benybrady wrote:
> Sounds like I will not be sacrificing quality or features by going the
> squeezebox route with the individual small amps at the same time saving
> close to $2k. I wonder if anyone out there has gone this route.
Squeezebox 3 (SB3), Duets or Touch devices as the signal source.
Well, to a certain degree you will have to plan for that anyway.
The house will last longer than the audio system. Period. Even if the
company is still around, replacement units will likely look different
when the one you currently buy breaks down.
Since audio cables, speakers and stuff are prett
I would think as much as I love the squeeze products, you should not
consider using them for a new installation where the installation cannot
be easily changed due to the fact that the good squeeze stuff has been
discountinued and there is no information on replacement technology. So
I would cons
g8vju wrote:
> I have seen the note about outage over the few days and today updates
> that it appears to be back, but I have found that although the windows
> 7.7.2 is now working ok, the 7.7.2 working from my readynas pro is
> still returning could not resolve ip address for www.bbc.co.uk. I h
bluegaspode wrote:
> As much as I hate to say it: a discontinued product isn't a good choice
> for a whole new house either?
At least when it comes to relying on it, like mounting stuff into walls
etc. that's certainly true.
-
bluegaspode wrote:
> As much as I hate to say it: a discontinued product isn't a good choice
> for a whole new house either?
Eh, depends on your use case. I'm disappointed that the product's been
discontinued but I haven't really liked any of the products since the
SB3 and I don't use mysb.com
bluegaspode wrote:
> As much as I hate to say it: a discontinued product isn't a good choice
> for a whole new house either?
True, but he does already own several SB players. (and once apple really
cranks up in this area, Sonos won't be long for this world either).
As much as I hate to say it: a discontinued product isn't a good choice
for a whole new house either?
bluegaspode's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=31651
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.
regarding, "why not just spend the money and go with SONOS". Speaking
personally, the cost is a zero issue for me but yet SONOS would be way
down on my list as an option for whole house audio. It has too many
limitations.
benybrady wrote:
> Alternatively, could I just buy 5 of these guys and 5 iPod touch and
> hook them independently to their own individual speakers and
> voila...??could I control each individual iPod with my phone?...just a
> thought. I watched the video on the link and he just hooked up a $22 am
azinck3 wrote:
> Alternatively, gary's suggestion of a Vortexbox might not be a bad one.
> I don't know much about what audio hardware a Vortexbox comes with (and
> there doesn't seem to be a whole lot of info online) but I'll take
> gary's word for it if he says it comes with sufficient hardwar
erland wrote:
> Isn't the price of a iPod Touch about the same as a Squeezebox ? So why
> not get the real thing ?
>
> You can definitely run an iPod Touch for each zone with iPeng app with
> playback option to turn it into a Squeezebox and after that you can
> remote control it from a iPhone, i
Deezer works with iPeng, so does MOG. Spotify works with the 3rd party
plugin.
I believe in reality it's just Rhapsody/Napster and Pandora which do not
work and you can get Pandora to work if you sync with a real Squeezebox.
---
benybrady wrote:
> Alternatively, could I just buy 5 of these guys and 5 iPod touch and
> hook them independently to their own individual speakers and
> voila...??could I control each individual iPod with my phone?...just a
> thought. I watched the video on the link and he just hooked up a $22 am
db122 wrote:
> Not sure about #1, as I don't have Rhapsody. But I am sure we can get it
> fixed, but it might be easiest to have you contact me directly at
> supp...@orangebikelabs.com and I will figure out a way for you to get me
> the logging information I need. If you are running a pre-Jellybe
Hi,
I am in a process of building a Squeezeslave ASIO by following the
wiki.
I have managed to solve some problems, however I can't get through this
one.
Here are the last few lines I get in Cygwin Terminal:
lib/libslimproto.a(slimproto.o):slimproto.c:(.text+0x7c5): undefined
reference to `_poll
benybrady wrote:
> Sounds like I will not be sacrificing quality or features by going the
> squeezebox route with the individual small amps at the same time saving
> close to $2k. I wonder if anyone out there has gone this route.
As aznick3 and others have pointed out, this is a common approach f
azinck3 wrote:
> You could stick the amp behind a service panel or in the ceiling
> (accessible via the attic).
>
> I understand not wanting a box around; I like the minimalist look, too.
> But I also like being able to see the current temperature and what's
> playing. I just wanted to be su
Nonreality wrote:
> So far I really like this program. I am having a problem if I pause or
> do something with the remote that comes with the touch I then lose use
> of the Orange remote and have to reboot my phone. I don't know if this
> is normal but it can be frustrating. Tonight I paused P
benybrady wrote:
> It's a new house build and I think it looks nice not to see any black
> box on the counter. Where would I tuck the amp? If its in the wall, how
> do I access it if it need to be changes out or it breaks down?
You could stick the amp behind a service panel or in the ceiling
(ac
azinck3 wrote:
> Yes! It's the basic squeezebox way of doing things and it's what
> virtually every squeezebox user does. One squeezebox per zone, with
> some form of amplification for each zone.
>
> Let me just now question one more of your assumptions: why are you
> running all the cables
(a) The website is in French, so Google Translate is a boon. Even so,
Google Chrome has an option to automatically translate web pages in
certain languages. Was quite confusing me when working on Norwegian music
service wimp.com :-)
If this website proves as good at it seems it would be w
benybrady wrote:
> Sounds like I will not be sacrificing quality or features by going the
> squeezebox route with the individual small amps at the same time saving
> close to $2k. I wonder if anyone out there has gone this route.
Yes! It's the basic squeezebox way of doing things and it's what
azinck3 wrote:
> Yes.
Sounds like I will not be sacrificing quality by going the squeezebox
route with the individual small amps at the same time saving close to
$2k. I wonder if anyone out there has gone this route.
beny
benybrady wrote:
> Could I access my iTunes folder? Only with my computer on correct?
Yes.
azinck3's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3967
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread
No matter which speakers you choose they must have an amp to drive them.
Small 2ch amp, self powered speakers, full receiver, etc...
Boom's audio out can only be used for headphones or extremely small
speakers, absent an amp after the audio out.
--
26 matches
Mail list logo
