Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-20 Thread the nightfly
I don't see SoX running (which it wouldn't if LMS wasn't invoking it), but the total load on the CPU -- except at the very start of play when it jumped to around 79% for a couple of seconds -- has been running at around 15% or lower. A lot of the time, it's at more than 90% idle.

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-20 Thread JohnSwenson
Mnyb wrote: I seriusly doubt that any arm CPU based device has the power to actually run SoX, but I could be wrong . If you use top command do you see it running and is the PI chocked at 100% CPU ? I'm running the Squeezelite with builtin sox resampling on the wandboard and it takes a

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-20 Thread Mnyb
JohnSwenson wrote: I'm running the Squeezelite with builtin sox resampling on the wandboard and it takes a whopping 6% cpu. Now the wandboard has a more powerful CPU, but it still should be usable on the PI. John S. That's good , wandbord is quite powerfull , so if current PI has power

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-19 Thread cadfish
Hi NightFly, on my Pi sox is here /usr/share/squeezeboxserver/Bin/arm-linux and the converter settings are here: /etc/squeezeboxserver I never touched those settings though ... Günther cadfish's Profile:

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-19 Thread cadfish
Hi Nightfly, I saw on another thread that you had (have?) problems with wifi setup on the PI. I'm running the PI with two of those http://www.amazon.com/TP-LINK-TL-WN722N-Wireless-Adapter-Detachable/dp/B002WBX9C6/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8qid=1371671054sr=8-1keywords=tp+link+usb+wifi One is configured

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-19 Thread the nightfly
Well, SoX is on my system (big surprise, since it is the SqueezePlug install), but it doesn't seem to be resampling sources greater than 24/96 (in other words, play a 24/192 file, get silence). Does anyone know how to turn on resampling? A web search seems to get divided opinion, with half the

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-19 Thread Mnyb
the nightfly wrote: Well, SoX is on my system (big surprise, since it is the SqueezePlug install), but it doesn't seem to be resampling sources greater than 24/96 (in other words, play a 24/192 file, get silence). Does anyone know how to turn on resampling? A web search seems to get divided

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-18 Thread the nightfly
O.K., I've got SqueezePlug (sort of) running on a Pi with LMS. I want to configure SoX resampling, which currently doesn't seem to be working (or isn't installed at all?). At this point, I'm lost. In what directory on the Pi would I be able to find a) the LMS config files and b) SoX (if

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-14 Thread JackOfAll
Günther, have you tried mounting the share you are using with iocharset=utf8 set in the mount options? eg. Code: //windows/music /storage cifs sec=ntlmv2,user=WORKGROUP\guest,pass=,iocharset=utf8,file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777 0 0

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-14 Thread cadfish
Hi Jack (?), as mentioned I ended up using ntfs-3g filesystem on the USB HD. It is mounted on the PI through Code: UUID=98869E72869E509C /mnt/hd1/ ntfs-3g rw,user,auto,locale=de_DE@euro 0 0 I don't know if this is the smartest way to do it -

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-13 Thread cadfish
Hi Nightfly, Tags are not a problem - the file/folder names are. I always make sure, that the tags are correct - but simplify the file names (Tag: P!nk, Folder: Pink). This can be done quite automatically through tools - I'm using Bulk Rename Utility which has a mode to remove accents. This way

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-13 Thread the nightfly
cadfish wrote: Of course, the easiest way to solve this problem is to avoid umlauts completely, but sometimes this is just not possible It certainly isn't possible in my case, as I have several thousand albums already tagged -- including lots of German classical music. Not knowing

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-12 Thread cadfish
I set up a RasPi exactly for the scenario you have in mind. Initial fill (and maybe regular syncs of larger chunks of data) through USB and usual access from windows through a samba share. SqueezePlug is definitely a very good starting point for this. Different character sets, however, caused

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-11 Thread the nightfly
I'm not expecting super-performance from the Pi, just better capability than on my current NAS, which is a closed system that only allows the capabilities of the pre-installed Squeezebox Server -- no way to upgrade to LMS, no plug-ins, no SoX resampling, and not even a way to access the

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-11 Thread kesey
the nightfly wrote: I'm not expecting super-performance from the Pi, just better capability than on my current NAS, which is a closed system that only allows the capabilities of the pre-installed Squeezebox Server -- no way to upgrade to LMS, no plug-ins, no SoX resampling, and not even a

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-11 Thread the nightfly
kesey wrote: You would not need to connect your USB drive to your PC to transfer files, unless you particularly wanted to. You could transfer files using Samba...just install Samba from the Squeezeplug suite and you'll be set. Truehl (Thomas) did a great job on that package. True, but I

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-11 Thread erland
the nightfly wrote: True, but I might want to do a direct transfer the first time, since I'd be talking about more than 1 TB of files, which would go a lot faster over a USB connection than wi-fi. Just be sure to format it with a file system which your computer can read and you should be

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-10 Thread castalla
the nightfly wrote: In an earlier thread, I had asked about building a SB Touch replacement that would be purely a player streaming from an existing NAS. After reviewing the options, I'm leaning more towards going with a full SqueezePlug build to get around some limitations with the way the

[slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-10 Thread the nightfly
In an earlier thread, I had asked about building a SB Touch replacement that would be purely a player streaming from an existing NAS. After reviewing the options, I'm leaning more towards going with a full SqueezePlug build to get around some limitations with the way the NAS does server duty. My

Re: [slim] Thinking of going with SqueezePlug - a couple of (maybe obvious) questions...

2013-06-10 Thread erland
the nightfly wrote: In an earlier thread, I had asked about building a SB Touch replacement that would be purely a player streaming from an existing NAS. After reviewing the options, I'm leaning more towards going with a full SqueezePlug build to get around some limitations with the way the