From: "deksawyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
One thing I did notice with the replacement; about a min after it was
switched on it would hang for about 15-20 secs then come back again.
Now it's actually on as I can ping it, but there is no sound and no
display.
Anyone ever seen this behaviour before..
dspeirs wrote:
...
As expected, this AM when I booted my machine (Squeezebox did not need
a reboot this time) I played a song. The song plays for 5 seconds and
then stops for 5 seconds. It does this for a LONG time. The song does
not continue to progress when it is silent, it literally stops
And one more thing to add. after having these previously described
drops, it usually stops after 30 to 60 minutes and then works fine (at
least until the next time I reboot).
Has the server completed scanning your music collection? [The banner on the web page changes from rescanning to the n
dspeirs wrote:
I saw that you're running on Windows... is the machine clean?
Yeah, I use it exclusively for itunes, slimserver and EAC
try disabling the iTunes plugin.
--
Jack At Monkeynoodle Dot Org: It's A Scientific Venture!
"I spent all me tin with the ladies drinking gin
so across the
Assuming you are accessing & updating the library with iTunes too, it is likely that the iTunes plugin is causing rescans - try
disabling this for the moment to see if it avoids the problems you are seeing.
Do you have iTunes or other plugins active for scanning your music
library?
Active Plugi
dryden555 wrote:
In short, I wouldn't reccomend a slimdevice for a non-techie.
The problem:
Open architecture is not always a 100% positive. The voices on this
forum are heavily from developers. Users like myself get a lot of
friendly support on the forum which is cool.
But developers dont
On 5-Nov-05, at 8:34 AM, dryden555 wrote:
In short, I wouldn't reccomend a slimdevice for a non-techie.
hmm..deja vu. does your mailer have a bug too?
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listi
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 17:01 -0800, Bonesteel wrote:
> If Slim Devices published performance metrics for each release that we
> could review it might make it easier to judge if we're willing to take
> the risk of an upgrade.
I don't work for SD, I'm just a happy user, but I think
that it is prudent
On 5-Nov-05, at 5:16 PM, Pat Farrell wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 17:01 -0800, Bonesteel wrote:
If Slim Devices published performance metrics for each release that we
could review it might make it easier to judge if we're willing to take
the risk of an upgrade.
I don't work for SD, I'm just
Michaelwagner wrote:
...
resources needed for this would be astronomical. Even the matrix I
showed you above, 6 server configurations, 6 client configurations,
would be a 36 test matrix. Add low memory, regular memory, fast
processor, slow processor configurations, and you're at 144
combin
Bonesteel wrote:
A spritied defense, yet the simple fact is that until they identify
what platforms they test it on and what tests they perform, the unknown
gaps in testing indeed get pushed to we consumers. The limited
regression testing increases the number of these instances we need to
deal
On 5/11/05 at 17:36 -0800, kdf wrote
That being said, at every release, I've wished that there were NO
changes for several days on a beta release. Let it get out to those
who test, CLOSE bug reports on anything aside from that beta (avoid
the clutter). Then spend a few days taking specific re
dryden555 wrote:
And I'm told I am being too negative! Non-techies are not to
generalized as "people who suck." You're actually supporting my point
that this forum has a way of programatically alienating non-developers.
You're misunderstanding me and applying your own agenda to my statemen
iTunes plugin = from iTunes
iTunes Update plugin = to iTunes
James
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. Sender does
not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited.
> When I disable the iTunes plugin it works perfectly. but, it
> no longer
> uses iTunes which I want it to use. When I tell it to rescan
> it reverts
> to not using iTunes. When I switch it to use iTunes it plays
> music for
> a few seconds then stops then picks back up. What should I do?
I think it is a common problem.
It seems to be affecting Mac users more than XP users. Or maybe there
are just more iTunes users on Mac?
The iTunes rescan changed significantly from 5.4 6.2 and produces a
different performance profile than before.
It has to both parse the iTunes XML and scan the
16 matches
Mail list logo
