38 PM, David wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know that I used to have the same problem with the original
> Suckerfish menu (ie. not the jQuery version). The workaround was to
> set the 'wmode' to 'transparent' on the flash file.
>
> Regards,
>
> David
I second that workaround. I remembe
Hi,
I know that I used to have the same problem with the original Suckerfish
menu (ie. not the jQuery version). The workaround was to set the 'wmode'
to 'transparent' on the flash file.
Regards,
David
Joel Birch wrote:
On 14/03/2007, at 5:18 AM, Nathan Young -X ((natyoung - Artizen at
Cis
On 14/03/2007, at 5:18 AM, Nathan Young -X ((natyoung - Artizen at
Cisco)) wrote:
> Hi Joel.
>
> In addition to the layer problem with form elements we've had problems
> overlaying DHTML on top of flash movies, especially in firefox. Is
> this
> a scenario you've tested with?
>
> >
On 14/03/2007, at 1:35 PM, John W wrote:
> Nice update on the menu Joel. Its a lot smoother now in IE6.
>
> John
I'm pleased you like it. I didn't end up going with the changes to
the plugin itself but instead demonstrated a way for the user to
apply the bgiframe to the relevant events. Just i
Nice update on the menu Joel. Its a lot smoother now in IE6.
John
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/enhanced-suckerfish-style-menu-plugin-tf3374021.html#a9467517
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuer
On 14/03/2007, at 6:47 AM, Josh Nathanson wrote:
>> On your site for example moving from "consumer info" to
>> "glasshouse" works
>> smoothly, but the menu doesn't disappear for a few seconds if you
>> move
>> from
>> "glasshouse" to "city of gurya" (in ff2)
>
> Daemach, I think Joel did that o
Yeah, that site is tight! In both appearance and functionality.
-- Josh
- Original Message -
From: "Daemach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: [jQuery] enhanced suckerfish-style menu plugin
>
> It's possible - it
djustable) whether mousing onto
> another
> menu item, or just anywhere out of the dropdown.
>
> -- Josh
>
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Daemach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [jQuery] enh
purpose, to allow for mousing errors.
There is a 400 ms onmouseout delay (adjustable) whether mousing onto another
menu item, or just anywhere out of the dropdown.
-- Josh
- Original Message -
From: "Daemach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:39 PM
S
It looks great - the only thing I would add is that the plugin roll up the
menu when you mouse over a menu item that doesn't have a dropdown attached.
On your site for example moving from "consumer info" to "glasshouse" works
smoothly, but the menu doesn't disappear for a few seconds if you move
||:.
Nathan Young
Cisco.com->Interface Development
A: ncy1717
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Birch
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 7:04 AM
> To: jQuery Discussion.
> Subject: Re: [jQue
Sweet :)
On 14/03/2007, at 1:09 AM, Brandon Aaron wrote:
> It will not increase file size very much at all, maybe up around 30%.
> It would be worth it for the flexibility. :)
> --
> Brandon Aaron
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquer
It will not increase file size very much at all, maybe up around 30%.
It would be worth it for the flexibility. :)
--
Brandon Aaron
On 3/13/07, Joel Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds great Brandon. My only thought is that currently your plugin
> is nice and light which is great for such
Just a quick note to say that I finished a passable demo page for the
Superfish plugin and I have now added the plugin to the main plugin
page at jquery.com.
Thanks to everyone who provided feedback - it was indispensable.
Please post to this list if you have anymore suggestions etc.
Joel B
Sounds great Brandon. My only thought is that currently your plugin
is nice and light which is great for such a useful utility plugin.
Wouldn't adding all these features bump up the size to almost 200%?
On the other hand I'm sure you have weighed the pros and cons of this
so... awesome!
Jo
I'm thinking about changing the name of offsetTop to top and
offsetLeft to left. I think it would be less confusing, less typing
and more representing of what they really are. :)
--
Brandon Aaron
On 3/13/07, Brandon Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reading this has inspired me to update the bgi
Reading this has inspired me to update the bgiframe plugin. I'm going
to have an options hash that can be passed in. The options will be:
* offsetTop: auto || specific value
* offsetLeft: auto || specific value
* width: auto || specific value
* height: auto || specific value
* zIndex: -1 || specif
On 13/03/2007, at 6:15 PM, Joel Birch wrote:
> On 13/03/2007, at 6:00 PM, John W wrote:
>> Thanks for the reply Joel. The jdmenu (current beta version) is
>> employing the
>> bgiframe to compensate for this same issue. Basically you bind the
>> bgiclass
>> to an element like a div or in the case of
On 13/03/2007, at 6:15 PM, Joel Birch wrote:
> I implemented the bgiframe plugin and experimented a bit.
Forgot to mention, I also commented out the two expressions relating
to borders in the bgiframe plugin - I think that helped the
performance a little too.
Joel.
__
On 13/03/2007, at 6:00 PM, John W wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Joel. The jdmenu (current beta version) is
> employing the
> bgiframe to compensate for this same issue. Basically you bind the
> bgiclass
> to an element like a div or in the case of an ordered list to the
> the UL
> tag. It th
Ahh good find I didnt pay attention to this. Hopefully some other jquery
guru has some suggestions. Thats my only issue with the menu, that an IE6
=).
