holmsn;237601 Wrote:
Here's the link
http://www.qnap.com.tw/images/products/NAS/TS109Pro/Thermal_TS-109_Series_ENG.pdf
The article makes no mention of what the drive does when it is being
accessed constantly eg. a mass copying operation of say 100GB of data.
The software screendump implies a
egd;238087 Wrote:
My experience with drives in fanless enclosures is they get very hot, to
the point of R/W errors, when copying large amounts of data. Great if
they've somehow overcome that, but I remain sceptial on that front.
Anyone have any real-world experience copying large volumes
Ian_F;238101 Wrote:
I'm surprised that any device which suffered r/w errors when you tried
to use it could possibly pass the design stage let alone make it to
market. :eek: heh, so was I...
Ian_F;238101 Wrote:
Anyway, onto your question. I've hammered my QNAPs for hours on end,
moving
egd;238200 Wrote:
heh, so was I...
Thanks for that, I think I've decided what I'll be buying my parents
for Christmas - an SB3/Aego-M/QNAP combo. Come to think of it I'd
better get a network cable for them also to enable copying of flac onto
the QNAP. To connect a QNAP directly to PC,
Here's the link
http://www.qnap.com.tw/images/products/NAS/TS109Pro/Thermal_TS-109_Series_ENG.pdf
--
holmsn
holmsn's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3809
View this thread:
I was trying to attach a pdf from QNAP but it's too big to post.
Try Googling +QNAP +thermal, quite interesting.
Neil
--
holmsn
holmsn's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3809
View this thread:
Now being the owner of a set of A5s and a set of Aego Ms (with two SB3s)
I have to say that I do find that the Aego M suit me more in a room
where less power/oomph is needed. The A5s are a lot punchier IMO, as
pablolie suggests.
Only thing I MAY consider for when we have parties is a separate
Out of curiosity, how does the hard drive do in the QNAP, seeing as it
is fanless - I presume it runs pretty hot?
--
egd
Thecus N5200PRO Transporter ATC SCA2 ATC SCM100SLAT
egd's Profile:
egd;236532 Wrote:
I've attached some screendumps for you to get a feel of functionality.
Thanks for this egd, very useful stuff.
I settled on the QNAP since it better suits my needs for now. However,
I do want to rip all my DVDs to disk and so something like the Thecus
will be required to
pablolie;236283 Wrote:
In my opinion the AE5 deliver on the higher resolution musical
experience - the Aego M's are great, but while they deliver on good and
balanced (when bass is set to 1) sound, they don't deliver as much
spacial resolution as the AE5s. Good to know as I contemplated
Empgamer;235998 Wrote:
I wanted a quiet system, with low power consumption, that will sleep and
wake on demand from the SB, that could do many other things, had been
subject of many good reviews and wasn't flaky when working with
Slimserver.Ditto for the N5200PRO.
Empgamer;235998 Wrote:
last screendump
+---+
|Filename: WOL_resize.JPG |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3577|
raid configuration
+---+
|Filename: RAID_resize.JPG |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3579|
Ian_F;236340 Wrote:
What would you call a tiny collection? =200 albums?
Ian_F;236340 Wrote:
Does the N5200PRO go to sleep on idle and/or by schedule? I supports
scheduled power on/ off and wakeup on LAN, so powering up
your SB3/ Transporter can trigger the NAS
Ian_F;236340 Wrote:
How many
egd;235187 Wrote:
I'm surprised you find the A5s better suited to a larger room. AFAIK
the Aego M's are rated 90W RMS whilst the Audioengine A5s are rated 45W
RMS?
I have both of them in my temporary apartment. The AE5s as my main
system in the living room, the Aego M's are the besdroom
egd;235523 Wrote:
A TS-109 would in my view be hopelessly underpowered unless you had a
tiny collection. If it must be a QNAP, consider the TS-401T, but even
then you're still 1GHZ slower than the N5200PRO.
What would you call a tiny collection?
egd;235523 Wrote:
Originally Posted by
From my understanding both the AegoM and A5s are rated the same. 90W
total system for the former, 45W per channel for the latter.
Depends what you are after with a NAS. For me, and it seems many
others, the QNAP TS109 Pro works fine. I wanted a quiet system, with
low power consumption, that
davejsb;235360 Wrote:
Now I'm debating whether to shell out for a TS-109 NAS ;)
Have a look at the Thecus N5200PRO. A TS-109 would in my view be
hopelessly underpowered unless you had a tiny collection. If it must
be a QNAP, consider the TS-401T, but even then you're still 1GHZ slower
than
Excellent, thanks for the kind advice :D
--
davejsb
davejsb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13463
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=39304
I have the Audioengine A5s. Excellent speakers. They are in a large
kitchen though and give plenty of sound. I'd likely consider the Aego
Ms for smaller rooms though. I have to say I'm just not that keen on
2.1 sets.
--
Empgamer
Empgamer;235181 Wrote:
I have the Audioengine A5s. Excellent speakers. They are in a large
kitchen though and give plenty of sound. I'd likely consider the Aego
Ms for smaller rooms though. I have to say I'm just not that keen on
2.1 sets.
I'm surprised you find the A5s better suited to
Cheers for all of the great replies and advice :)
After some thinking, I've plumped for another set of Aego's which are
arriving tomorrow.
Now I'm debating whether to shell out for a TS-109 NAS ;)
--
davejsb
davejsb's
Heya all,
I've recently invested in my now loved SB3. Needless to say it's
possibly the best gadget related purchase I've ever made!
Anyway, at the moment I have it running through an aged and underused
cheapo Acoustic Solutions SP101 system which I picked up on a whim in
Argos a couple of
davejsb wrote:
I realise neither option satisfies audiophilia by the way, I just don't
have the money, or space, or requirement really, for a more advanced
setup.
I tend to like powered speakers when space and money is a consideration.
The engineers can match the needs of the speaker to the
Cheers for your kind reply :)
I was certainly impressed with how the SB3 sounded when rigged up to my
Aego M 2.1's and that's certainly the cheapest way to solve the dilemma
:)
--
davejsb
davejsb's Profile:
davejsb;235132 Wrote:
Cheers for your kind reply :)
I was certainly impressed with how the SB3 sounded when rigged up to my
Aego M 2.1's and that's certainly the cheapest way to solve the dilemma
:)
Also check out
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=235097postcount=672
I have
davejsb;235128 Wrote:
I'm caught between purchasing some Acoustic Energy Aego M 2.1 powered
speakers (I already use a set for my PC and they're superb - and the
SB3 sounds brilliant through them) and some sort of midi hi-fi system
I use SB3-Aego M's in my bedroom study don't think you
egd;235157 Wrote:
IMHO no point spending more for a bedroom system
Unless your significant other is extremely attractive.
Ooh.
;-)
.
--
haunyack
Transporter - BK R200.2 - Vandersteen 3A Signature. (Listening room)
SB3 (RWA analog) - Rotel RB1070 - BW Matrix 805. (Bedroom)
Fridgidare -
haunyack;235162 Wrote:
Unless your significant other is extremely attractive.
In which case, one makes one's own music...
--
egd
Thecus N5200PRO Transporter ATC SCA2 ATC SCM100SLAT
egd's Profile:
29 matches
Mail list logo
