On 28/11/08 4:59 AM, Robert Hoekman Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you
mis-clicked, you can use the arrows to go back one question and change your
response.
what happens if they click on the text of the previous question? (it's
bigger, it's not a proxy, it's right above where their mouse
I like this much better than a wall of Likert Scale radio buttons.
The knowledge of exactly which question the user is focusing on, and
the layout of this survey, presents a really cool opportunity to
offer timed prompts. Suppose the user is mulling over a particular
question for an extended
Nice, inspiring design, and good suggestions.
The feedback Adrian is talking about to facilitate the review can be in the
form of colored bullet (with numbers -2 -1 0 1 and 2 in it or with thumbs
up/down) next to the answered question (in addition to the button highlight
you are suggesting -- I
One possibility is to perform a pilot and see which questions co-vary.
This can help identify questions which are perceived to answer the
same thing and reduce them down to one. Having said that, there might
be times when repeating a question (e.g., an L-score) is necessary.
In terms of examples,
Thanks for your responses, everyone. Turns out, though, that while writing
down the design criteria for the survey design, the solution magically
presented itself. Need to run it by a few users, but I think I have a
winner.
Cheers!
-r-
Hi Robert,
Attached is a screen shot of a word document. It's a likert-scale survey of
the Revised Learning Process Questionnaire (R-LPQ) I used for some teaching
research. I have adapted this kind of layout many times for online versions.
Instead of just a grid, I use radio buttons.
One
I have adapted this kind of layout many times for online versions.
Instead of just a grid, I use radio buttons.
This is exactly what I want to avoid—row after row of radio button groups.
Very tedious, not the least bit enjoyable, and in a survey with 100
questions, it means bombarding the
Here's what I designed http://rhjr.net/tests/LikertScale.gif.
I'd love any and all feedback. It's obviously an unconventional design, so
I'd like to run it by some users, and I'd love to hear the impressions of
other designers.
The task flow:
1. User clicks a response to the current active
On 27 Nov 2008, at 17:02, Robert Hoekman Jr wrote:
Here's what I designed http://rhjr.net/tests/LikertScale.gif.
I'd love any and all feedback. It's obviously an unconventional
design, so
I'd like to run it by some users, and I'd love to hear the
impressions of
other designers.
[snip]
I
* I initially thought green-is-good/red-is-bad... I expect that will bias
some folk from the actual accurate/inaccurate scale.
Good point. I was thinking, Red = negative as in disagree, Green = positive
as in agree. Trying to make use of that existing mental model. Perhaps
there are other
Cool design! Looks less intimidating than a huge form, too.
Feedback:
* Agree with Adrian that finished questions should have some indicator of
whether you answered them or not in the preview. And, they need to show
what answer you gave, so that you can decide to go back and change it if
On 27 Nov 2008, at 17:59, Robert Hoekman Jr wrote:
[snip]
In my storyboard for the design, I show that after you click your
response,
the other buttons turn gray and there's a 1-second delay before the
auto-advance kicks in. Haven't decided yet if I'm going to keep it
that way,
but it does
I'd agree with that.
A proposed flow:
- click an answer button
- immediately get the next question
- next question page includes a spot (top or bottom?) that confirms
the previous answer and offer to undo/go back
That way I can just ignore the confirmation unless I actually need to
change my
1) Can you move the scroll buttons from the right of the question
panel to the bottom - between the bottom of the questions panel and
the response buttons?
I appreciate the thoughts, but I'm confused by this. I put the arrows in the
same position a scrollbar would go in a textbox, browser,
I really like it, especially if you incorporate the feedback that
everyone has given. I don't have much to add that hasn't already
been said, but I am curious about what you're using to create the
survey. Flash? Something else?
Mike
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Anyone ever seen a great design for a long survey comprised entirely of
Likert scale questions?
One I need to design has 100 questions, which could obviously make it pretty
tedious. Looking for ways to make it feel fast and easy.
Thanks!
-r-
16 matches
Mail list logo