These parts seems to be relevant to us:
* It does take borders into consideration but all values
* need to be in pixels
My demo uses ems to
Thanks for the reply Joel. The jdmenu (current beta version) is employing the
bgiframe to compensate for this same issue. Basically you bind the bgiclass
to an element like a div or in the case of an ordered list to the the UL
tag. It then applies an iframe only for IE6. I was able to make it wor
On 13/03/2007, at 4:43 PM, John W wrote:
> This is a very nice implementation of the suckerfish menu with
> jquery. One
> thing, however, is there any way to add the z-index checking using
> something
> like bgiframe for the IE6 issue of menu elements not hovering over
> select
> menus in IE6
On 13/03/2007, at 4:43 PM, John W wrote:
> This is a very nice implementation of the suckerfish menu with
> jquery. One
> thing, however, is there any way to add the z-index checking using
> something
> like bgiframe for the IE6 issue of menu elements not hovering over
> select
> menus in IE6
This is a very nice implementation of the suckerfish menu with jquery. One
thing, however, is there any way to add the z-index checking using something
like bgiframe for the IE6 issue of menu elements not hovering over select
menus in IE6? I tried implementing it but it really bogs down the drop d
Hi Mathias,
Thanks for looking over the code and taking the time to work further
on it. First to respond to your points:
1. I'm not sure of what the down side of not removing the inline
opacity is. Also, doing an "out" animation does not seem to remove
the opacity anyway (look at it in Fire
Hi,
I have some improvements for your script:
1. You add opacity to the ul. This opacity should be removed at mouseout.
2. Instead of using find('ul'), you shoul use children('ul'). If you
have a li with no ul, your version will open the ul of the first li
with ul.
Here is the improved code:
//
On 10/03/2007, at 5:56 AM, Brice Burgess wrote:
> Joel,
>
> I wrote those reviews/changes @ 4am, and after more thought realize
> most of them were unnecessary. The original code would work @ multiple
> menus at once without the return this.each(...); The reasons I began
> with that is I wanted t
Joel Birch wrote:
> On another note, would it be better if my "over" and "out" functions
> were attached to the jQuery object, and defined outside of the
> plugin, eg:
>
> $.sfOut = function(){
> ...
> };
>
> instead of:
>
> var out = function(){
> ...
> };
>
> Would that be better?
On 09/03/2007, at 8:50 PM, Brice Burgess wrote:
> Perhaps I'm way off in protecting the expando ... and I too would like
> to hear some feedback ;)
>
> ~ Brice
I have studied your code closely now and I think I understand it
better. You are saying that it's important that the property I'm
atta
On 09/03/2007, at 8:45 PM, Torbjorn Tornkvist wrote:
>> Thanks for the compliments Tobbe! Whilst the intended purpose of this
>> thread is not so much to show off that site (I only included the link
>> because I have not had chance to do a real demo page yet), I'm always
>> happy to hear that someo
On 09/03/2007, at 8:50 PM, Brice Burgess wrote:
> Perhaps I'm way off in protecting the expando ... and I too would like
> to hear some feedback ;)
>
> ~ Brice
I've got to admit that I'm not overly familiar with the techniques
you are discussing. From what I can tell you are creating an array to
Joel Birch wrote:
> Here is the code:
> -
>
> (function($){
> $.fn.superfish = function(o){
> var defaults = {
> hoverClass : "sfHover",
> delay : 400,
> animation : {"opacity":"show"},
Joel Birch wrote:
> On 09/03/2007, at 7:22 PM, Torbjorn Tornkvist wrote:
>> Nice menues and a nice looking site!
>>
>> What especially caught my eye though was the
>> rolling fact box. Very nice!
>>
>> Cheers, Tobbe
>
> Thanks for the compliments Tobbe! Whilst the intended purpose of this
> thre
On 09/03/2007, at 7:40 PM, Brice Burgess wrote:
> Joel Birch wrote:
>> Example:
>> This plugin is now used on my Blush Tomatoes site although only two
>> of the main menu items have dropdowns.
>> http://www.blushtomatoes.com.au/about/
> Joel,
>
> The menu and the site look great. Fantastic actual
On 09/03/2007, at 7:22 PM, Torbjorn Tornkvist wrote:
> Nice menues and a nice looking site!
>
> What especially caught my eye though was the
> rolling fact box. Very nice!
>
> Cheers, Tobbe
Thanks for the compliments Tobbe! Whilst the intended purpose of this
thread is not so much to show off th
Joel Birch wrote:
> Example:
> This plugin is now used on my Blush Tomatoes site although only two
> of the main menu items have dropdowns.
> http://www.blushtomatoes.com.au/about/
Joel,
The menu and the site look great. Fantastic actually. As my .au
connection seems to be crawling, it got me
Nice menues and a nice looking site!
What especially caught my eye though was the
rolling fact box. Very nice!
Cheers, Tobbe
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Hi jQuerolians,
I'd like to offer up my new "superfish" plugin for feedback.
Basically, it takes an existing pure CSS dropdown menu and adds the
following features:
- suckerfish-style hover support for IE6. The class added is
'sfHover' by default but can be changed via the options object.
-
39 matches
Mail list logo