[slim] Re: Lacking feature

2006-09-08 Thread aubuti
JJZolx;134678 Wrote: > There are no additional solutions. The design of the Squeezebox > _requires_ a computer to drive it. It sounds like you went searching > for something and somehow found a solution that was 180 degrees the > opposite of what you desire. Exactly. In the original post Raptus

[slim] Re: Lacking feature

2006-09-08 Thread Raptus
JJZolx;134678 Wrote: > There are no additional solutions. The design of the Squeezebox > _requires_ a computer to drive it. I'm sorry, by solutions I meant products/devices not necessarily from SlimDevices. -- Raptus Rap

[slim] Re: Lacking feature

2006-09-08 Thread JJZolx
Raptus;134626 Wrote: > It's the added cost and complexity. > > Do you agree that the level of self sufficiency and ease of use most > DAPs offer is interesting, especially for non tech savvy people? > > I'm in no hurry so I'll keep watching the different solutions that > appear. There are no a

[slim] Re: Lacking feature

2006-09-08 Thread Raptus
Thanks for the hint, I hadn't seen Olive. They come close, featurewise I only miss support for Vorbis, Musepack and Replay Gain. I find them overpriced, but it fits the audiophile market (the price premium for the larger disks is ridiculous, Olive Musica 160GB is 1099U$, the 250GB version is 1499U

[slim] Re: Lacking feature

2006-09-08 Thread aubuti
I figure that most/many "non tech savvy people" are happy shuffling CDs or using an iPod + docking station. What really pushed me to SB (and looking at similar devices such as Roku, Sonos, Streamium, Airport Express, etc.) is wanting to have my whole CD collection available in multiple places. You

[slim] Re: Lacking feature

2006-09-08 Thread Raptus
It's the added cost and complexity. Do you agree that the level of self sufficiency and ease of use most DAPs offer is interesting, especially for non tech savvy people? I'm in no hurry so I'll keep watching the different solutions that appear. -- Raptus -

[slim] Re: Lacking feature

2006-09-08 Thread aubuti
It's still not clear to me what you didn't like about the NAS solution that was suggested in post #7 in this thread (almost a year ago). I'm not sure, but I expect you can connect the NAS directly to the SB with a crossover cable. And now there are several NASs with vendor support for slimserver.

[slim] Re: Lacking feature

2006-09-08 Thread Raptus
Michael Herger;57693 Wrote: > Decoding isn't the problem. But the management of a few thousand songs > (there are people using it with 100'000 songs!) and serving web pages > does need a little more performance. Go through the forums: there are > user > running slimserver on devices like the

[slim] Re: Lacking feature

2005-10-22 Thread paxtonc
1. Remote SB - http://www.slimdevices.com/images/remote-180.gif Skipjam - http://www.skipjam.com/_images/products/rfremote.jpg You can get an RF remote w/ 10 line, 128x128 lcd, so no line of sight necessary. This enables you to: hide the unit; operate it from another room (depending on RF power);

[slim] Re: Lacking feature

2005-10-18 Thread snarlydwarf
paxtonc Wrote: > You could buy a skipjam audio and report back on how it goes - seems to > have everything you're looking for, Hrrm? It doesn't look that different from a Squeezebox in how it behaves (ie, no internal HD, all music fetched from the network). That seems to be what the Original

[slim] Re: Lacking feature

2005-10-18 Thread paxtonc
You could buy a skipjam audio and report back on how it goes - seems to have everything you're looking for, and I'm wait for some user feedback on the device before I make a purchase decision :) http://www.skipjam.com/products.php?page=prods_av02.php&osCsid=691ebde0913398a3f0abc2346628b99d --

RE: [slim] Re: Lacking feature

2005-10-17 Thread Emile_Weekes
Wouldn't this be close to what you are looking for? http://fieldnetworks.com/slim/linkstation.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ceejay Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 6:00 AM To: discuss@lists.slimdevices.com Subject: [sli

Re: [slim] Re: Lacking feature

2005-10-15 Thread Michael Herger
Actually it doesn't need a decent processor, there are devices doing similar decoding tasks using a 180Mhz ARM CPU and less. SB2's RISC CPU should be up to it. Decoding isn't the problem. But the management of a few thousand songs (there are people using it with 100'000 songs!) and serving web

[slim] Re: Lacking feature

2005-10-15 Thread ceejay
Raptus Wrote: > Sorry, wasn't I clear on what I'd like? > > iPod + docking station: > No Vorbis support > No Musepack support > No ReplayGain support > No SPDIF out > No Ethernet connectivity > No IR remote control > No 300GB+ storage solution > Closed architecture > Not worth the money. > > ED

[slim] Re: Lacking feature

2005-10-15 Thread Raptus
Yes, that would be the "think big" solution, maybe some EPIA based system. Embedded hardware and dedicated OS/software still seem a more appropriate approach though, especially if there already are systems like SB2 with a mature LCD/remote controled interface. Actually it doesn't need a decent pr

[slim] Re: Lacking feature

2005-10-15 Thread Raptus
Sorry, wasn't I clear on what I'd like? iPod + docking station: No Vorbis support No Musepack support No ReplayGain support No SPDIF out No Ethernet connectivity No IR remote control No 300GB+ storage solution Closed architecture Not worth the money. EDIT: Ah, maybe you meant "something like an

[slim] Re: Lacking feature

2005-10-15 Thread Patrick Dixon
Surely you want an iPod with a docking station then? -- Patrick Dixon www.at-view.co.uk ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss