On Jun 19, 2009, at 7:20 PM, dave malouf wrote:
If the Mint out of box, purchasing, installing, etc. experience is
anything like what I went through with Fever, i can't believe that
it is lauded in any way what so ever. It was the convoluted and
scary.
I'm not going to defend the installation
Ok Andrei, I bought in.
So I'm reviewing it here:
1) I am not a Mint user (I'm not the CFO in my house, so it never
made sense for me), but I've heard amazing things about it.
If the Mint out of box, purchasing, installing, etc. experience is
anything like what I went through with Fever, i can't
On Jun 19, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Brian Mila wrote:
Having watched the video, it looks really amazing. But, is there
some reason for the large amount of whitespace? It seems like it
would be more beneficial to give more room to the actual feed
content. Perhaps the display was optimized just for
Hey can we get back to talking about the design please?
Having watched the video, it looks really amazing. But, is there
some reason for the large amount of whitespace? It seems like it
would be more beneficial to give more room to the actual feed
content. Perhaps the display was optimized ju
On Jun 18, 2009, at 11:28 PM, Justin Maxwell wrote:
"don't kid yourself" that being disrespectfully aggressive to
strangers on a mailing list facilitates productive discussion. I'm
new here. Are you the token list bully?
Ask around. I'm sure half of the folks on this list will tell you ye
On Jun 18, 2009, at 7:20 PM, Dave Malouf wrote:
re: the point of the thread ... I can't comment as to what Andrei
wants me
to. I'd love for people to start talking about that and I will sit and
admire the discussion the case study.
Two questions:
1) Is your current web blog for Engage serv
On Jun 18, 2009, at 8:11 PM, Justin Maxwell wrote:
If interaction design is the shaping of all actions pertaining to a
digital artifact or process, the discussion about Fever must focus on
the ways and means by which a customer can acquire knowledge to inform
a decision in purchasing the softwa
If interaction design is the shaping of all actions pertaining to a
digital artifact or process, the discussion about Fever must focus on
the ways and means by which a customer can acquire knowledge to inform
a decision in purchasing the software. It is clear through this
discussion, in particular
hmm? a few points:
re: Amazon vs. this thread.
I was arguing with whether it was "designed", not whether its output led to
a design touch point. I was alluding to process as in "traditional design"
as opposed to engineering or business methodologies.
re: experience design ... I know those referenc
On Jun 18, 2009, at 8:48 PM, Dave Malouf wrote:
actually, no, I meant "interaction design".
What I mean is definitely interaction.
As in how I interact with the touch points within the eco-system.
(BTW, I think I've established before that I don't really understand
"experience design" as anyt
actually, no, I meant "interaction design".What I mean is definitely
interaction.
As in how I interact with the touch points within the eco-system.
(BTW, I think I've established before that I don't really understand
"experience design" as anything other than "holistic strategy" & messaging)
The "
On Jun 18, 2009, at 1:38 AM, dave@gmail.com wrote:
Well, for me this isn't "business model". It is the core difference
btw UI Design & Interaction Design.
Actually, I think you're trying to say it's the difference between
interaction design and experience design. One just focuses on the
Well, for me this isn't "business model". It is the core difference
btw UI Design & Interaction Design.
How I interact with the product in all it's forms is part of the
IxD. Your attempt to try & separate them as distinct is a great
example of where UI design by itself fails. It is the way most o
13 matches
Mail list logo
