aubuti;288831 Wrote:
But if possible, I'd try a wired solution for the SB3 first.
Thanks, but does a wired solution actually help? Surely it just stops
intereference, but the network speed won't be much better (signal
strength in my flat is pretty good). I do think about upgrading to a
rbl wrote:
aubuti;288831 Wrote:
But if possible, I'd try a wired solution for the SB3 first.
Thanks, but does a wired solution actually help? Surely it just stops
intereference, but the network speed won't be much better (signal
strength in my flat is pretty good). I do think about
peter;288977 Wrote:
Wireshark is an option. but that usually won't work with a wifi
interface
Does that mean I have to run it from my wired desktop, and not my
wireless laptop, or does it mean I wont see the wireless activity
anyway (e.g. the SB3 activity).
Many thanks for your help ...
rbl wrote:
peter;288977 Wrote:
Wireshark is an option. but that usually won't work with a wifi
interface
Does that mean I have to run it from my wired desktop, and not my
wireless laptop, or does it mean I wont see the wireless activity
anyway (e.g. the SB3 activity).
Many thanks
Microsoft has a network monitor which also monitors Wifi - but I think
it is Vista only.
Use this as a start point
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=18b1d59d-f4d8-4213-8d17-2f6dde7d7aacdisplaylang=en
and here http://blogs.technet.com/netmon/
--
bpa
but the network speed won't be much better (signal strength in my flat
is pretty good).
Speed will be much better - 100mbs/sec vs at best 54mb/sec. I think
Wifi also has dead time between packets which will further reduce
throughput.
Even if you manage 54mbs/sec - it is shared amongst all
rbl;288955 Wrote:
Thanks, but does a wired solution actually help? Surely it just stops
intereference, but the network speed won't be much better (signal
strength in my flat is pretty good). I do think about upgrading to a
gigabit setup which I guess would help, but these gigabit setups
aubuti wrote:
rbl;288955 Wrote:
Thanks, but does a wired solution actually help? Surely it just stops
intereference, but the network speed won't be much better (signal
strength in my flat is pretty good). I do think about upgrading to a
gigabit setup which I guess would help, but these
peter;288984 Wrote:
[color=blue]
Gigabit is not really that expensive any more, but it won't give you a
10x speedup either. I get about 200 Mbps with file trnsfers between my
laptops and server over GB ethernet. With wireless I would be very
pleased to achieve 54Mbit with real world
aubuti wrote:
peter;288984 Wrote:
[color=blue]
Gigabit is not really that expensive any more, but it won't give you a
10x speedup either. I get about 200 Mbps with file trnsfers between my
laptops and server over GB ethernet. With wireless I would be very
pleased to achieve 54Mbit with
I find if I transfer large files on my wireless laptop then I get
massive drop out on the SB3. Is there a way to increase the network
priority of the SB3 (I am sure this is a network thing, not a processor
problem). The problem seems worse when I run two sync'd SB3s.
I have SS 6.5 running on an
Your router is a likely culprit. Some routers will allow you to give
higher priority to certain file types. One that I know of is the
Linksys WRT54GL, for which 3rd party firmware is available that can do
this, though I haven't had to try it myself yet.
Another possibility is to use a wired
By coincidence I actually have a LinkSys WRT54GX. Any idea how I get
this software, or what it is called. Presumably I just prioritise .flac
files and off I go!
--
rbl
rbl's Profile:
rbl;288733 Wrote:
By coincidence I actually have a LinkSys WRT54GX. Any idea how I get
this software, or what it is called. Presumably I just prioritise .flac
files and off I go!
Unfortunately, there are some big differences between the WRT54GL and
the WRT54GX, and the biggest is that the GX
14 matches
Mail list logo